Re: "Paste from LaTeX" does not work well with -userdir

2013-11-29 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Kornel Benko <kor...@lyx.org> wrote: > Am Freitag, 29. November 2013 um 10:04:52, schrieb Vincent van > Ravesteijn <v...@lyx.org> > > > > OK, found it. Vincent changed the signature of > > > > > > > > &q

Re: Tarballs lyx-2.1.0beta2 on FTP

2013-11-29 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Yes, I will fix it, whenever I'm in the position to get access to the server. Vincent On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Hugo Hinterberger < hugo.hinterber...@gmx.net> wrote: > On Thu, 28 Nov 2013 22:33:29 +0100, Vincent van Ravesteijn <v...@lyx.org> > wrote: > > I h

Re: Tarballs lyx-2.1.0beta2 on FTP

2013-11-29 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Vincent van Ravesteijn schreef op 29-11-2013 15:31: Yes, I will fix it, whenever I'm in the position to get access to the server. Vincent The windows installer is available now on the FTP. Vincent

Re: Tarballs lyx-2.1.0beta2 on FTP

2013-11-28 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Uwe Stöhr schreef op 25-11-2013 0:46: Am 24.11.2013 19:39, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Do you still have time to generate the Windows installer(s) ? Yes. I will try to upload an installer on Wednesday. regards Uwe I have created an installer myself and uploaded it onto the FTP

Re: Tarballs lyx-2.1.0beta2 on FTP

2013-11-28 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Uwe Stöhr schreef op 25-11-2013 0:46: Am 24.11.2013 19:39, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Do you still have time to generate the Windows installer(s) ? Yes. I will try to upload an installer on Wednesday. regards Uwe I have created an installer myself and uploaded it onto the FTP

Re: File locking while lyx configures

2013-11-26 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 9:27 PM, Georg Baum georg.b...@post.rwth-aachen.dewrote: Kornel Benko wrote: Hi, can we please have some locking mechanism here? This would indeed be a good idea. While parallel export testing is OK, if the userdir is configured, it is not if started with a

Re: File locking while lyx configures

2013-11-26 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org wrote: 2013/11/26 Vincent van Ravesteijn If we postpone the fix for windows, we can use this. I think we will ship LyX 2.2 with Qt5. BTW is LyX 2.1 with Qt5 already operational? Jürgen Not completely. For instance, we

Re: File locking while lyx configures

2013-11-26 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Kornel Benko schreef op 25-11-2013 13:20: Am Montag, 25. November 2013 um 13:01:05, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn v...@lyx.org The problem is that the commit is touching very essential code. If something goes wrong LyX becomes pretty much unusable (e.g. if configure isn't run anymore

Re: [LyX/master] Properly name Cancel button (part of #8787)

2013-11-26 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Juergen Spitzmueller schreef op 26-11-2013 16:16: commit aa5ef5bbbe0674e4e434882e5f2ffade9c68a7dc Author: Juergen Spitzmueller sp...@lyx.org Date: Tue Nov 26 16:16:24 2013 +0100 Properly name Cancel button (part of #8787) diff --git a/src/buffer_funcs.cpp b/src/buffer_funcs.cpp index

Re: File locking while lyx configures

2013-11-26 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Well, I've seen strange things happen before. Do we think this is safe enough to keep it in 2.1 now the last beta has been released ? I'd say for Linux it is safe if NFS is not used. For NFS http://stackoverflow.com/questions/575328/fcntl-lockf-which-is-better-to-

Re: File locking while lyx configures

2013-11-26 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Well, I've seen strange things happen before. Do we think this is safe enough to keep it in 2.1 now the last beta has been released ? I'd say for Linux it is safe if NFS is not used. For NFS http://stackoverflow.com/questions/575328/fcntl-lockf-which-is-better-to-

Re: File locking while lyx configures

2013-11-26 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 9:27 PM, Georg Baum wrote: > Kornel Benko wrote: > > > Hi, > > can we please have some locking mechanism here? > > This would indeed be a good idea. > > > While parallel export testing is OK, if the userdir is configured, > > it is not if

