I'm having difficulty understanding a couple of things and I appreciate
any help here.
Let's assume I have an object that is composed of the following
fields...
UID: 434 (Keyword/Stored)
TITLE: "Java For Dum Dums" (Text/Stored)
AUTHOR: "Fred Smith" - Text/Stored
DESCRIPTION: "Th
Sunday, February 8, 2004, 4:19:59 AM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
> On Feb 7, 2004, at 5:32 PM, Ramy Hardan wrote:
>> Is there an efficient way to search refinement preferably without
>> losing the Hits class?
> I'm not quite following your Filter questions, but QueryFilter seems to
> fit the bill for wh
Hi Ramy,
Maybe I'm misunderstand the question but wouldn't creating a
that ANDs the original query and the new one do what you want?
so if the original query was
foo bar
and the refinment is
blah
create a new query that does:
(foo bar) AND (bar)
Seems a lot easier but maybe I'm missing some
This may not fit any of Lucene's usage models, but is there a way to
match a single document - before it has been indexed - to a query?
The motivation for this is to add a listener to the IndexWriter which
listens for documents matching existing Query objects. Two possible
approaches, both of
A problem with Gump, I believe.
Otis
--- Eric Jain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How come there is no nightly snapshot newer than 2003-09-09 at
> http://cvs.apache.org/builds/jakarta-lucene/nightly/?
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-
Hello Dror,
Sunday, February 8, 2004, 7:35:32 PM, you wrote:
> Hi Ramy,
> Maybe I'm misunderstand the question but wouldn't creating a
> that ANDs the original query and the new one do what you want?
You are absolutely right. This approach would yield the desired
result. But what I'm concerned
On Feb 8, 2004, at 11:13 AM, David Black wrote:
Let's assume I have an object that is composed of the following
fields...
UID: 434 (Keyword/Stored)
TITLE: "Java For Dum Dums" (Text/Stored)
AUTHOR: "Fred Smith" - Text/Stored
DESCRIPTION: "This would be a big long field" - Text/Un
Thank you very much from the response...it was very helpful. After
playing around some more, I figured out that my Keyword fields DO get
indexed which is why they can be retrieved with a Term query regardless
of the analyzer at index time. The problem I discovered was that using
a search anal
