Re: r39491 - lyx-devel/trunk/development/cmake/modules

On 19.08.2011 17:36, Kornel wrote: Am Freitag, 19. August 2011 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Op 19-8-2011 16:45, Kornel schreef: Am Freitag, 19. August 2011 schrieb v...@lyx.org: ... -set(hints HINTS ${GNUWIN32_DIR}/deps20/gettext-tools) -FIND_PROGRAM(GETTEXT_MSGMERGE_EXECUTABLE msgmerge

Re: r39491 - lyx-devel/trunk/development/cmake/modules

On 19.08.2011 16:52, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: If I have your attention. I'm now puzzled again by LYX_INSTALL_PREFIX which is a directory but has the value OFF, CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX. Vincent The problem is that CMAKE generates settings-cmake.nsh with the line: !define FILES_LYX

Re: r39491 - lyx-devel/trunk/development/cmake/modules

On 19.08.2011 16:52, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: If I have your attention. I'm now puzzled again by LYX_INSTALL_PREFIX which is a directory but has the value OFF, CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX. Vincent The problem is that CMAKE generates settings-cmake.nsh with the line: settings.nsh.cmake is

Re: r39491 - lyx-devel/trunk/development/cmake/modules

Don't know, how this corresponds to ${hints}. What are your values? FILES_LYX should be created from value of CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX_ABSOLUTE I think. CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX_ABSOLUTE is used: !define FILES_LYX @CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX_ABSOLUTE@ seems CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX_ABSOLUT is somehow

Re: 1 "-pg" in call to cc should be enough

On 19.08.2011 17:04, Kornel wrote: I have this in cmake-build ... /usr/bin/c++ -Wall -Wunused-parameter -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -Wunused-parameter -O3 -DNDEBUG-pg -pg -pg -pg -pg -pg -pg -pg -pg -pg -pg - pg -pg -pg -pg -pg -pg -pg -pg -pg -pg -pg -pg -pg -pg

Re: r39491 - lyx-devel/trunk/development/cmake/modules

On 19.08.2011 17:36, Kornel wrote: Am Freitag, 19. August 2011 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Op 19-8-2011 16:45, Kornel schreef: Am Freitag, 19. August 2011 schrieb v...@lyx.org: ... -set(hints "HINTS ${GNUWIN32_DIR}/deps20/gettext-tools") -FIND_PROGRAM(GETTEXT_MSGMERGE_EXECUTABLE

Re: r39491 - lyx-devel/trunk/development/cmake/modules

On 19.08.2011 16:52, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: If I have your attention. I'm now puzzled again by LYX_INSTALL_PREFIX which is a directory but has the value OFF, CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX. Vincent The problem is that CMAKE generates "settings-cmake.nsh" with the line: !define FILES_LYX

Re: r39491 - lyx-devel/trunk/development/cmake/modules

On 19.08.2011 16:52, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: If I have your attention. I'm now puzzled again by LYX_INSTALL_PREFIX which is a directory but has the value OFF, CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX. Vincent The problem is that CMAKE generates "settings-cmake.nsh" with the line: settings.nsh.cmake is

Re: r39491 - lyx-devel/trunk/development/cmake/modules

Don't know, how this corresponds to ${hints}. What are your values? FILES_LYX should be created from value of "CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX_ABSOLUTE" I think. CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX_ABSOLUTE is used: !define FILES_LYX "@CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX_ABSOLUTE@" seems CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX_ABSOLUT is somehow

Re: MSVC dependencies

On 09.08.2011 16:06, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Pavel Sanda wrote: https://github.com/downloads/syntheticpp/lyx/lyx20-deps-msvc2010-x86.zip btw whats the time stamp of this binary? (uploaded by Peter or you?) Uploaded by Peter on July 09, 2011, according to the log. It's also here (I

Re: MSVC dependencies

On 09.08.2011 16:06, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Pavel Sanda wrote: https://github.com/downloads/syntheticpp/lyx/lyx20-deps-msvc2010-x86.zip btw whats the time stamp of this binary? (uploaded by Peter or you?) Uploaded by Peter on July 09, 2011, according to the log. It's also here (I

Re: Ubuntu 10.04.2 LTS suddenly broke --without-included-boost?

