Uwe Stöhr wrote:
I guess the fix is simple:
- When the LaTeX code of an item label contains the character [ but not
\[, embrace the whole item label.
I can have a look to provide a patch soon, but cannot promise it due to
lack of spare time.
I think we should do nothing in case of
On Tuesday 10 November 2009 08:54:13 Guenter Milde wrote:
I am trying to reply since yesterday morning so better to send some snippets
than not to reply at all. :-)
I like the patch and I will try to give some of the reasons why the original
code was as it was.
Some explanations:
*
On Friday 13 November 2009 13:21:36 rgheck wrote:
Oh, I see. I was concentrating on the fact that, if we don't have LaTeX,
then export to DVI will not be available.
Now that I see the issue, I think this is easy enough to do. You're
right about the outlines of the thing.
Is there a
On Sunday 08 November 2009 02:00:01 rgheck wrote:
I think Jose has been working on it here and there, but very much behind
the scenes. My own view is that we should do one of these two things, or
both:
After some of the current ultra-super-mega busy period is over I will post the
code I
On 14/11/2009 16:25, rgh...@lyx.org wrote:
Author: rgheck
Date: Sat Nov 14 16:25:32 2009
New Revision: 31979
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/31979
Log:
Get MathML output for XHTML working a bit.
Turns out MathML is already here, for the most part, so this will
not be too bad at all.
On 11/14/2009 11:01 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
On 14/11/2009 16:25, rgh...@lyx.org wrote:
Author: rgheck
Date: Sat Nov 14 16:25:32 2009
New Revision: 31979
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/31979
Log:
Get MathML output for XHTML working a bit.
Turns out MathML is already here, for the
I wrote:
I can use the special package handling like for arydshln in the
EmbeddedObjects manual. Then the document would always be compilable,
but you won't see sec. 20 in the output. Should I do this?
Of course I have to do this since mhchem is not in the standard/basic installation of
Yokota K. wrote:
Thank you! It's honorable for me, but I feel like my contributions
need to be checked by someone else. I think it'd be safer that I
continue posting staying at current status ;)
if its just question of safety its pretty normal that before committing
anything you post if for
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 09:19:51AM +1000, Douglas Ray wrote:
half the topics on this list seem to be how to
overcome problems of using Qt...
And the other two thirds are about re-inventing wheels without Qt.
Trying really hard I managed to avoid
On Sat, 14 Nov 2009, Christian Ridderström wrote:
So I think from a UI point of view, it would work well with having multiple
cursors shown in a document, possibly assuming that each cursor contains the
name of that user.
Here's a very short youtube clip:
Attached is a patch that gets math macros working for MathML output. The
patch is fairly simple, though it took me forever to figure this out.
I'm posting it because there is one part that is potentially
problematic, namely, the line I've commented out from clone(). I don't
see why this is
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 06:37:01PM -0500, rgheck wrote:
I'm posting it because there is one part that is potentially problematic,
namely, the line I've commented out from clone(). I don't see why this is
likely to be necessary, and it hasn't caused me problems in my limited
testing.
Given
Hi,
Just wanted to let you guys know that Lyx's layout file for revtex4 is out of
date (I think). It specifies the package revtex4.cls when the current version
is revtex4-1.cls (as of about a month ago). So right now I don't know how to
compile revtex 4.1 documents in lyx. Please let me know if
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> I guess the fix is simple:
>
> - When the LaTeX code of an item label contains the character "[" but not
> "\[", embrace the whole item label.
>
> I can have a look to provide a patch soon, but cannot promise it due to
> lack of spare time.
I think we should do nothing in
On Tuesday 10 November 2009 08:54:13 Guenter Milde wrote:
I am trying to reply since yesterday morning so better to send some snippets
than not to reply at all. :-)
I like the patch and I will try to give some of the reasons why the original
code was as it was.
> Some explanations:
>
> *
On Friday 13 November 2009 13:21:36 rgheck wrote:
> Oh, I see. I was concentrating on the fact that, if we don't have LaTeX,
> then export to DVI will not be available.
>
> Now that I see the issue, I think this is easy enough to do. You're
> right about the outlines of the thing.
>
> Is there
On Sunday 08 November 2009 02:00:01 rgheck wrote:
> I think Jose has been working on it here and there, but very much behind
> the scenes. My own view is that we should do one of these two things, or
> both:
After some of the current ultra-super-mega busy period is over I will post the
code I
On 14/11/2009 16:25, rgh...@lyx.org wrote:
Author: rgheck
Date: Sat Nov 14 16:25:32 2009
New Revision: 31979
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/31979
Log:
Get MathML output for XHTML working a bit.
Turns out MathML is already here, for the most part, so this will
not be too bad at all.
On 11/14/2009 11:01 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
On 14/11/2009 16:25, rgh...@lyx.org wrote:
Author: rgheck
Date: Sat Nov 14 16:25:32 2009
New Revision: 31979
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/31979
Log:
Get MathML output for XHTML working a bit.
Turns out MathML is already here, for the
I wrote:
I can use the special package handling like for arydshln in the
EmbeddedObjects manual. Then the document would always be compilable,
but you won't see sec. 20 in the output. Should I do this?
Of course I have to do this since mhchem is not in the standard/basic installation of
Yokota K. wrote:
Thank you! It's honorable for me, but I feel like my contributions
need to be checked by someone else. I think it'd be safer that I
continue posting staying at current status ;)
if its just question of safety its pretty normal that before committing
anything you post if for
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 09:19:51AM +1000, Douglas Ray wrote:
half the topics on this list seem to be how to
overcome problems of using Qt...
And the other two thirds are about re-inventing wheels without Qt.
Trying really hard I managed to avoid
On Sat, 14 Nov 2009, Christian Ridderström wrote:
So I think from a UI point of view, it would work well with having multiple
cursors shown in a document, possibly assuming that each cursor contains the
name of that user.
Here's a very short youtube clip:
Attached is a patch that gets math macros working for MathML output. The
patch is fairly simple, though it took me forever to figure this out.
I'm posting it because there is one part that is potentially
problematic, namely, the line I've commented out from clone(). I don't
see why this is
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 06:37:01PM -0500, rgheck wrote:
> I'm posting it because there is one part that is potentially problematic,
> namely, the line I've commented out from clone(). I don't see why this is
> likely to be necessary, and it hasn't caused me problems in my limited
> testing.
Hi,
Just wanted to let you guys know that Lyx's layout file for revtex4 is out of
date (I think). It specifies the package "revtex4.cls" when the current version
is "revtex4-1.cls" (as of about a month ago). So right now I don't know how to
compile revtex 4.1 documents in lyx. Please let me know
26 matches
Mail list logo
