Re: Is "make distcheck" failure a blocker?

This is the beta2 tar.gz. The versions are whatever Scott used Actually I think it was AC 2.69 and am 1.14.1. JMarc Le 23 février 2016 02:23:09 GMT+01:00, Pavel Sanda a écrit : >Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> Le 18/02/2016 04:45, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : >>> make distcheck

Re: blockers for 2.2.0?

Scott Kostyshak wrote: > what issues others view as critical. Which issues do you view as > blockers? Do we track the issue recently reported by Jerry? Signalized more general problem to me. Pavel

Re: [patch] support Bosnian, Macedonian, Piedmontese and Romansh

Guillaume Munch wrote: > I would not be shocked if an exception was made. Uwe's point is that it > is low risk/high reward and that being delayed until 2.3 is quite > significant. I do not remember seeing another patch in this situation. String changes break finalized translations or harass

Re: [PATCH] microtype

Guenter Milde wrote: > I got the same impression after some tests with a *.tex file here. > This is also what the documentation tells: it works for all three of > pdflatex, xelatex, and lualatex but only pdflatex supports all features. > There is no error with "plain" latex (DVI, PS, PDF (ps2pdf),

Re: Is "make distcheck" failure a blocker?

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 18/02/2016 04:45, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : >> make distcheck fails for some people and passes for others. It fails for >> me. I think it passes for Pavel now that Georg's fix was committed. >> >> We have not gotten to the root of why make distcheck fails for some.

Re: [patch] support Bosnian, Macedonian, Piedmontese and Romansh

Am 22.02.2016 um 20:23 schrieb Georg Baum: Le 21/02/2016 20:52, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 06:06:14PM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote: I also don't see a reason why this cannot be done now since otherwise users of than languages would have to wait 2 more years until LyX 2.3.

Re: [LyX/master] Spanish modernCV.lyx: update the file and make it compilable

Am Montag, 22. Februar 2016 um 23:20:21, schrieb Kornel Benko > > Did you try? It fails here. (Cf. lyx test file below.) > > > > I tried the lyx file you sent. Luatex has no problem with deactivated 1st > branch. > I.e. if '${a}_{\mbox{a}}$' is active. > Outch. I had overseen

Re: [LyX/master] Spanish modernCV.lyx: update the file and make it compilable

Am Montag, 22. Februar 2016 um 21:17:44, schrieb Guenter Milde > On 2016-02-21, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Sonntag, 21. Februar 2016 um 16:07:20, schrieb Guenter Milde > > > >> On 2016-02-21, Kornel Benko wrote: > > >> >> I investigated a little. Trying

Re: [PATCH] microtype

On 2016-02-21, Guillaume Munch wrote: > Le 21/02/2016 08:33, Pavel Sanda a écrit : is there some obstacle I should be aware of before implementing microtype support via simple checkbox in document setting (plus maybe edit box for params) which would result into simple

Re: [LyX/master] Spanish modernCV.lyx: update the file and make it compilable

On 2016-02-21, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Sonntag, 21. Februar 2016 um 16:07:20, schrieb Guenter Milde > >> On 2016-02-21, Kornel Benko wrote: >> >> I investigated a little. Trying to compile manually (export as luatex, >> >> use bibtex, use lualatex) I found what is causing

Re: Bug in Insert > Special Character > Symbols in beta1 & 2

Liviu Andronic wrote: > This I can replicate. However, it's not a permanent freeze. I can see > the CPU spiking, and LyX takes something like 10-15sec to settle, but > then the dialog appears and scrolls fine. I would imagine LyX attempts > to load quite a number of symbols, including hard to

Re: Fwd: Warnings in preview PS lyx-2.2.0beta2

On 2016-02-22, Buenas Noticias wrote: > Hi all: > Note that you can still view the PDF despite the reported errors, with > the "Show Output" button in the LaTeX Errors dialog. > Show Output is disabled in my lyx-2.2.0. The missing glyphs blocked the > output. Stop. Normally, missing glyphs

Re: clang doesn't like -std=c++11 for Objective C files

Am 22.02.2016 um 15:06 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes : > > Le 22/02/2016 14:37, Stephan Witt a écrit : >>> So, could you tell me what happens when you do (with my first patch) >>> cd src/support && make AppleSpeller.o >> >> With first patch applied compiling AppleSpeller.o

Re: Remove date external template for 2.2.0?

