Re: Natbib

2001-07-21 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Mittwoch, 18. Juli 2001 20:29 schrieb Dekel Tsur: And the good design is to have ALL packages in a dialog and be able what LaTeX code I want produce! AND this then should be honored by the LaTeX methods! In this dialog we would have a button to receck the LaTeX packages installed and

bug: latex preamble dialog

2001-07-21 Thread Ronny Buchmann
hi two little bugs with latex preamble 1st (important): in read-only files copy (with mouse) is not allowed 2nd: when resizing the dialog (- wider), right scrollbar is also resized (und looks really ugly) -- thanks ronny

Re: bug: latex preamble dialog

2001-07-21 Thread Ronny Buchmann
* Ronny Buchmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001-07-21 09:19] schrieb: hi two little bugs with latex preamble 1st (important): in read-only files copy (with mouse) is not allowed 2nd: when resizing the dialog (- wider), right scrollbar is also resized (und looks really ugly) i forgot:

Re: compile problems

2001-07-21 Thread Edwin Leuven
I did a clean checkout this morning and lyx compiles! strange how cvs sometimes makes mistakes. Sorry for the trouble! Thanks, Ed.

Re: www.devel.lyx.org

2001-07-21 Thread Garst R. Reese
Allan Rae wrote: This site is now updated and looks just as pretty as www.lyx.org. I'll look when your thesis is finished. Garst

Index Entry of Preceding Word

2001-07-21 Thread Garst R. Reese
Does nothing except show an empty Idx box. 07-20 Garst

Re: Fast question, hopefully fast answer!

2001-07-21 Thread Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen
On Fri, 20 Jul 2001, Juergen Vigna wrote: Hmm, probably it will not work, but then it's just stupid IMO! I just want some metrics which surely are not dependant from anything (draw==false) and I'm not able to get them. IMO we should add this static methods to be able to call them without the

Re: Natbib

2001-07-21 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 03:37:00PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote: I don't see why you need to implement a feature which will rarely be used. Because it's fun? Because people do actually need this and use it now because we assume internally that everything is available. Once proper checking

Re: misc guii

2001-07-21 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 07:18:42PM +0200, Edwin Leuven wrote: ... From: Edwin Leuven [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 19:18:42 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.1.99] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: misc guii distributions. lyx maintainers. no

How to choose packages (was Re: Natbib)

2001-07-21 Thread Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen
On Sat, 21 Jul 2001, Dekel Tsur wrote: I'm not against the option of generating a latex code that doesn't use fancy packages. However, I'm not sure that the best way is to have a dialog in which you can disable each package individually. Why is this not the best way? I suppose it is because

Re: LyX and RedHat 7.x

2001-07-21 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 06:32:04PM +0200, Philippe Charpentier wrote: I have recently installed lyx-1.1.6fix2 on two machines, one using RedHat 7.0, the other RedHat 7.1 and I have encounter a problem of La TeX compilation under LyX. It has to be noted that these problems do not appear

Re: A few new things to try out

2001-07-21 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 11:52:15AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: ... To: LyX Mechanics [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: A few new things to try out From: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 20 Jul 2001 11:52:15 +0200 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0806 (Gnus v5.8.6) Emacs/20.4 Hello there,

Re: Updated (Lyx/Latex) - (ps/pdf/html) script

2001-07-21 Thread Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen
On Thu, 19 Jul 2001, Fernando Pérez wrote: I've put up a bare bones web page for it at http://www-hep.colorado.edu/~fperez/lyxport Jean-Marc, you are welcome to include the latest version from the web page in lyx/contrib if you find it good enough for general use. I think we should do

Re: Updated (Lyx/Latex) - (ps/pdf/html) script

2001-07-21 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 10:17:50PM +0200, Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen wrote: ... Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2001 22:17:50 +0200 (METDST) From: Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Fernando Pérez [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Updated (Lyx/Latex) - (ps/pdf/html) script

Re: core dump

2001-07-21 Thread John Levon
On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 12:46:40AM +0100, John Levon wrote: The problem persists. Any box from greek to Misc. If I go into math mode first I get an emergency save, otherwise not. what compiler ? I get this with gcc 3.0 ... and now it's gone. 0.88.9, gcc 3.0 ... p.s. I have a

Re: bug: latex preamble dialog

2001-07-21 Thread John Levon
On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 09:19:04AM +0200, Ronny Buchmann wrote: two little bugs with latex preamble 1st (important): in read-only files copy (with mouse) is not allowed an xforms bug, it doesn't know the difference between read only and deactivated widgets. I have a fix for this, I'll