Re: File locking while lyx configures

2013-11-26 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Jürgen Spitzmüller <sp...@lyx.org> wrote: > 2013/11/26 Vincent van Ravesteijn > > If we postpone the fix for windows, we can use this. I think we will ship >> LyX 2.2 with Qt5. >> > > BTW is LyX 2.1 with Qt5 already operationa

Re: File locking while lyx configures

2013-11-26 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Kornel Benko schreef op 25-11-2013 13:20: Am Montag, 25. November 2013 um 13:01:05, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn <v...@lyx.org> > > The problem is that the commit is touching very essential code. If > something goes wrong LyX becomes pretty much unusable (e.g. if configu

Re: [LyX/master] Properly name Cancel button (part of #8787)

2013-11-26 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Juergen Spitzmueller schreef op 26-11-2013 16:16: commit aa5ef5bbbe0674e4e434882e5f2ffade9c68a7dc Author: Juergen Spitzmueller Date: Tue Nov 26 16:16:24 2013 +0100 Properly name Cancel button (part of #8787) diff --git a/src/buffer_funcs.cpp b/src/buffer_funcs.cpp index

Re: File locking while lyx configures

2013-11-26 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
> > Well, I've seen strange things happen before. > > > > Do we think this is safe enough to keep it in 2.1 now the last beta has > > been released ? > > I'd say for Linux it is safe if NFS is not used. For NFS > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/575328/fcntl-lockf-which-is-better-to-

Re: File locking while lyx configures

2013-11-26 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
> > > Well, I've seen strange things happen before. > > > > > > > > Do we think this is safe enough to keep it in 2.1 now the last beta has > > > > been released ? > > > > > > I'd say for Linux it is safe if NFS is not used. For NFS > > >

Re: File locking while lyx configures

2013-11-25 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Kornel Benko kor...@lyx.org wrote: Am Montag, 25. November 2013 um 08:22:27, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn v...@lyx.org On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 9:55 PM, Kornel Benko kor...@lyx.org wrote: Am Dienstag, 19. November 2013 um 21:06:21, schrieb Georg

Re: File locking while lyx configures

2013-11-25 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Georg Baum schreef op 25-11-2013 21:09: Stephan Witt wrote: Am 25.11.2013 um 13:01 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn v...@lyx.org: The problem is that the commit is touching very essential code. If something goes wrong LyX becomes pretty much unusable (e.g. if configure isn't run anymore). We

Re: File locking while lyx configures

2013-11-25 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Stephan Witt schreef op 25-11-2013 17:06: Am 25.11.2013 um 13:01 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn v...@lyx.org: On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Kornel Benko kor...@lyx.org wrote: Am Montag, 25. November 2013 um 08:22:27, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn v...@lyx.org On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 9

Re: File locking while lyx configures

2013-11-25 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Kornel Benko <kor...@lyx.org> wrote: > Am Montag, 25. November 2013 um 08:22:27, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn > <v...@lyx.org> > > > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 9:55 PM, Kornel Benko <kor...@lyx.org> wrote: > > > > >

Re: File locking while lyx configures

2013-11-25 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Georg Baum schreef op 25-11-2013 21:09: Stephan Witt wrote: Am 25.11.2013 um 13:01 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn <v...@lyx.org>: The problem is that the commit is touching very essential code. If something goes wrong LyX becomes pretty much unusable (e.g. if configure isn't run anymor

Re: File locking while lyx configures

2013-11-25 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Stephan Witt schreef op 25-11-2013 17:06: Am 25.11.2013 um 13:01 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn <v...@lyx.org>: On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Kornel Benko <kor...@lyx.org> wrote: Am Montag, 25. November 2013 um 08:22:27, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn <v...@lyx.org> On

Re: [LyX/master] make test environment. Exports with luatex and xetex.

