On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Kornel Benko <kor...@lyx.org> wrote:
> Am Freitag, 29. November 2013 um 10:04:52, schrieb Vincent van
> Ravesteijn <v...@lyx.org>
>
> > > OK, found it. Vincent changed the signature of
>
> > >
>
> > > &q
Yes, I will fix it, whenever I'm in the position to get access to the
server.
Vincent
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Hugo Hinterberger <
hugo.hinterber...@gmx.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Nov 2013 22:33:29 +0100, Vincent van Ravesteijn <v...@lyx.org>
> wrote:
>
> I h
Vincent van Ravesteijn schreef op 29-11-2013 15:31:
Yes, I will fix it, whenever I'm in the position to get access to the
server.
Vincent
The windows installer is available now on the FTP.
Vincent
Uwe Stöhr schreef op 25-11-2013 0:46:
Am 24.11.2013 19:39, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
Do you still have time to generate the Windows installer(s) ?
Yes. I will try to upload an installer on Wednesday.
regards Uwe
I have created an installer myself and uploaded it onto the FTP
Uwe Stöhr schreef op 25-11-2013 0:46:
Am 24.11.2013 19:39, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
Do you still have time to generate the Windows installer(s) ?
Yes. I will try to upload an installer on Wednesday.
regards Uwe
I have created an installer myself and uploaded it onto the FTP
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 9:27 PM, Georg Baum
georg.b...@post.rwth-aachen.dewrote:
Kornel Benko wrote:
Hi,
can we please have some locking mechanism here?
This would indeed be a good idea.
While parallel export testing is OK, if the userdir is configured,
it is not if started with a
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org wrote:
2013/11/26 Vincent van Ravesteijn
If we postpone the fix for windows, we can use this. I think we will ship
LyX 2.2 with Qt5.
BTW is LyX 2.1 with Qt5 already operational?
Jürgen
Not completely. For instance, we
Kornel Benko schreef op 25-11-2013 13:20:
Am Montag, 25. November 2013 um 13:01:05, schrieb Vincent van
Ravesteijn v...@lyx.org
The problem is that the commit is touching very essential code. If
something goes wrong LyX becomes pretty much unusable (e.g. if configure
isn't run anymore
Juergen Spitzmueller schreef op 26-11-2013 16:16:
commit aa5ef5bbbe0674e4e434882e5f2ffade9c68a7dc
Author: Juergen Spitzmueller sp...@lyx.org
Date: Tue Nov 26 16:16:24 2013 +0100
Properly name Cancel button (part of #8787)
diff --git a/src/buffer_funcs.cpp b/src/buffer_funcs.cpp
index
Well, I've seen strange things happen before.
Do we think this is safe enough to keep it in 2.1 now the last
beta has
been released ?
I'd say for Linux it is safe if NFS is not used. For NFS
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/575328/fcntl-lockf-which-is-better-to-
Well, I've seen strange things happen before.
Do we think this is safe enough to keep it in 2.1 now the last beta
has
been released ?
I'd say for Linux it is safe if NFS is not used. For NFS
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/575328/fcntl-lockf-which-is-better-to-
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 9:27 PM, Georg Baum
wrote:
> Kornel Benko wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > can we please have some locking mechanism here?
>
> This would indeed be a good idea.
>
> > While parallel export testing is OK, if the userdir is configured,
> > it is not if
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Jürgen Spitzmüller <sp...@lyx.org> wrote:
> 2013/11/26 Vincent van Ravesteijn
>
> If we postpone the fix for windows, we can use this. I think we will ship
>> LyX 2.2 with Qt5.