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 18/02/2016 04:50, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : >> There have been various discussions about how the date external material >> template is useless. I think it was kept around mostly just to be an >> example of what could be done. >> >> Two questions: >> 1. Do we want

Re: lyx-cvs messages: show file names changed

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 18/02/2016 02:58, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : >> Would anyone else find it useful if the lyx-cvs messages showed the file >> names that were changed at the beginning of a message? One example is >> that I would often like to know if a commit is documentation only or

Re: [patch] support Bosnian, Macedonian, Piedmontese and Romansh

Guillaume Munch wrote: > Le 21/02/2016 20:52, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : >> On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 06:06:14PM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote: >>> I also don't see a reason why this cannot be done now since otherwise >>> users of than languages would have to wait 2 more years until LyX 2.3. Every LyX

Re: blockers for 2.2.0?

Le 22/02/2016 17:03, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : Le 22/02/2016 16:54, Guillaume Munch a écrit : Before Jean-Marc's message, I moved the milestone to 2.2.x because the results of proper testing will not be known in time. But I agree with Jean-Marc that it could be applied right now without

Re: blockers for 2.2.0?

Le 22/02/2016 17:13, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : Pfff, actually I see now that if I do the resetAnchor before (or after) the clearSelection() call, nothing will happen any way, since clearSelection does a resetAnchor of its own. Therefore this patch is not good even in fixed form. I guess

Re: blockers for 2.2.0?

Le 22/02/2016 16:54, Guillaume Munch a écrit : Before Jean-Marc's message, I moved the milestone to 2.2.x because the results of proper testing will not be known in time. But I agree with Jean-Marc that it could be applied right now without being sure that it fixes the bug. (Unfortunately I am

Re: blockers for 2.2.0?

Le 22/02/2016 10:16, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : Le 21/02/2016 22:04, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : We have 11 trac tickets with a 2.2.0 milestone. Any help with reducing those 11 would be appreciated: http://www.lyx.org/trac/query?status=accepted=reopened=assigned=new=status=2.2.0 A few

Re: Fwd: Warnings in preview PS lyx-2.2.0beta2

Hi all: Note that you can still view the PDF despite the reported errors, with the "Show Output" button in the LaTeX Errors dialog. Show Output is disabled in my lyx-2.2.0. The missing glyphs blocked the output. Stop. Miguel On 19/02/16 17:32, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Fri, Feb 19, 2016

Re: clang doesn't like -std=c++11 for Objective C files

Le 22/02/2016 14:37, Stephan Witt a écrit : So, could you tell me what happens when you do (with my first patch) cd src/support && make AppleSpeller.o With first patch applied compiling AppleSpeller.o succeeds. Great. So I have your +1 to apply this first patch? I prefer to go step by step.

Re: Is "make distcheck" failure a blocker?

Le 18/02/2016 04:45, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : make distcheck fails for some people and passes for others. It fails for me. I think it passes for Pavel now that Georg's fix was committed. We have not gotten to the root of why make distcheck fails for some. See this thread for previous efforts:

Re: Replacement of "long table" by "multi-pages table" in the manuals

Le 10/02/2016 00:32, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : I mean, if there is string freeze, I, as a translator, can be sure that all needed strings are available. OK I think we are on the same page. What is the status of this? JMarc

Re: beta2?

Am 21.02.2016 um 17:59 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 05:06:19PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: Am Sonntag, 14. Februar 2016 um 23:39:00, schrieb Pavel Sanda Peter Kümmel wrote: Uwe still gets the following errors from the tar I sent to him:

Re: lyx-cvs messages: show file names changed

Le 18/02/2016 02:58, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : Would anyone else find it useful if the lyx-cvs messages showed the file names that were changed at the beginning of a message? One example is that I would often like to know if a commit is documentation only or if there is another change that I

Re: clang doesn't like -std=c++11 for Objective C files

Le 17/02/2016 11:41, Stephan Witt a écrit : You are not answering my question :) The question was "does it allow to compile .m files in C++11 mode?“ It looks like I didn’t know the answer. Perhaps I shouldn’t have give an answer :) So, could you tell me what happens when you do (with my

Re: blockers for 2.2.0?

Le 21/02/2016 22:04, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : We have 11 trac tickets with a 2.2.0 milestone. Any help with reducing those 11 would be appreciated: http://www.lyx.org/trac/query?status=accepted=reopened=assigned=new=status=2.2.0 A few comments: * regarding #9917, I'd appreciate if some