Am 25.04.2016 um 03:58 schrieb Scott Kostyshak :
>
> On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 09:52:48PM +0200, Stephan Witt wrote:
>> Am 24.04.2016 um 07:11 schrieb Scott Kostyshak :
>>>
>>> On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 12:03:15AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Fri, Apr 22,
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
In 2.1.x, because of a bug in our validator code, we allowed negative
values to be input into some document settings. This bug has been fixed
for 2.2.0dev but what that means is that if you open such a document
with LyX 2.2.0dev, you will not be able to save any changes to
On 04/24/2016 09:46 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 04:24:48PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
>> On 04/24/2016 01:10 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>>> In 2.1.x, because of a bug in our validator code, we allowed negative
>>> values to be input into some document settings. This bug
On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 09:52:48PM +0200, Stephan Witt wrote:
> Am 24.04.2016 um 07:11 schrieb Scott Kostyshak :
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 12:03:15AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> >> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 06:08:31PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> >>> Le 18/04/2016
On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 04:24:48PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 04/24/2016 01:10 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > In 2.1.x, because of a bug in our validator code, we allowed negative
> > values to be input into some document settings. This bug has been fixed
> > for 2.2.0dev but what that means
Le 24/04/2016 00:22, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
JMarc do you have any gut feeling about the crash? Should we just ignore
if we cannot reproduce?
No, sorry.
JMarc
On 04/24/2016 01:10 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> In 2.1.x, because of a bug in our validator code, we allowed negative
> values to be input into some document settings. This bug has been fixed
> for 2.2.0dev but what that means is that if you open such a document
> with LyX 2.2.0dev, you will not
Am 24.04.2016 um 07:11 schrieb Scott Kostyshak :
>
> On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 12:03:15AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 06:08:31PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote:
>>> Le 18/04/2016 02:20, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
I imagine Guillaume did not
Richard,
this might be interesting to you: After my latest fixes for mergepo.py in
2.3-staging it is quite easy to transfer translations between different
branches. Assuming that you have two different branches, and in both
branches no strings have been changed after the latest remerge, you
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> Please commit.
Done at dc38ae873a8b.
Georg
Kornel Benko wrote:
>
> I was not accusing anyone.
No problem. I interpreted the exclamation mark like it was not clear why the
commit wnet to master.
Georg
Am Sonntag, 24. April 2016 um 16:12:52, schrieb Georg Baum
> Kornel Benko wrote:
>
> > No, I compared with the file in repository.
> > Why do we have POTFILES.in in repo?
>
> It should not be there, and I can't see it in the repo.
Somehow I created this file
In 2.1.x, because of a bug in our validator code, we allowed negative
values to be input into some document settings. This bug has been fixed
for 2.2.0dev but what that means is that if you open such a document
with LyX 2.2.0dev, you will not be able to save any changes to document
settings unless
On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 02:12:52PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> Andrew Parsloe wrote:
>
> > http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/10074. This is a regression since they
> > display correctly as two hyphens in 2.1.4 in all cases (default,
> > emphasis, bolding, colour).
>
> Thank you very much for
On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 01:54:31PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> Le 24/04/2016 05:03, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> > On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 06:08:31PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> > > Le 18/04/2016 02:20, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> > > >
> > > > I imagine Guillaume did not intend this as a
On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 11:09:08AM -0500, disinteres...@gmail.com wrote:
> No, still haven't been able to reproduce it again.
OK thanks for trying.
Scott
>
> On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 5:22 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 03:34:03PM +0200, Jean-Marc
On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 11:07:59AM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 10:20:53PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> >
> >> Unless somebody has an idea how to quickly work around the line ending
> >> bug my guess would be that the best option would be that Uwe
On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 04:12:52PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> > Thanks, that explains it. I was misled by your last commit to (master!)
> > fr.gmo.
>
> Scott said in this thread that he was fine with whatever I decide for 2.2.0.
+1
Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
No, still haven't been able to reproduce it again.
On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 5:22 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 03:34:03PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > Le 22/04/2016 15:17, Richard Heck a écrit :
> > > This seems like a reasonable solution. It
Kornel Benko wrote:
> No, I compared with the file in repository.
> Why do we have POTFILES.in in repo?
It should not be there, and I can't see it in the repo.
> Thanks, that explains it. I was misled by your last commit to (master!)
> fr.gmo.
Scott said in this thread that he was fine with
Am Sonntag, 24. April 2016 um 14:47:42, schrieb Georg Baum
> Kornel Benko wrote:
>
> > Am Sonntag, 24. April 2016 um 11:20:16, schrieb Georg Baum
> >
> >> Kornel Benko wrote:
> >>
> >> > Am Samstag, 23. April 2016 um 12:01:32,
Le 24/04/2016 04:23, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
I like the patch you attached. Although I understand your
dissatisfaction that it doesn't completely fix one of the regressions
you were targetting, it is nice to get rid of that hack and more
importantly to solve the crash.
Please commit this
Le 24/04/2016 06:11, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
I wouldn't be surprised if this depends on the Qt version (e.g.
different Qt "features" and difficulty of Qt getting the high res right)
It is indeed different with Qt5 here, but not in a good way: the preview
is even smaller, about one third
Le 24/04/2016 05:03, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 06:08:31PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote:
Le 18/04/2016 02:20, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
I imagine Guillaume did not intend this as a full patch,
Indeed.
More importantly, the patch does not change anything for me. I
Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 24. April 2016 um 11:20:16, schrieb Georg Baum
>
>> Kornel Benko wrote:
>>
>> > Am Samstag, 23. April 2016 um 12:01:32, schrieb Kornel Benko
>> >> Hm, there are more differences. In cmake we add also header files to
>> >> the
Andrew Parsloe wrote:
> http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/10074. This is a regression since they
> display correctly as two hyphens in 2.1.4 in all cases (default,
> emphasis, bolding, colour).
Thank you very much for reporting this. I did indeed make a mistake when I
removed the special meaning
Am Sonntag, 24. April 2016 um 10:56:54, schrieb Jean-Pierre Chrétien
> Le 24/04/2016 10:37, Jean-Pierre Chrétien a écrit :
>
> >> I think you already committed, if I understood correctly. If you did
> >> not, please go ahead and commit. At worst case we will just
Am Sonntag, 24. April 2016 um 11:20:16, schrieb Georg Baum
> Kornel Benko wrote:
>
> > Am Samstag, 23. April 2016 um 12:01:32, schrieb Kornel Benko
> >> Hm, there are more differences. In cmake we add also header files to the
> >> list. But I wonder, why unix
Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Samstag, 23. April 2016 um 12:01:32, schrieb Kornel Benko
>> Hm, there are more differences. In cmake we add also header files to the
>> list. But I wonder, why unix command 'sort' is not working the same as
>> cmake internal sort.
>
> OK, setting env LC_ALL=C, sort
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 10:20:53PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
>
>> Unless somebody has an idea how to quickly work around the line ending
>> bug my guess would be that the best option would be that Uwe does the
>> remerge, then sends the resulting files to me, I remove the
Le 24/04/2016 10:37, Jean-Pierre Chrétien a écrit :
I think you already committed, if I understood correctly. If you did
not, please go ahead and commit. At worst case we will just revert.
I checked on trac, all is fine, thanks.
In fact, messages ordering is different, but I guess that it
Le 24/04/2016 03:25, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 11:43:41AM +0100, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
Le 22/04/2016 06:14, Georg Baum a écrit :
We really need to stop using two build systems. For now, I would suggest
that a remerge of all languages is done using cmake ASAP.
32 matches
Mail list logo