Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 2 Apr 2001, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
|
| > > "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > Dekel> On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 12:31:14PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
| > Dekel> wrote:
| > >> Comparing the sizes of binaries of 1.1.6cvs and
Kalle,
you can imagine two types of "input" in the dialog:
1) "input" that changes the state of the relevant Params struct and which
can, therefore, be "applied";
2) "input" that does not change any params, but which is used to navigate
around the dialog. Eg, clicking on the browsers in the cit
My apologies; I was getting confused. I don't actually use
ButtonController::valid(bool) to change the state of the buttons anymore.
FormBase::InputCB calls ButtonController::input direct.
> Angus, I know you were going to reimplement the input checking functions
> of the dialogs to return an
On 03-Apr-2001 R. Lahaye wrote:
> CutAndPaste.C: In function `static bool CutAndPaste::checkPastePossible(LyXParagraph
> *)':
> CutAndPaste.C:543: warning: unused parameter `class LyXParagraph * par'
Fixed!
Jürgen
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Hi,
I import the attached latex file succesfully in an empty/new lyx document.
(I run lyx-1.1.6fix1) If I try to save it as a lyx file, LYX crashes and I
receive this bug/error report:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 1024 (LWP 1338)]
0x402341d9 in ostr
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 12:14:13PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > function(param1 p1, param2 p2, ...
> > paramx px, paramy py)
> > {
> > ...
> > }
> >
> > Try to indent this with tabs and set tab-width to 4 or to 8!
>
> In my own stuff I use in such cases real spaces starting from the
On 03-Apr-2001 Jules Bean wrote:
>
> http://www.jwz.org/doc/tabs-vs-spaces.html
Yes! That's exactly what I do for my files! 4 'spaces' indent per level
and have emacs fill in spaces and not tabs or misced stuff like:
4 spaces == 4 spaces
8 spaces == tab
12 spaces == tab 4 spaces
(this is what h
There are two pieces of xforms-cruft that have been left in
BufferView_pimpl.h and in BufferView.h. Would anybody be upset if I removed
them?
Note that the FL_OBJECT is private data and is never referenced in
BufferView_pimpl.[Ch] (moved over to WorkArea?) and that there is no xforms
code at
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| There are two pieces of xforms-cruft that have been left in
| BufferView_pimpl.h and in BufferView.h. Would anybody be upset if I removed
| them?
|
| Note that the FL_OBJECT is private data and is never referenced in
| BufferView_pimpl.[Ch] (moved o
Angus, as discussed yesterday ...
It does :
1) rename of UndoAll and associated
2) ControlButton -> ControlButtons
3) s/popup/dialog/
4) moves bc().refresh() into FormBase.show() for xforms
This patch doesn't include the necessary KDE changes since
that patch has several other KDE changfes in
On Mon, 2 Apr 2001, Kalle Dalheimer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> can somebody with access to the web server please mark the Credits dialog in
> the Qt2 frontend as "Completed"?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kalle
OK, done. You really should get write cvs to www-devel. It's a matter of seconds
to update it (literally
On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, Allan Rae wrote:
> John, don't change the valid() function name or add another one. Wait
> for Angus or I to change the operation of the dialogs input checking.
> Then you won't need those direct calls to bc().valid() just to workaround
> a mishandled input routine.
>
> All
It's a bit all over the place (see FormCharacter). Any chance you can use
tabs consistently ?
(petty I know)
thanks
john
--
"Unredeemable train-spotting vacuity overlaid by the gloss of management theory."
- John Redwood on William "Tory Boy" Haigh
On Tuesday 03 April 2001 14:14, John Levon wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Apr 2001, Kalle Dalheimer wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > can somebody with access to the web server please mark the Credits dialog
> > in the Qt2 frontend as "Completed"?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Kalle
>
> OK, done. You really should get write c
On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, Kalle Dalheimer wrote:
> On Tuesday 03 April 2001 14:14, John Levon wrote:
> > On Mon, 2 Apr 2001, Kalle Dalheimer wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > can somebody with access to the web server please mark the Credits dialog
> > > in the Qt2 frontend as "Completed"?
> > >
> > > Thank
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Hassle Lars, I think he only has to change a line since you have an
| account already
done
| > Is the CVS module called www-devel?
yes.
--
Lgb
I'll just recompile and then shove it in.
A
On Tuesday 03 April 2001 13:09, John Levon wrote:
> >
> Angus, as discussed yesterday ...
>
> It does :
>
> 1) rename of UndoAll and associated
> 2) ControlButton -> ControlButtons
> 3) s/popup/dialog/
> 4) moves bc().refresh() into FormBase.show(
> btw, Angus, am I ok to change the TabCreate controller to access
setParams(uint, uint)
> ? The dialogs have no business knowing that the rows, cols are represented
as "rows cols"
> string in the Dispatch
Of course.
A
> I actually have another problem/request: we need to share management of
buttons
> between the controller and the dialog.
>
> for exapmle, the citation dialog has "Add" "Remove" buttons which obviously
should be
> disabled when readonly etc. Unfortunately the dialog also has some say in
when
Hello, you have a tutorial about LyX?
thank you, Helder
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 04:23:41PM -0300, Helder wrote:
> Hello, you have a tutorial about LyX?
> thank you, Helder
Run LyX and select Help->Tutorial from the menu.
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 05:22:42PM -0500, Paul E Johnson wrote:
> > Will you test my fixed up RPM?
> >
> > ---Kayvan
> I will be delighted to test.
Okay. The new lyx RPMs (in ftp.sylvan.com/pub/lyx/devel) for 1.2.0cvs
are now correct. Please test them. If you are still
On 3 Apr 2001, Lars Gullik [iso-8859-1] Bjønnes wrote:
> I don't really buy into the size argument.
5MB stripped versus 2MB stripped. Compile time on a dual processor 128MB
machine that is at least 5 times longer (no swapping). And that was
months ago I measured that, now we have a compile time
On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, Juergen Vigna wrote:
[...]
> But ok, I'm not happy with it, but if most of the developers are happy with
> a tab indent I'll adapt!
>
> I for myself will still use 4 spaces on NON-LyX files as IMO that is the
> best way to have sourcefiles written (NO TAB INSIDE FILES!)
But th
On Mon, 2 Apr 2001, Michael A. Koziarski wrote:
> It's a complete rewrite, I preferred the Gnome::About look and feel but
> GUII is GUII and this is consistent with the other frontends.
You are free to combine things like:
Help->Version
Help->Copyright
Help->Credits
into
25 matches
Mail list logo