On 03.07.2011 15:17, John McCabe-Dansted wrote: Whenever I try to run a recent version of trunk I get the error below. This does not seem to be a regession in LyX but rather a regression in the Ubuntu boost... except that they don't seem to have changed that recently. I don't really know what is

Re: Ubuntu 10.04.2 LTS suddenly broke --without-included-boost?

On 03.07.2011 15:17, John McCabe-Dansted wrote: Whenever I try to run a recent version of trunk I get the error below. This does not seem to be a regession in LyX but rather a regression in the Ubuntu boost... except that they don't seem to have changed that recently. I don't really know what is

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Wednesday

On 14.06.2011 20:58, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Richard Heck wrote: I intend to build and tag LyX 2.0.1 on Wednesday---or at least try to do so, as it will be my first time. Alas, I just stumbled over a bug today that should be fixed before that. Lyx segfaults as soon as you open a document

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Wednesday

On 14.06.2011 20:58, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Richard Heck wrote: I intend to build and tag LyX 2.0.1 on Wednesday---or at least try to do so, as it will be my first time. Alas, I just stumbled over a bug today that should be fixed before that. Lyx segfaults as soon as you open a document

Re: Profiling results of scrolling through the Users Guide

On 10.06.2011 09:41, Stephan Witt wrote: But metrics computation looks innocent in the profiles. Attached the output of gprof on Linux and Mac. On the Mac there is no timing, but on both systems we have the number of function calls, so it gives at least an idea which function should be

Re: Profiling results of scrolling through the Users Guide

On 10.06.2011 09:41, Stephan Witt wrote: But metrics computation looks innocent in the profiles. Attached the output of gprof on Linux and Mac. On the Mac there is no timing, but on both systems we have the number of function calls, so it gives at least an idea which function should be

Re: Profiling results of scrolling through the Users Guide

On 09.06.2011 08:12, Stephan Witt wrote: To investigate the recently mentioned scrolling problems I did some profiling on my machine. See http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users@lists.lyx.org/msg87278.html Ok, it's a completely different environment (Mac, Qt-4.6-Cocoa, SVN-trunk) but it's

Re: Profiling results of scrolling through the Users Guide

On 09.06.2011 20:21, Peter Kümmel wrote: On 09.06.2011 08:12, Stephan Witt wrote: To investigate the recently mentioned scrolling problems I did some profiling on my machine. See http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users@lists.lyx.org/msg87278.html Ok, it's a completely different environment (Mac

Re: Profiling results of scrolling through the Users Guide

On 09.06.2011 08:12, Stephan Witt wrote: To investigate the recently mentioned scrolling problems I did some profiling on my machine. See http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users@lists.lyx.org/msg87278.html Ok, it's a completely different environment (Mac, Qt-4.6-Cocoa, SVN-trunk) but it's

Re: Profiling results of scrolling through the Users Guide

On 09.06.2011 20:21, Peter Kümmel wrote: On 09.06.2011 08:12, Stephan Witt wrote: To investigate the recently mentioned scrolling problems I did some profiling on my machine. See http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users@lists.lyx.org/msg87278.html Ok, it's a completely different environment (Mac

Re: Problem with converter in Lyx 2.0 - possible bug?

On 22.05.2011 19:52, Enrico Forestieri wrote: In this case, your only bet is recompiling LyX using the attached patch. Would disabling the definition of USE_PROCESS completely fix the issue? So why do we not a command line and settings option do switch between the two modes? Peter

Re: Problem with converter in Lyx 2.0 - possible bug?

On 22.05.2011 19:52, Enrico Forestieri wrote: In this case, your only bet is recompiling LyX using the attached patch. Would disabling the definition of USE_PROCESS completely fix the issue? So why do we not a command line and settings option do switch between the two modes? Peter

Re: r38802 - lyx-devel/trunk

On 21.05.2011 14:36, Kornel Benko wrote: Am Samstag, 21. Mai 2011 schrieb kuem...@lyx.org: Log: cmake: better cmake messages, don't overwrite CPacks default Modified: lyx-devel/trunk/CMakeLists.txt Modified: lyx-devel/trunk/CMakeLists.txt Peter, could you check, why there are so many

