On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 02:38:47AM -0700, Michael C. Robinson wrote:
> The idea behind LTSP is to support thin clients and unfortunately,
> redundancy is extremely hard to implement because the expectations
> aren't compatible. There is no standard way to pick one server over
> another during a ne
This is where virtualization can really help. You can test the entire
new server in a virtual environment on one PC, place certain VMs on
certain networks, etc. If you need to boot physical clients, if you
have a dual port server attach a second network switch and run an LTSP
server on each port. O
hat's the most important thing.
Thank you again. Progress... that's a good thing!
I hope you have a very nice day. You made my day, that's for sure!
- Original Message
From: Michael Crider
To: ltsp-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Thu, May 13, 2010 1:51:36
smo.koski...@arkki.info"
> To: alafor...@mail.com; ltsp-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
> Sent: Sat, May 8, 2010 12:32:29 AM
> Subject: Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Upgrading LTSP from Karmic to Lucid
>
>
>
>> LTSP usually work ok on Ubuntu but 10.4 does not appear to be in th
7;d rather not have to do that.
- Original Message
From: "asmo.koski...@arkki.info"
To: alafor...@mail.com; ltsp-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Sat, May 8, 2010 12:32:29 AM
Subject: Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Upgrading LTSP from Karmic to Lucid
> LTSP usually work ok on Ub
To: alafor...@mail.com; ltsp-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Sat, May 8, 2010 12:32:29 AM
Subject: Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Upgrading LTSP from Karmic to Lucid
> LTSP usually work ok on Ubuntu but 10.4 does not appear to be in that
> category.
Both LTSP and LTSP-Cluster work ok on Ubuntu 1
> Both LTSP and LTSP-Cluster work ok on Ubuntu 10.04.
>
> I have HP t5125 (manufactured september 2006) thin client as a reference
> machine and you all know that one is very low end thin client. But it
> works, too.
We have here in Finland our third LTSP workshop next week (10.-11.5).
This time
> LTSP usually work ok on Ubuntu but 10.4 does not appear to be in that
> category.
Both LTSP and LTSP-Cluster work ok on Ubuntu 10.04.
I have HP t5125 (manufactured september 2006) thin client as a reference
machine and you all know that one is very low end thin client. But it
works, too.
Do t
I was working on a clean Ubuntu 10.4 LTSP install today and noticed that
same thing with the root of the tftp server. I soft linked the
/var/lib/tftpboot/ltsp directory to /srv/tftp/ltsp and built a new client
image.
I get to the beginning of the Ubuntu splash page but I don't get any
movement on
Hi,
It have two ltsp server one for my usage and the other for a COOP.
The first is a 64 bits and I used the upgrade manager.
COOP's serveur is a new install in 32 bits.
Both gave me same results.
I did the change and now I can see logon splash screen.
Autentification of user seems alright sinc
John McCreesh wrote:
On Sun, 30 May 2004 22:45:52 +0200
Michael Heiming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[..]
Now while looking around, found this article, describing two-way sync,
which seems to be just what I want.;)
http://www.linuxbusinessweek.com/story/32704.htm
Does this article describe everythin
On Sun, 30 May 2004 22:45:52 +0200
Michael Heiming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> >>Even with solid server hw, hotplugable hw RAID disks, there's always
> >the>possibility of some part breaking. Users shouldn't need anymore
> >then>switching their tc off and on again to boot
Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
Even with solid server hw, hotplugable hw RAID disks, there's always the
possibility of some part breaking. Users shouldn't need anymore then
switching their tc off and on again to boot from the second server.
Problem remaining, how to keep /home in sync. One way would be a
d
> Even with solid server hw, hotplugable hw RAID disks, there's always the
> possibility of some part breaking. Users shouldn't need anymore then
> switching their tc off and on again to boot from the second server.
>
> Problem remaining, how to keep /home in sync. One way would be a
> dedicated li
14 matches
Mail list logo
