On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 3:33 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Samstag, 7. September 2013 um 01:01:06, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
>
>
>> Several LyX math parser warnings are fixed at 1a96a9cf
>
>>
>
>> Two warnings remain that might be serious. Attached is an MWE that can
>
>> be used to reproduce an asse
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 09/10/2013 11:51 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
>>> I wrote the lyx2lyx stuff to do this, so if you can post an example that
>>> doesn't convert, I'll fix it.
>>
>> The examples are: l
Hello Jean-Marc,
> > 1) When moving from the left most position of a row to the above too wide
> > row using left arrow, row does not get slide. (I think I found a fix for
> > this, have to test more)
>
> Here is what I observe:
> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/105510128/Bug_2.webm
Did you
On 09/10/2013 11:51 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 08/20/2013 03:36 PM, Kornel Benko wrote:
In lyx2.0 we had "Style Chunk" and now we have only "InsetLayout
Flex:Chunk".
But we have also files using the style (which is ATM 'unknown')
Can w
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 08/20/2013 03:36 PM, Kornel Benko wrote:
>>
>>
>> In lyx2.0 we had "Style Chunk" and now we have only "InsetLayout
>> Flex:Chunk".
>>
>> But we have also files using the style (which is ATM 'unknown')
>>
>> Can we please get it back? Insert
Am 10.09.2013 um 09:01 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn :
> Op 6-9-2013 11:59, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schreef:
>> 28/08/2013 22:45, Vincent van Ravesteijn:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I think it's time to start thinking about what is needed before we can
>>> release beta2.
>>>
>>> Please reply if you know a
10/09/2013 13:40, Vincent van Ravesteijn:
I'm in no position to tell you what you'll have to do. I'll rebase the
branch when it is clear to me what Stephan exactly wanted to do with the
Encodings stuff, and I might add your previous explanations to the logs.
It's hardly any effort then.
However,
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
wrote:
> 10/09/2013 09:01, Vincent van Ravesteijn:
>
> I had a look at the branch, and I have the following comments:
>>
>> - In the commit logs, it is nowhere mentioned why the cleanups are
>> necessary.
>>
>
>
> Indeed... But removing #ifde
10/09/2013 09:01, Vincent van Ravesteijn:
I had a look at the branch, and I have the following comments:
- In the commit logs, it is nowhere mentioned why the cleanups are
necessary.
Indeed... But removing #ifdef's is always good, isn't it?
- In commit ed55131e8, the "automake subdirs" is s
Op 6-9-2013 11:59, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schreef:
28/08/2013 22:45, Vincent van Ravesteijn:
Hi all,
I think it's time to start thinking about what is needed before we can
release beta2.
Please reply if you know about any issues so that I won't be able to
overlook them.
I would like to merge t
10 matches
Mail list logo