>>
>
> BTW is LyX 2.1 with Qt5 already operationa
Kornel Benko schreef op 25-11-2013 13:20:
Am Montag, 25. November 2013 um 13:01:05, schrieb Vincent van
Ravesteijn <v...@lyx.org>
>
> The problem is that the commit is touching very essential code. If
> something goes wrong LyX becomes pretty much unusable (e.g. if configu
Juergen Spitzmueller schreef op 26-11-2013 16:16:
commit aa5ef5bbbe0674e4e434882e5f2ffade9c68a7dc
Author: Juergen Spitzmueller
Date: Tue Nov 26 16:16:24 2013 +0100
Properly name Cancel button (part of #8787)
diff --git a/src/buffer_funcs.cpp b/src/buffer_funcs.cpp
index
> > Well, I've seen strange things happen before.
> >
> > Do we think this is safe enough to keep it in 2.1 now the last
beta has
> > been released ?
>
> I'd say for Linux it is safe if NFS is not used. For NFS
>
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/575328/fcntl-lockf-which-is-better-to-
> > > Well, I've seen strange things happen before.
>
> > >
>
> > > Do we think this is safe enough to keep it in 2.1 now the last beta
has
>
> > > been released ?
>
> >
>
> > I'd say for Linux it is safe if NFS is not used. For NFS
>
> >
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Kornel Benko kor...@lyx.org wrote:
Am Montag, 25. November 2013 um 08:22:27, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn
v...@lyx.org
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 9:55 PM, Kornel Benko kor...@lyx.org wrote:
Am Dienstag, 19. November 2013 um 21:06:21, schrieb Georg
Georg Baum schreef op 25-11-2013 21:09:
Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 25.11.2013 um 13:01 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn v...@lyx.org:
The problem is that the commit is touching very essential code. If
something goes wrong LyX becomes pretty much unusable (e.g. if configure
isn't run anymore). We
Stephan Witt schreef op 25-11-2013 17:06:
Am 25.11.2013 um 13:01 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn v...@lyx.org:
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Kornel Benko kor...@lyx.org wrote:
Am Montag, 25. November 2013 um 08:22:27, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn
v...@lyx.org
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 9
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Kornel Benko <kor...@lyx.org> wrote:
> Am Montag, 25. November 2013 um 08:22:27, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn
> <v...@lyx.org>
>
> > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 9:55 PM, Kornel Benko <kor...@lyx.org> wrote:
>
> >
>
>
Georg Baum schreef op 25-11-2013 21:09:
Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 25.11.2013 um 13:01 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn <v...@lyx.org>:
The problem is that the commit is touching very essential code. If
something goes wrong LyX becomes pretty much unusable (e.g. if configure
isn't run anymor
Stephan Witt schreef op 25-11-2013 17:06:
Am 25.11.2013 um 13:01 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn <v...@lyx.org>:
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Kornel Benko <kor...@lyx.org> wrote:
Am Montag, 25. November 2013 um 08:22:27, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn
<v...@lyx.org>
On
Georg Baum schreef op 18-11-2013 21:35:
Kornel Benko wrote:
diff --git a/development/autotests/lyxStatus.pm
b/development/autotests/lyxStatus.pm new file mode 100644
index 000..b8d0b5f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/development/autotests/lyxStatus.pm
@@ -0,0 +1,357 @@
+#! /usr/bin/env perl
+# -*-
Kornel Benko schreef op 21-11-2013 22:36:
So it is OK for Linux and OS X, but not for Windows. Who is going to
implement the Windows equivalent? Sorry to play the devils advocate
again,
but I believe these things are important.
ATM, for windows does not change anything.
Until now nobody
Kornel Benko schreef op 21-11-2013 13:07:
Sorry to bother again.
I am using
#git checkout features/chat2
error: you need to resolve your current index first
po/sk.po: needs merge
I think you had a previous merge conflict, and you needed to git add
po/sk.po to mark the merge conflict to
Peter Kümmel schreef op 9-11-2013 12:09:
On 18.10.2013 03:32, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Be warned that this is an orphan branch (i.e. it is not connected to
the lyx history).
Vincent
Is it possible to integrate an orphan branch without loosing history?