Re: r38796 - in lyx-devel/trunk: . development/Win32/packaging/installer development/Win32/packaging/installer/include

On 21.05.2011 13:32, Kornel Benko wrote: Am Samstag, 21. Mai 2011 schrieb kuem...@lyx.org: if(PACKAGE_VERSION MATCHES ^\([0-9]+\)\\.\([0-9]+\).*$) set(LYX_MAJOR_VERSION ${CMAKE_MATCH_1}) set(LYX_MINOR_VERSION ${CMAKE_MATCH_2}) +

Re: r38796 - in lyx-devel/trunk: . development/Win32/packaging/installer development/Win32/packaging/installer/include

On 21.05.2011 14:42, Peter Kümmel wrote: On 21.05.2011 13:32, Kornel Benko wrote: Am Samstag, 21. Mai 2011 schrieb kuem...@lyx.org: if(PACKAGE_VERSION MATCHES ^\([0-9]+\)\\.\([0-9]+\).*$) set(LYX_MAJOR_VERSION ${CMAKE_MATCH_1

Re: r38802 - lyx-devel/trunk

On 21.05.2011 14:36, Kornel Benko wrote: Am Samstag, 21. Mai 2011 schrieb kuem...@lyx.org: Log: cmake: better cmake messages, don't overwrite CPacks default Modified: lyx-devel/trunk/CMakeLists.txt Modified: lyx-devel/trunk/CMakeLists.txt Peter, could you check, why there are so many

Re: r38796 - in lyx-devel/trunk: . development/Win32/packaging/installer development/Win32/packaging/installer/include

On 21.05.2011 13:32, Kornel Benko wrote: Am Samstag, 21. Mai 2011 schrieb kuem...@lyx.org: if(PACKAGE_VERSION MATCHES "^\([0-9]+\)\\.\([0-9]+\).*$") set(LYX_MAJOR_VERSION ${CMAKE_MATCH_1}) set(LYX_MINOR_VERSION ${CMAKE_MATCH_2})

Re: r38796 - in lyx-devel/trunk: . development/Win32/packaging/installer development/Win32/packaging/installer/include

On 21.05.2011 14:42, Peter Kümmel wrote: On 21.05.2011 13:32, Kornel Benko wrote: Am Samstag, 21. Mai 2011 schrieb kuem...@lyx.org: if(PACKAGE_VERSION MATCHES "^\([0-9]+\)\\.\([0-9]+\).*$") set(LYX_MAJOR_VERSION ${CMA

Re: Road to LyX 2.1 - #1 (2011-05-15)

On 20.05.2011 17:00, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: On 19/05/2011 23:31, Peter Kümmel wrote: On 19.05.2011 14:55, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: On 19-5-2011 14:04, Richard Heck wrote: On 05/19/2011 03:03 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: about the model so even my dumb brain gets

Re: Road to LyX 2.1 - #1 (2011-05-15)

On 20.05.2011 17:00, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: On 19/05/2011 23:31, Peter Kümmel wrote: On 19.05.2011 14:55, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: On 19-5-2011 14:04, Richard Heck wrote: On 05/19/2011 03:03 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: about the model so even my dumb brain gets

Re: still not possible to compile LyX 2.0.x with CMake

On 19.05.2011 15:41, Uwe Stöhr wrote: Am 18.05.2011 08:29, schrieb Peter Kümmel: OK, but why can this not be done automatically. I mean I have to specify the source folder as my-lyx-checkout/development/cmake So it should be possible to automatically set the LYX_DIR_20x variable in CMake

Re: Road to LyX 2.1 - #1 (2011-05-15)

On 19.05.2011 14:55, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: On 19-5-2011 14:04, Richard Heck wrote: On 05/19/2011 03:03 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: about the model so even my dumb brain gets it. it was written that only maintainer is expected to determine whats go

Re: still not possible to compile LyX 2.0.x with CMake

On 19.05.2011 16:57, Joost Verburg wrote: Uwe Stöhruwesto...@web.de wrote in message news:4dd51e0b.3010...@web.de... It is the same, but doesn't work, neither in trunk nor branch. I have to set it manually. Perhaps because it is only set on Win32, but I am on Win64. IIRC it does work but it

