Re: Support for boxes

2003-09-22 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 10:42:04PM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly: ... Returning to nit-picking mode: +InsetBox::InsetBox(BufferParams const bp, string const label) + : InsetCollapsable(bp) +{ + params_.type = label; + init(); + setButtonLabel(); +}

Re: Bug: Problem with Navigate menu and Branches

2003-09-22 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 01:53:08PM -0700, Kayvan A. Sylvan spake thusly: On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 07:40:08PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote: I don't really agree with limiting this. It certainly breaks the principle of least surprise. The Section numbering on-screen should just

Re: Latest CVS lyx compile error

2003-09-22 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 12:38:32AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes spake thusly: Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote: g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../lyx/src/frontends -I../../src -I../../../lyx/src/frontends/.. -I../../../lyx/boost -I/u/ksylvan/include

Re: Latest CVS: bindings messages, what are these?

2003-09-22 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Kayvan A. Sylvan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Run latest lyx-xforms, then click on File menu. The following messages | appear, though it seems to cause no problems: | No bindings for file-open(/home/Kayvan/foo.lyx) | No bindings for file-open(/home/Kayvan/src/fsmon/fsmon.lyx) ... They are not

Re: Latest CVS lyx compile error

2003-09-22 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | I couldn't care less. Talk to my compiler ;-) I think it is too old and grumpy. You should upgrade. -- Lgb

Re: Support for boxes

2003-09-22 Thread Angus Leeming
On Monday 22 September 2003 6:26 am, Martin Vermeer wrote: Question. Why doesn't InsetBoxMailer::string2params set the type It does... Hmmm. Could this be simplified? Yes! Like this case LFUN_INSET_MODIFY: { InsetNoteMailer::string2params(cmd.argument, params_);

Re: Latest CVS lyx compile error

2003-09-22 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 08:58:54AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes spake thusly: Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | I couldn't care less. Talk to my compiler ;-) I think it is too old and grumpy. You should upgrade. -- Lgb Yeah yeah yeah. Carthago est delendam. Don't you

Re: Support for boxes

2003-09-22 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 08:34:25AM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly: On Monday 22 September 2003 6:26 am, Martin Vermeer wrote: Question. Why doesn't InsetBoxMailer::string2params set the type It does... Hmmm. Could this be simplified? Yes! Like this case LFUN_INSET_MODIFY: {

Pseudo actions

2003-09-22 Thread Michael Schmitt
Hi, just for the curious ones: What are/were pseudo actions? Michael

Re: One for the LaTeX masters

2003-09-22 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 01:46:35PM -0400, Kuba Ober wrote: I guess if you play pipe organs you can pay Prof. Knuth an unannounced visit :) I don't. But seriously, if you can think of improvements and how to implement them in terms of what's written in the bible (The TexBook), esp. wrt the

Re: [PATCH] scrclass.inc

2003-09-22 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 12:00:39PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: The attached patch uses the new counter code to finally add KOMA's addchap and addsec to the navigation menu. Furthermore, it fixes the order of Inputs. André's change has broken the font redefinition (i.e., Chapter*,

Re: [patch] More refinemens LyXAction, kb_action and friends

2003-09-22 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 12:46:29AM +0100, John Levon wrote: No, this latest patch fixes it and the first one did not introduce it. Hmm, then what am I left with to complain about ! Maybe you could just complain about nothing being left to complain about... [Although this is a thing I'd call

Re: Pseudo actions

2003-09-22 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Michael Schmitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Hi, | just for the curious ones: What are/were pseudo actions? All lyx functions (LFUN) has assigned a hardcoded number. This number is used for running a specific action. A pseudo action is a combination of an LFUN and its arguments, and a number is

Re: Bug: Problem with Navigate menu and Branches

2003-09-22 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 09:31:58AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote: I don't know. Is there some way of making the Chapter/Section numbering global to the document instead of local to the insets? I really don't know the code, so I'm just tossing out ideas. Hmmm. LyX kernel experts? What about

Re: Latest CVS lyx compile error

2003-09-22 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 08:58:54AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | I couldn't care less. Talk to my compiler ;-) I think it is too old and grumpy. You should upgrade. Btw when will Lgb 2.0 ship? The one we have now is certainly too old and

