Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
>> Few technical things:
>> - lfun naming should be object-operation, not operation-object
>
> I was "inspired" by close-tab-group, which could be renamed as
> tab-group-close, to respect this convention.
Feel free to fix it (cf. "NAMING RULES FOR USER-COMMANDS" in lyxact
On 09/16/2012 02:05 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
lyx.org is down.
It seems to have rebooted again. I'm afraid I'm out of ideas about what
might be happening, or how to figure it out.
Richard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 17/09/12 11:41, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Rainer M Krug wrote:
>> OK - this makes sense, but why not close the master if one is working only
>> in the child
>> document?
>
> Because this would close the master and all its children. And I want to
Rainer M Krug wrote:
> OK - this makes sense, but why not close the master if one is working only
> in the child document?
Because this would close the master and all its children. And I want to keep
the master buffer active (to use master-buffer-view, for instance).
Jürgen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 17/09/12 10:10, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Rainer M Krug wrote:
>> But anyway: is there a real use-case or need for the hide function?
>
> Yes: You work with a multi-part document, and you want to hide the master.
OK - this makes sense, but why n
Le 17/09/2012 08:55, Tommaso Cucinotta a écrit :
On 16/09/12 14:19, Pavel Sanda wrote:
No strong opinion about the change itself.
Few technical things:
- lfun naming should be object-operation, not operation-object
I was "inspired" by close-tab-group, which could be renamed as
tab-group-close
Am Montag, 17. September 2012 um 08:00:32, schrieb Tommaso Cucinotta
> On 16/09/12 16:55, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > Kornel Benko wrote:
> >> What I would like is hiding even if it were the last WA.
> > So we are at the usual problem that everyone has different opinion how the
> > UI should work :)
Rainer M Krug wrote:
> But anyway: is there a real use-case or need for the hide function?
Yes: You work with a multi-part document, and you want to hide the master.
Jürgen
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>> I do not think that the other changes in the patch are contrary to the
>> current style. I made them with the same thought as what Richard has:
>
> I trust your decision, go on.
It's in.
Thanks,
Scott
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 16/09/12 15:05, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
>> Also, I just noticed that the "Close Tab" action available when
>> right-clicking on a tab name,
>> actually closes the buffer, along with all tabs in any view possibly
>> associated
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 16/09/12 14:55, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
>> On 13/09/12 01:07, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>>> Richard Heck wrote:
> Shouldn't we close the view only,
>>> I thought thats why we have "hide" function distinguished from close.
>>
>> T
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 15/09/12 12:26, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> On 13/09/12 10:29, Rainer M Krug wrote:
>
>> What about a popup box, asking:
>>
>> - Do you want to close All windows / views of this document
>> or only this
>> one?
>>
>> All / Only T
On 16/09/12 16:55, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Kornel Benko wrote:
What I would like is hiding even if it were the last WA.
So we are at the usual problem that everyone has different opinion how the UI
should work :) P
However, this might be fixable as someone suggested in a prior message:
close the
13 matches
Mail list logo