2013-11-24 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Georg Baum schreef op 18-11-2013 21:35: Kornel Benko wrote: diff --git a/development/autotests/lyxStatus.pm b/development/autotests/lyxStatus.pm new file mode 100644 index 000..b8d0b5f --- /dev/null +++ b/development/autotests/lyxStatus.pm @@ -0,0 +1,357 @@ +#! /usr/bin/env perl +# -*-

Re: File locking while lyx configures

2013-11-24 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Kornel Benko schreef op 21-11-2013 22:36: So it is OK for Linux and OS X, but not for Windows. Who is going to implement the Windows equivalent? Sorry to play the devils advocate again, but I believe these things are important. ATM, for windows does not change anything. Until now nobody

Re: git

2013-11-24 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Kornel Benko schreef op 21-11-2013 13:07: Sorry to bother again. I am using #git checkout features/chat2 error: you need to resolve your current index first po/sk.po: needs merge I think you had a previous merge conflict, and you needed to git add po/sk.po to mark the merge conflict to

Re: Corkboard code

2013-11-24 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Peter Kümmel schreef op 9-11-2013 12:09: On 18.10.2013 03:32, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Be warned that this is an orphan branch (i.e. it is not connected to the lyx history). Vincent Is it possible to integrate an orphan branch without loosing history? Peter If I'm not wrong

Re: Tarballs lyx-2.1.0beta2 on FTP

2013-11-24 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Vincent van Ravesteijn schreef op 10-11-2013 21:49: The tarballs of lyx-2.1.0beta2 can be found on the FTP server: ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.1/lyx-2.1.0beta2/ As usual, I will wait for the packagers to make binaries and to provide feedback before announcing the release. Vincent

ANNOUNCE: LyX version 2.1.0 (beta 2)

2013-11-24 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Public release of LyX version 2.1.0beta2 We are proud to announce the second public beta release of the new LyX 2.1 series. With this release, LyX celebrates 18 years of existence. The 2.1 series has a rich set of new features compared to the current

Re: File locking while lyx configures

2013-11-24 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 9:55 PM, Kornel Benko kor...@lyx.org wrote: Am Dienstag, 19. November 2013 um 21:06:21, schrieb Georg Baum georg.b...@post.rwth-aachen.de Kornel Benko wrote: Trying to lock with open(lock_file.c_str(), O_CREAT|O_EXCL|O_SYNC|O_RDWR, 0666); seams to work

Re: [LyX/master] make test environment. Exports with luatex and xetex.

2013-11-24 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Georg Baum schreef op 18-11-2013 21:35: Kornel Benko wrote: diff --git a/development/autotests/lyxStatus.pm b/development/autotests/lyxStatus.pm new file mode 100644 index 000..b8d0b5f --- /dev/null +++ b/development/autotests/lyxStatus.pm @@ -0,0 +1,357 @@ +#! /usr/bin/env perl +# -*-

Re: File locking while lyx configures

2013-11-24 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Kornel Benko schreef op 21-11-2013 22:36: > So it is OK for Linux and OS X, but not for Windows. Who is going to > implement the Windows equivalent? Sorry to play the devils advocate again, > but I believe these things are important. ATM, for windows does not change anything. Until now

Re: git

2013-11-24 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Kornel Benko schreef op 21-11-2013 13:07: Sorry to bother again. I am using #git checkout features/chat2 error: you need to resolve your current index first po/sk.po: needs merge I think you had a previous merge conflict, and you needed to "git add po/sk.po" to mark the merge conflict

Re: Corkboard code

2013-11-24 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Peter Kümmel schreef op 9-11-2013 12:09: On 18.10.2013 03:32, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Be warned that this is an orphan branch (i.e. it is not connected to the lyx history). Vincent Is it possible to integrate an orphan branch without loosing history? Peter If I'm not wrong

Re: Tarballs lyx-2.1.0beta2 on FTP

2013-11-24 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Vincent van Ravesteijn schreef op 10-11-2013 21:49: The tarballs of lyx-2.1.0beta2 can be found on the FTP server: ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.1/lyx-2.1.0beta2/ As usual, I will wait for the packagers to make binaries and to provide feedback before announcing the release. Vincent

ANNOUNCE: LyX version 2.1.0 (beta 2)

2013-11-24 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Public release of LyX version 2.1.0beta2 We are proud to announce the second public beta release of the new LyX 2.1 series. With this release, LyX celebrates 18 years of existence. The 2.1 series has a rich set of new features compared to the current

Re: File locking while lyx configures

2013-11-24 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 9:55 PM, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Dienstag, 19. November 2013 um 21:06:21, schrieb Georg Baum < > georg.b...@post.rwth-aachen.de> > > Kornel Benko wrote: > > > > > Trying to lock with > > > open(lock_file.c_str(), O_CREAT|O_EXCL|O_SYNC|O_RDWR, 0666); > > >

