gary digman wrote:
> It occurs to me there may be a touch of irony in this concern with
> being "historically correct", We're the artists whose aesthetic we are
> trying to embody concerned about being historically correct? If not,
> is not our concern for historical correctness unhistorical?
> We're the artists whose
> aesthetic we are trying to embody concerned about being
> historically correct?
I think there is a confusing typo here: "we're" instead
of "were".
To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
--- Howard Posner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> gary digman wrote:
> > is not our concern for historical correctness
> unhistorical?
yes and no: politicians seem to behave as if they're
servants of history but artists shouldn't even touch
it with a stick. craft is another matter - lots of
gastr
I think the answer to this is absolutely not! I found the collection
of essays entitled "Authenticity and early Music", edited by Nicholas
Kenyon (OUP 1988, reprinted 2002) very illuminating on this issue.
Will Crutchfield covers this very point, suggesting that
consciousness of historical
Thank you for the correction, Herbert.
Gary
- Original Message -
From: "Herbert Ward" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005 8:15 AM
Subject: [LUTE] Re: Gastric distress (gut)
> > We're the artists whose
> > aesthetic
. Play on.
Gary
- Original Message -
From: "Howard Posner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "lutelist"
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005 8:03 AM
Subject: [LUTE] Re: Gastric distress (gut)
> gary digman wrote:
>
> > It occurs to me
nd others
> like synthetics for whatever reasons. Play on.
>
> Gary
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Howard Posner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "lutelist"
> Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005 8:03 AM
> Subject: [L
