Re: sub-figures and labelling on 1.6.0beta4 + the-wheel-of-doom

2008-08-20 Thread Christopher Reeve
Hi, Ok here are the LyX snippets (including the file headers). Cheers, Chris. *Before:* #LyX 1.5.6 created this file. For more info see http://www.lyx.org/ \lyxformat 276 \begin_document \begin_header \textclass report \begin_preamble \usepackage{hyperref} \usepackage{varioref }

Re: LyX/Mac troubles: Please test!

2008-08-20 Thread Konrad Hofbauer
Hi Anders Anders Ekberg wrote: Concerning t1 (where you said in a previous post that it works): No, what worked was that I saw nothing of the other bug. So everything was a misunderstanding then? Let me then summarize again: For you, none of the four versions gives you a Swedish LyX (which

Re: LyX/Mac troubles: Please test!

2008-08-20 Thread Anders Ekberg
On 20 aug 2008, at 19.55, Konrad Hofbauer wrote: Hi Anders Anders Ekberg wrote: Concerning t1 (where you said in a previous post that it works): No, what worked was that I saw nothing of the other bug. So everything was a misunderstanding then? Let me then summarize again: For you, none of

Re: sub-figures and labelling on 1.6.0beta4 + the-wheel-of-doom

2008-08-20 Thread Christopher Reeve
Hi, Ok here are the LyX snippets (including the file headers). Cheers, Chris. *Before:* #LyX 1.5.6 created this file. For more info see http://www.lyx.org/ \lyxformat 276 \begin_document \begin_header \textclass report \begin_preamble \usepackage{hyperref} \usepackage{varioref }

Re: LyX/Mac troubles: Please test!

2008-08-20 Thread Konrad Hofbauer
Hi Anders Anders Ekberg wrote: Concerning t1 (where you said in a previous post that it works): No, what worked was that I saw nothing of the other bug. So everything was a misunderstanding then? Let me then summarize again: For you, none of the four versions gives you a Swedish LyX (which

Re: LyX/Mac troubles: Please test!

2008-08-20 Thread Anders Ekberg
On 20 aug 2008, at 19.55, Konrad Hofbauer wrote: Hi Anders Anders Ekberg wrote: Concerning t1 (where you said in a previous post that it works): No, what worked was that I saw nothing of the other bug. So everything was a misunderstanding then? Let me then summarize again: For you, none of