Re: Moving LyX XMPP Chat to features/chat2

2013-11-18 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Kornel Benko kor...@lyx.org wrote: Am Mittwoch, 13. November 2013 um 10:31:53, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn v...@lyx.org The errors will not be the result of a 'git checkout' command. It more looks like a git pull. This is the reason, I don't advice

Re: Moving LyX XMPP Chat to features/chat2

2013-11-18 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 1:49 AM, Tommaso Cucinotta tomm...@lyx.org wrote: On 15/11/13 20:24, Kornel Benko wrote: I probably misunderstood, what to send. it was ok. I just wanted to check whether your origin was actually the main lyx repo or mine, so you actually must have cloned the whole

Re: Moving LyX XMPP Chat to features/chat2

2013-11-18 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Kornel Benko <kor...@lyx.org> wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 13. November 2013 um 10:31:53, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn > <v...@lyx.org> > > > > > The errors will not be the result of a 'git checkout' command. It more > > looks

Re: Moving LyX XMPP Chat to features/chat2

2013-11-18 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 1:49 AM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: > On 15/11/13 20:24, Kornel Benko wrote: > > I probably misunderstood, what to send. > > it was ok. I just wanted to check whether your origin was actually the > main lyx repo or mine, so you actually must have cloned the

Re: Moving LyX XMPP Chat to features/chat2

2013-11-14 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Tommaso Cucinotta schreef op 14-11-2013 11:43: On 13/11/13 09:31, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: If you would have done a 'git fetch', you will retrieve the new commits. Then, you want to reset the features/chat2 branch to the new one tommasso pushed: $ git checkout features/chat2 $ git reset

Re: Moving LyX XMPP Chat to features/chat2

2013-11-14 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Tommaso Cucinotta schreef op 14-11-2013 11:43: On 13/11/13 09:31, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: If you would have done a 'git fetch', you will retrieve the new commits. Then, you want to reset the features/chat2 branch to the new one tommasso pushed: $ git checkout features/chat2 $ git reset

Re: Moving LyX XMPP Chat to features/chat2

2013-11-13 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Kornel Benko kor...@lyx.org wrote: Am Mittwoch, 13. November 2013 um 10:02:30, schrieb Kornel Benko kor...@lyx.org Am Dienstag, 12. November 2013 um 22:21:48, schrieb Tommaso Cucinotta tomm...@lyx.org Kornel, I'm just thinking of dropping entirely

Re: [LyX/master] Now run-tests.sh captures PROGRAM_SUFFIX from config.h, in order to use the correct .lyx folder name.

2013-11-13 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 3:42 AM, Tommaso Cucinotta tomm...@lyx.org wrote: commit a2291edac65fe16bf8f158150c7474e1c3480685 Author: Tommaso Cucinotta tomm...@lyx.org Date: Wed Nov 13 02:41:38 2013 + Now run-tests.sh captures PROGRAM_SUFFIX from config.h, in order to use the correct

Re: Moving LyX XMPP Chat to features/chat2

2013-11-13 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 13. November 2013 um 10:02:30, schrieb Kornel Benko < > kor...@lyx.org> > > Am Dienstag, 12. November 2013 um 22:21:48, schrieb Tommaso Cucinotta < > tomm...@lyx.org> > > > Kornel, > > > > > > I'm just thinking

Re: [LyX/master] Now run-tests.sh captures PROGRAM_SUFFIX from config.h, in order to use the correct .lyx folder name.

2013-11-13 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 3:42 AM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: > commit a2291edac65fe16bf8f158150c7474e1c3480685 > Author: Tommaso Cucinotta > Date: Wed Nov 13 02:41:38 2013 + > > Now run-tests.sh captures PROGRAM_SUFFIX from config.h, in order to > use

Re: [LyX-Mentors-GSoC-2013] GSoC 2014 ?

2013-11-12 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org wrote: 2013/11/12 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes I'll try to have a look. I thought about a couple of good projects, but I cannot remember anymore what they were %-|tors again, I think that would be One thing that crossed my mind was

Re: [LyX-Mentors-GSoC-2013] GSoC 2014 ?

