Herbert == Herbert Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Herbert we don't really have at this time a defaulttab.
This is what happens when you create a new LyXTabular object, no?
Herbert It makes
Herbert sense for all options which are not of boolean and length.
Herbert But especially all boolean
Zvezdan == Zvezdan Petkovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Zvezdan What bothers me more is that OpenBSD port of LyX is marked
Zvezdan broken in OpenBSD 3.0. Reason given: does not build in any
Zvezdan reproducible way. I plan to contact the port maintainer to
Zvezdan see if fix4 changes things in
On Monday 21 January 2002 8:27 pm, Herbert Voss wrote:
what is the best way to tell lyx what to do with the images:
display yes/no
monochrom |
gray | radio buttons
color |
1. all in preferences - nothing in the gui
2. additional a Display yes/no in the graphic gui,
On Tue, 22 Jan 2002, Angus Leeming wrote:
So, I'd change nothing in the dialog in this regard.
Instead, I think we should ask what functionality the dialog should really
end up having. My thoughts:
Support the optional arguments of includegraphics to specify a section of the
original
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 08:36:52AM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
Improved patch.
+ Renders OK on-screen and in print, saves and loads OK
+ Key sequences M-m ^ space and M-m _ now work (hey, *almost* good enough :-)
- Still based on \hat. Horizontal positioning in screen rendering may
Attached is my patch against the sources to make Lyx running on Win32 using
the Cygwin environment (release 1.3.6). Maybe someone is interested and this
patch will be included in future releases.
Some remarks to that patch:
1) lib/configure.m4 wasn't part of the sources tarball. I've picked
On Tuesday 22 January 2002 10:47 am, Herbert Voss wrote:
On Tue, 22 Jan 2002, Angus Leeming wrote:
So, I'd change nothing in the dialog in this regard.
Instead, I think we should ask what functionality the dialog should really
end up having. My thoughts:
Support the optional
On Tuesday 22 January 2002 12:18 pm, Angus Leeming wrote:
Sure. What I was trying to say was that somehow the user should be able to
rotate the figure, scale it and chose only a part of it. Moreover, the
image
size in LyX should be specifiable independent of that in the paper output.
This
Hi developpers.
Hi Alain!
I was a little bit upset by a limitation in tabular : if you need
columns of a given width (e.g. to format successive tables the same
cannot set the H. alignement anymore, unless you do it cell by cell, or
you have to write the whole preamble using special
Angus Leeming wrote:
I was thinking of something like this. Have I missed anything?
A
Looks sensible (though the behaviour Herbert proposed - add buttons to
switch between natural size, custom height/width, scale and save those
values - makes a lot of sense IMHO).
If you are intending to
- I appreciate any fix for the multicolumns table problem
(see mail Table and figure bugs)
I´m still waiting for an answer for this problem. I don´t know how
to fix the LaTeX code in the right way.
Jug
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr.
On Tuesday 22 January 2002 1:49 pm, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Angus Leeming wrote:
I was thinking of something like this. Have I missed anything?
A
Looks sensible (though the behaviour Herbert proposed - add buttons to
switch between natural size, custom height/width, scale and save
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 08:36:52AM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
this is still buggy: \_test is exported well into latex, but
drawn wrong in mathed (as subscript).
Huh? Works for me. Try the attached test.
created by M-m S-underscore t e s t in mathed
this is
Jürgen Vigna wrote:
- I appreciate any fix for the multicolumns table problem
(see mail Table and figure bugs)
I´m still waiting for an answer for this problem. I don´t know how
to fix the LaTeX code in the right way.
is there a demofile for that?
Herbert
--
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Jürgen Vigna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Well I didn´t see the patch, but I can imagine what you did. While I agree
| that the pwidth can be omited if the string is empty I don´t think we should
| omit booleans. I think we had this discussion already and decided
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 03:01:51PM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 08:36:52AM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
this is still buggy: \_test is exported well into latex, but
drawn wrong in mathed (as subscript).
