On 17/06/13 01:06, Phill Whiteside wrote:
@ Jluien, if Z-Ram works so well, could we drop alternate for some of
the archs?
NO! NO! NO! and again NO!
The alternate installer is needed for those machines with unsupported
video. You can install with the Alternate and then force the VESA
@Phill
Thank you for your nice words and I'm glad to help and support. I will do
my best soon to send another report when I test on a Real Hardware. The
machine is connected and waiting for me :)
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Yorvyk yorvik.ubu...@googlemail.comwrote:
On 17/06/13 01:06,
On 2013-06-17 12:52, Yorvyk wrote:
On 17/06/13 01:06, Phill Whiteside wrote:
@ Jluien, if Z-Ram works so well, could we drop alternate for some of
the archs?
NO! NO! NO! and again NO!
The alternate installer is needed for those machines with unsupported
video. You can install with the
On 17/06/13 02:13, Nio Wiklund wrote:
Hi,
With all respect to your skill as a tester, Ali, I have to ask:
1. Has the GUI installer of Saucy improved a lot compared to Raring?
Doesn't look like it. I had my trained monkey run the following test:-
Compaq Deskpro as previous with 512 MiB RAM.
Am Montag, 17. Juni 2013, 12:48:27 schrieb Yorvyk:
On 17/06/13 02:13, Nio Wiklund wrote:
2. Or was I doing something seriously wrong?
Probably :D
We need to run Saucy installs on as much hardware as possible as I
believe there is more to this than just RAM size. I suspect some old CD
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Leszek Lesner leszek.les...@web.de wrote:
Am Montag, 17. Juni 2013, 12:48:27 schrieb Yorvyk:
On 17/06/13 02:13, Nio Wiklund wrote:
2. Or was I doing something seriously wrong?
Probably :D
We need to run Saucy installs on as much hardware as
Hi Nio,
the BIG change with Saucy is the recent inclusion of ZRam, it is for this
reason we are re-testing how low can it go :)
Regards,
Phill.
On 17 June 2013 02:13, Nio Wiklund nio.wikl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
With all respect to your skill as a tester, Ali, I have to ask:
1. Has the
Having carried out a few tests I think we can say zRAM does appear to
make a positive make a difference to the ability to use the Live CD,
although further testing may be required. What concerns me is that it
remains enabled on the installed system. I thought we were just going to
use it on
According to those nice people at Adobe the minimum requirements for
running Flash with Linux are:-
2.33GHz or faster x86-compatible processor, or Intel Atom 1.6GHz or
faster processor for netbooks
Red Hat® Enterprise Linux® (RHEL) 5.6 or later (32 bit and 64 bit),
openSUSE® 11.3 or later
Hi,
I'm replying yet again to this email because, I must say, our community
seems 'still confused' about zRAM and things are getting lost in the
translation - I know how hard it is, sometimes to explain in purely writing
but let's hope we can all agree about what is zRAM? and how it works?
On 2013-06-17 14:05, Ali Linx (amjjawad) wrote:
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Leszek Lesner leszek.les...@web.de
mailto:leszek.les...@web.de wrote:
Am Montag, 17. Juni 2013, 12:48:27 schrieb Yorvyk:
On 17/06/13 02:13, Nio Wiklund wrote:
2. Or was I doing something
On 2013-06-17 15:20, Yorvyk wrote:
Having carried out a few tests I think we can say zRAM does appear to
make a positive make a difference to the ability to use the Live CD,
although further testing may be required. What concerns me is that it
remains enabled on the installed system. I
Am 17.06.2013 16:37, schrieb John Hupp:
On 6/17/2013 9:30 AM, Yorvyk wrote:
According to those nice people at Adobe the minimum requirements for
running Flash with Linux are:-
2.33GHz or faster x86-compatible processor, or Intel Atom 1.6GHz or
faster processor for netbooks
Red Hat®
On 17/06/13 15:42, Leszek Lesner wrote:
Am 17.06.2013 16:37, schrieb John Hupp:
On 6/17/2013 9:30 AM, Yorvyk wrote:
According to those nice people at Adobe the minimum requirements for
running Flash with Linux are:-
2.33GHz or faster x86-compatible processor, or Intel Atom 1.6GHz or
faster
On 17/06/13 15:37, John Hupp wrote:
On 6/17/2013 9:30 AM, Yorvyk wrote:
According to those nice people at Adobe the minimum requirements
for running Flash with Linux are:-
2.33GHz or faster x86-compatible processor, or Intel Atom 1.6GHz or
faster processor for netbooks
Red Hat® Enterprise
On 06/17/2013 04:48 AM, Yorvyk wrote:
On 17/06/13 02:13, Nio Wiklund wrote:
1. Has the GUI installer of Saucy improved a lot compared to Raring?
Doesn't look like it. I had my trained monkey run the following test:-
Compaq Deskpro as previous with 512 MiB RAM. Single FAT32 partition
on
On 06/17/2013 04:53 AM, Leszek Lesner wrote:
Am Montag, 17. Juni 2013, 12:48:27 schrieb Yorvyk:
On 17/06/13 02:13, Nio Wiklund wrote:
2. Or was I doing something seriously wrong?
Probably :D
We need to run Saucy installs on as much hardware as possible as I
believe there is more to
On 06/17/2013 07:28 AM, Nio Wiklund wrote:
Live CD is classic but not standard nowadays, Ali ;-)
But the low-RAM machines we are testing are not nowadays machines!
Please, focus on the test as requested, let's not start testing USB boot
of older PCs mixed in with the minimum RAM testing, that
As a further update, the meetings will be held on #lubuntu-offtopic at
20:00 UTC / GMT. The agenda[1] is now posted up, please feel free to add
topics to it.
On 16 June 2013 01:26, Phill Whiteside phi...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Tue 25th June (pre Alpha 1)
Tue 23rd July (pre Alpha 2)
Tue 27th August
On 06/17/2013 05:53 AM, Leszek Lesner wrote:
Therefore we need to recommend the usage of usb live sticks. CD-ROM/DVD-ROM
drives tend to fail and also cd/dvd-writers tend to write cd-rs with to much
errors.
But only if the tool for building the live USB stick works dependably...
I thought the
Hi,
http://unity.ubuntu.com/mir/
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Leszek Lesner leszek.les...@web.de wrote:
The biggest issue I see currently is the switch of Ubuntu to Mir and the
consequences it might bear for Lubuntu.
As only Unity will be officially supported by Mir and Kubuntu also
in line answers...
2013/6/17 Ali Linx (amjjawad) amjja...@gmail.com
Hello,
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 8:24 AM, Iberê Fernandes
ibere.fernan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hardware has been cleaned and Ubuntu 10.04 is installed again.
Obviously, that lead me to a guess that it is a Kernel Issue or
On 17/06/13 18:22, Iberê Fernandes wrote:
Next weekend I'll try Lubuntu 10.04 on that desktop.
When you do, can you run 'lspci' in a terminal and post the results. It
should look something like:-
~$ lspci
00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation 82875P/E7210 Memory Controller
Hub (rev 02)
2013/6/17 Yorvyk yorvik.ubu...@googlemail.com
On 17/06/13 18:22, Iberê Fernandes wrote:
Next weekend I'll try Lubuntu 10.04 on that desktop.
When you do, can you run 'lspci' in a terminal and post the results. It
should look something like:-
~$ lspci
00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel
Hi,
Yes, you did read it correctly. I'm really shocked.
Yesterday, I have sent my report and I was testing 13.10 but not the
latest daily build. Today, I thought to download the latest one and do
my phase 2 of testing on a Real Hardware (yesterday, all my tests were
on VM).
And ... I noticed a
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 2:22 AM, Ali Linx (amjjawad) amjja...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Yes, you did read it correctly. I'm really shocked.
Yesterday, I have sent my report and I was testing 13.10 but not the
latest daily build. Today, I thought to download the latest one and do
my phase 2 of
/20130617/saucy-desktop-i386.iso.zsync
100.0% 129.9 kBps DONE
reading seed file saucy-desktop-i386.iso
On 17/06/13 23:45, Ali Linx (amjjawad) wrote:
Hi,
http://i43.tinypic.com/2wezygm.jpg
I have noticed that during the installation when you choose
Something Else and want to set the mount points, file type, etc.
And it appears to follow me even after the installation is done as
you can see on
what difference it makes.
Steve
$ zsync
http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/lubuntu/daily-live/20130617/saucy-desktop-i386.iso.zsync
100.0% 129.9 kBps DONE
reading seed file saucy-desktop-i386.iso
29 matches
Mail list logo
