d" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Lucene Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2004 10:42 AM
Subject: RE: Moving from a single server to a cluster
Would it be cheeky to ask you to post the docs to the group? It would be
be a pleasure, just didn't want to mislead someone down the wrong way.
Give me a few days and I'll have the new version up.
Nader
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Would it be cheeky to ask you to post the docs to the group? It would be interesting
to read how you've tackled this.
-Original Message-
From: Nader Henein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 September 2004 13:57
To: Lucene Users List
Subject: Re: Moving from a single server to a cl
Hey Ben,
We've been using a distributed environment with three servers and three
separate indecies for the past 2 years since the first stable Lucene
release and it has been great, recently and for the past two months I've
been working on a redesign for our Lucene App and I've shared my
finding
I've used scp and rsync successfully in the past.
Lucene now includes a remote searcher (RMI stuff), so you may want to
consider a single index, too.
Otis
--- Ben Sinclair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My application currently uses Lucene with an index living on the
> filesystem, and it works fin
My application currently uses Lucene with an index living on the
filesystem, and it works fine. I'm moving to a clustered environment
soon and need to figure out how to keep my indexes together. Since the
index is on the filesystem, each machine in the cluster will end up
with a different index.
I
