Am Montag, den 10.08.2020, 21:44 +0200 schrieb Daniel:
> Since I always considered LyX to be quite LaTeX-centric, I am
> curious
>
> what application of LyX there is where one font size step down from
>
> normal wouldn't be footnote size and still it makes sense to have
> the
>
> ten
On 2020-08-11 00:34, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
On 8/10/20 1:31 PM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Am Montag, den 10.08.2020, 15:36 +0200 schrieb Daniel:
The font sizes should be those used in the cls file. The right
patch will be the one that does the same as the LaTeX source. It
may depend on
I get the following:
Runaway argument?
{\emph {包含了调整文档格式的详细方法，包括水平填�\ETC.
! File ended while scanning use of \textit .
\par
<*> Tutorial.tex
Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
On 8/10/20 1:31 PM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Montag, den 10.08.2020, 15:36 +0200 schrieb Daniel:
>>> The font sizes should be those used in the cls file. The right
>>> patch will be the one that does the same as the LaTeX source. It
>>> may depend on the class.
>>
>> I am not sure I follow
On 8/10/20 6:00 AM, Daniel wrote:
> On 2020-08-09 18:56, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
>> On 8/9/20 7:41 AM, Daniel wrote:
>>> On 2020-08-08 19:45, Daniel wrote:
Is there a reason that the font size for the Part layout is not
greater than that for the Chapter (Book) or Section (Article)
On 2020-08-10 19:28, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Am Montag, den 10.08.2020, 11:14 -0600 schrieb Joel Kulesza:
On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 9:37 AM Kornel Benko wrote:
I have not found 'huger' in the dictionary, so Giant is OK for me.
But I would drop footnotesize and scriptsize and use
On 2020-08-10 17:38, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Am Montag, den 10.08.2020, 17:06 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko:
So you are suggesting to do both of those changes, right?
No, only the last.
No need to change these IMHO. These are just internal representations.
They are not just internal. For
Am Montag, den 10.08.2020, 15:36 +0200 schrieb Daniel:
> > The font sizes should be those used in the cls file. The right
> > patch will be the one that does the same as the LaTeX source. It
> > may depend on the class.
>
>
> I am not sure I follow you. There are no font size defined for the
>
Am Montag, den 10.08.2020, 11:14 -0600 schrieb Joel Kulesza:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 9:37 AM Kornel Benko wrote:
> > I have not found 'huger' in the dictionary, so Giant is OK for me.
> > But I would drop footnotesize and scriptsize and use
> > smaller+smallest and use the GUI
> > names here.
>
On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 9:37 AM Kornel Benko wrote:
>
> I have not found 'huger' in the dictionary, so Giant is OK for me.
> But I would drop footnotesize and scriptsize and use smaller+smallest and
> use the GUI
> names here.
>
Would it be too cluttered to have, for example, "smaller
Am Montag, den 10.08.2020, 17:06 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko:
> > So you are suggesting to do both of those changes, right?
>
> No, only the last.
No need to change these IMHO. These are just internal representations.
On the other points, I strongly agree with Kornel.
Jürgen
signature.asc
Am Mon, 10 Aug 2020 17:09:28 +0200
schrieb Daniel :
> On 10/8/20 17:06, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Am Mon, 10 Aug 2020 16:31:52 +0200
> > schrieb Daniel :
> >
> >> On 10/8/20 13:51, Kornel Benko wrote:
> >>> Am Mon, 10 Aug 2020 13:21:56 +0200
> >>> schrieb Daniel :
> >>>
> On
On 10/8/20 17:06, Kornel Benko wrote:
Am Mon, 10 Aug 2020 16:31:52 +0200
schrieb Daniel :
On 10/8/20 13:51, Kornel Benko wrote:
Am Mon, 10 Aug 2020 13:21:56 +0200
schrieb Daniel :
On 2020-08-10 12:59, Daniel wrote:
On 2020-08-10 12:42, Daniel wrote:
On 2020-08-10 12:08, Kornel Benko
Am Mon, 10 Aug 2020 16:31:52 +0200
schrieb Daniel :
> On 10/8/20 13:51, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Am Mon, 10 Aug 2020 13:21:56 +0200
> > schrieb Daniel :
> >
> >> On 2020-08-10 12:59, Daniel wrote:
> >>> On 2020-08-10 12:42, Daniel wrote:
> On 2020-08-10 12:08, Kornel Benko wrote:
>
On 10/8/20 13:51, Kornel Benko wrote:
Am Mon, 10 Aug 2020 13:21:56 +0200
schrieb Daniel :
On 2020-08-10 12:59, Daniel wrote:
On 2020-08-10 12:42, Daniel wrote:
On 2020-08-10 12:08, Kornel Benko wrote:
Am Mon, 10 Aug 2020 11:32:35 +0200
schrieb Daniel :
On 2020-08-10 09:15, Kornel Benko
On 10/8/20 9:54, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
On 8/10/20 3:49 AM, racoon wrote:
On 2020-08-10 09:19, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
On 8/10/20 12:23 AM, Daniel wrote:
On 2020-08-09 19:41, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
On 8/9/20 1:04 PM, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
On 8/9/20 5:45 AM, Daniel
On 10/8/20 13:46, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 10 août 2020 12:00:35 GMT+02:00, Daniel a écrit :
Which is the better patch depends on what the reason for a difference
to
LaTeX was. I am not sure what that reason might have been. Use less
space in the work area for headers?