Peter
If I'm not wrong
Vincent van Ravesteijn schreef op 10-11-2013 21:49:
The tarballs of lyx-2.1.0beta2 can be found on the FTP server:
ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.1/lyx-2.1.0beta2/
As usual, I will wait for the packagers to make binaries and to
provide feedback before announcing the release.
Vincent
Public release of LyX version 2.1.0beta2
We are proud to announce the second public beta release of the new
LyX 2.1 series.
With this release, LyX celebrates 18 years of existence. The 2.1 series
has a rich set of new features compared to the current
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 9:55 PM, Kornel Benko kor...@lyx.org wrote:
Am Dienstag, 19. November 2013 um 21:06:21, schrieb Georg Baum
georg.b...@post.rwth-aachen.de
Kornel Benko wrote:
Trying to lock with
open(lock_file.c_str(), O_CREAT|O_EXCL|O_SYNC|O_RDWR, 0666);
seams to work
Georg Baum schreef op 18-11-2013 21:35:
Kornel Benko wrote:
diff --git a/development/autotests/lyxStatus.pm
b/development/autotests/lyxStatus.pm new file mode 100644
index 000..b8d0b5f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/development/autotests/lyxStatus.pm
@@ -0,0 +1,357 @@
+#! /usr/bin/env perl
+# -*-
Kornel Benko schreef op 21-11-2013 22:36:
> So it is OK for Linux and OS X, but not for Windows. Who is going to
> implement the Windows equivalent? Sorry to play the devils advocate
again,
> but I believe these things are important.
ATM, for windows does not change anything.
Until now
Kornel Benko schreef op 21-11-2013 13:07:
Sorry to bother again.
I am using
#git checkout features/chat2
error: you need to resolve your current index first
po/sk.po: needs merge
I think you had a previous merge conflict, and you needed to "git add
po/sk.po" to mark the merge conflict
Peter Kümmel schreef op 9-11-2013 12:09:
On 18.10.2013 03:32, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Be warned that this is an orphan branch (i.e. it is not connected to
the lyx history).
Vincent
Is it possible to integrate an orphan branch without loosing history?
Peter
If I'm not wrong
Vincent van Ravesteijn schreef op 10-11-2013 21:49:
The tarballs of lyx-2.1.0beta2 can be found on the FTP server:
ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.1/lyx-2.1.0beta2/
As usual, I will wait for the packagers to make binaries and to
provide feedback before announcing the release.
Vincent
Public release of LyX version 2.1.0beta2
We are proud to announce the second public beta release of the new
LyX 2.1 series.
With this release, LyX celebrates 18 years of existence. The 2.1 series
has a rich set of new features compared to the current
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 9:55 PM, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 19. November 2013 um 21:06:21, schrieb Georg Baum <
> georg.b...@post.rwth-aachen.de>
> > Kornel Benko wrote:
> >
> > > Trying to lock with
> > > open(lock_file.c_str(), O_CREAT|O_EXCL|O_SYNC|O_RDWR, 0666);
> > >
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Kornel Benko kor...@lyx.org wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 13. November 2013 um 10:31:53, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn
v...@lyx.org
The errors will not be the result of a 'git checkout' command. It more
looks like a git pull. This is the reason, I don't advice
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 1:49 AM, Tommaso Cucinotta tomm...@lyx.org wrote:
On 15/11/13 20:24, Kornel Benko wrote:
I probably misunderstood, what to send.
it was ok. I just wanted to check whether your origin was actually the
main lyx repo or mine, so you actually must have cloned the whole
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Kornel Benko <kor...@lyx.org> wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 13. November 2013 um 10:31:53, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn
> <v...@lyx.org>
> > >
> > The errors will not be the result of a 'git checkout' command. It more
> > looks
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 1:49 AM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> On 15/11/13 20:24, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > I probably misunderstood, what to send.