Re: Too much options in LyX

On 18.05.2011 23:03, venom00 wrote: Are the fancylineedit.* files 1:1 copied from qtcreator? Then we should not touch them otherwise we could lyxify them. I've changed the namespace, removed an export macro and changed the copyright notice as you can see in the patch or in a previous mail. We

Re: still not possible to compile LyX 2.0.x with CMake

On 19.05.2011 15:41, Uwe Stöhr wrote: Am 18.05.2011 08:29, schrieb Peter Kümmel: OK, but why can this not be done automatically. I mean I have to specify the source folder as /development/cmake So it should be possible to automatically set the LYX_DIR_20x variable in CMake automatically

Re: Road to LyX 2.1 - #1 (2011-05-15)

On 19.05.2011 14:55, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: On 19-5-2011 14:04, Richard Heck wrote: On 05/19/2011 03:03 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: about the model so even my dumb brain gets it. it was written that only maintainer is expected to determine whats go

Re: still not possible to compile LyX 2.0.x with CMake

On 19.05.2011 16:57, Joost Verburg wrote: "Uwe Stöhr" wrote in message news:4dd51e0b.3010...@web.de... It is the same, but doesn't work, neither in trunk nor branch. I have to set it manually. Perhaps because it is only set on Win32, but I am on Win64. IIRC it does work but

Re: Too much options in LyX

On 18.05.2011 23:03, venom00 wrote: Are the fancylineedit.* files 1:1 copied from qtcreator? Then we should not touch them otherwise we could lyxify them. I've changed the namespace, removed an export macro and changed the copyright notice as you can see in the patch or in a previous mail. We

Re: still not possible to compile LyX 2.0.x with CMake

On 18.05.2011 03:09, Uwe Stöhr wrote: Am 17.05.2011 08:09, schrieb Peter Kümmel: 1. a LyX.exe file is compiled, but at the end of the compilation process MSVC complains telling me D:\LyXSVN\LyX2.0.x\compile-result\Debug\ALL_BUILD cannot find file But thee is no such directory, there is only

Re: Lyx 2.0.0 OSX crashes

On 18.05.2011 07:33, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 17.05.2011 um 23:21 schrieb Murat Yildizoglu: I think I have found the other conflict: I have recently bought Forever save 2 in a bundle and installed it. Since Lyx is my main editor, I have configured it for taking snapshots of Lyx 2 documents and

Re: Road to LyX 2.1 - #1 (2011-05-15)

On 18.05.2011 21:04, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: its because of the stability reasons why people usually start think about some branch and not just trunk. to impose levels of bureaucratic controls on trunk ... I don't know why you think I want to impose bureaucratic controls. Just because I

Re: still not possible to compile LyX 2.0.x with CMake

On 18.05.2011 12:15, Kornel wrote: Am Mittwoch, 18. Mai 2011 schrieb Richard Heck: On 05/17/2011 08:52 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: Am 17.05.2011 11:39, schrieb Kornel: 3. I cannot disable the CMake component DOC. It is annoying that the compiler always stumbles over this component. I can of course

Re: Too much options in LyX

On 18.05.2011 11:51, venom00 wrote: And... Scons? :P However I'll test it under Linux with autotools to be sure everything is right. OK, here's the version of the patch working under Linux with autotools. So if I'm correct, to add a file which needs the moc file in src/frontends/qt4 I have to:

Re: Too much options in LyX

On 18.05.2011 11:51, venom00 wrote: And... Scons? :P However I'll test it under Linux with autotools to be sure everything is right. OK, here's the version of the patch working under Linux with autotools. So if I'm correct, to add a file which needs the moc file in src/frontends/qt4 I have to:

Re: still not possible to compile LyX 2.0.x with CMake

On 18.05.2011 03:09, Uwe Stöhr wrote: Am 17.05.2011 08:09, schrieb Peter Kümmel: 1. a LyX.exe file is compiled, but at the end of the compilation process MSVC complains telling me D:\LyXSVN\LyX2.0.x\compile-result\Debug\ALL_BUILD cannot find file But thee is no such directory, there is only