2013-11-12 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > 2013/11/12 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > >> I'll try to have a look. I thought about a couple of good projects, but I >> cannot remember anymore what they were %-|tors again, I think that would be >> > > One thing that crossed

Re: LyX Chat @ private git repo

2013-11-11 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 12:51 AM, Tommaso Cucinotta tomm...@lyx.org wrote: On 10/11/13 14:37, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Hope it's now all ok and u can see the repo. The feature is in the features/chat branch. T. Yes, it works now. other question/help: now I'm co-editing

Re: LyX Chat @ private git repo

2013-11-11 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 1:17 AM, Tommaso Cucinotta tomm...@lyx.org wrote: On 10/11/13 23:51, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: Any hint as to how to restore a sane environment (branch) :-) ? looking at http://git.lyx.org/?p=developers/tommaso/lyx.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/features/chat it

Re: LyX Chat @ private git repo

2013-11-11 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Tommaso Cucinotta tomm...@lyx.org wrote: On 11/11/13 08:03, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: First of all, it wouldn't be necessary to merge with master over and over again. Chances are not that big that master is now interfering with your feature, so don't

Re: LyX Chat @ private git repo

2013-11-11 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 12:51 AM, Tommaso Cucinotta <tomm...@lyx.org> wrote: > On 10/11/13 14:37, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > >> Hope it's now all ok and u can see the repo. The feature is in the > features/chat branch. > >> > >> T. > >> >

Re: LyX Chat @ private git repo

2013-11-11 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 1:17 AM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: > On 10/11/13 23:51, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: > > Any hint as to how to restore a sane environment (branch) :-) ? > > looking at > > > http://git.lyx.org/?p=developers/tommaso/lyx.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/features/chat

Re: LyX Chat @ private git repo

2013-11-11 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Tommaso Cucinotta <tomm...@lyx.org> wrote: > On 11/11/13 08:03, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > > First of all, it wouldn't be necessary to merge with master over and > > over again. Chances are not that big that master is now interfering

Re: LyX Chat @ private git repo

2013-11-10 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Tommaso Cucinotta schreef op 6-11-2013 22:50: On 04/11/13 20:44, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Tommaso Cucinotta schreef op 2-11-2013 17:15: On 30/10/13 03:19, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: I can reach the server, but the ssh ... setperms developers/tommaso/lyx just hangs forever. Now I'm on my

Re: Freeze for LyX 2.1.0 beta2

2013-11-10 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Jürgen Spitzmüller schreef op 10-11-2013 12:17: Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Hi all, I want to freeze the master and to evaluate a few days whether the last changes introduce any regressions. The coming days I will be at the GSoC mentor summit, and I will prepare the tarballs. When

Tarballs lyx-2.1.0beta2 on FTP

2013-11-10 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
The tarballs of lyx-2.1.0beta2 can be found on the FTP server: ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.1/lyx-2.1.0beta2/ As usual, I will wait for the packagers to make binaries and to provide feedback before announcing the release. Vincent

Re: LyX Chat @ private git repo

2013-11-10 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Tommaso Cucinotta schreef op 6-11-2013 22:50: On 04/11/13 20:44, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Tommaso Cucinotta schreef op 2-11-2013 17:15: On 30/10/13 03:19, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: I can reach the server, but the "ssh ... setperms developers/tommaso/lyx" just hangs forever

Re: Freeze for LyX 2.1.0 beta2

2013-11-10 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Jürgen Spitzmüller schreef op 10-11-2013 12:17: Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Hi all, I want to freeze the master and to evaluate a few days whether the last changes introduce any regressions. The coming days I will be at the GSoC mentor summit, and I will prepare the tarballs. When

Tarballs lyx-2.1.0beta2 on FTP

2013-11-10 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
The tarballs of lyx-2.1.0beta2 can be found on the FTP server: ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.1/lyx-2.1.0beta2/ As usual, I will wait for the packagers to make binaries and to provide feedback before announcing the release. Vincent

Re: QXMPP dependency for LyX Chat

2013-11-08 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 10:40 PM, Nico Williams n...@cryptonector.comwrote: On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 09:23:15PM +, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: Sure, feel free to commit them. Guess that in multi-user commit mode, it's much better to NOT rewrite history, so we won't use push -f, right ?