>
> it was ok. I just wanted to check whether your origin was actually the
> main lyx repo or mine, so you actually must have cloned the
Tommaso Cucinotta schreef op 14-11-2013 11:43:
On 13/11/13 09:31, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
If you would have done a 'git fetch', you will retrieve the new
commits. Then, you want to reset the features/chat2 branch to the new
one tommasso pushed:
$ git checkout features/chat2
$ git reset
Tommaso Cucinotta schreef op 14-11-2013 11:43:
On 13/11/13 09:31, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
If you would have done a 'git fetch', you will retrieve the new
commits. Then, you want to reset the features/chat2 branch to the new
one tommasso pushed:
$ git checkout features/chat2
$ git reset
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Kornel Benko kor...@lyx.org wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 13. November 2013 um 10:02:30, schrieb Kornel Benko
kor...@lyx.org
Am Dienstag, 12. November 2013 um 22:21:48, schrieb Tommaso Cucinotta
tomm...@lyx.org
Kornel,
I'm just thinking of dropping entirely
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 3:42 AM, Tommaso Cucinotta tomm...@lyx.org wrote:
commit a2291edac65fe16bf8f158150c7474e1c3480685
Author: Tommaso Cucinotta tomm...@lyx.org
Date: Wed Nov 13 02:41:38 2013 +
Now run-tests.sh captures PROGRAM_SUFFIX from config.h, in order to
use the correct
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 13. November 2013 um 10:02:30, schrieb Kornel Benko <
> kor...@lyx.org>
> > Am Dienstag, 12. November 2013 um 22:21:48, schrieb Tommaso Cucinotta <
> tomm...@lyx.org>
> > > Kornel,
> > >
> > > I'm just thinking
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 3:42 AM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> commit a2291edac65fe16bf8f158150c7474e1c3480685
> Author: Tommaso Cucinotta
> Date: Wed Nov 13 02:41:38 2013 +
>
> Now run-tests.sh captures PROGRAM_SUFFIX from config.h, in order to
> use
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org wrote:
2013/11/12 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
I'll try to have a look. I thought about a couple of good projects, but I
cannot remember anymore what they were %-|tors again, I think that would be
One thing that crossed my mind was
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> 2013/11/12 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
>
>> I'll try to have a look. I thought about a couple of good projects, but I
>> cannot remember anymore what they were %-|tors again, I think that would be
>>
>
> One thing that crossed
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 12:51 AM, Tommaso Cucinotta tomm...@lyx.org wrote:
On 10/11/13 14:37, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Hope it's now all ok and u can see the repo. The feature is in the
features/chat branch.
T.
Yes, it works now.
other question/help: now I'm co-editing
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 1:17 AM, Tommaso Cucinotta tomm...@lyx.org wrote:
On 10/11/13 23:51, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
Any hint as to how to restore a sane environment (branch) :-) ?
looking at
http://git.lyx.org/?p=developers/tommaso/lyx.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/features/chat
it
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Tommaso Cucinotta tomm...@lyx.org wrote:
On 11/11/13 08:03, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
First of all, it wouldn't be necessary to merge with master over and
over again. Chances are not that big that master is now interfering
with your feature, so don't
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 12:51 AM, Tommaso Cucinotta <tomm...@lyx.org> wrote:
> On 10/11/13 14:37, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> >> Hope it's now all ok and u can see the repo. The feature is in the
> features/chat branch.
> >>
> >> T.
> >>
>
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 1:17 AM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> On 10/11/13 23:51, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> > Any hint as to how to restore a sane environment (branch) :-) ?
>
> looking at
>
>
> http://git.lyx.org/?p=developers/tommaso/lyx.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/features/chat
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Tommaso Cucinotta <tomm...@lyx.org> wrote:
> On 11/11/13 08:03, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> > First of all, it wouldn't be necessary to merge with master over and
> > over again. Chances are not that big that master is now interfering
Tommaso Cucinotta schreef op 6-11-2013 22:50:
On 04/11/13 20:44, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Tommaso Cucinotta schreef op 2-11-2013 17:15:
On 30/10/13 03:19, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
I can reach the server, but the ssh ... setperms developers/tommaso/lyx just
hangs forever.
