[LUTE] Re: Broken consort

2008-10-08 Thread jslute
Dear All: In my experience the bass recorder is the instrument of the recorder family that blends best in the English consort. By the way, why not use the term "English consort?" Isn't there some historical basis for that? Cheers, Jim Oct 7, 2008 09:55:08 PM, [EMAIL P

[LUTE] Re: Broken consort

2008-10-06 Thread Sam Chapman
final > > chapters. We shall have to wait a little longer, I'm afraid, but it > will > > be worth it. From what I have read so far, I can safely say that it > will > > be an excellent book. > > > > Best wishes, > > > > Stewart

[LUTE] Re: Broken consort

2008-10-06 Thread Sam Chapman
limited > and if you've anything to add, or correct, on cittern sizes, tunings, pitches > etc for the 'Rroken Consort' I'd be delighted to hear it. > > MH > > > --- On Sun, 5/10/08, Doc Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> From: Doc Rossi <[E

[LUTE] Re: Broken consort

2008-10-06 Thread Ron Andrico
nt book. > > Best wishes, > > Stewart McCoy. > > -Original Message- > From: Jean-Marie Poirier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 04 October 2008 14:41 > To: lute > Subject: [LUTE] Re: Broken consort > > Puzzling, indeed ! I re

[LUTE] Re: Broken consort

2008-10-05 Thread Nancy Carlin
I last played the broken consorts a long, long time ago with a recorder and don't remember any problems with the octave shifts. I do remember some concern about whether the lute was loud enough. More recently I have enjoyed the CD by L'Poem Harmoniqe Love Is Strange, which includes b

[LUTE] Re: Broken consort

2008-10-05 Thread demery
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008, Doc Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >> 2. NRI current historical notes on cittern strings extract In 1602 >> "Meuler was able to produce an even stronger wire, which allowed the >> small cittern to tune up to g" note that the so-called mueller wire is argued, clear that

[LUTE] Re: Broken consort

2008-10-05 Thread Doc Rossi
ken Consort' I'd be delighted to hear it. MH --- On Sun, 5/10/08, Doc Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: From: Doc Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [LUTE] Re: Broken consort To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: "Lute List" Date: Sunday, 5 October, 2008, 10:14 AM On

[LUTE] Re: Broken consort

2008-10-05 Thread Martyn Hodgson
ail that I was advocating such an instrument in this repertoire! My own knowledge of the cittern is limited and if you've anything to add, or correct, on cittern sizes, tunings, pitches etc for the 'Rroken Consort' I'd be delighted to hear it. MH --- On Sun, 5/10/08,

[LUTE] Re: Broken consort

2008-10-05 Thread Doc Rossi
On Oct 5, 2008, at 10:08 AM, Martyn Hodgson wrote: More recently the gittern tuning (with highest string on the first course at g') seems to have found favour Which tuning is this? To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

[LUTE] Re: Broken consort

2008-10-05 Thread David Tayler
My wife and I just played some renaissance flutes and recorders and they were close to 440, maybe a bit lower, whatever the keynote was. The instruments came in many sizes, so what was a D flute or a C flute or a small bass flute is an interesting question. All of the instruments sounded differe

[LUTE] Re: Broken consort

2008-10-05 Thread Martyn Hodgson
e of this repertoire in 2010 and am looking at suitable cittern models. Peter Forrester is the leading authority on citterns. MH --- On Sat, 4/10/08, Sam Chapman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Sam Chapman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [LUTE] Re: Broken consort >

[LUTE] Re: Broken consort

2008-10-04 Thread Jean-Marie Poirier
what I have read so far, I can safely say that it will >be an excellent book. > >Best wishes, > >Stewart McCoy. > >-Original Message- >From: Jean-Marie Poirier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: 04 October 2008 14:41 >To: lute >Subject: [LUTE] Re: Broke

[LUTE] Re: Broken consort

2008-10-04 Thread Sam Chapman
s copied for the Morley print. > > regards > > Martyn > > --- On Sat, 4/10/08, Martin Shepherd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> From: Martin Shepherd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Subject: [LUTE] Re: Broken consort >> To: "Sam Chapman" <[EMAIL PR

[LUTE] Re: Broken consort

2008-10-04 Thread Martin Shepherd
Dear Sam, I'm copying Ian into this because apart from the fact that most of the pieces we played were from the Holmes MSS, I can't remember the details of what the flute parts do. Can you enlighten us, Ian? Best wishes, Martin Sam Chapman wrote: Hi Martin, Which pieces did you play? We

[LUTE] Re: Broken consort

2008-10-04 Thread Sam Chapman
Hi Martin, Which pieces did you play? Were they from the Morley publication, the Holmes manuscripts, or something else? Did you use flute or recorder? It wasn't quite clear from your Email if the flute/recorder played at the written pitch or an octave higher (I assume it was the former if you were

[LUTE] Re: Broken consort

2008-10-04 Thread Jean-Marie Poirier
for Morley's arrangements of his own > lighter pieces which seem to be notated at pitch; the other pieces are mostly > by other composers particularly associated with this form (eg Allison) and > presumably from manuscripts copied for the Morley print. > >regards > >Martyn

[LUTE] Re: Broken consort

2008-10-04 Thread Martyn Hodgson
er pieces are mostly by other composers particularly associated with this form (eg Allison) and presumably from manuscripts copied for the Morley print. regards Martyn --- On Sat, 4/10/08, Martin Shepherd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Martin Shepherd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[LUTE] Re: Broken consort

2008-10-04 Thread Martin Shepherd
Hi Sam, These are interesting questions. At the recent Lute Society weekend Ian Harwood managed to assemble a consort at the high pitch - a minor third above modern pitch. I played my "A lute" tuned up a semitone, strung all in gut except for the top string which was nylgut. For a gut string