Presentation of GSoC results

2013-11-08 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
FYI, OpenCV has made a youtube video of the results of the GSoC students. It's a rather neat way to show what the program brought the project. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_TTtN4frMEA Vincent

Re: QXMPP dependency for LyX Chat

2013-11-08 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 10:40 PM, Nico Williams wrote: > On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 09:23:15PM +, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: > > Sure, feel free to commit them. Guess that in multi-user commit mode, > > it's much better to NOT rewrite history, so we won't use push -f, right ?

Presentation of GSoC results

2013-11-08 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
FYI, OpenCV has made a youtube video of the results of the GSoC students. It's a rather neat way to show what the program brought the project. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_TTtN4frMEA Vincent

Re: LyX Chat @ private git repo

2013-11-04 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Tommaso Cucinotta schreef op 2-11-2013 17:15: On 30/10/13 03:19, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: I can reach the server, but the ssh ... setperms developers/tommaso/lyx just hangs forever. Now I'm on my usual connection, but it's still hanging forever. Any clue of how to fix this ? Did you do

Re: LyX Chat @ private git repo

2013-11-04 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Tommaso Cucinotta schreef op 2-11-2013 17:15: On 30/10/13 03:19, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: I can reach the server, but the "ssh ... setperms developers/tommaso/lyx" just hangs forever. Now I'm on my usual connection, but it's still hanging forever. Any clue of how to fix this ? Did you do

Re: LyX Chat @ private git repo

2013-10-28 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Tommaso Cucinotta schreef op 26-10-2013 19:26: I'm trying to fight my laziness in learning git. Good. Apparently, I managed to fetch, push and also a bit of hist rewrite (push -f), however it seems I get seemingly harmless messages like this on git ops: remote: Traceback (most recent

Re: LyX Chat @ private git repo

2013-10-28 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Tommaso Cucinotta schreef op 26-10-2013 19:26: Perhaps this way others may more easily contribute to the patch/feature, if interested, by committing to this particular repo and branch ? If you want us to actually try the feature, you need to give read access to your fellow developers (at

Re: LyX twitter account ?

2013-10-28 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Yihui Xie schreef op 25-10-2013 3:08: I think this is a good idea, but perhaps most LyX developers may not want to waste much time on SNS like the our generation :) LyX does have a Google+ page: https://plus.google.com/u/0/110001097193208807095/about but as you can see, it is not actively

Re: LyX twitter account ?

2013-10-28 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Scott Kostyshak schreef op 25-10-2013 8:50: On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 2:30 AM, Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org wrote: Scott Kostyshak wrote: In this case, can I have the login and password? Vincent is behind the twitter idea. I can forward you some exchange about this (didn't went through devel

Re: LyX twitter account ?

2013-10-28 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Scott Kostyshak schreef op 25-10-2013 2:38: Here are some selected relevant tweets with #lyx: https://twitter.com/u203d/status/392915523870019584 It feels good to finally be free from the tyranny of #PowerPoint (and clones) now that I create my slides with #Lyx and the beamer class.

Re: LyX Chat @ private git repo

2013-10-28 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Tommaso Cucinotta schreef op 26-10-2013 19:26: I'm trying to fight my laziness in learning git. Good. Apparently, I managed to fetch, push and also a bit of hist rewrite (push -f), however it seems I get seemingly harmless messages like this on git ops: remote: Traceback (most recent

Re: LyX Chat @ private git repo

2013-10-28 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Tommaso Cucinotta schreef op 26-10-2013 19:26: Perhaps this way others may more easily contribute to the patch/feature, if interested, by committing to this particular repo and branch ? If you want us to actually try the feature, you need to give read access to your fellow developers (at

Re: LyX twitter account ?

2013-10-28 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Yihui Xie schreef op 25-10-2013 3:08: I think this is a good idea, but perhaps most LyX developers may not want to waste much time on SNS like the our generation :) LyX does have a Google+ page: https://plus.google.com/u/0/110001097193208807095/about but as you can see, it is not actively

Re: LyX twitter account ?