Re: Latest CVS lyx compile error

2003-09-22 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 08:58:54AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | I couldn't care less. Talk to my compiler ;-) I think it is too old and grumpy. You should upgrade. | Btw when will Lgb 2.0 ship? |

make xx.pox doesn't work

2003-09-22 Thread dooteo
Hi folks, Trying to get an update po file to be translated using (as README said): $ make eu.pox doesn't work. It said: make: *** No rule to make target 'eu.pox'. Stop. Trying another (perhaps old) way: cd po; cp POTFILES.in ../; cd ../ xgettext --default-domain=luyx --add-comments

InsetExternal and transformations

2003-09-22 Thread Angus Leeming
I've been trying to get a feel for what would be needed to transform InsetExternal. First, what do we do with InsetGraphics? LaTeX export from InsetGraphics makes use of the graphicx package, which regards all these transformations as options to the \includegraphics call. Here is what we

Re: [PATCH] Initial support for the memoir class

2003-09-22 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: I have set up a first version of a layout file for Peter Wilson's memoir class. OK, André has commited this to 1.4. Can someone with lyxdoc write access please commit the patch to Extended.lyx (memoir-doc.diff)? Thanks, Juergen.

Re: [PATCH] Initial support for the memoir class

2003-09-22 Thread Angus Leeming
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: I have set up a first version of a layout file for Peter Wilson's memoir class. OK, André has committed this to 1.4. Can someone with lyxdoc write access please commit the patch to Extended.lyx (memoir-doc.diff)? Just a thought, but

Re: Support for boxes

2003-09-22 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 10:42:04PM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly: Returning to nit-picking mode: Do I infer correctly that discussion-in-principle-whether-this-is-a-good-idea-at-all-mode has been turned off? Anyway, new version. Only the ControlBox/FormBox stuff still missing, but should

Re: [patch] More refinemens LyXAction, kb_action and friends

2003-09-22 Thread John Levon
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 10:24:11AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 12:46:29AM +0100, John Levon wrote: No, this latest patch fixes it and the first one did not introduce it. Hmm, then what am I left with to complain about ! Maybe you could just complain about

Re: [PATCH] Initial support for the memoir class

2003-09-22 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: I have set up a first version of a layout file for Peter Wilson's memoir class. OK, André has committed this to 1.4. Can someone with lyxdoc write access please commit the patch to

Re: Support for boxes

2003-09-22 Thread Angus Leeming
On Monday 22 September 2003 10:37 am, Martin Vermeer wrote: On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 10:42:04PM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly: Returning to nit-picking mode: Do I infer correctly that discussion-in-principle-whether-this-is-a-good-idea-at-all-mode has been turned off? Support for new

Re: [PATCH] Initial support for the memoir class

2003-09-22 Thread Angus Leeming
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: If I see a lot of people wanting to contribute to the docs then I'll change it. Or are you feeling left out? Not at all. A bit guilty maybe. Given the number of users asking questions about graphics... I also note that we have three separate documentation

Re: [PATCH] Initial support for the memoir class

2003-09-22 Thread John Levon
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 12:17:27PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: * lyx-doc; effectively dead, or at least showing no signs of life. This is perhaps a little unfair ... current CVS is now relatively up to date. OK, so there's no maintainership as such, but ... little tweaks go a long way regards

Re: InsetExternal and transformations

2003-09-22 Thread Angus Leeming
Angus Leeming wrote: How about XFIG? Well, I admit that I have no idea how to rotate an XFIG image with LaTeX text. I have tried \rotatebox, \usepackage{rotating} \begin{sideways}\include{my_figure.pstex_t}\end{sideways} I even tried wrapping it in a minipage. In all cases, the eps

Re: [PATCH] Initial support for the memoir class

2003-09-22 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: If I see a lot of people wanting to contribute to the docs then I'll change it. Or are you feeling left out? | Not at all. A bit guilty maybe. Given the number of users asking questions | about graphics... | I also note

