Scott Kostyshak wrote:
0005-Check-exit-code-of-LaTeX-process-in-LaTeX-run.patch
- To see why this patch is useful, open New New from Template
ACM-sigplan.lyx and compile. It says that compilation was successful
and shows the PDF. However, there was an error that was missed in
parsing (the
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:33 PM, mark.braving...@csiro.au wrote:
I am a LyX lover. However ... :)
... inside equations and tables, Lyx's cursor movement rules drive me nuts!
I dislike mousing, and prefer cursor-movement keys as more predictable and
requiring less conscious control. But
Guenter Milde wrote:
Can't we use the standard way of representing insets even if the inset is
nested in math?
E.g.
\begin_layout Standard
Was ist
\begin_inset Formula $
\begin_inset ERT
status open
\begin_layout Plain Layout
ert
\end_layout
\end_inset
in math$
Richard Heck wrote:
Is MathML anything like as expressive as LaTeX?
I am no expert, but AFAIK not completely. However, for the math insets we
have I believe it should be possible to create a somewhat clean MathML
representation if one would want to invest the time.
Georg
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Georg Baum
georg.b...@post.rwth-aachen.de wrote:
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
0005-Check-exit-code-of-LaTeX-process-in-LaTeX-run.patch
- To see why this patch is useful, open New New from Template
ACM-sigplan.lyx and compile. It says that compilation was
Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:33 PM, mark.braving...@csiro.au wrote:
I am a LyX lover. However ... :)
... inside equations and tables, Lyx's cursor movement rules drive me
nuts! I dislike mousing, and prefer cursor-movement keys as more
predictable and requiring less conscious control. But the
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> 0005-Check-exit-code-of-LaTeX-process-in-LaTeX-run.patch
> - To see why this patch is useful, open New > New from Template >
> ACM-sigplan.lyx and compile. It says that compilation was successful
> and shows the PDF. However, there was an error that was missed in
>
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:33 PM, wrote:
> I am a LyX lover. However ... :)
>
> ... inside equations and tables, Lyx's cursor movement "rules" drive me nuts!
> I dislike mousing, and prefer cursor-movement keys as more predictable and
> requiring less conscious
Guenter Milde wrote:
> Can't we use the standard way of representing insets even if the inset is
> nested in math?
>
> E.g.
>
> \begin_layout Standard
> Was ist
> \begin_inset Formula $
> \begin_inset ERT
> status open
>
> \begin_layout Plain Layout
>
> ert
> \end_layout
>
> \end_inset
>
>
Richard Heck wrote:
> Is MathML anything like as expressive as LaTeX?
I am no expert, but AFAIK not completely. However, for the math insets we
have I believe it should be possible to create a somewhat clean MathML
representation if one would want to invest the time.
Georg
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Georg Baum
wrote:
> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
>> 0005-Check-exit-code-of-LaTeX-process-in-LaTeX-run.patch
>> - To see why this patch is useful, open New > New from Template >
>> ACM-sigplan.lyx and compile. It says that compilation
Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:33 PM, wrote:
> > I am a LyX lover. However ... :)
> >
> > ... inside equations and tables, Lyx's cursor movement "rules" drive me
> nuts! I dislike mousing, and prefer cursor-movement keys as more
> predictable and requiring less conscious
12 matches
Mail list logo