[LUTE] Re: I saw my lady weep

2006-03-20 Thread Nick Gravestock
-Europe; lute list Subject: [LUTE] Re: I saw my lady weep We are talking about 400 year old English here. It is difficult for many native speakers. The lute songs are not just normal English but sometimes very deep. The syntax often blows my mind, - very hard to hang on to sometimes. I

[LUTE] Re: I saw my lady weep

2006-03-17 Thread Ed Durbrow
We are talking about 400 year old English here. It is difficult for many native speakers. The lute songs are not just normal English but sometimes very deep. The syntax often blows my mind, - very hard to hang on to sometimes. I wouldn't worry at all about such a detail. If you can

[LUTE] Re: I saw my lady weep

2006-03-17 Thread Craig Allen
David wrote: On the contrary. Yes, of course we must have a general understanding of the poem to be able to play the song, but that is only the beginning. Poetry is written in very precise language; ideas condensed into a few words and made to fit into to the constraints of the poetic form.

[LUTE] Re: I saw my lady weep

2006-03-17 Thread Martin Shepherd
Dear David, Having studied with the late Robert Spencer at roughly the same time as you, I too wish he were still here to ask But I think the plural noun commonly took a singular verb form in Elizabethan English. Sorry I can't (at the moment) come up with other examples or references,

[LUTE] Re: I saw my lady weep

2006-03-17 Thread Spring, aus dem, Rainer
-Original Message- From: Martin Shepherd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 2:17 PM To: Lute Net Subject: [LUTE] Re: I saw my lady weep Dear David, Having studied with the late Robert Spencer at roughly the same time as you, I too wish he were still here

[LUTE] Re: I saw my lady weep

2006-03-17 Thread Denys Stephens
of writing to reflect on. Best wishes, Denys - Original Message - From: Ed Durbrow [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: LGS-Europe [EMAIL PROTECTED]; lute list lute@cs.dartmouth.edu Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 10:29 AM Subject: [LUTE] Re: I saw my lady weep We are talking about 400 year old English

[LUTE] Re: I saw my lady weep

2006-03-16 Thread Arto Wikla
Dear David, On Thu, 16 Mar 2006, LGS-Europe wrote: ..joyful looks excells. Tears kills the heart... What's with the s-es after the verbs? 'Looks' and 'tears' (noun, for sure in the contaxt) are plural, so I would expect 'excell' and 'kill'. Just an uneducated guess and speculation:

[LUTE] Re: I saw my lady weep

2006-03-16 Thread guy_and_liz Smith
: Thursday, March 16, 2006 1:52 PM Subject: [LUTE] Re: I saw my lady weep Dear David, On Thu, 16 Mar 2006, LGS-Europe wrote: ..joyful looks excells. Tears kills the heart... What's with the s-es after the verbs? 'Looks' and 'tears' (noun, for sure in the contaxt) are plural, so I

[LUTE] Re: I saw my lady weep

2006-03-16 Thread adS
Arto Wikla wrote: Dear David, On Thu, 16 Mar 2006, LGS-Europe wrote: ..joyful looks excells. Tears kills the heart... What's with the s-es after the verbs? 'Looks' and 'tears' (noun, for sure in the contaxt) are plural, so I would expect 'excell' and 'kill'. Just an uneducated guess

[LUTE] Re: I saw my lady weep

2006-03-16 Thread guy_and_liz Smith
then. - Original Message - From: guy_and_liz Smith To: LGS-Europe ; Arto Wikla Cc: Lute net Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 2:39 PM Subject: [LUTE] Re: I saw my lady weep Look can also be used as a noun, as in I gave him a dirty look. I think that's how he's using it here

[LUTE] Re: I saw my lady weep

2006-03-16 Thread corun
it to mean -- neither more nor less.' Lewis Carroll - Original Message - From: Sean Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: lute@cs.dartmouth.edu Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 4:16 PM Subject: [LUTE] Re: I saw my lady weep It was a poor imagination that could think of but one way to spell a uuord