Re: [PATCH] Initial support for the memoir class

2003-09-22 Thread Angus Leeming
John Levon wrote: On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 12:17:27PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: * lyx-doc; effectively dead, or at least showing no signs of life. This is perhaps a little unfair ... current CVS is now relatively up to date. OK, so there's no maintainership as such, but ... little

Re: [PATCH] Initial support for the memoir class

2003-09-22 Thread John Levon
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 12:50:06PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: My apologies. Incidentally, I really like my idea of a whats_new_1_4_x.lyx that is clickable from splash.lyx which in turn pops up automatically the first time the user uses the newly installed version. So do I. How about

Re: Support for boxes

2003-09-22 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 12:12:46PM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly: On Monday 22 September 2003 10:37 am, Martin Vermeer wrote: On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 10:42:04PM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly: Returning to nit-picking mode: Do I infer correctly that

Re: Support for boxes

2003-09-22 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Martin Vermeer wrote: Colorbox would be nice too, but I want to see first what Jürgen has in mind for character colours (i.e., general LaTeX colours support.) Don't hold your breath, Martin. Although I have submitted my PH.D. thesis few weeks ago, I am already snowed with real work :-(

Re: Support for boxes

2003-09-22 Thread Angus Leeming
On Monday 22 September 2003 12:16 pm, Martin Vermeer wrote: About the LaTeX stuff here BTW I noticed one unfortunate thing. If you try to redefine fboxsep in the preamble, it ends up after the fboxwidth definition... should I make that rather a newcommand? Then it is called from the inset

Re: Support for boxes

2003-09-22 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Martin == Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Martin This patch adds support for rectangular frames containing one Martin or more paragraphs of text, at the width of the column, using Martin the Note infrastructure. Why hardcoding the width?? Not everybody wants to to have boxen with these

Re: Support for boxes

2003-09-22 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Angus On Monday 22 September 2003 12:16 pm, Martin Vermeer wrote: About the LaTeX stuff here BTW I noticed one unfortunate thing. If you try to redefine fboxsep in the preamble, it ends up after the fboxwidth definition... should I make that

Re: Support for boxes

2003-09-22 Thread Angus Leeming
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: I am not sure that we will be easy to do this in a clean way. I fear that for some people, the thing you think should be before user preamble should actually be another place for their usage pattern. We should try to get these things as straightforward as possible.

Re: One for the LaTeX masters

2003-09-22 Thread Kuba Ober
But seriously, if you can think of improvements and how to implement them in terms of what's written in the bible (The TexBook), esp. wrt the TeX's digestive tract structure which should remain intact -- I'd love to hear it. That's the problem. The whole idea of the digestive tract is

Re: Support for boxes

2003-09-22 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 01:50:30PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: How about a Preamble dialog (or pane) that displayed the stuff that LyX was auto-inserting too. These lines would be displayed in a different colour and could not be deleted. However, if the user hit the 'Return' button when the

Re: One for the LaTeX masters

2003-09-22 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 08:51:20AM -0400, Kuba Ober wrote: That's the problem. The whole idea of the digestive tract is broken in my not so humble opinion. Uhm, OK, so you're really looking at reimplementing something that gives you TeX power yet is more sane to use. Well, I am not. I am

Re: One for the LaTeX masters

2003-09-22 Thread Kuba Ober
Uhm, OK, so you're really looking at reimplementing something that gives you TeX power yet is more sane to use. Well, I am not. I am just not calling TeX (the language, not the typesetting as such) 'the best thing since sliced bread'... Obviously it's not. About the only seriously good

Re: One for the LaTeX masters

2003-09-22 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 09:30:02AM -0400, Kuba Ober wrote: Obviously it's not. About the only seriously good thing about TeX, actually a thing that has been kept broken for ages by designers of onscreen and printed renderings in Windows and typical X-based systems, is that dimensions are

Re: Support for boxes

2003-09-22 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 02:53:54PM +0200, Andre Poenitz spake thusly: On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 01:50:30PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: How about a Preamble dialog (or pane) that displayed the stuff that LyX was auto-inserting too. These lines would be displayed in a different colour and

Re: Support for boxes

2003-09-22 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 02:33:47PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes spake thusly: Martin == Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Martin This patch adds support for rectangular frames containing one Martin or more paragraphs of text, at the width of the column, using Martin the Note