2013-10-28 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Scott Kostyshak schreef op 25-10-2013 8:50: On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 2:30 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote: Scott Kostyshak wrote: In this case, can I have the login and password? Vincent is behind the twitter idea. I can forward you some exchange about this (didn't went through devel

Re: LyX twitter account ?

2013-10-28 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Scott Kostyshak schreef op 25-10-2013 2:38: Here are some selected relevant tweets with #lyx: https://twitter.com/u203d/status/392915523870019584 It feels good to finally be free from the tyranny of #PowerPoint (and clones) now that I create my slides with #Lyx and the beamer class.

Re: XeTeX does not like a Hebrew \newtheorem command?

2013-10-20 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Scott Kostyshak schreef op 19-10-2013 19:43: I think that polyglossia is used by default and \make@lr is only defined by babel, maybe. Try adding the following snippet to the preamble: \@ifundefined{make@lr} {\def\make@lr#1{\begingroup \toks@=\expandafter{#1}% \edef\x{\endgroup

Re: XeTeX does not like a Hebrew \newtheorem command?

2013-10-20 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Scott Kostyshak schreef op 19-10-2013 19:43: I think that polyglossia is used by default and \make@lr is only defined by babel, maybe. Try adding the following snippet to the preamble: \@ifundefined{make@lr} {\def\make@lr#1{\begingroup \toks@=\expandafter{#1}% \edef\x{\endgroup

Re: [PATCH] Remove FreeBSD checks when defining USE_WCHAR_T.

2013-10-18 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Op 18 okt. 2013 06:56 schreef Raphael Kubo da Costa rak...@freebsd.org: Vincent van Ravesteijn vfr at lyx.org writes: Ok, it's in. Thank you Raphael. Thanks. What's the procedure for getting those changes into 2.0.x and the upcoming 2.1.x series? It is now automatically in the 2.1.x

Re: git help!

2013-10-18 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Op 18 okt. 2013 15:47 schreef Tommaso Cucinotta tomm...@lyx.org: Thx again for all the further hints. I felt the need to copy these in our lyx/git wiki page at: http://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/LyXGit Feel free to edit/integrate further. So you're writing your first Git manual. Anyway I like to

Re: [PATCH] Remove FreeBSD checks when defining USE_WCHAR_T.

2013-10-18 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Op 18 okt. 2013 06:56 schreef "Raphael Kubo da Costa" <rak...@freebsd.org>: > > Vincent van Ravesteijn lyx.org> writes: > > Ok, it's in. > > > > Thank you Raphael. > > Thanks. What's the procedure for getting those changes into 2.0.x and the &g

Re: git help!

2013-10-18 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Op 18 okt. 2013 15:47 schreef "Tommaso Cucinotta" : > > Thx again for all the further hints. I felt the need to copy these > in our lyx/git wiki page at: > > http://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/LyXGit > > Feel free to edit/integrate further. So you're writing your first Git manual.

Re: Corkboard code

2013-10-17 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Op 17 okt. 2013 07:27 schreef Peter Kümmel syntheti...@gmx.net: Hi, I wanna have a look at the corkboard code, but haven't found a git branch anywhere, only Rob's bazaar repository with changes from February. Is there something more actual? The code thay Ashley produced lives somewhere on

Re: git help!

2013-10-17 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Nico Williams schreef op 18-10-2013 0:59: In general, if you stay away from destructive operations, git is quite safe. If you find yourself wanting to perform a destructive operation, make sure first that any extant changes in your workspace are committed so that you can always get them back

Re: Corkboard code

2013-10-17 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Peter Kümmel schreef op 17-10-2013 17:45: On 17.10.2013 17:13, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Op 17 okt. 2013 07:27 schreef Peter Kümmel syntheti...@gmx.net mailto:syntheti...@gmx.net: Hi, I wanna have a look at the corkboard code, but haven't found a git branch anywhere, only Rob's bazaar

Re: [PATCH] Remove FreeBSD checks when defining USE_WCHAR_T.