Re: View-TOC buglet

2001-07-21 Thread John Levon
On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 09:08:50PM -0700, Mike Ressler wrote: The Close button in the TOC panel changes to Cancel after you use the window to jump around. Why? Shouldn't it just stay Close. This is with the lyx-1.1.6fix3 CVS branch. Haven't tried 1.2.0 CVS ... in 1.2.0cvs I don't see the TOC

Re: Preference's Save/Apply button anomalities

2001-07-21 Thread John Levon
On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 05:01:44PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote: (simply typing my infront of pipe), I cannot [Save] or [Apply] that change because both buttons are still disabled. This is not the correct behaviour to my opinion, since I have changed the pipe in a legitimate way. Or what do

Re: core dump

2001-07-21 Thread Garst R. Reese
John Levon wrote: On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 12:46:40AM +0100, John Levon wrote: The problem persists. Any box from greek to Misc. If I go into math mode first I get an emergency save, otherwise not. what compiler ? I get this with gcc 3.0 ... and now it's gone. 0.88.9, gcc 3.0 ...

Re: core dump

2001-07-21 Thread John Levon
On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 10:01:41PM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote: ... and now it's gone. 0.88.9, gcc 3.0 ... Still bombs here with 0.89.5, gcc 3.0 ... , can others test please (JMarc, you don't get it either ?) ? but I can get greek with the kbd. at least you can still get your work done

Re: Updated (Lyx/Latex) - (ps/pdf/html) script

2001-07-21 Thread Fernando Pérez
In my distro epstopdf is part of tetex. The philosophy apparently being that it is needed when running pdflatex instead of LaTeX on a document prepared with eps graphics. As far as I understand it, epstopdf comes together with pdflatex, it was written by the same people. So anyone who has

www.devel.lyx.org

2001-07-21 Thread Allan Rae
This site is now updated and looks just as pretty as www.lyx.org. (still waiting for the update of the main site but my test site looks pretty anyway -- should be only a couple of minutes) I think there are only a few minor nitpicks left to clear up: 1. translation_hints.php3 hasn't been

Re: Natbib

2001-07-21 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Mittwoch, 18. Juli 2001 20:29 schrieb Dekel Tsur: > > And the good design is to have ALL packages in a dialog and be able > > what LaTeX code I want produce! AND this then should be honored by > > the LaTeX methods! In this dialog we would have a button to receck > > the LaTeX packages

bug: latex preamble dialog

2001-07-21 Thread Ronny Buchmann
hi two little bugs with latex preamble 1st (important): in read-only files copy (with mouse) is not allowed 2nd: when resizing the dialog (-> wider), right scrollbar is also resized (und looks really ugly) -- thanks ronny

Re: bug: latex preamble dialog

2001-07-21 Thread Ronny Buchmann
* Ronny Buchmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001-07-21 09:19] schrieb: > hi > > two little bugs with latex preamble > > 1st (important): in read-only files copy (with mouse) is not allowed > > 2nd: when resizing the dialog (-> wider), right scrollbar is also resized (und looks >really ugly) > i

Re: compile problems

2001-07-21 Thread Edwin Leuven
I did a clean checkout this morning and lyx compiles! strange how cvs sometimes makes mistakes. Sorry for the trouble! Thanks, Ed.

Re: www.devel.lyx.org

2001-07-21 Thread Garst R. Reese
Allan Rae wrote: > > This site is now updated and looks just as pretty as www.lyx.org. I'll look when your thesis is finished. Garst

Index Entry of Preceding Word

2001-07-21 Thread Garst R. Reese
Does nothing except show an empty Idx box. 07-20 Garst

Re: Fast question, hopefully fast answer!

2001-07-21 Thread Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen
On Fri, 20 Jul 2001, Juergen Vigna wrote: > Hmm, probably it will not work, but then it's just stupid IMO! I just > want some metrics which surely are not dependant from anything (draw==false) > and I'm not able to get them. IMO we should add this static methods to be > able to call them without

Re: Natbib

2001-07-21 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 03:37:00PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote: > > > > I don't see why you need to implement a feature which will rarely be used. > > > > Because it's fun? > > Because people do actually need this and use it now because we assume > internally that everything is available. Once

Re: misc guii

2001-07-21 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 07:18:42PM +0200, Edwin Leuven wrote: ... > From: Edwin Leuven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 19:18:42 +0200 > X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.1.99] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: misc guii > > > distributions. lyx

How to choose packages (was Re: Natbib)

