Hi,
For those who are interested, the release 0.1.3 of the DB2LyX
stylesheets is available at http://perso.libertysurf.fr/bgu/#DB2LyX
The main changes are:
* New support of xsltproc (catalog resolver + config step)
* XML configuration added
* SGML to XML translation script added
* Bug fixes.
A
On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 09:46:25AM +0900, Shigeru Miyata wrote:
> In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > and the support for \mathscr (\usepackage{eucal}) is problematic since
> > > it changes the meaning of \mathcal as well.
> >
> > How?
>
> It s
On Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 06:32:55PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> Next try.
Here is an updated version of Andre's patch.
This version allow to view on screen (almost) all AMS symbols.
font4.diff.gz
#!/usr/bin/python
import sys,string,re
def is_prefix(a, b):
return a[:len(b)] == b
def g
Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> PS: I have come recently from vacations... I now can claim to now more
> than 50 castles in Portugal...
>
> --
> José
Sounds like book material to me.
Garst
On Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 11:07:20AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 11:37:16AM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > It is not hard to generate the information we need for all latex symbols
> > from the latex files (fontmath.ltx and amssymb.sty).
>
> Looks like you are volunteering.
On Sat, Aug 18, 2001 at 09:20:31AM +0200, jdd wrote:
> Le Samedi 18 Août 2001 00:13, vous avez écrit :
>
> > How far away is it from being usable for LDP Authors?
Feedback is always welcome.
> I think LyX is right now usable to LDP authors. With the help of David
> Merrill I could fix the
On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 03:44:25PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > at the very end of each of these I should add :
> >
> > bc().invalid();
> > bc().restore();
> >
> > ? (this sequence works w/o errors)
>
> Shall I shove these in too? Why not!
yes, OK. I will still need Qt2Base::reset(
On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 06:20:16PM -0400, David Merrill wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> First, thank you very much for the work you're doing. The LDP is
> looking forward to being able to use and recommend Lyx for our
> authors, and so we have been following the DocBook development,
> although I haven't
> Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 10:04:52 +0200
> FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Feedback from www.lyx.org
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> Jean-Daniel Dodin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) entered the
> following feedback message on the LyX home page:
> ---
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 06:00:43PM +1200, Michael Koziarski wrote:
>
[...]
> I'm not a hard-core LaTeXer so I don't know how suitable a maintainer I'd
> be. If the bugs are explained in detail I should be able to fix them, but
> bug reports relying on detailed knowledge of TeX will go unfixed.
On Friday 24 August 2001 13:54, John Levon wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 10:27:49AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> > The change of state is coming from the LyX side not the Dialog side and
so
>
> no, it's coming from the Dialog side. Have you read the other mail where I
was a bit
> cleare
On Friday 24 August 2001 15:27, John Levon wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 03:26:37PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> > E why? A dialog should be built once only and the controller's
call
> > view().show() from only one place.
>
> yes, you're right, sorry.
Well, you diverted me from
I hope this is not a duplicate, it does not appear to be in
1.1.6fix3's known bug list and a quick search of the archive did not
reveal a report.
Typing the characters "-" causes a display of ``-`` (where the `` is
really the proper single character to represent opening double
quotes). The rend
On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 03:26:37PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> E why? A dialog should be built once only and the controller's call
> view().show() from only one place.
yes, you're right, sorry.
thanks
john
--
"That's just kitten-eating wrong."
- Richard Henderson
On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 04:10:20PM +0200, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> - Open the latex preamble; insert some previously selected text with the middle
> mouse button -> the OK button is not activated
>
> - It is not possible to add a second index entry right after another one
>
> - In the "Float
On Friday 24 August 2001 14:53, John Levon wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 02:51:04PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> > template
> > void ControlInset::show(Params const & params)
> > {
> > if (params_) delete params_;
> > params_ = new Params(params);
> >
> > setDaughterParams();
On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 02:53:39PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> the static bool needs to be non-local as there are 4 places we need this
> AFAICS - ControlInset twice, ControlDialogs twice
how do I add a static member to a template class ? This isn't simple, is it ?
Angus, where should I put isBu
On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 02:51:04PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> template
> void ControlInset::show(Params const & params)
> {
> if (params_) delete params_;
> params_ = new Params(params);
>
> setDaughterParams();
>
> + static bool isBuilt = false;
> + if (!isBuilt)
On Friday 24 August 2001 14:09, John Levon wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 02:00:07PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> > > it is ::build() that must be protected in this way.
> >
> > Sorry, I don't understand you.
> > As far as I can see, build() is a virtual function that is called only
from
thanks
john
--
"That's just kitten-eating wrong."