Re: Lyx 2.0.0 OSX crashes

On 18.05.2011 07:33, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 17.05.2011 um 23:21 schrieb Murat Yildizoglu: I think I have found the other conflict: I have recently bought Forever save 2 in a bundle and installed it. Since Lyx is my main editor, I have configured it for taking snapshots of Lyx 2 documents and

Re: Road to LyX 2.1 - #1 (2011-05-15)

On 18.05.2011 21:04, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: its because of the stability reasons why people usually start think about some branch and not just trunk. to impose levels of bureaucratic controls on trunk ... I don't know why you think I want to impose bureaucratic controls. Just because I

Re: still not possible to compile LyX 2.0.x with CMake

On 18.05.2011 12:15, Kornel wrote: Am Mittwoch, 18. Mai 2011 schrieb Richard Heck: On 05/17/2011 08:52 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: Am 17.05.2011 11:39, schrieb Kornel: 3. I cannot disable the CMake component "DOC". It is annoying that the compiler always stumbles over this component. I can of course

Re: Too much options in LyX

On 18.05.2011 11:51, venom00 wrote: And... Scons? :P However I'll test it under Linux with autotools to be sure everything is right. OK, here's the version of the patch working under Linux with autotools. So if I'm correct, to add a file which needs the moc file in src/frontends/qt4 I have to:

Re: Too much options in LyX

On 18.05.2011 11:51, venom00 wrote: And... Scons? :P However I'll test it under Linux with autotools to be sure everything is right. OK, here's the version of the patch working under Linux with autotools. So if I'm correct, to add a file which needs the moc file in src/frontends/qt4 I have to:

Re: still not possible to compile LyX 2.0.x with CMake

On 17.05.2011 01:17, Uwe Stöhr wrote: I spent now another few hours to get LyX 2_0_x branch to compile with CMake. I started from a clean SVN tree and followed exactly the file Install.Win32. There are 3 problems: 1. a LyX.exe file is compiled, but at the end of the compilation process MSVC

Re: Too much options in LyX

On 16.05.2011 23:54, venom00 wrote: Vincent or someone else, can you tell me if it's OK to include a pair of files directly from the Qt Creator code? Just a quick reply so I can go on with the patch. Isn't QtCreator LGPL? Then it would be ok. Peter

Re: Too much options in LyX

Is there a reason for which the moc_ file is included at the end? I've spent an The include triggers the moc generation. I've moved fancylineedit.* into qt4 (no gui code in support, only QtCore classes), then called cmake again and it build without errors. hour (in cmake's lyx_automoc

Re: Too much options in LyX

On 17.05.2011 21:46, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Mmmh, now I'm starting to get confused about your question. Are you asking why you have to include the moc_* files or why the moc_* file was not created for fancylineedit ? The creation of the moc_* file is not trigged by including it.

Re: Lyx 2.0.0 OSX crashes

On 17.05.2011 23:04, Murat Yildizoglu wrote: Hi Stephan, I have bad news. I have deactivated Divvy and restarted my laptop. I have checked that Divvy is not answering its keyboard shortcut and started Lyx 2. Bang! It has crashed. I have renamed the config folder and restarted, Lyx has created a

Re: LyX 1.6.10 won't compile on gcc 4.6

On 16.05.2011 20:45, Pavel Sanda wrote: hi, i got this report. CXXInsetInclude.lo insets/InsetInclude.cpp: In member function `const lyx::support::FileNameList lyx::InsetInclude::getBibfilesCache(const lyx::Buffer) const`: insets/InsetInclude.cpp:809:37: error: uninitialized const

Re: r38765 - in lyx-devel/trunk: . development/cmake src src/client src/tex2lyx

-- warning: *NOT* handled - .app directory case... CMake Error at /opt/local/share/cmake-2.8/Modules/BundleUtilities.cmake:627 (message): error: fixup_bundle: not a valid bundle Call Stack (most recent call first): cmake_install.cmake:1835 (fixup_bundle) OK, I have the same here. I

Re: still not possible to compile LyX 2.0.x with CMake

On 17.05.2011 01:17, Uwe Stöhr wrote: I spent now another few hours to get LyX 2_0_x branch to compile with CMake. I started from a clean SVN tree and followed exactly the file Install.Win32. There are 3 problems: 1. a LyX.exe file is compiled, but at the end of the compilation process MSVC