Re: Support for boxes

2003-09-22 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Martin == Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: - set a width (which could be columnwidth) Martin The two most popular widths will be (corrected) \columnwidth Martin and adaptive (i.e., don't put a parbox inside the fbox). I Martin was considering at least having that in the Box dialog. But

Re: [PATCH] Initial support for the memoir class

2003-09-22 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Juergen == Juergen Spitzmueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Juergen Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: I have set up a first version of a layout file for Peter Wilson's memoir class. Juergen OK, André has commited this to 1.4. Can someone with lyxdoc Juergen write access please commit the patch to

Re: lyx 1.3.2: extended, ijmpd

2003-09-22 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Hartmut == Hartmut Haase [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hartmut There is no ijmpd.lyx template yet. Oops! My fault. The file is present on the 1.2.x branch, but I forgot to propagate it. This is fixed now. Thanks. JMarc

Re: InsetInclude: wherefore now?

2003-09-22 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: As far as the code reduction is concerned these are a few dozens of lines of trivial code, which do not cause any maintainance headache, as far as I remember... Angus Well, apart from the fact that I have just spent 10 hours Angus getting it

Re: [PATCH] Initial support for the memoir class

2003-09-22 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: I did it. Merci beaucoup! Concerning 1.3.3, if you are confident that you will not to make incompatible changes as the class matures (the risk seems low and adding new stuff later is OK), then I would accept a patch for 1.3.3. We could also decide to wait a bit

Re: [patch] unneeded full rebreak

2003-09-22 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
John == John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: John On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 10:24:30AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes John wrote: I think we should start backporting stuff to 1.3.x What stuff are you thinking about? John I'm not sure yet. At least some of the Qt dialog cleanups are John relatively

Re: Support for boxes

2003-09-22 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 04:10:42PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes spake thusly: Martin == Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: - set a width (which could be columnwidth) Martin The two most popular widths will be (corrected) \columnwidth Martin and adaptive (i.e., don't put a parbox

Re: Support for boxes

2003-09-22 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Martin == Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Could also be fixed width or 'twice the natural size of this text' (like latex2e allows) or 'make the box square'... Martin Sure. Some easy, some not so easy. But ask the UI folks first Martin :-) Those are chosen to be easy examples. See

Re: Support for boxes

2003-09-22 Thread Angus Leeming
Martin Vermeer wrote: Getting better all the time... see attached. and why are you blaming me for your code ? + * \author Angus Leeming -- Angus

lyxfont problem

2003-09-22 Thread Martin Vermeer
Angus, I still need lyxfont.h in paragraph and paragraph_pimpl as follows: Index: paragraph.C === RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/src/paragraph.C,v retrieving revision 1.326 diff -u -p -r1.326 paragraph.C --- paragraph.C

Re: Support for boxes

2003-09-22 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 05:08:16PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote: On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 02:53:54PM +0200, Andre Poenitz spake thusly: What's the real world problem you are currently trying to solve? The one the (tested, working) solution of which is the following: (lyx_sty.C) string

Re: Support for boxes

2003-09-22 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 05:10:59PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes spake thusly: Martin == Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Could also be fixed width or 'twice the natural size of this text' (like latex2e allows) or 'make the box square'... Martin Sure. Some easy, some not so

Re: Support for boxes

2003-09-22 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 04:13:18PM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly: Martin Vermeer wrote: Getting better all the time... see attached. and why are you blaming me for your code ? + * \author Angus Leeming -- Angus One day you'll be grateful ;-) Okay, okay, ... - M pgp0.pgp

Re: Support for boxes

2003-09-22 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 05:22:09PM +0200, Andre Poenitz spake thusly: In fact I'd think something along the lines of \usepackage{fancybox} \usepackage{calc} \par\fbox{\parbox{\columnwidth-2\fboxsep-2\fboxrule}{}} \par\ovalbox{\parbox{\columnwidth-2\fboxsep-0.8pt}{}} might be

Re: lyxfont problem

2003-09-22 Thread Angus Leeming
On Monday 22 September 2003 3:36 pm, Martin Vermeer wrote: Angus, I still need lyxfont.h in paragraph and paragraph_pimpl as follows: The fix is really nasty (read fragile). Especially the position-dependence in paragraph.C. Could we dig a little deeper first and ascertain what exactly is

Too good an oportunity to miss?

