Re: 1.4.x TermInfosWriter.indexInterval not public static ?

2005-02-28 Thread Doug Cutting
Chris Hostetter wrote: 1) If making it mutatable requires changes to other classes to propogate it, then why is it now an instance variable instead of a static? (Presumably making it an instance variable allows subclasses to override the value, but if other classes have internal

Re: 1.4.x TermInfosWriter.indexInterval not public static ?

2005-02-25 Thread Doug Cutting
Kevin A. Burton wrote: Whats the desired pattern of using of TermInfosWriter.indexInterval ? There isn't one. It is not a part of the public API. It is an unsupported internal feature. Do I have to compile my own version of Lucene to change this? Yes. The last API was public static final but

Re: 1.4.x TermInfosWriter.indexInterval not public static ?

2005-02-25 Thread Chris Hostetter
: Whats the desired pattern of using of TermInfosWriter.indexInterval ? : : There isn't one. It is not a part of the public API. It is an : unsupported internal feature. : It was never public. It used to be static and final, but is now an : instance variable. : The place to put

1.4.x TermInfosWriter.indexInterval not public static ?

2005-02-24 Thread Kevin A. Burton
Whats the desired pattern of using of TermInfosWriter.indexInterval ? Do I have to compile my own version of Lucene to change this? The last API was public static final but this is not public nor static. I'm wondering if we should just make this a value that can be set at runtime.