please put new installer to ftp.lyx.org

2013-01-01 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Hello Richard, can you please put the new installer version 5 to ftp.lyx.org from here: https://sourceforge.net/projects/lyxwininstaller/files/LyXWinInstaller/2.0.5/ I know that LyX 2.0.5.1 is coming soon but the fixed bugs are major: There were 2 bugs which prevented that LyX could be installed

Re: Restart layout update discussion; was: Re: [patch] final layout patches for branch

2013-01-01 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 17.12.2012 17:19, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: While looking into moderncv.cls, I saw an interesting line: \RequirePackageWithOptions{moderncvcompatibility} Looking inside this file is indeed interesting: % compatibility with version 0.1 \newcommand*{\cvresume}[2]{\cvlistdoubleitem

Re: Restart layout update discussion; was: Re: [patch] final layout patches for branch

2013-01-01 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 16.12.2012 19:33, schrieb Richard Heck: 1. backward compatibility Perhaps I am reading too much into this, but if your main concern is the example or template file, then there is no issue here. I have already said that I have no objection to making the example and template files be up to

Re: Box minipage is too big to fit the screen

2013-01-01 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 18.12.2012 12:04, schrieb Zohar Levi: As can be seen in the image below I'm using the siggraph template, and the only way I found to set the teaser image inside a float is to embed it in a box minipage. I guess it was you who made the box that large. - please right-click on the box label an

Re: 2 questions regarding InsetLayout and InsetArgument

2013-01-01 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 01.01.2013 01:20, schrieb Pavel Sanda: "LatexType is perhaps a bit misleading, since these rules apply to SGML classes, too. Visit the SGML class files for specific examples." But I cannot find SGML classes files. Where are they, do we once supported SGML in layouts and now not? I guess th

Re: 2 questions regarding InsetLayout and InsetArgument

2013-01-01 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Uwe Stöhr wrote: > > Cut and paste error probably. The first occurrence gets overwritten. > > But this strange definition occurs without exception in all layouts/modules, > e.g. also in all APA layouts. Their authors probably have copied it from scrclass.inc (or vide versa). Jürgen

Re: [patch for branch] add missing packages to chkconfig.ltx

2013-01-01 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 01.01.2013 10:20, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: Uwe Stöhr wrote: - Jürgen, I noticed that your doc file linguistics.lyx needs the package etoolbox. Can I put it on the list of packages needed by doc files? Sure. Done. OK for branch too Richard? regards Uwe

Re: [patch for branch] fix bug #8477

2013-01-01 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 01.01.2013 01:35, schrieb Enrico Forestieri: OK to go in? You just reintroduce bug 7718. Hmm, you also said that I even reintroduced 3 bugs. But I am using a German Windows and even with paths with spaces and umlauts I could not reproduce the bugs you mentioned. I mean all I have done w

Re: 2 questions regarding InsetLayout and InsetArgument

2013-01-01 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 01.01.2013 14:57, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: But "Senseless!!!" is the LabelString. So if LabelType is set to "Sensitive" LabelString should be set to "Senseless!" for the case that the caption is inserted outside of a float, right? No, the string is hardcoded in Buffer.cpp::4427 and Inse

Re: 2 questions regarding InsetLayout and InsetArgument

2013-01-01 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Uwe Stöhr wrote: > But "Senseless!!!" is the LabelString. So if LabelType is set to "Sensitive" > LabelString should be set to "Senseless!" for the case that the caption is > inserted outside of a float, right? No, the string is hardcoded in Buffer.cpp::4427 and InsetCaption::updateBuffer (Howev

Re: 2 questions regarding InsetLayout and InsetArgument

2013-01-01 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 01.01.2013 10:28, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: It is a label used for the old caption layouts. It outputs the float type plus counter or "Senseless!!!" outside floats. See for instance CaptionAbove in the branch KOMA layouts. But "Senseless!!!" is the LabelString. So if LabelType is set to "

Re: annotations for new layout argument feature

2013-01-01 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 01.01.2013 10:16, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: 2. We have the "LaTeXType" named "Bib_Environment". But this type is nothing more than adding \begin{bibliography}{99} Thanks to your work we can get rid of the hardcoded "99" because we could redefine it using a required argument for the biblio

Re: [patch] final layout patches for branch

2013-01-01 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Uwe Stöhr wrote: > But it also fails if you are using a KOMA version in your LaTeX distribution > that does not know about a style that was added to a later version of > KOMA. And that was what I was referring to. If you send someone your file > created with e.g. KOMA version 2 but he has only KOM

Re: Re: [LyX master] Adapt format to lyx-files in tex2lyx-tests

2013-01-01 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Montag, 31. Dezember 2012 um 22:55:10, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn > Op 31 dec. 2012 18:51 schreef "Kornel Benko" het volgende: > > > > The branch, master, has been updated. > > > > - Log - > > > > commit 297d534fdda7b497b8a0a

Re: 2 questions regarding InsetLayout and InsetArgument

2013-01-01 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Uwe Stöhr wrote: > 1. We have the "LabelType" Sensitive. I read its documentation several times > but I don't understand how it really works. I expect that it can also be > used for self-defined floats but that doesn't seem to work. It is a label used for the old caption layouts. It outputs the

Re: [patch for branch] add missing packages to chkconfig.ltx

2013-01-01 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Uwe Stöhr wrote: > - Jürgen, I noticed that your doc file linguistics.lyx needs the package > etoolbox. Can I put it on the list of packages needed by doc files? Sure. Jürgen

Re: annotations for new layout argument feature

2013-01-01 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Uwe Stöhr wrote: > 2. We have the "LaTeXType" named "Bib_Environment". But this type is nothing > more than adding \begin{bibliography}{99} > Thanks to your work we can get rid of the hardcoded "99" because we could > redefine it using a required argument for the bibliography environment > instea