Another possibility- performers, (like their listeners) are human;
therefore fallible- they are not going to bat everything out of the
park every time up to bat- and listeners are also human (therefore
fallible) and will have different subjective responses. For that
matter, the recording proces
30 years of listening! Hah! I certainly would like to. But implicitely my point
was that too many lute recordings are on the brink of being too bland for my
humble taste. Now even Robert Barto falls prey to this. This I did not expect.
g
On 10.02.2010, at 00:12, howard posner wrote:
> On Feb 9
EMA Summer Workshop Scholarships
Early Music America is pleased to be able to offer scholarships ($500
each) to students attending early music workshops in the United States
and Canada. The scholarships are open to high school, undergraduate, or
graduate student
On Feb 9, 2010, at 2:47 PM, Gernot Hilger wrote:
> My reference interpretation, a beloved compagnion for more than
> thirty years is Hoppy's 1978 rendition on the 1755 Widhalm lute,
> Reflexe edition, not the later recording on his van Lennep lute. I
> find this particular piece overflowing with e
Hi,
after a while, I am back to the lute list.
There is a reason for this posting. Yesterday, finally, I got my Barto Weiss
vol.10 CD. This includes the Tombeau sur la mort de M. Conte de Logy, which is
an all-time favourite of mine.
Robert Barto is one of my favourite baroque lute players. I r