Huh? Works for me. Try the
Angus Leeming wrote:
On Tuesday 22 January 2002 12:18 pm, Angus Leeming wrote:
Sure. What I was trying to say was that somehow the user should be able to
rotate the figure, scale it and chose only a part of it. Moreover, the
image
size in LyX should be specifiable independent of that
Herbert == Herbert Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Herbert Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Jürgen Vigna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Well I didn´t see the patch,
but I can imagine what you did. While I agree | that the pwidth can
be omited if the string is empty I don´t think we should | omit
Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lars We have been in a slush state regarding patches for a log time
Lars now. I belive we have fixed most of the really important
Lars problems now, so I want us to move to a near-full-freeze state.
Good.
Lars So... fix those bugs in
On Tuesday 22 January 2002 2:29 pm, Herbert Voss wrote:
I don't really understand the sense of the width/height/scale
for displaying in LyX. shouldn't this done by default depending
to the values on the left??
NO! I want to print an image on paper that's 15cm wide x 25cm high. I also
want
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
We have been in a slush state regarding patches for a log time now. I
belive we have fixed most of the really important problems now, so I
want us to move to a near-full-freeze state.
This means that patches that fix _anything_ that is not in Bugzilla
shall not
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 03:55:53PM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
but telle me, what is a bug? for example:
http://cvs.koziarski.com/show_bug.cgi?id=38
is not a bug, only a missing feature. And there are a lot of
them.
well the question is, can 1.2.0 be OK without this ? If so we can
remove
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 03:58:18PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
and it is marked as an enhancement right?
no, it's a bug because it's a regression from insetfig
So, not a bug. and I do not want anybody to even look at it for now.
i'll remove the milestone.
what about synchronous
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Because option 4 has no practial use, and it just bloats the dialog.
Another option is to support _per_document_ the option draft which,
among other things, would disable display of figures in this document
(and on print too, so this may not good for
this patch allows you to insert lyx files inside an inset, but it
doesn't update properly. what do I need to do ?
thanks
john
Index: BufferView2.C
===
RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/src/BufferView2.C,v
retrieving
Hi guys!
First, really thank you for your good work, I'm using LyX since 2 years
and I continue to love it more and more and I never stop to say to my
friends to use it ;-)
Ok... let's talk about something more serious. Maybe 9yes, Maybe0 i found
a little bug in Lyx 1.1.6 fix 4
do this:
-
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 04:08:56PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
then since no one is working on getting insetgraphics to work as well
as the old figinset we will have to revert to figinset.
not true, angus has some ideas and even some preliminary proof of concept code
1.2.0 proper is
On Tuesday 22 January 2002 3:08 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 03:58:18PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
and it is marked as an enhancement right?
| no, it's a bug because it's a regression from insetfig
Then it
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 04:09:52PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| + LyXText * text = getLyXText();
| +
Hmm, you shadow the class var? is that safe?
hmpph, I changed it to t and it got even worse
:gives up
john
--
The irony is that Bill Gates claims to be making a stable
Hi Jürgen.
First, I wanted to precize that the use of the word upset in my previous
mail was a (bad, I know) joke. I should remember that my english is too
bad to play with words.
May be some explanations will help you understand what I mean (Well, I
thought you used to read your LaTeX
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Tuesday 22 January 2002 3:08 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 03:58:18PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
and it is marked as an enhancement right?
| no,
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 03:40:53PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Herbert Remember that I never changed the read-code of the tabular.
Herbert So it's a good question, why to write a lot of code when it's
Herbert not important for reading???
Because if we decide in lyx 1.3.0 that some
On Tuesday 22 January 2002 3:19 pm, Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
I'm back to a stock system; none of the symlinks we used a few months
abo to deal with lib3/4 issues, which this kind of looks like.
Well it looks to me like your lib3/4 issues are warnings only. The problem
lies with these
On Tuesday 22 January 2002 15:20, Alain Castera wrote:
- I didn't checked that it was safe for SGML.