Re: Too much options in LyX

On 16.05.2011 23:54, venom00 wrote: Vincent or someone else, can you tell me if it's OK to include a pair of files directly from the Qt Creator code? Just a quick reply so I can go on with the patch. Isn't QtCreator LGPL? Then it would be ok. Peter

Re: Too much options in LyX

Is there a reason for which the moc_ file is included at the end? I've spent an The include triggers the moc generation. I've moved fancylineedit.* into qt4 (no gui code in support, only QtCore classes), then called cmake again and it build without errors. hour (in cmake's lyx_automoc&

Re: Too much options in LyX

On 17.05.2011 21:46, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Mmmh, now I'm starting to get confused about your question. Are you asking why you have to include the moc_* files or why the moc_* file was not created for fancylineedit ? The creation of the moc_* file is not trigged by including it.

Re: Lyx 2.0.0 OSX crashes

On 17.05.2011 23:04, Murat Yildizoglu wrote: Hi Stephan, I have bad news. I have deactivated Divvy and restarted my laptop. I have checked that Divvy is not answering its keyboard shortcut and started Lyx 2. Bang! It has crashed. I have renamed the config folder and restarted, Lyx has created a

Re: LyX 1.6.10 won't compile on gcc 4.6

On 16.05.2011 20:45, Pavel Sanda wrote: hi, i got this report. CXXInsetInclude.lo insets/InsetInclude.cpp: In member function `const lyx::support::FileNameList& lyx::InsetInclude::getBibfilesCache(const lyx::Buffer&) const`: insets/InsetInclude.cpp:809:37: error: uninitialized const

Re: r38765 - in lyx-devel/trunk: . development/cmake src src/client src/tex2lyx

-- warning: *NOT* handled - .app directory case... CMake Error at /opt/local/share/cmake-2.8/Modules/BundleUtilities.cmake:627 (message): error: fixup_bundle: not a valid bundle Call Stack (most recent call first): cmake_install.cmake:1835 (fixup_bundle) OK, I have the same here. I

Re: [Qt5-feedback] Full SOAP 1.x and WCF Support

On 16.05.2011 23:04, David Reeves wrote: It would be great to have full support for SOAP 1.2 and WCF built into Qt 5. It's not free but very Qt-like I assume: http://kdab.com/kd-soap Peter

Re: [Qt5-feedback] Full SOAP 1.x and WCF Support

On 16.05.2011 23:25, Peter Kümmel wrote: On 16.05.2011 23:04, David Reeves wrote: It would be great to have full support for SOAP 1.2 and WCF built into Qt 5. It's not free but very Qt-like I assume: http://kdab.com/kd-soap Peter What was the command the undo-send, resend HEAD

Re: [Qt5-feedback] Full SOAP 1.x and WCF Support

On 16.05.2011 23:04, David Reeves wrote: It would be great to have full support for SOAP 1.2 and WCF built into Qt 5. It's not free but very Qt-like I assume: http://kdab.com/kd-soap Peter

Re: [Qt5-feedback] Full SOAP 1.x and WCF Support

On 16.05.2011 23:25, Peter Kümmel wrote: On 16.05.2011 23:04, David Reeves wrote: It would be great to have full support for SOAP 1.2 and WCF built into Qt 5. It's not free but very Qt-like I assume: http://kdab.com/kd-soap Peter What was the command the undo-send, resend HEAD

Re: How to compile LyX with MSVC 2010?

On 15.05.2011 01:35, Uwe Stöhr wrote: Am 15.05.2011 00:20, schrieb Peter Kümmel: Try to add #define LYX_USE_TR1 1 in config.h Thanks, this fixed the issue for me! However since something seemed to be misconfigured, I decided to start from scratch again (new MSVC installation, new

Re: Questions about r38758

On 15.05.2011 18:30, Uwe Stöhr wrote: Am 15.05.2011 10:03, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Wouldn't it be a good idea to: - first discuss this with Richard and the CMake people, - wait until the work in trunk has finished, - wait until it is confirmed that everything works fine for all

