Re: [Ltsp-discuss] RE: LTSP-E 1.4 and recent LTSP versions

2001-09-25 Thread Deryk Robosson
On Tuesday 25 September 2001 22:31, you wrote: > Peter, > > Yes, that is exactly right. We'll use pam_ldap to handle authentication. > > This will be optional. NIS will also be supported, so you (as an > administrator) can choose which authentication method you would > like to use. I've had pam

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] RE: LTSP-E 1.4 and recent LTSP versions

2001-09-25 Thread Peter Rundle
> Yes, that is exactly right. We'll use pam_ldap to handle authentication. Beautiful! _ Ltsp-discuss mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss Fo

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] RE: LTSP-E 1.4 and recent LTSP versions

2001-09-25 Thread Jim McQuillan
Peter, Yes, that is exactly right. We'll use pam_ldap to handle authentication. This will be optional. NIS will also be supported, so you (as an administrator) can choose which authentication method you would like to use. Jim. Peter Rundle wrote: > Hi Jim, > > When you talk about LDAP authe

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] RE: LTSP-E 1.4 and recent LTSP versions

2001-09-25 Thread Peter Rundle
Hi Jim, When you talk about LDAP authentication is this in terms of replacing NIS for local Apps? I currently use LDAP authentication for the GDM login on the desktop, (non-local apps). This is achieved via PAM. This is definitely the preferred method for me as the pam_ldap module allows us to d

RE: [Ltsp-discuss] RE: LTSP-E 1.4 and recent LTSP versions

2001-09-25 Thread Egan, Matt B. (Artco)
1:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Ltsp-discuss] RE: LTSP-E 1.4 and recent LTSP versions Matt, Yes, you should be fine. The 2.09pre releases are installed into /opt/ltsp, whereas the older releases are in /tftpboot/lts. So, they can both exist at the same time. The files you will

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] RE: LTSP-E 1.4 and recent LTSP versions

2001-09-25 Thread Jim McQuillan
rom: Jim McQuillan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:45 PM >To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [Ltsp-discuss] RE: LTSP-E 1.4 and recent LTSP versions > >Charles, > >The announcement that Jason made a few day

RE: [Ltsp-discuss] RE: LTSP-E 1.4 and recent LTSP versions

2001-09-25 Thread Egan, Matt B. (Artco)
Jim McQuillan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Ltsp-discuss] RE: LTSP-E 1.4 and recent LTSP versions Charles, The announcement that Jason made a few days ago was strictly about his 

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] RE: LTSP-E 1.4 and recent LTSP versions

2001-09-25 Thread Jim McQuillan
Charles, The announcement that Jason made a few days ago was strictly about his 'Enhancements' package. It does NOT indicate the direction of the LTSP project in general. We are still planning on having LDAP based authentication. In fact, Andrew Williams was working on that last week. We are