Hi Andre',
I use
eval "exec perl $0 $*"
if 0;
as the first two lines of a "portable" perl script (but I do not know,
how portable it really is).
yes, I sort of remember seeing this somewhere but wasn't able to find it
when I looked for it... This seems to be the standard way to do
yes, I sort of remember seeing this somewhere but wasn't able to find it
when I looked for it... This seems to be the standard way to do the job. I
think the only advantage over a perl line #!perl would be a more helpful
error message, am I wrong? Both eval ... and #!perl require that perl is
"Andre'" == Andre' Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
yes, I sort of remember seeing this somewhere but wasn't able to
find it when I looked for it... This seems to be the standard way
to do the job. I think the only advantage over a perl line #!perl
would be a more helpful error message, am
Andre' #!perl does not work at all, I think, even if perl is in
Andre' $PATH. In this place an absolute path is required.
To enter a bit in this discussion, let me say that the problem is not
to find perl, but to know how perl = 5.002 is named.
How does autoconf handle that case? It
"Andre'" == Andre' Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andre' #!perl does not work at all, I think, even if perl is in
Andre' $PATH. In this place an absolute path is required.
To enter a bit in this discussion, let me say that the problem is
not to find perl, but to know how perl = 5.002
On Tue, Jun 29, 1999 at 04:50:32PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Andre'" == Andre' Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That's what it does actually. It tries, in this order
perl perl5 perl5.002 perl5.003 perl5.004 perl5.005
and executes 'require 5.002;exit' on each of them. I agree
So we're waiting breathlessly for reports from the ~M. It seems that at
least JMarc has recovered from his hangover^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H exhausting
travels, so maybe he could tell us what happened.
-Amir
"Amir" == Amir Karger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Amir On Tue, Jun 29, 1999 at 04:50:32PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Amir wrote:
"Andre'" == Andre' Poenitz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That's what it does actually. It tries, in this order perl perl5
perl5.002 perl5.003 perl5.004 perl5.005
"Amir" == Amir Karger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Amir So we're waiting breathlessly for reports from the ~M. It seems
Amir that at least JMarc has recovered from his
Amir hangover^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H exhausting travels, so maybe he could
Amir tell us what happened.
I am not very good at writing
On Tue, 29 Jun 1999 16:50:32 +0200 (MET DST), Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
wrote:
Another fun idea would be that configure could find the right perl,
and then do a
ln -s /usr/local/bin/perl /usr/local/share/lyx/thegoodperl
Why not always directly use the absolute pathname instead of using the
link to
On Tue, Jun 29, 1999 at 05:06:28PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Amir" == Amir Karger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Because I'm stupid. I'll invert the order.
It's always more fun to make you say it rather than saying it myself. That
way it still looks like I"m polite.
Amir Why can't
Regarding borders.
When you designate certain cells of the first row of a table as
Multicolumn, then try and delete the left vertical lines (and right?) of
any particular box, LyX displays that the entire column's left vertical
line has been removed. However, LyX generates the right LaTeX code,
Delete row works properly. Delete row five, and you can hit Delete Row
again and delete row six.
Not so with Delete Column. After you delete column 8, hit Delete Column
again and you delete column 1.
--
-lsm
Hi Andre',
> I use
>
> eval "exec perl $0 $*"
> if 0;
>
> as the first two lines of a "portable" perl script (but I do not know,
> how portable it really is).
yes, I sort of remember seeing this somewhere but wasn't able to find it
when I looked for it... This seems to be the standard way
> yes, I sort of remember seeing this somewhere but wasn't able to find it
> when I looked for it... This seems to be the standard way to do the job. I
> think the only advantage over a perl line #!perl would be a more helpful
> error message, am I wrong? Both eval ... and #!perl require that
> "Andre'" == Andre' Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> yes, I sort of remember seeing this somewhere but wasn't able to
>> find it when I looked for it... This seems to be the standard way
>> to do the job. I think the only advantage over a perl line #!perl
>> would be a more helpful
> Andre'> #!perl does not work at all, I think, even if perl is in
> Andre'> $PATH. In this place an absolute path is required.
>
> To enter a bit in this discussion, let me say that the problem is not
> to find perl, but to know how perl >= 5.002 is named.
How does autoconf handle that case?
> "Andre'" == Andre' Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Andre'> #!perl does not work at all, I think, even if perl is in
>> Andre'> $PATH. In this place an absolute path is required.
>>
>> To enter a bit in this discussion, let me say that the problem is
>> not to find perl, but to
On Tue, Jun 29, 1999 at 04:50:32PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Andre'" == Andre' Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> That's what it does actually. It tries, in this order
> perl perl5 perl5.002 perl5.003 perl5.004 perl5.005
> and executes 'require 5.002;exit' on each of
So we're waiting breathlessly for reports from the ~M. It seems that at
least JMarc has recovered from his hangover^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H exhausting
travels, so maybe he could tell us what happened.
-Amir
> "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Amir> On Tue, Jun 29, 1999 at 04:50:32PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Amir> wrote:
>> > "Andre'" == Andre' Poenitz
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> That's what it does actually. It tries, in this order perl perl5
>> perl5.002
> "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Amir> So we're waiting breathlessly for reports from the ~M. It seems
Amir> that at least JMarc has recovered from his
Amir> hangover^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H exhausting travels, so maybe he could
Amir> tell us what happened.
I am not very good at
On Tue, 29 Jun 1999 16:50:32 +0200 (MET DST), Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
wrote:
>Another fun idea would be that configure could find the right perl,
>and then do a
> ln -s /usr/local/bin/perl /usr/local/share/lyx/thegoodperl
Why not always directly use the absolute pathname instead of using the
link
On Tue, Jun 29, 1999 at 05:06:28PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Because I'm stupid. I'll invert the order.
It's always more fun to make you say it rather than saying it myself. That
way it still looks like I"m polite.
> Amir>
Regarding borders.
When you designate certain cells of the first row of a table as
Multicolumn, then try and delete the left vertical lines (and right?) of
any particular box, LyX displays that the entire column's left vertical
line has been removed. However, LyX generates the right LaTeX code,
Delete row works properly. Delete row five, and you can hit Delete Row
again and delete row six.
Not so with Delete Column. After you delete column 8, hit Delete Column
again and you delete column 1.
--
-lsm
26 matches
Mail list logo