Don´t worry we don´t check this too we normaly give more work to José by
changes to the code, but he likes coding so he´s always happy if he can
add new stuff, isn´t it #:O)
Hi
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 03:44:39PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lars We have been in a slush state regarding patches for a log time
Lars now. I belive we have fixed most of the really important
Lars problems now, so I want us to
Herbert Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
any comments to the gui?
Seems ok, I especially like the Scale % thing.
How is the % of column width handled? Is it in Width/Height? Maybe
all the scaling could be combined?
And I don't quite like the |#x lables. They just look a bit messy.
Yours
Herbert Voss wrote:
any comments to the gui?
Just a few cosmetics (matter of taste, of course):
IMHO Enable is useless and unusual (compared to the other dialogs in
LyX). Natural Size - Custom Width/ Height - Scale, Subcaption, Dither
etc. are better and match the overall design. And Natural
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Herbert Remember that I never changed the read-code of the tabular.
Herbert So it's a good question, why to write a lot of code when it's
Herbert not important for reading???
Because if we decide in lyx 1.3.0 that some bool should be true by default
instead of
Thomas Steffen wrote:
Herbert Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
any comments to the gui?
Seems ok, I especially like the Scale % thing.
How is the % of column width handled? Is it in Width/Height? Maybe
all the scaling could be combined?
And I don't quite like the |#x lables. They
On Tuesday 22 January 2002 3:40 pm, Herbert Voss wrote:
any comments to the gui?
How about, it's messy?
More seriously, I think that we're getting there. You've added
* dither
* rotation origin
variables to your previous proposal.
I think that we should, in addition, have
* a way to specify
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 05:09:59PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| Also I made this cool little patch below that allows you to right
| click on a formula to bring up the math panel. But about unistd.h
| and usleep... so very C. Is there a better way for this?
Why sleep at all?
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
default ?
What could be done maybe is to output at the beginning things like
defaults
column alignment=center valignment=top leftline=true rightline=false
width=0pt special=
trow topline=true bottomline=true endhead=false endfirsthead=false
endfoot=false
Angus Leeming wrote:
More seriously, I think that we're getting there. You've added
* dither
* rotation origin
variables to your previous proposal.
I think that we should, in addition, have
* a way to specify the image size in LyX (separate to that of the output
image).
* a way to
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 05:22:32PM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
I can delete in a lyx file all blah=false all [length]=0 and
all [align]=center in the table sections. reading the original file
and the changed file makes no difference.
The same file format or not?
Such a change would only be
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 05:22:32PM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
I can delete in a lyx file all blah=false all [length]=0 and
all [align]=center in the table sections. reading the original file
and the changed file makes no difference.
The same file format or not?
Such a
On Tuesday 22 January 2002 4:23 pm, Martin Vermeer wrote:
| 2002-01-14 Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| * formulabase.C: math panel comes up 0.5 s after right mouse
| click on formula. Delay is to allow positioning of the panel.
better to make the panel
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 04:38:37PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
Dear Martin. No need to be so self-deprecating. We're all morons here!
:-)
Appreciated.
Anyway, the MathsPanel is derived from FormBaseDeprecated. The show() method
of this base class contains the code that defines where the
Huh.
I never had to do any of this to get it to compile and run on
Cygwin 1.3.6.
I wonder what the difference is?
---Kayvan
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 12:15:52PM +0100, Claus Hentschel wrote:
Attached is my patch against the sources to make Lyx running on Win32 using
Kayvan == Kayvan A Sylvan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Kayvan Huh.
Kayvan I never had to do any of this to get it to compile and run on
Kayvan Cygwin 1.3.6.
Kayvan I wonder what the difference is?
Most of these patches are included in 1.2.0cvs. My intent is to have
all necessary stuff in 1.2.0.
Martin == Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Martin The math panel differs from most other panels (tabular?) in
Martin that you want the object it is working on to be simultaneously
Martin visible!
So you open it with right click, and keep it open until you think it
annoying and keep it
Herbert == Herbert Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Herbert why is this save, when the logical structure of read()
Herbert doesn't notice that there are some values missing??
