Re: cms

2012-04-23 Thread Christopher Currens
I'll take a look at it. On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Prescott Nasser wrote: > > > > > If anyone is familiar with the CMS, something happened to the download > page (formatting is screwed up), but it's exactly like the other pages. I > could use another pair of eyes on it. ~P >

cms

2012-04-23 Thread Prescott Nasser
If anyone is familiar with the CMS, something happened to the download page (formatting is screwed up), but it's exactly like the other pages. I could use another pair of eyes on it. ~P

RE: [Lucene.Net] FW: trouble getting cms content to work correctly

2012-03-01 Thread Prescott Nasser
I'm told it should "only take" about 10 minutes to publish now (as opposed to ~2.5 hours before). No harm in trying ;) ~P > Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 21:47:49 -0500 > From: mhern...@wickedsoftware.net > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] FW:

Re: [Lucene.Net] FW: trouble getting cms content to work correctly

2012-03-01 Thread Michael Herndon
Is it safe to add content to the site through the CMS again? Anything to be wary of or not explicitly do? On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 6:30 PM, Prescott Nasser wrote: > > Took all day, but Joe was there babysitting and correcting things for us. > Basically there is a bug in svn 1.6.17 tha

[Lucene.Net] Re: trouble getting cms content to work correctly

2012-02-16 Thread Joe Schaefer
> From: Prescott Nasser >To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org >Cc: joe_schae...@yahoo.com >Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 6:30 PM >Subject: FW: trouble getting cms content to work correctly > > > >Took all day, but Joe was there babysitting and correcting things

Re: [Lucene.Net] FW: trouble getting cms content to work correctly

2012-02-16 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2012-02-16, Prescott Nasser wrote: > Thanks Joe, I can't thank you enough for the help today. +1 Many, many thanks Joe Stefan

[Lucene.Net] FW: trouble getting cms content to work correctly

2012-02-15 Thread Prescott Nasser
Took all day, but Joe was there babysitting and correcting things for us. Basically there is a bug in svn 1.6.17 that the CMS is based on, which is making our commits a pain at the moment. Once that gets upgraded it should be relatively smooth sailing. It won't help us though if we want

[Lucene.Net] [jira] [Resolved] (LUCENENET-401) Update website to be Apache CMS based

2011-03-20 Thread Prescott Nasser (JIRA)
ate website to be Apache CMS based > - > > Key: LUCENENET-401 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-401 > Project: Lucene.Net > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components