2001-07-21 Thread Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen
On Sat, 21 Jul 2001, Dekel Tsur wrote: > I'm not against the option of generating a latex code that doesn't use fancy > packages. However, I'm not sure that the best way is to have a dialog in which > you can disable each package individually. Why is this not the best way? I suppose it is

Re: LyX and RedHat 7.x

2001-07-21 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 06:32:04PM +0200, Philippe Charpentier wrote: > I have recently installed lyx-1.1.6fix2 on two machines, one using > RedHat 7.0, the other RedHat 7.1 and I have > encounter a problem of La TeX compilation under LyX. > It has to be noted that these problems do not appear

Re: A few new things to try out

2001-07-21 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 11:52:15AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: ... > To: LyX Mechanics <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: A few new things to try out > From: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 20 Jul 2001 11:52:15 +0200 > User-Agent: Gnus/5.0806 (Gnus v5.8.6) Emacs/20.4 > > >

Re: Updated (Lyx/Latex) -> (ps/pdf/html) script

2001-07-21 Thread Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen
On Thu, 19 Jul 2001, Fernando Pérez wrote: > I've put up a bare bones web page for it at > http://www-hep.colorado.edu/~fperez/lyxport > > Jean-Marc, you are welcome to include the latest version from the web page > in lyx/contrib if you find it good enough for general use. I think we should

Re: Updated (Lyx/Latex) -> (ps/pdf/html) script

2001-07-21 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 10:17:50PM +0200, Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen wrote: ... > Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2001 22:17:50 +0200 (METDST) > From: "Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Fernando Pérez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Updated (Lyx/Latex) ->

Re: core dump

2001-07-21 Thread John Levon
On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 12:46:40AM +0100, John Levon wrote: > > The problem persists. Any box from greek to Misc. If I go into math mode > > first I get an emergency save, otherwise not. > > what compiler ? I get this with gcc 3.0 ... and now it's gone. 0.88.9, gcc 3.0 ... p.s. I have a

Re: bug: latex preamble dialog

2001-07-21 Thread John Levon
On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 09:19:04AM +0200, Ronny Buchmann wrote: > two little bugs with latex preamble > > 1st (important): in read-only files copy (with mouse) is not allowed an xforms bug, it doesn't know the difference between read only and deactivated widgets. I have a "fix" for this,

Re: View->TOC buglet

2001-07-21 Thread John Levon
On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 09:08:50PM -0700, Mike Ressler wrote: > The "Close" button in the TOC panel changes to "Cancel" after you use the > window to jump around. Why? Shouldn't it just stay "Close". This is with > the lyx-1.1.6fix3 CVS branch. Haven't tried 1.2.0 CVS ... in 1.2.0cvs I don't

Re: Preference's Save/Apply button anomalities

2001-07-21 Thread John Levon
On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 05:01:44PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote: > > (simply typing "my" infront of "pipe"), I cannot [Save] or [Apply] that change > > because both buttons are still disabled. This is not the correct behaviour to > > my opinion, since I have changed the pipe in a legitimate way. > >

Re: core dump

2001-07-21 Thread Garst R. Reese
John Levon wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 12:46:40AM +0100, John Levon wrote: > > > > The problem persists. Any box from greek to Misc. If I go into math mode > > > first I get an emergency save, otherwise not. > > > > what compiler ? I get this with gcc 3.0 > > ... and now it's gone.

Re: core dump

2001-07-21 Thread John Levon
On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 10:01:41PM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote: > > ... and now it's gone. 0.88.9, gcc 3.0 ... > Still bombs here with 0.89.5, gcc 3.0 ... , can others test please (JMarc, you don't get it either ?) ? > but I can get greek with the kbd. at least you can still get your work

Re: Updated (Lyx/Latex) -> (ps/pdf/html) script

2001-07-21 Thread Fernando Pérez
> In my distro epstopdf is part of tetex. The philosophy apparently > being that it is needed when running pdflatex instead of LaTeX on a > document prepared with eps graphics. As far as I understand it, epstopdf comes together with pdflatex, it was written by the same people. So anyone who

www.devel.lyx.org

2001-07-21 Thread Allan Rae
This site is now updated and looks just as pretty as www.lyx.org. (still waiting for the update of the main site but my test site looks pretty anyway -- should be only a couple of minutes) I think there are only a few minor nitpicks left to clear up: 1. translation_hints.php3 hasn't been

Re: www.devel.lyx.org

2001-07-21 Thread Ronny Buchmann
* Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001-07-21 09:21] schrieb: > > This site is now updated and looks just as pretty as www.lyx.org. > (still waiting for the update of the main site but my test site looks > pretty anyway -- should be only a couple of minutes) > > I think there are only a few minor