The font sizes
Le 9 août 2020 14:53:23 GMT+02:00, Stephan Witt a écrit :
>Next patch including the first one corrects the char count w/o
>additional
>inset member function. My primary target is to get the navigation
>correct.
>But improved statistics correctness is a nice by-catch.
>
>I’ve checked the code for
Am Mon, 10 Aug 2020 13:21:56 +0200
schrieb Daniel :
> On 2020-08-10 12:59, Daniel wrote:
> > On 2020-08-10 12:42, Daniel wrote:
> >> On 2020-08-10 12:08, Kornel Benko wrote:
> >>> Am Mon, 10 Aug 2020 11:32:35 +0200
> >>> schrieb Daniel :
> >>>
> On 2020-08-10 09:15, Kornel Benko wrote:
Le 10 août 2020 12:00:35 GMT+02:00, Daniel a écrit :
>Which is the better patch depends on what the reason for a difference
>to
>LaTeX was. I am not sure what that reason might have been. Use less
>space in the work area for headers?
The font sizes should be those used in the cls file. The
On 2020-08-10 12:00, Daniel wrote:
On 2020-08-09 18:56, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
On 8/9/20 7:41 AM, Daniel wrote:
On 2020-08-08 19:45, Daniel wrote:
Is there a reason that the font size for the Part layout is not
greater than that for the Chapter (Book) or Section (Article) layout?
There
On 2020-08-10 12:59, Daniel wrote:
On 2020-08-10 12:42, Daniel wrote:
On 2020-08-10 12:08, Kornel Benko wrote:
Am Mon, 10 Aug 2020 11:32:35 +0200
schrieb Daniel :
On 2020-08-10 09:15, Kornel Benko wrote:
Am Mon, 10 Aug 2020 08:24:56 +0200
schrieb Daniel :
Attached is a chart of LyX font
On 2020-08-10 12:42, Daniel wrote:
On 2020-08-10 12:08, Kornel Benko wrote:
Am Mon, 10 Aug 2020 11:32:35 +0200
schrieb Daniel :
On 2020-08-10 09:15, Kornel Benko wrote:
Am Mon, 10 Aug 2020 08:24:56 +0200
schrieb Daniel :
Attached is a chart of LyX font sizes. Does anyone else find it
On 2020-08-10 12:08, Kornel Benko wrote:
Am Mon, 10 Aug 2020 11:32:35 +0200
schrieb Daniel :
On 2020-08-10 09:15, Kornel Benko wrote:
Am Mon, 10 Aug 2020 08:24:56 +0200
schrieb Daniel :
Attached is a chart of LyX font sizes. Does anyone else find it slightly
confusing that LyX uses two
Am Mon, 10 Aug 2020 11:32:35 +0200
schrieb Daniel :
> On 2020-08-10 09:15, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Am Mon, 10 Aug 2020 08:24:56 +0200
> > schrieb Daniel :
> >
> >> Attached is a chart of LyX font sizes. Does anyone else find it slightly
> >> confusing that LyX uses two different naming schemes
On 2020-08-09 18:56, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
On 8/9/20 7:41 AM, Daniel wrote:
On 2020-08-08 19:45, Daniel wrote:
Is there a reason that the font size for the Part layout is not
greater than that for the Chapter (Book) or Section (Article) layout?
There is a difference in size in both
On 2020-08-10 09:15, Kornel Benko wrote:
Am Mon, 10 Aug 2020 08:24:56 +0200
schrieb Daniel :
Attached is a chart of LyX font sizes. Does anyone else find it slightly
confusing that LyX uses two different naming schemes (in addition to
LaTeX)? Maybe some historic reason? If possible, I suggest
On 8/10/20 3:49 AM, racoon wrote:
> On 2020-08-10 09:19, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
>> On 8/10/20 12:23 AM, Daniel wrote:
>>> On 2020-08-09 19:41, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
On 8/9/20 1:04 PM, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> On 8/9/20 5:45 AM, Daniel wrote:
>> I have produced a
On 2020-08-10 09:19, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
On 8/10/20 12:23 AM, Daniel wrote:
On 2020-08-09 19:41, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
On 8/9/20 1:04 PM, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
On 8/9/20 5:45 AM, Daniel wrote:
I have produced a number of (unsolicited) patches. I will stop doing
so for
Am Sonntag, den 09.08.2020, 14:53 +0200 schrieb Stephan Witt:
> Next patch including the first one corrects the char count w/o
> additional
> inset member function. My primary target is to get the navigation
> correct.
> But improved statistics correctness is a nice by-catch.
>
> I’ve checked the
On 8/10/20 12:23 AM, Daniel wrote:
> On 2020-08-09 19:41, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
>> On 8/9/20 1:04 PM, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
>>> On 8/9/20 5:45 AM, Daniel wrote:
I have produced a number of (unsolicited) patches. I will stop doing
so for now until some of them are either
Am Mon, 10 Aug 2020 08:24:56 +0200
schrieb Daniel :
> Attached is a chart of LyX font sizes. Does anyone else find it slightly
> confusing that LyX uses two different naming schemes (in addition to
> LaTeX)? Maybe some historic reason? If possible, I suggest to go for
> only one naming scheme.
Attached is a chart of LyX font sizes. Does anyone else find it slightly
confusing that LyX uses two different naming schemes (in addition to
LaTeX)? Maybe some historic reason? If possible, I suggest to go for
only one naming scheme.
I guess the LaTeX naming scheme for large font sizes is a
33 matches
Mail list logo