2003-09-22 Thread Angus Leeming
Lars, I reckon that this is your chance to do some evangelizing on LyX's behalf... RE: BoostBook http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel/25474 -- Angus

Re: Too good an oportunity to miss?

2003-09-22 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Lars, I reckon that this is your chance to do some evangelizing on LyX's | behalf... I'll leave the honours for you. -- Lgb

Re: Support for boxes

2003-09-22 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Martin == Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Martin OK, so minipage must be provided at least. ... and in a way that replaces the minipage inset. Martin Eventually, why not. I think this is something that we have to do to keep the UI coherent. You want to make sure that the size

Re: Too good an oportunity to miss?

2003-09-22 Thread Angus Leeming
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Lars, I reckon that this is your chance to do some evangelizing on | LyX's behalf... I'll leave the honours for you. Nah. You're the guy at the top of the tree. -- Angus

Re: [PATCH] Initial support for the memoir class

2003-09-22 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Juergen == Juergen Spitzmueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Juergen Anyway, appended is the patch for your graceful decision. The Juergen Extended patch you have should also apply to the 1.3 branch, Juergen I guess. Thanks. I applied both. JMarc

Re: lyxfont problem

2003-09-22 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 04:56:04PM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly: On Monday 22 September 2003 3:36 pm, Martin Vermeer wrote: Angus, I still need lyxfont.h in paragraph and paragraph_pimpl as follows: The fix is really nasty (read fragile). Especially the position-dependence in

Re: lyxfont problem

2003-09-22 Thread Angus Leeming
On Monday 22 September 2003 5:24 pm, Martin Vermeer wrote: On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 04:56:04PM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly: On Monday 22 September 2003 3:36 pm, Martin Vermeer wrote: Angus, I still need lyxfont.h in paragraph and paragraph_pimpl as follows: The fix is really

Re: lyxfont problem

2003-09-22 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 06:13:52PM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly: ... Attached. Ahh. Then we need a destructor to Paragraph::Pimpl that is defined out of line I think. No need for Paragraph itself to know anything about this. Try: paragraph_pimpl.h: struct Paragraph::Pimpl {

Re: Too good an oportunity to miss?

2003-09-22 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Lars, I reckon that this is your chance to do some evangelizing on | LyX's behalf... I'll leave the honours for you. | Nah. You're the guy at the top of the tree. But not a

Re: lyxfont problem

2003-09-22 Thread Angus Leeming
Martin Vermeer wrote: Attached my patch (did I get it right?) and the error output. Almost ;-) What I meant when I said the original was nasty was that it was a fragile solution. The code compiled if you positioned #include lyxfont.h in paragraph.C in one position and not if it were

Re: lyxfont problem

2003-09-22 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 07:07:53PM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly: Martin Vermeer wrote: Attached my patch (did I get it right?) and the error output. Almost ;-) What I meant when I said the original was nasty was that it was a fragile solution. The code compiled if you positioned

Re: lyxfont problem

2003-09-22 Thread Angus Leeming
Martin Vermeer wrote: On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 07:07:53PM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly: Martin Vermeer wrote: Attached my patch (did I get it right?) and the error output. Almost ;-) What I meant when I said the original was nasty was that it was a fragile solution. The code

Re: lyxfont problem

2003-09-22 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 08:18:08PM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly: shrug. Fair enough. If the container is complaining that it needs LyXFont, then maybe we should believe it. Perhaps paragraph_pimpl.h itself is inconsistent on your box. Ie, it wouldn't compile on its own. I attach the

Re: lyxfont problem

2003-09-22 Thread Angus Leeming
On Monday 22 September 2003 8:01 pm, Martin Vermeer wrote: On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 08:18:08PM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly: shrug. Fair enough. If the container is complaining that it needs LyXFont, then maybe we should believe it. Perhaps paragraph_pimpl.h itself is inconsistent on