Now I'm on my
Jürgen Spitzmüller schreef op 10-11-2013 12:17:
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Hi all,
I want to freeze the master and to evaluate a few days whether the last
changes introduce any regressions.
The coming days I will be at the GSoC mentor summit, and I will prepare
the tarballs. When
The tarballs of lyx-2.1.0beta2 can be found on the FTP server:
ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.1/lyx-2.1.0beta2/
As usual, I will wait for the packagers to make binaries and to provide
feedback before announcing the release.
Vincent
Tommaso Cucinotta schreef op 6-11-2013 22:50:
On 04/11/13 20:44, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Tommaso Cucinotta schreef op 2-11-2013 17:15:
On 30/10/13 03:19, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
I can reach the server, but the "ssh ... setperms developers/tommaso/lyx" just
hangs forever
Jürgen Spitzmüller schreef op 10-11-2013 12:17:
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Hi all,
I want to freeze the master and to evaluate a few days whether the last
changes introduce any regressions.
The coming days I will be at the GSoC mentor summit, and I will prepare
the tarballs. When
The tarballs of lyx-2.1.0beta2 can be found on the FTP server:
ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.1/lyx-2.1.0beta2/
As usual, I will wait for the packagers to make binaries and to provide
feedback before announcing the release.
Vincent
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 10:40 PM, Nico Williams n...@cryptonector.comwrote:
On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 09:23:15PM +, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
Sure, feel free to commit them. Guess that in multi-user commit mode,
it's much better to NOT rewrite history, so we won't use push -f, right ?
FYI,
OpenCV has made a youtube video of the results of the GSoC students. It's a
rather neat way to show what the program brought the project.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_TTtN4frMEA
Vincent
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 10:40 PM, Nico Williams wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 09:23:15PM +, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> > Sure, feel free to commit them. Guess that in multi-user commit mode,
> > it's much better to NOT rewrite history, so we won't use push -f, right ?
FYI,
OpenCV has made a youtube video of the results of the GSoC students. It's a
rather neat way to show what the program brought the project.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_TTtN4frMEA
Vincent
Tommaso Cucinotta schreef op 2-11-2013 17:15:
On 30/10/13 03:19, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
I can reach the server, but the ssh ... setperms developers/tommaso/lyx just
hangs forever.
Now I'm on my usual connection, but it's still hanging forever. Any clue of how
to fix this ?
Did you do
Tommaso Cucinotta schreef op 2-11-2013 17:15:
On 30/10/13 03:19, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
I can reach the server, but the "ssh ... setperms developers/tommaso/lyx" just
hangs forever.
Now I'm on my usual connection, but it's still hanging forever. Any clue of how
to fix this ?
Did you do
Tommaso Cucinotta schreef op 26-10-2013 19:26:
I'm trying to fight my laziness in learning git.
Good.
Apparently, I managed to fetch, push and also a bit of hist rewrite (push -f),
however it seems I get seemingly harmless messages like this on git ops:
remote: Traceback (most recent
Tommaso Cucinotta schreef op 26-10-2013 19:26:
Perhaps this way others may more easily contribute to the patch/feature, if
interested, by committing to this particular repo and branch ?
If you want us to actually try the feature, you need to give read access
to your fellow developers (at
Yihui Xie schreef op 25-10-2013 3:08:
I think this is a good idea, but perhaps most LyX developers may not
want to waste much time on SNS like the our generation :) LyX does
have a Google+ page:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/110001097193208807095/about but as you can
see, it is not actively
Scott Kostyshak schreef op 25-10-2013 8:50:
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 2:30 AM, Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org wrote:
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
In this case, can I have the login and password?
Vincent is behind the twitter idea. I can forward you some
exchange about this (didn't went through devel
Scott Kostyshak schreef op 25-10-2013 2:38:
Here are some selected relevant tweets with #lyx:
https://twitter.com/u203d/status/392915523870019584
It feels good to finally be free from the tyranny of #PowerPoint (and
clones) now that I create my slides with #Lyx and the beamer class.