- Richard Henderson
build.diff.gz
On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 03:49:55PM +0300, Baruch Even wrote:
> > Agreed, there is no way to pass this info to docbook. Or we could take
> > care of that with the new code. Is that feasible? (Baruch)
>
> The new code can probably be extended to do it, but I'd rather not do it
> for this version
On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 02:00:07PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > it is ::build() that must be protected in this way.
>
> Sorry, I don't understand you.
> As far as I can see, build() is a virtual function that is called only from
> show. Wither you test whether the dialog has been built befor
On Friday 24 August 2001 13:49, John Levon wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 10:34:38AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> > > Am I OK to add if (dialog_.get()) return; or equivalent to every single
> > > build() in all frontends ?
> >
> > Errr... we already have that for xforms...
>
> no you don't
On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 10:27:49AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> The change of state is coming from the LyX side not the Dialog side and so
no, it's coming from the Dialog side. Have you read the other mail where I was a bit
clearer on what's going on ?
>
> template
> void ControlInset::show
On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 10:34:38AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Am I OK to add if (dialog_.get()) return; or equivalent to every single
> > build() in all frontends ?
>
> Errr... we already have that for xforms...
no you don't (well you do in my tree ;)
it is ::build() that must be protecte
* Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010824 15:43]:
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 01:52:17PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > > The best thing to do if you want this fixed in the next version is to
> > > hunt the DocBook commands to do what is needed and to post them for
> > > whatever featur
On Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 09:29:55PM +0300, Baruch Even wrote:
> >I'm just trying to do some documentation in LyX using the DocBook
> > layout style and I'm finding a few things which are making life difficult.
> >
> > Firstly, is there a way to make text appear in a different font, eg
> > emph
On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 01:52:17PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > The best thing to do if you want this fixed in the next version is to
> > hunt the DocBook commands to do what is needed and to post them for
> > whatever feature we are missing from DocBook.
>
> We also need to disable in dialogs fe
Is it normal that things like '.' and ',' act as dead keys and produce
funny accents? I.e. . produces something like \cdot and ,M some ,
under an M?
Andre'
--
André Pönitz . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> Trying to delete an empty col. in the middle of a table crashes lyx. No
> emergency save.
That corresponds to the purify report I sent yesterday; added to my list.
> Trying to delete an empty row in the middle of a table always gets the
> wrong row.
On Friday 24 August 2001 11:14, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Friday 24 August 2001 11:07, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> | > On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 11:04:47AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> | > > LyXAction contains the entries
> | > >
> | > >
> Either they go or every inset should be able to be manipulated fully from the
> minibuffer. This is the wrong way to go, I think; they should be removed.
I don't really know what these three LFUNs exactly do, maybe they are
indeed bogus.
But in general I believe the whole of lyx should be acc
On Friday 24 August 2001 11:07, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 11:04:47AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > LyXAction contains the entries
> >
> > { LFUN_BIBDB_ADD, "bibtex-database-add", "", Noop },
> > { LFUN_BIBDB_DEL, "bibtex-database-del", "", Noop },
>
On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 11:04:47AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> LyXAction contains the entries
>
> { LFUN_BIBDB_ADD, "bibtex-database-add", "", Noop },
> { LFUN_BIBDB_DEL, "bibtex-database-del", "", Noop },
> { LFUN_BIBTEX_STYLE, "bibtex-style", "", Noop
LyXAction contains the entries
{ LFUN_BIBDB_ADD, "bibtex-database-add", "", Noop },
{ LFUN_BIBDB_DEL, "bibtex-database-del", "", Noop },
{ LFUN_BIBTEX_STYLE, "bibtex-style", "", Noop },
These allow the user to manipulate the content of the BibTeX i
On Friday 24 August 2001 04:40, John Levon wrote:
> can I get commit on frontends/ frontends/controllers/ frontends/xforms as
well as qt/ ?
>
> I often notice some trivial things in other directories that it would be
convenient to
> fix during a Qt session (and I'd like to fix FormParagraph/Pre
On Friday 24 August 2001 04:12, you wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 12:44:26PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
>
> > > Of course the read_only list is empty if the dialog hasn't been built.
> > >
> > > How to fix ?
> >
> > build();
> > refreshReadOnly();
> > show();
>
> This means build()
On Friday 24 August 2001 02:10, John Levon wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 02:04:23AM +0100, John Levon wrote:
>
> > 1) open dialog on existing citation. if the dialog was previously open,
> > the text after is reset to the parameters for the citation. Unfortunately
> > this triggers a changed()
On Friday 24 August 2001 00:29, Allan Rae wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, John Levon wrote:
> > > Why not just use the IgnorantPolicy until you have the rest of the
dialog
> > > working? This is the equivalent of how LyX used to run before I got
> >
> > Policy is dictated by the controllers right
39 matches
Mail list logo
