Also posting from above:
Not sure why these posts from 2016 came out in recent digest, but I would
support Nio & Aere's request for continuing to support i386 development, in
comparison to PPC, where it might be said that there aren't that many
machines, I would assume that there are quite a few e
[continuing top posting]
Hi everybody,
1. I think that we should keep making the current 32-bit versions alias
'i386' (with i686 kernels) of Lubuntu, Ubuntu Server, mini.iso and the
other flavours that want to keep it.
I agree with Aere's arguments (near the end of this mail).
2. I can unde
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Walter Lapchynski wrote:
> As far as my perspective is concerned, I'm perfectly happy with dropping
> PPC. It makes me sad. PPC brought me to the Lubuntu community. However, it
> becomes increasingly harder to make PPC users happy. The successes that we
> have had
Has there been an announcement that FF will drop PPC?
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Fritz Hudnut
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Walter Lapchynski wrote:
>
>> As far as my perspective is concerned, I'm perfectly happy with dropping
>> PPC. It makes me sad. PPC brought me to the
Walter & Julien:
What is meant by the proposal of "dropping i386"?
Does it mean dropping all 32-bit machines (as 'i386' in Debian
packages would imply)?
If so, I think that would be a very extreme, draconian thing to do.
In my particular case, it would mean that seven of the machines in my
[continuing top posting; re-sending with less recipients to allow
posting to the lubuntu mailing lists]
Hi everybody,
1. I think that we should keep making the current 32-bit versions alias
'i386' (with i686 kernels) of Lubuntu, Ubuntu Server, mini.iso and the
other flavours that want to keep
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/lubuntu-devel/2016-November/000908.html
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 4:52 PM, Israel wrote:
> On 11/16/2016 06:45 PM, Walter Lapchynski wrote:
>
> PPC has been dropped as a release architecture in Debian. It's not looking
> too good there.
>
> Well... That is new.
>
On 11/16/2016 06:45 PM, Walter Lapchynski wrote:
> PPC has been dropped as a release architecture in Debian. It's not
> looking too good there.
Well... That is new.
I knew they were dropping i586, but I thought they would keep PPC...
maybe it is just PPC64? Alas.. maybe PPC is really doing to be
PPC has been dropped as a release architecture in Debian. It's not looking
too good there.
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Israel wrote:
> On 11/16/2016 04:58 PM, Walter Lapchynski wrote:
>
> Aere: I think what Ubuntu is discussing is removing i386/x86/32-bit, i.e.
> going all amd64/x64/64-bit.
On 11/16/2016 04:58 PM, Walter Lapchynski wrote:
> Aere: I think what Ubuntu is discussing is removing i386/x86/32-bit,
> i.e. going all amd64/x64/64-bit. And yes, it would very negatively
> impact many Lubuntu users as well as the goals of the Lubuntu project
> as a whole.
>
> Unfortunately, I was
Aere: I think what Ubuntu is discussing is removing i386/x86/32-bit, i.e.
going all amd64/x64/64-bit. And yes, it would very negatively impact many
Lubuntu users as well as the goals of the Lubuntu project as a whole.
Unfortunately, I was not able to make it to the session. For those of us in
the
On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 10:30:10 -0700
Aere Greenway wrote:
> On 11/16/2016 05:45 AM, Julien Lavergne wrote:
> > 2016-11-14 21:36 GMT+01:00 Walter Lapchynski :
> >> It should be pointed out that this discussion is not only about PPC but
> >> it's
> >> also about i386. Since i386 is a major target of
On 11/16/2016 05:45 AM, Julien Lavergne wrote:
2016-11-14 21:36 GMT+01:00 Walter Lapchynski :
It should be pointed out that this discussion is not only about PPC but it's
also about i386. Since i386 is a major target of Lubuntu, I would advise
attendance.
I'm woking this day, so I will not be
esday, November 16, 2016 4:45 AM
To: Walter Lapchynski
Cc: lubuntu-devel ; Bryan Quigley ; Fritz Hudnut ; Simon Quigley ; lubuntu
user list
Subject: Re: [lubuntu-users] dropping i386/PPC (was: Re: [lubuntu-devel]
State of PPC)
2016-11-14 21:36 GMT+01:00 Walter Lapchynski :
It should be pointed out
2016-11-14 21:36 GMT+01:00 Walter Lapchynski :
> It should be pointed out that this discussion is not only about PPC but it's
> also about i386. Since i386 is a major target of Lubuntu, I would advise
> attendance.
>
I'm woking this day, so I will not be able to attempt :-(
However, dropping i386
I would to be at this meeting, but I work conference call at the same
time...sorry
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Walter Lapchynski wrote:
> 1500 is 0700 in PST. Pacific Time oscillates between PST (UTC-8) and PDT
> (UTC-7). UTC does suffer such changes. There is no such thing as UTC zones.
>
1500 is 0700 in PST. Pacific Time oscillates between PST (UTC-8) and PDT
(UTC-7). UTC does suffer such changes. There is no such thing as UTC zones.
There are time zones, which are based on UTC, but UTC can only mean one
thing.
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 3:50 PM, Eric Bradshaw <
ericbrads...@computer
@Yao:
Thanks for that link, it did go to the correct page, but, still the "time"
is eluding me, is that "1500" UTC zone 1 . . . ??? How to extrapolate
that to Pacific Time Zone?
F
Change UTC to your time zone:
http://www.worldtimeserver.com/convert_time_in_UTC.aspx
Eric Bradshaw
---
Thank y
On Mon, 14 Nov 2016 13:39:08 -0800, Fritz Hudnut wrote:
>@Yao:
>
>Thanks for that link, it did go to the correct page, but, still the
>"time" is eluding me, is that "1500" UTC zone 1 . . . ??? How to
>extrapolate that to Pacific Time zone???
In the left upper corner, here's a clock. If you cli
@Yao:
Thanks for that link, it did go to the correct page, but, still the "time"
is eluding me, is that "1500" UTC zone 1 . . . ??? How to extrapolate
that to Pacific Time zone???
F
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Yao Wei wrote:
> The correct link is: http://summit.ubuntu.com/uos-1611/meeti
On Mon, 14 Nov 2016 12:54:58 -0800, Fritz Hudnut wrote:
>I tried the link and it said "page doesn't exist"
I posted the correct link here:
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-user/2016-November/106712.html
It was just a "space" between "16" and "11".
--
Lubuntu-users mailing list
The correct link is:
http://summit.ubuntu.com/uos-1611/meeting/22714/architecture-discussions/
On Tue, 15 Nov 2016 at 04:55 Fritz Hudnut wrote:
> @wxl:
>
> Again asking what time this will be happening? I tried the link and it
> said "page doesn't exist" . . . possibly link is busted or the page
@wxl:
Again asking what time this will be happening? I tried the link and it
said "page doesn't exist" . . . possibly link is busted or the page doesn't
exist until in use?
F
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 12:36 PM, Walter Lapchynski wrote:
> It should be pointed out that this discussion is not only
It should be pointed out that this discussion is not only about PPC but
it's also about i386. Since i386 is a major target of Lubuntu, I would
advise attendance.
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 9:14 AM, Bryan Quigley
wrote:
> Sorry for the late notice - there is a live discussion scheduled for
> this We
24 matches
Mail list logo
