Shortcuts for 'post' arguments

The Alt+A 1, etc. shortcuts for custom inset arguments are a real boon. However, I note that a 'post' argument, following the main argument, doesn't get a shortcut, which is a pity. Is this oversight or are there technical reasons preventing the extension of shortcuts to 'post' arguments? And

Re: severe lyx2lyx problem for 2.1 => 2.0 conversion

Georg Baum wrote: > a document with invalid header settings and data loss where argument and > index insets are mixed. I fixed these two problems at BTW how often this dataloss happens - only if index inset is present? (I ask whether immediate 2.1.(0.)1 release is needed or we can wait weeks...)

Re: severe lyx2lyx problem for 2.1 => 2.0 conversion

Richard Heck wrote: > On 04/25/2014 06:48 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: >> Richard Heck wrote: >>> I'm inclined to agree. It would mean re-packaging for everyone, but it >>> shouldn't be too bad. Other opinions? >> We should have 2.0.8.1 (or 2.0.9), 2.0.8 packages are already in the wild. > > Yes, that's

Re: severe lyx2lyx problem for 2.1 => 2.0 conversion

On 04/25/2014 06:48 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: Richard Heck wrote: I'm inclined to agree. It would mean re-packaging for everyone, but it shouldn't be too bad. Other opinions? We should have 2.0.8.1 (or 2.0.9), 2.0.8 packages are already in the wild. Yes, that's true. rh

Re: severe lyx2lyx problem for 2.1 => 2.0 conversion

Richard Heck wrote: > I'm inclined to agree. It would mean re-packaging for everyone, but it > shouldn't be too bad. Other opinions? We should have 2.0.8.1 (or 2.0.9), 2.0.8 packages are already in the wild. Pavel

Re: lyx2lyx bug

On 04/24/2014 02:47 PM, Georg Baum wrote: Richard Heck wrote: This is close to right, but the problem is in the conversion of layouts. It's fine not to quote the names. Look at e.g. logicalmkup.module. Mone of the InsetLayout names are quoted, yet they work fine. The problem is that there is so

Re: severe lyx2lyx problem for 2.1 => 2.0 conversion

On 04/25/2014 05:05 PM, Georg Baum wrote: I am sorry that this comes so late, but I found severe problems in lyx2lyx which occur for 2.1 => 2.0 conversion while testing my fix for bug #9069. If you do the roundtrip 2.0 => 2.1 => 2.0 for the 2.0.8 user guide, you get a document with invalid header

severe lyx2lyx problem for 2.1 => 2.0 conversion

I am sorry that this comes so late, but I found severe problems in lyx2lyx which occur for 2.1 => 2.0 conversion while testing my fix for bug #9069. If you do the roundtrip 2.0 => 2.1 => 2.0 for the 2.0.8 user guide, you get a document with invalid header settings and data loss where argument an

Re: r41003 - www-user/trunk/farm/cookbook/LyX

Jürgen Spitzmüller schreef op 25-4-2014 17:58: 2014-04-25 17:44 GMT+02:00: Author: rgheck Date: Fri Apr 25 17:44:36 2014 New Revision: 41003 URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/41003 Log: Announce 2.1.0. Excellent. Congrats to everybody. Yes, congratulations. Tha

Re: Feature request

On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 3:36 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > Does the netiquette say something about hijacking a thread to discuss a > non-related subject ? Good point. Scott

Re: Feature request

Scott Kostyshak schreef op 25-4-2014 16:00: So I think no snipping is not a major problem. Well, some people view it as a problem and because it is listed on the List Netiquette (http://www.lyx.org/MailingLists#toc7) in my opinion we should follow it, or argue to change the Netiquette. I actuall

After GSoC proposal rejection

Hello, I had applied for GSoC for project "Implement 3-box drawing of insets"(http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/public/google/gsoc2014/mitul15/5629499534213120) which was not selected. I want to do this project out of GSoC. So if mentors can tell what was lacking in proposal or strategy

OSX Problem With 2.1.0 [Was: Re: launch incomplete]

We got this report on the user list. Richard Original Message Subject:Re: launch incomplete Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 19:33:26 +0200 From: Anders Ekberg To: David Nuddleman , lyx-us...@lists.lyx.org Can partly confirm on MacBook Air 10.9.2. Judging from Conso

Re: Feature request

Rainer M Krug wrote: > Gmail has folding, Thunderbird has folding, GNUS has folding, and I > assume most email clients have folding / hiding of quotes. Well, there exists world beyond gmail and thunderbird and this world still produces reasonable traffic on this list. But I agree that until delet

Re: r41003 - www-user/trunk/farm/cookbook/LyX

On 04/25/2014 11:58 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: +If you have trouble using LyX or have a question, consult the +documentation that comes with LyX (under Help) and the +http://wiki.lyx.org/\ ">LyX wiki. +You can also send email to the LyX users'

Re: r41003 - www-user/trunk/farm/cookbook/LyX

2014-04-25 17:44 GMT+02:00: > Author: rgheck > Date: Fri Apr 25 17:44:36 2014 > New Revision: 41003 > URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/41003 > > Log: > Announce 2.1.0. > Excellent. Congrats to everybody. Small typo below: > +Source tarballs can be found at our > +ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx

[ANNOUNCE] LyX 2.1.0 Released

The LyX development team is pleased to announce the release of LyX 2.1.0. This release represents the result of more than three years of hard work. Many bugs have been fixed, and several new features have been added. The new features in LyX 2.1 are detailed in http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/NewInLyX

Re: Feature request

On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Rainer M Krug wrote: > Gmail has folding, Thunderbird has folding, GNUS has folding, and I > assume most email clients have folding / hiding of quotes. > > As stated, some mailing lists wish to have the whole thread, to make > reading a reply separately possible.

Re: Feature request

Scott Kostyshak writes: > On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: >> Scott Kostyshak wrote: >>> Another problem is that some mailing lists require/encourage "quote >>> prior messages in entirety" (e.g. >> >> It makes any longer exchange unreadable. > > Agreed. > >> When involved in t

Re: Anybody Wanna Own Some Bugs?

2014-04-24 0:29 GMT+02:00 Vincent van Ravesteijn : > > You could sign me up for those two. > Done. > However, I'm not sure what it means to be the ticket owner. > I think the main purpose is that someone knowledgeable in the respective area checks the severity of the bug, maybe invites people to f