Yes, but read() may change in a year or two.
JMarc
Andre == Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andre On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 05:22:32PM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
I can delete in a lyx file all blah=false all [length]=0 and all
[align]=center in the table sections. reading the original file and
the changed file makes no difference. The
Dekel == Dekel Tsur [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dekel I don't see a reason why the default values should be changed.
Dekel When you create a table in 1.3.0, will every cell be a
Dekel multicolumn by default ?
No, but maybe for some reason, we'll decide that valignment is
center.
Or let's say we
Herbert == Herbert Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Herbert no, not from my point of view ...
Herbert I would like for an example and a 10x10 table \begin_inset
Herbert Tabular lyxtabular version=3 rows=10 columns=10
Herbert features column leftline column leftline column
Herbert leftline column
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Herbert == Herbert Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Herbert why is this save, when the logical structure of read()
Herbert doesn't notice that there are some values missing??
Yes, but read() may change in a year or two.
there may be other things changed too,
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Andre == Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andre On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 05:22:32PM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
I can delete in a lyx file all blah=false all [length]=0 and all
[align]=center in the table sections. reading the original file and
the changed
bpeng == bpeng [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
bpeng Bo Peng ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) entered the following feedback message
bpeng on the LyX home page:
bpeng
bpeng Wonderful job. Comparable to Scientific Workplace.
Thanks.
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 07:21:51PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Dekel == Dekel Tsur [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dekel I don't see a reason why the default values should be changed.
Dekel When you create a table in 1.3.0, will every cell be a
Dekel multicolumn by default ?
No, but
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 07:10:16PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Kayvan == Kayvan A Sylvan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Kayvan Huh.
Kayvan I never had to do any of this to get it to compile and run on
Kayvan Cygwin 1.3.6.
Kayvan I wonder what the difference is?
Most of these
John wrote:
1.2.0 proper is likely to be quite some time away (when we get deluged by
bugs on 1.2.0pre1)
Well, I'll try to get a bugzilla helper like ximian's or Eazel's (before
they popped). Ideally users will be able to submit the bugs directly
rather than posting them to a mailing list.
> "Herbert" == Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Herbert> we don't really have at this time a "defaulttab".
This is what happens when you create a new LyXTabular object, no?
Herbert> It makes
Herbert> sense for all options which are not of boolean and length.
Herbert> But
> "Zvezdan" == Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Zvezdan> What bothers me more is that OpenBSD port of LyX is marked
Zvezdan> broken in OpenBSD 3.0. Reason given: "does not build in any
Zvezdan> reproducible way". I plan to contact the port maintainer to
Zvezdan> see if fix4
On Monday 21 January 2002 8:27 pm, Herbert Voss wrote:
> what is the best way to tell lyx what to do with the images:
>
> display yes/no
> monochrom |
> gray | radio buttons
> color |
>
> 1. all in preferences - nothing in the gui
> 2. additional a "Display yes/no" in the graphic gui,
On Tue, 22 Jan 2002, Angus Leeming wrote:
> So, I'd change nothing in the dialog in this regard.
>
> Instead, I think we should ask what functionality the dialog should really
> end up having. My thoughts:
>
> Support the optional arguments of includegraphics to specify a section of the
>
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 08:36:52AM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
> > Improved patch.
> >
> > + Renders OK on-screen and in print, saves and loads OK
> > + Key sequences M-m ^ and M-m _ now work (hey, *almost* good enough :-)
> > - Still based on \hat. Horizontal positioning in screen rendering
Attached is my patch against the sources to make Lyx running on Win32 using
the Cygwin environment (release 1.3.6). Maybe someone is interested and this
patch will be included in future releases.
Some remarks to that patch:
1) lib/configure.m4 wasn't part of the sources tarball. I've picked
On Tuesday 22 January 2002 10:47 am, Herbert Voss wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Jan 2002, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> > So, I'd change nothing in the dialog in this regard.