Re: Support for boxes

2003-09-22 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 05:10:59PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes spake thusly: ... Martin OK, so minipage must be provided at least. ... and in a way that replaces the minipage inset. ... The corrections for oval box seem even worse. Concerning oval box, we have to wonder: do we

Re: Support for boxes

2003-09-22 Thread Angus Leeming
Martin Vermeer wrote: BTW is there a 'cvs subtract' to cancel a 'cvs add'? No, but if you open CVS/Entries in the appropriate dir, find the file you've added and remove that line, then who's to know ;-) (Ie, cvs add is just a local command. No change to the repository at all.) -- Angus

Re: One for the LaTeX masters

2003-09-22 Thread Angus Leeming
On Monday 22 September 2003 2:39 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: %% Do command #1 if file #2 exists, else print a warning \newcommand{\DoOrWarn}[2]{ \IfFileExists{#2}{#1{#2}}{\warnNotFound{#2}} } Guess what? I got greedy! I'm trying to write a design document describing how to implement

Re: One for the LaTeX masters

2003-09-22 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Angus Guys, the attached file works well enough, but it's rather Angus inelegant. I have defined a macro, so: Angus, I am not sure what was the concusion of this thread, but let me propose a \DoOrWarn variant: %% Do command #1 if file #2 exists,

Re: One for the LaTeX masters

2003-09-22 Thread Angus Leeming
On Monday 22 September 2003 2:39 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Angus Guys, the attached file works well enough, but it's rather Angus inelegant. I have defined a macro, so: Angus, I am not sure what was the concusion of this thread, but let

Re: Support for boxes

2003-09-22 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 10:42:04PM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly: ... > Returning to nit-picking mode: > > +InsetBox::InsetBox(BufferParams const & bp, string const & label) > + : InsetCollapsable(bp) > +{ > + params_.type = label; > + init(); > + setButtonLabel();

Re: Bug: Problem with "Navigate" menu and Branches

2003-09-22 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 01:53:08PM -0700, Kayvan A. Sylvan spake thusly: > > On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 07:40:08PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote: > > > > > > I don't really agree with limiting this. > > > > > > It certainly breaks the principle of least surprise. > > > > > > The Section numbering

Re: Latest CVS lyx compile error

2003-09-22 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 12:38:32AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes spake thusly: > > Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote: > > > >> g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../lyx/src/frontends -I../../src > >> -I../../../lyx/src/frontends/.. -I../../../lyx/boost

Re: Latest CVS: bindings messages, what are these?

2003-09-22 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
"Kayvan A. Sylvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Run latest lyx-xforms, then click on File menu. The following messages | appear, though it seems to cause no problems: > | No bindings for file-open(/home/Kayvan/foo.lyx) | No bindings for file-open(/home/Kayvan/src/fsmon/fsmon.lyx) ... They are

Re: Latest CVS lyx compile error

2003-09-22 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | I couldn't care less. Talk to my compiler ;-) I think it is too old and grumpy. You should upgrade. -- Lgb

Re: Support for boxes

2003-09-22 Thread Angus Leeming
On Monday 22 September 2003 6:26 am, Martin Vermeer wrote: > > Question. Why doesn't InsetBoxMailer::string2params set the "type" > > It does... Hmmm. Could this be simplified? Yes! Like this > > case LFUN_INSET_MODIFY: { > InsetNoteMailer::string2params(cmd.argument, params_); >

Re: Latest CVS lyx compile error

2003-09-22 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 08:58:54AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes spake thusly: > > Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > | I couldn't care less. Talk to my compiler ;-) > > I think it is too old and grumpy. You should upgrade. > > -- > Lgb Yeah yeah yeah. Carthago est

Re: Support for boxes

2003-09-22 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 08:34:25AM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly: > On Monday 22 September 2003 6:26 am, Martin Vermeer wrote: > > > Question. Why doesn't InsetBoxMailer::string2params set the "type" > > > > It does... Hmmm. Could this be simplified? Yes! Like this > > > > case

Pseudo actions

2003-09-22 Thread Michael Schmitt
Hi, just for the curious ones: What are/were pseudo actions? Michael

