Works now. Got a 404 yesterday.
probably fine then. Sorry about the noise.
Thijs
Jack Lawson schreef:
Thanks - just noticed that and fixed messages. Strange that you can't hit the
changelog, works here. What happens?
https://github.com/Olivine-Labs/busted/compare/v1.7...v1.8
On Tue, Apr 3
It was thus said that the Great Hisham once stated:
> On 30 April 2013 00:01, Sean Conner wrote:
> >
> > I'm afraid I'm the only one that wants this, but I would really love the
> > ability to specify C99 when compiling Lua modules. All the Lua modules I've
> > written in C use C99 features (so
On 30 April 2013 18:17, Jack Lawson wrote:
> Busted 1.8 is out with two tremendous new features: async tests and
> moonscript support. We've had contributions from lipp, tieske, leafo and
> ajacksified.
>
> Rockspec:
> https://raw.github.com/Olivine-Labs/busted/master/busted-1.8-0.rockspec
Upload
Uploaded, thank you!
-- Hisham
http://hisham.hm/
On 30 April 2013 19:06, Doug Currie wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Please update the lunitx rockspec to the attached version.
>
> lunitx 0.7 includes bug fixes and improvements from Alexey Melnichuk (thanks!)
>
> e
>
>
>
Uploaded, thank you!
-- Hisham
http://hisham.hm/
On 30 April 2013 07:11, Alexey Melnichuk wrote:
> Rockspec for lzmq version 0.1.1 attached.
> Lua binding to ZeroMQ 3 library.
> + socket.recv_len method return first N bytes from message
> + message.set_size resize zmq_msg_t object (create/copy)
On 29 April 2013 13:27, Philipp Janda wrote:
> Hi!
>
> lbci[1] for Lua 5.2 has been released by lhf. I have made a rockspec and a
> matching tarball, that supports Lua 5.1 and Lua 5.2. The rockspec is
> attached, the tarball can be found here[2] temporarily, but I kind of
> assumed that the tarbal
Uploaded, thank you!
-- Hisham
http://hisham.hm/
On 29 April 2013 10:31, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> Rockspec for specl version 5 attached.
>
> --
> Try New Relic Now & We'll Send You this Cool Shirt
> New Relic is the onl
Hello,
Please update the lunitx rockspec to the attached version.
lunitx 0.7 includes bug fixes and improvements from Alexey Melnichuk (thanks!)
e
lunitx-0.7-0.rockspec
Description: Binary data
--
Introducing AppDynam
Thanks - just noticed that and fixed messages. Strange that you can't hit
the changelog, works here. What happens?
https://github.com/Olivine-Labs/busted/compare/v1.7...v1.8
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 2:29 PM, Thijs Schreijer wrote:
> Jack,
>
> ** **
>
> Here; http://olivinelabs.com/busted/#o
Jack,
Here; http://olivinelabs.com/busted/#output-types the images are not showing
And I cannot access the link to the changelog mentioned below.
Thijs.
From: Jack Lawson [mailto:ajacksif...@gmail.com]
Sent: dinsdag 30 april 2013 23:17
To: luarocks-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Drew Ditth
Busted 1.8 is out with two tremendous new features: async tests and
moonscript support. We've had contributions from lipp, tieske, leafo and
ajacksified.
Rockspec:
https://raw.github.com/Olivine-Labs/busted/master/busted-1.8-0.rockspec
Docs have been updated:
http://olivinelabs.com/busted/#async
On 30 April 2013 00:01, Sean Conner wrote:
>
> I'm afraid I'm the only one that wants this, but I would really love the
> ability to specify C99 when compiling Lua modules. All the Lua modules I've
> written in C use C99 features (some more, some less). I rationalize this
> because
>
>
On Apr 30, 2013, at 2:53 PM, Sean Conner wrote:
>> Unless you consider OS X a Unix.
>
> I do, but Luarocks still uses gcc:
Yeah, that's why my config.lua looks like this:
luarocks-2.0.13 e$ cat /Users/e/.luarocks/config.lua
variables = {
-- CC = "export MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET=10.6; gcc -a
It was thus said that the Great Doug Currie once stated:
>
> On Apr 29, 2013, at 11:01 PM, Sean Conner wrote:
>
> > This is usable (it took long enough) but I'm not terribly happy with it,
> > because of that [[ CC = "$(CC) -std=c99" ]] business. Yes, I could change
> > it to [[ CC = "gcc -std
On Apr 29, 2013, at 11:01 PM, Sean Conner wrote:
> This is usable (it took long enough) but I'm not terribly happy with it,
> because of that [[ CC = "$(CC) -std=c99" ]] business. Yes, I could change
> it to [[ CC = "gcc -std=c99" ]] since (and I have checked) all the Unix
> variants define CC
It was thus said that the Great steve donovan once stated:
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 5:01 AM, Sean Conner wrote:
>
> > variables =
> > {
> > CC = "gcc -std=c99"
> > }
> > }
> >
>
> That would be a nice addition to the builtin type. Although it d
Rockspec for lzmq version 0.1.1 attached.
Lua binding to ZeroMQ 3 library.
+ socket.recv_len method return first N bytes from message
+ message.set_size resize zmq_msg_t object (create/copy)
+ message.pointer return pointer to zmq_msg_data as lightuserdata
+ tests use lunit
-
package =
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 5:01 AM, Sean Conner wrote:
I'm afraid I'm the only one that wants this, but I would really love the
> ability to specify C99 when compiling Lua modules.
>
Absolutely. You should not worry too much about MS, because LR people use
mingw (things like lcomplex work fine!)
18 matches
Mail list logo