Tommaso Cucinotta schreef op 26-10-2013 19:26:
I'm trying to fight my laziness in learning git.
Good.
Apparently, I managed to fetch, push and also a bit of hist rewrite (push -f),
however it seems I get seemingly harmless messages like this on git ops:
remote: Traceback (most recent
Tommaso Cucinotta schreef op 26-10-2013 19:26:
Perhaps this way others may more easily contribute to the patch/feature, if
interested, by committing to this particular repo and branch ?
If you want us to actually try the feature, you need to give read access
to your fellow developers (at
Yihui Xie schreef op 25-10-2013 3:08:
I think this is a good idea, but perhaps most LyX developers may not
want to waste much time on SNS like the our generation :) LyX does
have a Google+ page:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/110001097193208807095/about but as you can
see, it is not actively
Scott Kostyshak schreef op 25-10-2013 8:50:
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 2:30 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
In this case, can I have the login and password?
Vincent is behind the twitter idea. I can forward you some
exchange about this (didn't went through devel
Scott Kostyshak schreef op 25-10-2013 2:38:
Here are some selected relevant tweets with #lyx:
https://twitter.com/u203d/status/392915523870019584
It feels good to finally be free from the tyranny of #PowerPoint (and
clones) now that I create my slides with #Lyx and the beamer class.
Scott Kostyshak schreef op 19-10-2013 19:43:
I think that polyglossia is used by default and \make@lr is only defined
by babel, maybe. Try adding the following snippet to the preamble:
\@ifundefined{make@lr}
{\def\make@lr#1{\begingroup
\toks@=\expandafter{#1}%
\edef\x{\endgroup
Scott Kostyshak schreef op 19-10-2013 19:43:
I think that polyglossia is used by default and \make@lr is only defined
by babel, maybe. Try adding the following snippet to the preamble:
\@ifundefined{make@lr}
{\def\make@lr#1{\begingroup
\toks@=\expandafter{#1}%
\edef\x{\endgroup
Op 18 okt. 2013 06:56 schreef Raphael Kubo da Costa rak...@freebsd.org:
Vincent van Ravesteijn vfr at lyx.org writes:
Ok, it's in.
Thank you Raphael.
Thanks. What's the procedure for getting those changes into 2.0.x and the
upcoming 2.1.x series?
It is now automatically in the 2.1.x
Op 18 okt. 2013 15:47 schreef Tommaso Cucinotta tomm...@lyx.org:
Thx again for all the further hints. I felt the need to copy these
in our lyx/git wiki page at:
http://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/LyXGit
Feel free to edit/integrate further.
So you're writing your first Git manual. Anyway I like to
Op 18 okt. 2013 06:56 schreef "Raphael Kubo da Costa" <rak...@freebsd.org>:
>
> Vincent van Ravesteijn lyx.org> writes:
> > Ok, it's in.
> >
> > Thank you Raphael.
>
> Thanks. What's the procedure for getting those changes into 2.0.x and the
&g
Op 18 okt. 2013 15:47 schreef "Tommaso Cucinotta" :
>
> Thx again for all the further hints. I felt the need to copy these
> in our lyx/git wiki page at:
>
> http://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/LyXGit
>
> Feel free to edit/integrate further.
So you're writing your first Git manual.
Op 17 okt. 2013 07:27 schreef Peter Kümmel syntheti...@gmx.net:
Hi, I wanna have a look at the corkboard code, but haven't
found a git branch anywhere, only Rob's bazaar repository with
changes from February. Is there something more actual?