Re: One for the LaTeX masters

2003-09-22 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 01:46:35PM -0400, Kuba Ober wrote: > I guess if you play pipe organs you can pay Prof. Knuth an > unannounced visit :) I don't. > But seriously, if you can think of improvements and how to implement > them in terms of what's written in the bible (The TexBook), esp. wrt >

Re: [PATCH] scrclass.inc

2003-09-22 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 12:00:39PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > The attached patch uses the new counter code to finally add KOMA's addchap and > addsec to the navigation menu. Furthermore, it fixes the order of Inputs. > André's change has broken the font redefinition (i.e., Chapter*,

Re: [patch] More refinemens LyXAction, kb_action and friends

2003-09-22 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 12:46:29AM +0100, John Levon wrote: > > No, this latest patch fixes it and the first one did not introduce it. > > Hmm, then what am I left with to complain about ! Maybe you could just complain about nothing being left to complain about... [Although this is a thing I'd

Re: Pseudo actions

2003-09-22 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Michael Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Hi, > | just for the curious ones: What are/were pseudo actions? All lyx functions (LFUN) has assigned a hardcoded number. This number is used for running a specific action. A pseudo action is a combination of an LFUN and its arguments, and a number

Re: Bug: Problem with "Navigate" menu and Branches

2003-09-22 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 09:31:58AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote: > > I don't know. Is there some way of making the Chapter/Section numbering > > global to the document instead of local to the insets? I really don't > > know the code, so I'm just tossing out ideas. > > Hmmm. LyX kernel experts?

Re: Latest CVS lyx compile error

2003-09-22 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 08:58:54AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > | I couldn't care less. Talk to my compiler ;-) > > I think it is too old and grumpy. You should upgrade. Btw when will Lgb 2.0 ship? The one we have now is certainly too

Re: Latest CVS lyx compile error

2003-09-22 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 08:58:54AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> >> | I couldn't care less. Talk to my compiler ;-) >> >> I think it is too old and grumpy. You should upgrade. > | Btw when will

make xx.pox doesn't work

2003-09-22 Thread dooteo
Hi folks, Trying to get an update po file to be translated using (as README said): $ make eu.pox doesn't work. It said: "make: *** No rule to make target 'eu.pox'. Stop." Trying another (perhaps old) way: cd po; cp POTFILES.in ../; cd ../ xgettext --default-domain=luyx --add-comments

InsetExternal and transformations

2003-09-22 Thread Angus Leeming
I've been trying to get a feel for what would be needed to "transform" InsetExternal. First, what do we do with InsetGraphics? LaTeX export from InsetGraphics makes use of the graphicx package, which regards all these transformations as options to the \includegraphics call. Here is what we

Re: [PATCH] Initial support for the memoir class

2003-09-22 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > I have set up a first version of a layout file for Peter Wilson's memoir > class. OK, André has commited this to 1.4. Can someone with lyxdoc write access please commit the patch to Extended.lyx (memoir-doc.diff)? Thanks, Juergen.

Re: [PATCH] Initial support for the memoir class

2003-09-22 Thread Angus Leeming
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: >> I have set up a first version of a layout file for Peter Wilson's memoir >> class. > > OK, André has committed this to 1.4. Can someone with lyxdoc write access > please commit the patch to Extended.lyx (memoir-doc.diff)? Just a

Re: Support for boxes

2003-09-22 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 10:42:04PM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly: > > Returning to nit-picking mode: Do I infer correctly that discussion-in-principle-whether-this-is-a-good-idea-at-all-mode has been turned off? Anyway, new version. Only the ControlBox/FormBox stuff still missing, but

Re: [patch] More refinemens LyXAction, kb_action and friends

2003-09-22 Thread John Levon
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 10:24:11AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 12:46:29AM +0100, John Levon wrote: > > > No, this latest patch fixes it and the first one did not introduce it. > > > > Hmm, then what am I left with to complain about ! > > Maybe you could just complain

Re: [PATCH] Initial support for the memoir class

2003-09-22 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > >> Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: >>> I have set up a first version of a layout file for Peter Wilson's memoir >>> class. >> >> OK, André has committed this to 1.4. Can someone with lyxdoc write access >> please commit the

  1   2   >