On Sunday 23 August 2009 17:16:24 LyX Ticket Tracker wrote:
> #6174: Insert and Edit buttons for outline mode
> -+-
>- Reporter: stevelitt| Owner: nob...@…
> Type: enhancement | Status: new
> Priority:
> Please report any problems.
Hartmut pointed me today to this regression to LyX 1.6.3:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/6175
I think it it not that problematic to hold back LyX 1.6.4.
regards Uwe
Hello Enrico,
thanks for your documentation addition/update. Nevertheless your commit makes it hard to keep the
documentation up to date. Can you therefore please use changetracking for all changes you make in
the documentation files. The file maintainer will proof-read your change and will upd
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> I'm trying to set up 1.6.4.
Branch remains frozen now until the regression on the Mac reported by Anders
is sorted out. It looks like we'll have to release a LyX 1.6.4.1, which will
only fix this very bug.
Please refrain from committing anything to branch for the tim
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 9:48 AM, Anders Ekberg wrote:
> On 23 aug 2009, at 15.31, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
>>>
The crucial question for me is now, if these dialogs can only be
accessed if a
buffer is loaded or if they cannot be accessed at all on the Mac.
If the latter
On 23 aug 2009, at 15.31, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
The crucial question for me is now, if these dialogs can only be
accessed if a
buffer is loaded or if they cannot be accessed at all on the Mac.
If the latter, we need to release a LyX 1.6.4.1 for Mac users
really soon, if
the former,
The crucial question for me is now, if these dialogs can only be
accessed if a
buffer is loaded or if they cannot be accessed at all on the Mac.
If the latter, we need to release a LyX 1.6.4.1 for Mac users really
soon, if
the former, the issue is less pressing.
In my case they can't be ac
Anders Ekberg wrote:
> In my case they can't be accessed at all.
I see. So I propose to either fix the issue or revert the respective change
and release LyX 1.6.4.1. Since only the Mac seems to be concerned, we would
just need to replace the current 1.6.4 Mac binary by a 1.6.4.1 binary. Other
p
On 23 aug 2009, at 13.15, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Yes, I goofed. What we miss is a good way to separate document-
related
dialogs from
non-document ones. Maybe two different lfuns would be useful.
The crucial question for me is now, if these dialogs can only be
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Yes, I goofed. What we miss is a good way to separate document-related
> dialogs from
> non-document ones. Maybe two different lfuns would be useful.
The crucial question for me is now, if these dialogs can only be accessed if a
buffer is loaded or if they cannot be
Le 23/08/2009 12:59, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit :
I'm not sure I understand your elaborations. We have some dialogs (such as
prefs, aboutlyx, texinfo) that are supposed to be enabled if no buffer is
loaded, and it's perfectly sane to do this.
I suspected this was (unintentionally) changed by Jea
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> So, if there is no view (that
> is if no buffer is open, right ?), then no menu option that shows a
> dialog would be enabled, but that would also be the case without this
> change.
I'm not sure I understand your elaborations. We have some dialogs (such as
prefs,
Jürgen Spitzmüller schreef:
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Maybe lyx_view_->hasFocus() returns something bogus on Mac ?
Hm, but according to the comment, only the buffer- or view-related items are
to be disabled. And prefs and aboutlyx are both not of that kind. So maybe the
disabling
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> Jürgen, you can find a cygwin binary here:
> http://file.webalice.it
Thanks, it's up.
Jürgen
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> Maybe lyx_view_->hasFocus() returns something bogus on Mac ?
Hm, but according to the comment, only the buffer- or view-related items are
to be disabled. And prefs and aboutlyx are both not of that kind. So maybe the
disabling method is too general.
Does the prob
15 matches
Mail list logo