2013-10-17 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schreef op 17-10-2013 23:03: Le 17/10/13 22:39, Raphael Kubo da Costa a écrit : The problems the comments in the build systems refer to seem to have been fixed for years. [1] says the checks in libstdc++ have been improved, and all supported FreeBSD versions enable

Re: #8703: 'new shortcut' box closes if no shortcut

2013-10-17 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Scott Kostyshak schreef op 15-10-2013 21:51: On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 6:43 PM, Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org wrote: On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 7:12 AM, Martin Hoffmann hoffi...@gmail.com wrote: On 06.10.2013 10:25, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Scott Kostyshak wrote: Welcome to the list! Yes,

Re: Corkboard code

2013-10-17 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Op 17 okt. 2013 07:27 schreef "Peter Kümmel" : > > Hi, I wanna have a look at the corkboard code, but haven't > found a git branch anywhere, only Rob's bazaar repository with > changes from February. Is there something more actual? > The code thay Ashley produced lives

Re: git help!

2013-10-17 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Nico Williams schreef op 18-10-2013 0:59: In general, if you stay away from destructive operations, git is quite safe. If you find yourself wanting to perform a destructive operation, make sure first that any extant changes in your workspace are committed so that you can always get them back

Re: Corkboard code

2013-10-17 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Peter Kümmel schreef op 17-10-2013 17:45: On 17.10.2013 17:13, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Op 17 okt. 2013 07:27 schreef "Peter Kümmel" <syntheti...@gmx.net <mailto:syntheti...@gmx.net>>: Hi, I wanna have a look at the corkboard code, but haven't found a git branc

Re: [PATCH] Remove FreeBSD checks when defining USE_WCHAR_T.

2013-10-17 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schreef op 17-10-2013 23:03: Le 17/10/13 22:39, Raphael Kubo da Costa a écrit : The problems the comments in the build systems refer to seem to have been fixed for years. [1] says the checks in libstdc++ have been improved, and all supported FreeBSD versions enable

Re: #8703: 'new shortcut' box closes if no shortcut

2013-10-17 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Scott Kostyshak schreef op 15-10-2013 21:51: On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 6:43 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 7:12 AM, Martin Hoffmann wrote: On 06.10.2013 10:25, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Scott Kostyshak wrote: Welcome to the list! Yes,

Freeze for LyX 2.1.0 beta2

2013-10-15 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Hi all, I want to freeze the master and to evaluate a few days whether the last changes introduce any regressions. The coming days I will be at the GSoC mentor summit, and I will prepare the tarballs. When there are no big problems, I can tag and release the second beta after the weekend.

Freeze for LyX 2.1.0 beta2

2013-10-15 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Hi all, I want to freeze the master and to evaluate a few days whether the last changes introduce any regressions. The coming days I will be at the GSoC mentor summit, and I will prepare the tarballs. When there are no big problems, I can tag and release the second beta after the weekend.

Re: 2.1.0 Blocker

2013-10-12 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Enrico Forestieri schreef op 7-10-2013 21:05: On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 02:28:18PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: It is very strange that I can't reproduce, if this is the cause, and, indeed, that people haven't been seeing this bug all along. Actually, all my files are converted correctly. But

Re: 2.1.0 Blocker

2013-10-12 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Georg Baum schreef op 10-10-2013 23:41: OK, I believe I understand what happens, but I can't test, since I do not see the \newcommand differences: The MacroData which is constructed from a DocIterator is a lazy version, which does not have data initially, but queries it when needed. This is not

[PATCH] Make the export of macros thread-safer

2013-10-12 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
In general, the metrics() functions should not change the Buffer; we have updateBuffer/updateMacros for that purpose. --- src/mathed/MathMacroTemplate.cpp |8 ++-- src/mathed/MathMacroTemplate.h |4 ++-- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git

Re: 2.1.0 Blocker

2013-10-12 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Enrico Forestieri schreef op 7-10-2013 21:05: On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 02:28:18PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: It is very strange that I can't reproduce, if this is the cause, and, indeed, that people haven't been seeing this bug all along. Actually, all my files are converted correctly. But

Re: 2.1.0 Blocker

2013-10-12 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Georg Baum schreef op 10-10-2013 23:41: OK, I believe I understand what happens, but I can't test, since I do not see the \newcommand differences: The MacroData which is constructed from a DocIterator is a lazy version, which does not have data initially, but queries it when needed. This is not

<    4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   >