> >
> > Instead, I think we should ask what functionality the dialog should really
> > end up having. My thoughts:
> >
> > Support the
On Tuesday 22 January 2002 12:18 pm, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Sure. What I was trying to say was that somehow the user should be able to
> rotate the figure, scale it and chose only a part of it. Moreover, the
image
> size in LyX should be specifiable independent of that in the paper output.
>
>
> Hi developpers.
Hi Alain!
> I was a little bit upset by a limitation in tabular : if you need
> columns of a given width (e.g. to format successive tables the same
> cannot set the H. alignement anymore, unless you do it cell by cell, or
> you have to write the whole preamble using "special
Angus Leeming wrote:
> I was thinking of something like this. Have I missed anything?
> A
Looks sensible (though the behaviour Herbert proposed - add buttons to
switch between natural size, custom height/width, scale and save those
values - makes a lot of sense IMHO).
If you are intending to
> - I appreciate any fix for the multicolumns table problem
> (see mail "Table and figure bugs")
I´m still waiting for an answer for this problem. I don´t know how
to fix the LaTeX code in the right way.
Jug
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
On Tuesday 22 January 2002 1:49 pm, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
> > I was thinking of something like this. Have I missed anything?
> > A
>
> Looks sensible (though the behaviour Herbert proposed - add buttons to
> switch between natural size, custom height/width, scale
Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 08:36:52AM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
>
> >>this is still buggy: \_test is exported well into latex, but
>>
>>drawn wrong in mathed (as subscript).
> Huh? Works for me. Try the attached test.
> created by M-m S-underscore t e s t in mathed
Jürgen Vigna wrote:
>> - I appreciate any fix for the multicolumns table problem
>>(see mail "Table and figure bugs")
>>
>
> I´m still waiting for an answer for this problem. I don´t know how
> to fix the LaTeX code in the right way.
is there a demofile for that?
Herbert
--
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> "Jürgen Vigna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Well I didn´t see the patch, but I can imagine what you did. While I agree
> | that the pwidth can be omited if the string is empty I don´t think we should
> | omit "booleans". I think we had this discussion already
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 03:01:51PM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 08:36:52AM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
> >
> > >>this is still buggy: \_test is exported well into latex, but
> >>
> >>drawn wrong in mathed (as subscript).
>
>
> > Huh? Works
Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Tuesday 22 January 2002 12:18 pm, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
>>Sure. What I was trying to say was that somehow the user should be able to
>>rotate the figure, scale it and chose only a part of it. Moreover, the
>>
> image
>
>>size in LyX should be specifiable
> "Herbert" == Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Herbert> Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> "Jürgen Vigna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Well I didn´t see the patch,
>> but I can imagine what you did. While I agree | that the pwidth can
>> be omited if the string is empty I don´t think we
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> We have been in a slush state regarding patches for a log time
Lars> now. I belive we have fixed most of the really important
Lars> problems now, so I want us to move to a near-full-freeze state.
Good.
Lars> So... fix those
On Tuesday 22 January 2002 2:29 pm, Herbert Voss wrote:
> I don't really understand the sense of the width/height/scale
>
> for displaying in LyX. shouldn't this done by default depending
> to the values on the left??
NO! I want to print an image on paper that's 15cm wide x 25cm high. I also
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> We have been in a slush state regarding patches for a log time now. I
> belive we have fixed most of the really important problems now, so I
> want us to move to a near-full-freeze state.
>
> This means that patches that fix _anything_ that is not in Bugzilla
>
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 03:55:53PM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
> but telle me, what is a bug? for example:
>
> http://cvs.koziarski.com/show_bug.cgi?id=38
>
> is not a bug, only a missing feature. And there are a lot of
> them.
well the question is, can 1.2.0 be OK without this ? If so we can
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 03:58:18PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> and it is marked as an enhancement right?
no, it's a bug because it's a regression from insetfig
> So, not a bug. and I do not want anybody to even look at it for now.
i'll remove the milestone.
what about synchronous
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> Because option 4 has no practial use, and it just bloats the dialog.
