At 15:04 18.02.02 +0100, you wrote:
On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 03:18:41AM +0100, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Is this still up-to-date?
Fairly.
Or are there plans to do anything using the Lyx-Server? If not, I'd
glad to
implement parts of the
the scripting capabilities into Lyx.
Furhter
At 15:04 18.02.02 +0100, you wrote:
>On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 03:18:41AM +0100, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
> > Is this still up-to-date?
>
>Fairly.
>
> > Or are there plans to do anything using the Lyx-Server? If not, I'd
> glad to
> > implement parts of the
> &
At 02:28 16.02.02 +, you wrote:
On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 03:18:41AM +0100, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Or are there plans to do anything using the Lyx-Server? If not, I'd
glad to
implement parts of the
the scripting capabilities into Lyx.
the idea is to sort out the lyxfunc interface
At 02:28 16.02.02 +, you wrote:
>On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 03:18:41AM +0100, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
>
> > Or are there plans to do anything using the Lyx-Server? If not, I'd
> glad to
> > implement parts of the
> > the scripting capabilities into Lyx.
>
>th
Is this still up-to-date?
Scripting language
Support a scripting language to control various parts of LyX, this requires
deciding on an official scripting language. The idea is for non-core parts
of LyX to be moved to the scripting language and thus simplifying extension
and customization.
Is this still up-to-date?
Scripting language
Support a scripting language to control various parts of LyX, this requires
deciding on an official scripting language. The idea is for non-core parts
of LyX to be moved to the scripting language and thus simplifying extension
and customization.