On 05/04/2017 07:15 PM, Andrew Parsloe wrote:
> I would like to see the following small change made to the script
> ext_copy.py for 2.3.0:
>
> Currently it contains the lines:
>
> # output directory
> to_dir = args[1]
> if targext != '.':
> to_dir += "." + targext
>
> Change this to
>
> #
On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 07:32:36PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> Thanks for checking the signatures, Uwe. To be sure, I'll send the tars
> and sigs to Kornel before uploading them to the FTP.
Kornel confirmed the signatures look good. I pushed 2.3.0alpha1-1 and
uploaded the tars and binaries
On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 10:30:11PM +0200, Guillaume MM wrote:
> Le 04/05/2017 à 19:43, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
> > Guillaume MM wrote:
> > > Le 01/05/2017 ?? 18:43, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
> > > > We can define a lower bound for acceptable qt5 version like we do for
> > > > python 3 vs 2. I
On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 08:15:23PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Thanks for the testcase.
Yes thanks for taking care of that.
Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
I would like to see the following small change made to the script
ext_copy.py for 2.3.0:
Currently it contains the lines:
# output directory
to_dir = args[1]
if targext != '.':
to_dir += "." + targext
Change this to
# output directory
if targext == '+':
to_dir =
On 2017-05-03, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> El 03.05.2017 a las 12:05, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes escribió:
...
>> So you are telling me that, when you use plain babel (TeX fonts) and
>> arabic language, without any fancy leqno option, you do not see that the
>> number is on the left without asking for it???
Le 04/05/2017 à 19:43, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
Guillaume MM wrote:
Le 01/05/2017 ?? 18:43, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
We can define a lower bound for acceptable qt5 version like we do for
python 3 vs 2. I would not want a crappy qt 5.1 on a system with a
perfectly valid qt4.8.
Note that the
Am Donnerstag, 4. Mai 2017 um 16:08:41, schrieb Guenter Milde
...
> I checked 0x2018, it's the LEFT SINGLE QUOTATION MARK ‘.
>
> This appears 2 times in id_UserGuide.lyx:
>
> 28091: description "The quote sign is output by writing ‘ \"\"\"\" '"
> 43702: It is
Guillaume MM wrote:
> Le 01/05/2017 ?? 18:43, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
>> We can define a lower bound for acceptable qt5 version like we do for
>> python 3 vs 2. I would not want a crappy qt 5.1 on a system with a
>> perfectly valid qt4.8.
>>
>> Note that the end of life warning is not
On 2017-05-03, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 3. Mai 2017 um 21:20:11, schrieb Guenter Milde
>
>> On 2017-04-30, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>> > On current master if I do:
>> > ctest -R "id_UserGuide_pdf2"
>> > I get a failed export, and iconv errors such as:
>> >
Am Donnerstag, 4. Mai 2017 um 01:06:44, schrieb Tommaso Cucinotta
> As we're on this, a few other things I had in my tommaso/master [1], out of
> which:
> I'd really love to have 3)...
> about 2) I'm stuck with recurring to Emacs-editing the first line of a .lyx
> file every
On 04/05/2017 11:53, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
Assuming we do want to embed the picture on the clipboard, the next
but I don't think any of this is actually working, copying from
an inset containing a real image file (.jpg) into LibreOffice,
it just inserts an XML header line, along with a
On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 09:29:49AM +0200, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> On 04/05/2017 01:45, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > > I'd really love to have 3)...
> >
> > Is it polished? Is there a trac ticket for this one? Or an archived
> > discussion?
>
> http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/5962
Thanks.
I
On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 07:52:00AM +0200, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> On 04/05/2017 01:36, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > Works well! I found what I think is unexpected behavior: if I select the
> > graphics inset (e.g. after I have followed your instructions and clicked
> > on "run" and everything
Am 04.05.2017 um 10:21 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes :
>
> Le 02/05/2017 à 22:26, mn a écrit :
>>> Mike, did ever get a chance to test with the patch that I sent? I am a
>>> bit lost whether this restores the performance. Is there a big
>>> difference in terms of memory use?
>>
On 04/05/2017 01:45, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
I'd really love to have 3)...
Is it polished? Is there a trac ticket for this one? Or an archived
discussion?
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/5962
thanks,
T.
16 matches
Mail list logo