Are you addressing moi, David? Your remarks follow mine, but they
don't have much to do with them.
On Jan 24, 2008, at 11:05 AM, David Rastall wrote:
>
>> I'm sure there's a lot of lute music that's inconsequential enough
>> that it's not a great sin to tamper with it, but Forlorne Hope
>> isn
t;Whoever after crappinge not wipeth his arse clean
On his breeches it will seene."
RT
- Original Message -
From: "G. Crona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Lute" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'Lutelist'" ;
"'Roman Turovsky'"
I suppose playing only two notes of the last chord (and getting one of
them wrong) is a tremendouser sin than just changing one of the notes
of the last chord, eh? And yet, considering the setting (and the title
of the music) who is to say? I can't speak for the manuscript that
Forlorn Hope is foun
the piece.
Also the images are almost never in sync with the music.
All the best
Mark
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: G. Crona [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 24. Januar 2008 19:30
An: Lutelist; Roman Turovsky
Betreff: [LUTE] Re: Karamazov...
Great perfirmance indeed! Very evocativ
On Jan 24, 2008, at 1:48 PM, howard posner wrote:
> I'm sure there's a lot of lute music that's inconsequential enough
> that it's not a great sin to tamper with it, but Forlorne Hope
> isn't in that class.
God forbid that we should Tamper with it! ;-) Is Dowland really as
"etched in ston
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Roman Turovsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Lutelist"
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 7:48 PM
Subject: [LUTE] Re: Karamazov...
I find it noisy and gimmicky; a lot of look-at-me that distracts from the
fl
Nachricht-
Von: G. Crona [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 24. Januar 2008 19:30
An: Lutelist; Roman Turovsky
Betreff: [LUTE] Re: Karamazov...
Great perfirmance indeed! Very evocative and "affektiert". Don't know if the
archlute (thankfully double coursed) is so
I find it noisy and gimmicky; a lot of look-at-me that distracts from
the flow of a masterpiece. But that's a matter of taste, I suppose,
as is tolerance for the slop whenever he plays sixteenth notes.
But if he doesn't like the way Dowland ended the piece, he should
play another piece ins
Great perfirmance indeed! Very evocative and "affektiert". Don't know if the
archlute (thankfully double coursed) is something Dowland would have played
on, but it sounded great. Short nails on RH. Combination of TI - TO. Lots of
changes of RH position and holding of the lute, which makes the cl
>> have just come home from the Karamazov/Sting gig here in NYC, and it was
<> EXCELLENT. Karamazov on 3 DOUBLESTRUNG archlutes and an 8course, and
Sting
>> on a singlestrung archlute
>Live does sound much better and quite diferant to the CD. I also know that
>he
>"now" uses double strung instru
Dear All:
What I'm interested in is whether the next time one of us HIPsters does a
Dowland concert, any more people show up as a result of Sting stirring the
waters.
Cheers,
Jim
--
To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I think in the end the big "Lute Boom" will not come
> about through this CD,
> because in the end the lute doesn't sound anything
> like a lute on the CD.
Most non-musicians can not distinguish, or even care
to distinguish, the difference between the sound of a
m
In einer eMail vom 10.10.2006 05:17:11 Westeurop=E4ische Normalzeit schreibt
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> have just come home from the Karamazov/Sting gig here in NYC, and it was
> EXCELLENT. Karamazov on 3 DOUBLESTRUNG archlutes and an 8course, and Sting
> on a singlestrung archlute
Live does sound
> It is double strung, David. I saw it, played, and heard it.
Such a smooth and silken sound he makes on it! Well-done. How come the
Dowalnds sounds so ty? Must be the MP3 then.
David
To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.htm
man Turovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
> Subject: [LUTE] Re: Karamazov sound
> Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 10:39:48 +0200
> > > Karamazov (note the spelling, and the Dostoyevsky allusion to help
> you
> > > remember it) is a strictl
It is double strung, David. I saw it, played, and heard it.
A
__
From: LGS-Europe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Roman Turovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
Subject: [LUTE] Re: Kar
101 - 116 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