The code thay Ashley produced lives somewhere on
Nico Williams schreef op 18-10-2013 0:59:
In general, if you stay away from destructive operations, git is quite
safe. If you find yourself wanting to perform a destructive
operation, make sure first that any extant changes in your workspace
are committed so that you can always get them back
Peter Kümmel schreef op 17-10-2013 17:45:
On 17.10.2013 17:13, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Op 17 okt. 2013 07:27 schreef Peter Kümmel
syntheti...@gmx.net mailto:syntheti...@gmx.net:
Hi, I wanna have a look at the corkboard code, but haven't
found a git branch anywhere, only Rob's bazaar
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schreef op 17-10-2013 23:03:
Le 17/10/13 22:39, Raphael Kubo da Costa a écrit :
The problems the comments in the build systems refer to seem to have
been
fixed for years. [1] says the checks in libstdc++ have been improved,
and
all supported FreeBSD versions enable
Scott Kostyshak schreef op 15-10-2013 21:51:
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 6:43 PM, Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org wrote:
On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 7:12 AM, Martin Hoffmann hoffi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06.10.2013 10:25, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
Welcome to the list!
Yes,
Op 17 okt. 2013 07:27 schreef "Peter Kümmel" :
>
> Hi, I wanna have a look at the corkboard code, but haven't
> found a git branch anywhere, only Rob's bazaar repository with
> changes from February. Is there something more actual?
>
The code thay Ashley produced lives
Nico Williams schreef op 18-10-2013 0:59:
In general, if you stay away from destructive operations, git is quite
safe. If you find yourself wanting to perform a destructive
operation, make sure first that any extant changes in your workspace
are committed so that you can always get them back
Peter Kümmel schreef op 17-10-2013 17:45:
On 17.10.2013 17:13, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Op 17 okt. 2013 07:27 schreef "Peter Kümmel"
<syntheti...@gmx.net <mailto:syntheti...@gmx.net>>:
Hi, I wanna have a look at the corkboard code, but haven't
found a git branc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schreef op 17-10-2013 23:03:
Le 17/10/13 22:39, Raphael Kubo da Costa a écrit :
The problems the comments in the build systems refer to seem to have
been
fixed for years. [1] says the checks in libstdc++ have been improved,
and
all supported FreeBSD versions enable
Scott Kostyshak schreef op 15-10-2013 21:51:
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 6:43 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 7:12 AM, Martin Hoffmann wrote:
On 06.10.2013 10:25, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
Welcome to the list!
Yes,
Hi all,
I want to freeze the master and to evaluate a few days whether the last
changes introduce any regressions.
The coming days I will be at the GSoC mentor summit, and I will prepare
the tarballs. When there are no big problems, I can tag and release the
second beta after the weekend.
Hi all,
I want to freeze the master and to evaluate a few days whether the last
changes introduce any regressions.
The coming days I will be at the GSoC mentor summit, and I will prepare
the tarballs. When there are no big problems, I can tag and release the
second beta after the weekend.
Enrico Forestieri schreef op 7-10-2013 21:05:
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 02:28:18PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
It is very strange that I can't reproduce, if this is the cause,
and, indeed, that people haven't been seeing this bug all along.
Actually, all my files are converted correctly. But
Georg Baum schreef op 10-10-2013 23:41:
OK, I believe I understand what happens, but I can't test, since I do not
see the \newcommand differences: The MacroData which is constructed from a
DocIterator is a lazy version, which does not have data initially, but
queries it when needed. This is not
In general, the metrics() functions should not change the Buffer; we have
updateBuffer/updateMacros for that purpose.
---
src/mathed/MathMacroTemplate.cpp |8 ++--
src/mathed/MathMacroTemplate.h |4 ++--
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git
Enrico Forestieri schreef op 7-10-2013 21:05:
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 02:28:18PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
It is very strange that I can't reproduce, if this is the cause,
and, indeed, that people haven't been seeing this bug all along.
Actually, all my files are converted correctly. But
Georg Baum schreef op 10-10-2013 23:41:
OK, I believe I understand what happens, but I can't test, since I do not
see the \newcommand differences: The MacroData which is constructed from a
DocIterator is a lazy version, which does not have data initially, but
queries it when needed. This is not
801 - 900 of 6163 matches
Mail list logo