Re: r38754 - lyx-devel/trunk/development/cmake/intl

On 15.05.2011 20:47, Kornel Benko wrote: Am Samstag, 14. Mai 2011 schrieb kuem...@lyx.org: Author: kuemmel Date: Sat May 14 14:49:26 2011 New Revision: 38754 URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/38754 Log: cmake: remove mac warnings when building intl Modified:

Re: Road to LyX 2.1 - #1 (2011-05-15)

On 15.05.2011 22:21, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: In this mail I collect all topics that are under development in the current trunk. Some of the topics that are obvious and/or truly cosmetic will merge into 'trunk-stable' soon. The other topics will be tested in the 'development' branch for a

Re: Road to LyX 2.1 - #1 (2011-05-15)

On 15.05.2011 22:21, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: It would be nice if Kornel or Peter could rewrite this history in logical steps and split it up in the different topics. How could the history changed? Peter

Re: How to compile LyX with MSVC 2010?

On 15.05.2011 01:35, Uwe Stöhr wrote: Am 15.05.2011 00:20, schrieb Peter Kümmel: > Try to add > #define LYX_USE_TR1 1 > in config.h Thanks, this fixed the issue for me! However since something seemed to be misconfigured, I decided to start from scratch again (new MSVC ins

Re: Questions about r38758

On 15.05.2011 18:30, Uwe Stöhr wrote: Am 15.05.2011 10:03, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Wouldn't it be a good idea to: - first discuss this with Richard and the CMake people, - wait until the work in trunk has finished, - wait until it is confirmed that everything works fine for all

Re: r38754 - lyx-devel/trunk/development/cmake/intl

On 15.05.2011 20:47, Kornel Benko wrote: Am Samstag, 14. Mai 2011 schrieb kuem...@lyx.org: Author: kuemmel Date: Sat May 14 14:49:26 2011 New Revision: 38754 URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/38754 Log: cmake: remove mac warnings when building intl Modified:

Re: Road to LyX 2.1 - #1 (2011-05-15)

On 15.05.2011 22:21, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: In this mail I collect all topics that are under development in the current trunk. Some of the topics that are obvious and/or truly cosmetic will merge into 'trunk-stable' soon. The other topics will be tested in the 'development' branch for a

Re: Road to LyX 2.1 - #1 (2011-05-15)

On 15.05.2011 22:21, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: It would be nice if Kornel or Peter could rewrite this history in logical steps and split it up in the different topics. How could the history changed? Peter

Re: r38732 - lyx-devel/trunk

On 13.05.2011 09:43, Kornel Benko wrote: Am Donnerstag, 12. Mai 2011 schrieb kuem...@lyx.org: Modified: lyx-devel/trunk/CMakeLists.txt === === --- lyx-devel/trunk/CMakeLists.txt Thu May 12 23:48:11 2011(r38731)

Re: r38733 - in lyx-devel/trunk/src: client tex2lyx

On 13.05.2011 11:04, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 13.05.2011 um 09:48 schrieb Kornel: Am Freitag, 13. Mai 2011 schrieb Stephan Witt: Am 13.05.2011 um 00:06 schrieb kuem...@lyx.org: Author: kuemmel Date: Fri May 13 00:06:06 2011 New Revision: 38733 URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/38733 Log:

Re: r38733 - in lyx-devel/trunk/src: client tex2lyx

Do you still have this warning with current trunk? I could not reproduce it. Yes, exactly. I have them... with these setting: OK, let's include config.h. I also moved the .cmake file into the intl folder. Peter

Run in-place

Running LyX from the build directory should now work on all systems and all IDEs http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/38753/ please test. Peter

Re: Run in-place

On 14.05.2011 15:08, Peter Kümmel wrote: Running LyX from the build directory should now work on all systems and all IDEs and build systems. http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/38753/ please test. Peter

Re: Run in-place

On 14.05.2011 16:01, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 14.05.2011 um 15:12 schrieb Peter Kümmel: On 14.05.2011 15:08, Peter Kümmel wrote: Running LyX from the build directory should now work on all systems and all IDEs and build systems. http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/38753/ please test

Re: How to compile LyX with MSVC 2010?