>
>
>
> Another option is to support _per_document_ the option draft which,
> among other things, would disable display of figures in this document
> (and on print too, so this may not good
this patch allows you to insert lyx files inside an inset, but it
doesn't update properly. what do I need to do ?
thanks
john
Index: BufferView2.C
===
RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/src/BufferView2.C,v
retrieving
Hi guys!
First, really thank you for your good work, I'm using LyX since 2 years
and I continue to love it more and more and I never stop to say to my
friends to use it ;-)
Ok... let's talk about something more serious. Maybe 9yes, Maybe0 i found
a little bug in Lyx 1.1.6 fix 4
do this:
-
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 04:08:56PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> then since no one is working on getting insetgraphics to work as well
> as the old figinset we will have to revert to figinset.
not true, angus has some ideas and even some preliminary proof of concept code
1.2.0 proper is
On Tuesday 22 January 2002 3:08 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 03:58:18PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> >
> >> and it is marked as an enhancement right?
> >
> | no, it's a bug because it's a regression from insetfig
>
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 04:09:52PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | + LyXText * text = getLyXText();
> | +
>
> Hmm, you shadow the class var? is that safe?
hmpph, I changed it to "t" and it got even worse
:gives up
john
--
"The irony is that Bill Gates claims to be making a stable
Hi Jürgen.
First, I wanted to precize that the use of the word "upset" in my previous
mail was a (bad, I know) joke. I should remember that my english is too
bad to play with words.
May be some explanations will help you understand what I mean (Well, I
thought you used to read your LaTeX
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Tuesday 22 January 2002 3:08 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>>>John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>
>>>| On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 03:58:18PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>>
>and it is marked as an
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 03:40:53PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Herbert> Remember that I never changed the read-code of the tabular.
> Herbert> So it's a good question, why to write a lot of code when it's
> Herbert> not important for reading???
>
> Because if we decide in lyx 1.3.0 that
On Tuesday 22 January 2002 3:19 pm, Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
> I'm back to a stock system; none of the symlinks we used a few months
> abo to deal with lib3/4 issues, which this kind of looks like.
Well it looks to me like your lib3/4 issues are warnings only. The problem
lies with these
>
On Tuesday 22 January 2002 15:20, Alain Castera wrote:
> > > - I didn't checked that it was safe for SGML.
> >
> > Don´t worry we don´t check this too we normaly give more work to José by
> > changes to the code, but he likes coding so he´s always happy if he can
> > add new stuff, isn´t
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 03:44:39PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Lars> We have been in a slush state regarding patches for a log time
> Lars> now. I belive we have fixed most of the really important
> Lars> problems
Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> any comments to the gui?
Seems ok, I especially like the "Scale %" thing.
How is the "% of column width" handled? Is it in Width/Height? Maybe
all the scaling could be combined?
And I don't quite like the |#x lables. They just look a bit messy.
Herbert Voss wrote:
> any comments to the gui?
Just a few cosmetics (matter of taste, of course):
IMHO "Enable" is useless and unusual (compared to the other dialogs in
LyX). Natural Size - Custom Width/ Height - Scale, Subcaption, Dither
etc. are better and match the overall design. And
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Herbert> Remember that I never changed the read-code of the tabular.
> Herbert> So it's a good question, why to write a lot of code when it's
> Herbert> not important for reading???
>
> Because if we decide in lyx 1.3.0 that some bool should be true by default
>
Thomas Steffen wrote:
> Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>>any comments to the gui?
>>
>
> Seems ok, I especially like the "Scale %" thing.
>
> How is the "% of column width" handled? Is it in Width/Height? Maybe
> all the scaling could be combined?
>
> And I don't quite like
On Tuesday 22 January 2002 3:40 pm, Herbert Voss wrote:
> any comments to the gui?
How about, "it's messy"?
More seriously, I think that we're getting there. You've added
* dither
* rotation origin
variables to your previous proposal.
I think that we should, in addition, have
* a way to
1 - 100 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