On 14.05.2011 19:44, Uwe Stöhr wrote: Following Joost's advice I upgraded to MSVC 2010. But now I'm no longer able to compile LyX. I get tons of errors like these: d:\lyxsvn\lyx-devel\src\frontends\qt4\InGuiThread.h(100) : error C2780: 'boost::

Re: r38732 - lyx-devel/trunk

On 13.05.2011 09:43, Kornel Benko wrote: Am Donnerstag, 12. Mai 2011 schrieb kuem...@lyx.org: Modified: lyx-devel/trunk/CMakeLists.txt === === --- lyx-devel/trunk/CMakeLists.txt Thu May 12 23:48:11 2011(r38731)

Re: r38733 - in lyx-devel/trunk/src: client tex2lyx

On 13.05.2011 11:04, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 13.05.2011 um 09:48 schrieb Kornel: Am Freitag, 13. Mai 2011 schrieb Stephan Witt: Am 13.05.2011 um 00:06 schrieb kuem...@lyx.org: Author: kuemmel Date: Fri May 13 00:06:06 2011 New Revision: 38733 URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/38733 Log:

Re: r38733 - in lyx-devel/trunk/src: client tex2lyx

Do you still have this warning with current trunk? I could not reproduce it. Yes, exactly. I have them... with these setting: OK, let's include config.h. I also moved the .cmake file into the intl folder. Peter

Run in-place

Running LyX from the build directory should now work on all systems and all IDEs http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/38753/ please test. Peter

Re: Run in-place

On 14.05.2011 15:08, Peter Kümmel wrote: Running LyX from the build directory should now work on all systems and all IDEs and build systems. http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/38753/ please test. Peter

Re: Run in-place

On 14.05.2011 16:01, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 14.05.2011 um 15:12 schrieb Peter Kümmel: On 14.05.2011 15:08, Peter Kümmel wrote: Running LyX from the build directory should now work on all systems and all IDEs and build systems. http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/38753/ please test

Re: How to compile LyX with MSVC 2010?

On 14.05.2011 19:44, Uwe Stöhr wrote: Following Joost's advice I upgraded to MSVC 2010. But now I'm no longer able to compile LyX. I get tons of errors like these: d:\lyxsvn\lyx-devel\src\frontends\qt4\InGuiThread.h(100) : error C2780: 'boost::

Re: Compilation Errors

On 14.05.2011 01:12, Rob Oakes wrote: It's fixed. It's possible to build with external and internal libintl now. Thanks for taking a look at it. For some reason, I still kept having problems (even after deleting my build directory and CMakeLists.txt.user). It still kept trying to use the

Re: Compilation Errors

On 14.05.2011 01:01, Rob Oakes wrote: Thanks Peter, It's fixed. It's possible to build with external and internal libintl now. Thanks for taking a look at it. For some reason, I still kept having problems (even after deleting my build directory and CMakeLists.txt.user). It still kept

Re: Compilation Errors

On 14.05.2011 01:12, Rob Oakes wrote: It's fixed. It's possible to build with external and internal libintl now. Thanks for taking a look at it. For some reason, I still kept having problems (even after deleting my build directory and CMakeLists.txt.user). It still kept trying to use the

Re: Compilation Errors

On 14.05.2011 01:01, Rob Oakes wrote: Thanks Peter, It's fixed. It's possible to build with external and internal libintl now. Thanks for taking a look at it. For some reason, I still kept having problems (even after deleting my build directory and CMakeLists.txt.user). It still kept

Re: r38716 - in lyx-devel/trunk: . development/cmake

On 12.05.2011 09:56, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 12/05/11 06:22, kuem...@lyx.org a écrit : Log: cmake: we already test on gettext Modified: lyx-devel/trunk/development/cmake/configCompiler.h.msvc == ---

Re: CMake TODOs

On 12.05.2011 10:00, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 11/05/11 08:32, Peter Kümmel a écrit : The 3rd variant on Mac OSX is as follows: * lyx binary is named LyX * it resides in bin/Debug for debug configuration, but it's - bin/Release/LyX for release configuration, - bin/MinSizeRel/LyX

Re: Compilation Errors

On 12.05.2011 18:04, Rob Oakes wrote: Dear LyX Developers, Is anyone else getting compilation errors on Mac OS X after the cmake directory cleanup? I just merged with the most recent SVN, and this is what I'm getting (after reconfiguring with cmake):

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >