Re: 2.0.x - Ghostscript error when opening EmbeddedObjects.lyx with InstantPreview

2011-08-31 Thread venom00
code 1 GPL Ghostscript 9.01: Unrecoverable error, exit code 1 GPL Ghostscript 9.01: Unrecoverable error, exit code 1 GPL Ghostscript 9.01: Unrecoverable error, exit code 1 I'll try to reproduce the error as I get a moment. Last time I checked was working fine. venom00

Re: 2.0.x - Ghostscript error when opening EmbeddedObjects.lyx with InstantPreview

2011-08-31 Thread venom00
.01: Unrecoverable error, exit code 1 > GPL Ghostscript 9.01: Unrecoverable error, exit code 1 > GPL Ghostscript 9.01: Unrecoverable error, exit code 1 > GPL Ghostscript 9.01: Unrecoverable error, exit code 1 I'll try to reproduce the error as I get a moment. Last time I checked was working fine. venom00

RE: Too much options in LyX

2011-05-20 Thread venom00
If this are all changes, I wouldn't touch it any more, maybe we update it later, and if we have changed it there would be too much noise in the diff. You mean update from the original Qt Creator source? Yeah, that's a good idea. Then here's the patch with camel-cased filenames. venom00

RE: Too much options in LyX

2011-05-20 Thread venom00
> If this are all changes, I wouldn't touch it any more, maybe > we update it later, > and if we have changed it there would be too much noise in the diff. You mean update from the original Qt Creator source? Yeah, that's a good idea. Then here's the patch with camel-cased filenames.

RE: still not possible to compile LyX 2.0.x with CMake

2011-05-18 Thread venom00
My 2 cents without reading anything of this thread: CMake under Windows 7 32 bit with Qt Creator and VS2010 compiler works fine for me, I just noticed you have changed the location of CMakeList.txt, all the rest is fine. venom00

RE: Too much options in LyX

2011-05-18 Thread venom00
; - add the files in src/frontends/qt4/Makefile.am in SOURCE_FILES - add the header file in src/frontends/qt4/Makefile.am in MOC_HEADER venom00 Index: src/frontends/qt4/Makefile.am === --- src/frontends/qt4/Makefile.am (revisione

RE: Start page

2011-05-18 Thread venom00
? In the following days I'll make a draft widget and I'll post some image. venom00

RE: Start page

2011-05-18 Thread venom00
somewhere which explains how LyX can make you a coffee. Other things like You can make a presentation with LyX should automatically become better known if we put it clearly in the start page. venom00 P.S. Why don't we put an easter egg in LyX? For instance: if you write Word is better than LyX

RE: Too much options in LyX

2011-05-18 Thread venom00
it means :P What should I do exactly? I'll fix the case of the file name. venom00

RE: still not possible to compile LyX 2.0.x with CMake

2011-05-18 Thread venom00
My 2 cents without reading anything of this thread: CMake under Windows 7 32 bit with Qt Creator and VS2010 compiler works fine for me, I just noticed you have changed the location of CMakeList.txt, all the rest is fine. venom00

RE: Too much options in LyX

2011-05-18 Thread venom00
c file at the end; - add the files in src/frontends/qt4/Makefile.am in SOURCE_FILES - add the header file in src/frontends/qt4/Makefile.am in MOC_HEADER venom00 Index: src/frontends/qt4/Makefile.am === --- src/frontends/qt4/Makef

RE: "Start" page

2011-05-18 Thread venom00
a reasonable time or should we start using things as they're right now? In the following days I'll make a draft widget and I'll post some image. venom00

RE: "Start" page

2011-05-18 Thread venom00
ser list!" - "Contribute!" These are the most interesting hidden (or less hidden) things for my everyday use of LyX. But I'm sure there's a hidden wiki page somewhere which explains how LyX can make you a coffee. Other things like "You can make a presentation with LyX&quo

RE: Too much options in LyX

2011-05-18 Thread venom00
Whatever it means :P What should I do exactly? I'll fix the case of the file name. venom00

RE: Too much options in LyX

2011-05-17 Thread venom00
me know! venom00 [1] http://qt.gitorious.org/qt-creator/qt-creator/blobs/HEAD/src/libs/utils/fancylin eedit.h [2] http://qt.gitorious.org/qt-creator/qt-creator/blobs/HEAD/src/libs/utils/fancylin eedit.cpp Index: src/frontends/qt4/PanelStack.cpp

RE: Too much options in LyX

2011-05-17 Thread venom00
what do you think of the result? venom00 [1] In file src/support/CMakeLists.txt: ... file(GLOB support_sources ${TOP_SRC_DIR}/src/support/${LYX_CPP_FILES}) ... lyx_automoc(${support_sources}) Lyx_automoc is defined in file: development/cmake/modules/LyXMacros.cmake macro(LYX_AUTOMOC

RE: Too much options in LyX

2011-05-17 Thread venom00
with fancylineedit in frontends/qt4 (which I think it's the right place). Moreover I've moved back it to frontend namespace. If there aren't big issues with the build system or credits I'll switch to the next feature. venom00 Index: src/frontends/qt4/fancylineedit.cpp

RE: Too much options in LyX

2011-05-17 Thread venom00
t, IMO it's great, it's animated! :) Let me know! venom00 > [1] http://qt.gitorious.org/qt-creator/qt-creator/blobs/HEAD/src/libs/utils/fancylin eedit.h > [2] http://qt.gitorious.org/qt-creator/qt-creator/blobs/HEAD/src/libs/utils/fancylin eedit.cpp I

RE: Too much options in LyX

2011-05-17 Thread venom00
hed) on the textbox is taken from > Qt Creator too, but > > maybe we can replace it. > > I've no idea how to handle the license and credits. I see. Thanks for the quick reply ;) Have you tried the patch what do you think of the result? venom00 [1] In file src/support/CMakeLists.txt

RE: Too much options in LyX

2011-05-17 Thread venom00
t; to think again > how I'm gonna apply a patch to my tree. Np. OK, here's the version of the patch with fancylineedit in frontends/qt4 (which I think it's the right place). Moreover I've moved back it to frontend namespace. If there aren't big issues with the build system or credits I'll s

RE: Too much options in LyX

2011-05-16 Thread venom00
Vincent or someone else, can you tell me if it's OK to include a pair of files directly from the Qt Creator code? Just a quick reply so I can go on with the patch. Thanks, venom00 Ping The patch looks pretty good now, so I'll put it in my testing tree. I'm not completely sure

RE: Too much options in LyX

2011-05-16 Thread venom00
Vincent or someone else, can you tell me if it's OK to include a pair of files directly from the Qt Creator code? Just a quick reply so I can go on with the patch. Thanks, venom00 > Ping > > > > > The patch looks pretty good now, so I'll put it in my > > testin

RE: Too much options in LyX

2011-05-11 Thread venom00
is fine, I've tried green and dark green but I don't like them. venom00 [1] http://qt.gitorious.org/qt-creator/qt-creator/blobs/HEAD/src/l ibs/utils/fancylineedit.h [2] http://qt.gitorious.org/qt-creator/qt-creator/blobs/HEAD/src/l ibs/utils/fancylineedit.cpp

RE: Too much options in LyX

2011-05-11 Thread venom00
we use it? > Otherwise I'll add a pushbutton outside the QLineEdit, on the right. > > Red is fine, I've tried green and dark green but I don't like them. > > venom00 > > [1] > http://qt.gitorious.org/qt-creator/qt-creator/blobs/HEAD/src/l > ibs/utils/fanc

RE: Too much options in LyX

2011-05-09 Thread venom00
and dark green but I don't like them. venom00 [1] http://qt.gitorious.org/qt-creator/qt-creator/blobs/HEAD/src/libs/utils/fancylin eedit.h [2] http://qt.gitorious.org/qt-creator/qt-creator/blobs/HEAD/src/libs/utils/fancylin eedit.cpp

RE: Too much options in LyX

2011-05-09 Thread venom00
on the right. Red is fine, I've tried green and dark green but I don't like them. venom00 [1] http://qt.gitorious.org/qt-creator/qt-creator/blobs/HEAD/src/libs/utils/fancylin eedit.h [2] http://qt.gitorious.org/qt-creator/qt-creator/blobs/HEAD/src/libs/utils/fancylin eedit.cpp

RE: Goals for 2.1

2011-05-06 Thread venom00
And who collects all the ideas from this 100+ thread? When extending the list we should post the complete list. And discussion should not be done within the list. A wiki page? venom00

RE: Scripting vs plugins (was RE: Goals for 2.1)

2011-05-06 Thread venom00
for the scripting engine. venom00

RE: CMake TODOs

2011-05-06 Thread venom00
I tried XCode a bit and, for LyX, I think QtCreator is much much better, that's all. For Mac specific development XCode is probably better. The same with Visual Studio under Windows. venom00

RE: Scripting vs plugins (was RE: Goals for 2.1)

2011-05-06 Thread venom00
and memory footprint even more. An example would be the parsing of the unicodesymbols file. Weren't we talking about scripting? However seems hard that making something in an interpreted language could improve performances compared with (good) C++. venom00 P.S. Please use this thread.

RE: Goals for 2.1

2011-05-06 Thread venom00
> And who collects all the ideas from this 100+ thread? > > When extending the list we should post the complete list. > And discussion should not be done within the list. A wiki page? venom00

RE: Scripting vs plugins (was RE: Goals for 2.1)

2011-05-06 Thread venom00
yxCommand: lfun(LFUN_ID, args.join(" ")) In this way we could make a "binary" implementation of LFUNs in the future and just update the lyxInterface internals. > -) a few vein attempts to introduce LFUN return values. That's fundamental for the scripting engine. venom00

RE: CMake TODOs

2011-05-06 Thread venom00
> I tried XCode a bit and, for LyX, I think QtCreator is much > much better, > that's all. For Mac specific development XCode is probably better. The same with Visual Studio under Windows. venom00

RE: Scripting vs plugins (was RE: Goals for 2.1)

2011-05-06 Thread venom00
re Python, that's a point in its favour. > > Or did I get it wrong? ;) > > The idea is to outsource¹ tasks. This would reduce the binary size and > memory footprint even more. An example would be the parsing of the > unicodesymbols file. Weren't we talking about scripting? Howe

Scripting vs plugins (was RE: Goals for 2.1)

2011-05-05 Thread venom00
a lot more changes. venom00

RE: Scripting vs plugins (was RE: Goals for 2.1)

2011-05-05 Thread venom00
command. We need several new LFUNs to have a useful and complete scripting envinronment but I think that's the way to follow. venom00

Scripting vs plugins (was RE: Goals for 2.1)

2011-05-05 Thread venom00
approximation. I agree, if we're talking about plugins in C++, but with Python we have a lot more changes. venom00

RE: Scripting vs plugins (was RE: Goals for 2.1)

2011-05-05 Thread venom00
ction with LyX goes through a LyX user command. We need several new LFUNs to have a useful and complete scripting envinronment but I think that's the way to follow. venom00

RE: 80 chars rule (was: Too much options in LyX)

2011-05-04 Thread venom00
. This discussion is useful. I'd prefer 100 chars but 80 is OK too to me! :P venom00

RE: Goals for 2.1

2011-05-04 Thread venom00
, but are the ideas I've in my list. venom00 [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg168196.html [2] http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg168076.html [3] http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg167218.html

RE: LyX opening future versions

2011-05-04 Thread venom00
by hardcoded lists in the client code, distributed via browser updates. You don't want such things in a word processor. Well... But they didn't generate a fake certificate for lyx.org :P venom00

RE: LyX opening future versions

2011-05-04 Thread venom00
venom00 wrote: Well... But they didn't generate a fake certificate for lyx.org :P yet. P To be honest I think that the last thing a malicious cracker would do, having the possibility to create trusted certificates, is using them for lyx.org. Private keys have not been compromised, they just

RE: Goals for 2.1

2011-05-04 Thread venom00
Follow this thread is impossible for me :P Please try to split where needed. venom00

RE: LyX opening future versions

2011-05-04 Thread venom00
with that is probably too much, HTTPS is more than enough. Network stuff are well managed by Qt, aren't they? venom00

RE: 80 chars rule (was: Too much options in LyX)

2011-05-04 Thread venom00
. This discussion is useful. I'd prefer 100 chars but 80 is OK too to me! :P venom00

RE: Goals for 2.1

2011-05-04 Thread venom00
alize all of these things, but are the ideas I've in my list. venom00 [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg168196.html [2] http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg168076.html [3] http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg167218.html

RE: LyX opening future versions

2011-05-04 Thread venom00
to be > disabled by hardcoded lists in the client code, distributed > via browser > updates. You don't want such things in a word processor. Well... But they didn't generate a fake certificate for lyx.org :P venom00

RE: LyX opening future versions

2011-05-04 Thread venom00
> venom00 wrote: > > Well... But they didn't generate a fake certificate for lyx.org :P > > yet. P To be honest I think that the last thing a malicious cracker would do, having the possibility to create trusted certificates, is using them for lyx.org. Private keys have not b

RE: Goals for 2.1

2011-05-04 Thread venom00
Follow this thread is impossible for me :P Please try to split where needed. venom00

RE: LyX opening future versions

2011-05-04 Thread venom00
is gunpg, but I agree with that is probably too much, HTTPS is more than enough. Network stuff are well managed by Qt, aren't they? venom00

RE: Too much options in LyX

2011-05-03 Thread venom00
characters. Mmmh, maybe Qt Creator has an option to show a vertical bar at 80 chars. Thanks for your support! venom00

Start page

2011-05-03 Thread venom00
dialog, maybe an RSS feed, things like that. The idea comes from Adobe products and Qt Creator itself. Opinions? Things to add? venom00

RE: Release manager for 2.1

2011-05-03 Thread venom00
! ;) So at this stage I propose Vincent van Ravesteijn as a new relase manager. (Vincent tentatively accepted taking this responsibility.) Yeah! Hoping for the best for LyX 2.0.x/2.1.0 and good luck Vincent! Wait, will you stay with us or are you leaving the whole LyX project? :( venom00

RE: LyX opening future versions

2011-05-03 Thread venom00
much. Liviu Maybe the Comodo issue [1]? venom00 [1] http://www.comodo.com/Comodo-Fraud-Incident-2011-03-23.html

RE: 80 chars rule (was: Too much options in LyX)

2011-05-03 Thread venom00
fix the thing silently? This discussion will set a rule that (whatever it will be!) will make me crazy! It will be worst than the #include sorting thing! :D My opinion is: who is still developing on a terminal? :P We need a limit, 100 is perfect IMSO [1]. venom00 (is sure someone here is still

RE: Instant preview undefined macros

2011-05-03 Thread venom00
. venom00

RE: 80 chars rule (was: Too much options in LyX)

2011-05-03 Thread venom00
. The old master gave me the ownership of the chan three days ago. Let's make it active again! Sometimes newbies appear and make question that could help us understand what's wrong in LyX. venom00

RE: Too much options in LyX

2011-05-03 Thread venom00
shorter than 80 > characters. Mmmh, maybe Qt Creator has an option to show a vertical bar at 80 chars. Thanks for your support! venom00

"Start" page

2011-05-03 Thread venom00
ter", a list of recent documents, link to option dialog, maybe an RSS feed, things like that. The idea comes from Adobe products and Qt Creator itself. Opinions? Things to add? venom00

RE: Release manager for 2.1

2011-05-03 Thread venom00
the whole LyX project? :( venom00

RE: LyX opening future versions

2011-05-03 Thread venom00
aster. > > > Of curiosity, which one? Wikipedia doesn't say much. > Liviu Maybe the Comodo issue [1]? venom00 [1] http://www.comodo.com/Comodo-Fraud-Incident-2011-03-23.html

RE: 80 chars rule (was: Too much options in LyX)

2011-05-03 Thread venom00
ted(int)), this, > SLOT(decorationChanged(int))); Vincent, why didn't you fix the thing silently? This discussion will set a rule that (whatever it will be!) will make me crazy! It will be worst than the #include sorting thing! :D My opinion is: who is still developing on a terminal? :P

RE: Instant preview & undefined macros

2011-05-03 Thread venom00
tigate the problem. venom00

RE: 80 chars rule (was: Too much options in LyX)

2011-05-03 Thread venom00
velopers!) have to join irc://irc.oftc.net/lyx. The old master gave me the ownership of the chan three days ago. Let's make it active again! Sometimes newbies appear and make question that could help us understand what's wrong in LyX. venom00

RE: Development for LyX 2.1

2011-05-02 Thread venom00
the branches ? I see it as an opportunity to discover something new :) I've used git only for small projects, it would be intersting to make use of it in LyX. Just my 2 cents, as I'm not even a LyX developer :P venom00

RE: Development for LyX 2.1

2011-05-02 Thread venom00
/lyx/lyx/commits/venom00/preference-filtering and which is merged together with some other uncommitted features on top of master into the experimental branch: http://www.gitorious.org/lyx/lyx/commits/experimental Just, in case people want to try the brand new unfinished features

RE: Development for LyX 2.1

2011-05-02 Thread venom00
o do small > things and refrain from the larger features because they don't > know how to use the branches ? I see it as an opportunity to discover something new :) I've used git only for small projects, it would be intersting to make use of it in LyX. Just my 2 cents, as I'm not even a LyX developer :P venom00

RE: Development for LyX 2.1

2011-05-02 Thread venom00
gt; > http://www.gitorious.org/lyx/lyx/commits/venom00/preference-filtering > and which is merged together with some other uncommitted > features on top of master into the experimental branch: > http://www.gitorious.org/lyx/lyx/commits/experimental > > Just, in case people wan

RE: Too much options in LyX

2011-05-01 Thread venom00
); + } if enable_all is true, we don't need to loop over all widgets... We have to, enable_all (search box empty) means we have to re-enable all the items in the tree, as they could have been disabled by the previous search. Thanks for your comments. venom00 Index: src/frontends/qt4

RE: LyX opening future versions

2011-05-01 Thread venom00
is enough. Lyx4lyx for instance :) It looks like a complicated solution for a not so frequent problem. Another solution would be an online (web based) LyX conversion script. This requires a permanent connection to the Internet while LyX is an offline application. venom00

RE: Too much options in LyX

2011-05-01 Thread venom00
ed to loop over all widgets... We have to, enable_all (search box empty) means we have to re-enable all the items in the tree, as they could have been disabled by the previous search. Thanks for your comments. venom00 Index: src/frontends/qt4/PanelStack.cpp

RE: LyX opening future versions

2011-05-01 Thread venom00
ame to the file is enough. Lyx4lyx for instance :) > It looks like a complicated solution for a not so frequent problem. > Another solution would be an online (web based) LyX conversion script. This requires a "permanent" connection to the Internet while LyX is an offline application. venom00

Memory LyXs

2011-04-30 Thread venom00
and understand what's wrong. Here's the command line I used: valgrind --log-file=lyx.valgrind --leak-check=yes --show-reachable=yes --track-origins=yes --num-callers=50 lyx venom00 [1] http://k002.kiwi6.com/hotlink/7uw25zysou/valgrind.zip or http://ifile.it/7ze3ysn/valgrind.zip

RE: Memory LyXs

2011-04-30 Thread venom00
orphan: 47,920 bytes are indirectly lost. This is a serious memory leak IMHO, as paragraph are created and destroyed quite frequently. venom00

RE: Some stats for 2.0 development

2011-04-30 Thread venom00
Pavel Sanda wrote: emoticons per mail jose0.68 That's less than I perceived. Jürgen :D You're right! :) venom00 (subtly climbs the emoticons pyramid)

RE: LyX opening future versions

2011-04-30 Thread venom00
Yes, though it seems kind of dangerous to download python scripts from the web and then offer to run them. We could add HTTPS to lyx.org and use a free certificate from StartSSL [1], which is a trusted CA. venom00 [1] http://www.startssl.com/

RE: Memory LyXs

2011-04-30 Thread venom00
() stores a copy [2] so you have to remove it manually. word should die when goes out of scope. Thanks. I hope we can defeat this and other memory leaks and make LyX more lightweight. venom00 [1] http://valgrind.org/docs/manual/mc-manual.html#mc-manual.errormsgs [2] http://stackoverflow.com

Memory LyXs

2011-04-30 Thread venom00
and understand what's wrong. Here's the command line I used: valgrind --log-file=lyx.valgrind --leak-check=yes --show-reachable=yes --track-origins=yes --num-callers=50 lyx venom00 [1] http://k002.kiwi6.com/hotlink/7uw25zysou/valgrind.zip or http://ifile.it/7ze3ysn/valgrind.zip

RE: Memory LyXs

2011-04-30 Thread venom00
ation, but when we call delete d; in the destructor all the data remains orphan: 47,920 bytes are indirectly lost. This is a serious memory leak IMHO, as paragraph are created and destroyed quite frequently. venom00

RE: Some stats for 2.0 development

2011-04-30 Thread venom00
> Pavel Sanda wrote: > > emoticons per mail > > > > jose0.68 > > That's less than I perceived. > > Jürgen :D You're right! :) venom00 (subtly climbs the emoticons pyramid)

RE: LyX opening future versions

2011-04-30 Thread venom00
> Yes, though it seems kind of dangerous to download python scripts from > the web and then offer to run them. We could add HTTPS to lyx.org and use a free certificate from StartSSL [1], which is a trusted CA. venom00 [1] http://www.startssl.com/

RE: Memory LyXs

2011-04-30 Thread venom00
it->font().language(); > - d->words_[*lang].insert(word); > + d->words_[*lang].insert(asString(from, pos, AS_STR_NONE);); > } > } > } set.insert() stores a copy [2] so you have to remove it manually. word should die when goes out of scope. Thanks. I hope

RE: Too much options in LyX

2011-04-29 Thread venom00
Hi. On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 02:07:55PM +0200, venom00 wrote: +void GuiDocument::hideView() { + Dialog::hideView(); + // Reset the search box + this-docPS-resetSearch(); +} Style nits: { on a separate line for the function body, and this- seems superfluous. OK

RE: #7493 and preview-latex in general

2011-04-29 Thread venom00
the problem of labels too distant from equations in IP. I'll take a look, but I don't think I'll be able to do that. :( venom00

RE: Too much options in LyX

2011-04-29 Thread venom00
patch. I've added a 300 ms delay, now it should be more responsive as the search it's not done for each charatecter in input. venom00 Index: src/frontends/qt4/GuiDocument.h === --- src/frontends/qt4/GuiDocument.h (revisione 38474

RE: Maintenance release management

2011-04-29 Thread venom00
to thank everybody for the support over the last 4 years. Jürgen Bravo! :) venom00

RE: Too much options in LyX

2011-04-29 Thread venom00
> Hi. > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 02:07:55PM +0200, venom00 wrote: > > > +void GuiDocument::hideView() { > > > + Dialog::hideView(); > > > + // Reset the search box > > > + this->docPS->resetSearch(); > > > +} > > Style ni

RE: #7493 and preview-latex in general

2011-04-29 Thread venom00
od idea, this would also solve the problem of labels too distant from equations in IP. I'll take a look, but I don't think I'll be able to do that. :( venom00

RE: Too much options in LyX

2011-04-29 Thread venom00
tle delay. Here's the new patch. I've added a 300 ms delay, now it should be more responsive as the search it's not done for each charatecter in input. venom00 Index: src/frontends/qt4/GuiDocument.h === --- src/frontends/qt4/GuiDocumen

RE: Maintenance release management

2011-04-29 Thread venom00
ion, IMHO. > > Let me take the opportunity to thank everybody for the > support over the last 4 > years. > > Jürgen > Bravo! :) venom00

RE: Too much options in LyX

2011-04-28 Thread venom00
On 27-4-2011 14:07, venom00 wrote: Ping Yes, shame on me... Vincent Np, it's just that I want this patch commited before going to other improvements. venom00

RE: Trunk is completely frozen for any commits

2011-04-28 Thread venom00
Local control tower: giving permission to land. Over. One small step for a bunch of developers, a giant leap for mankind. venom00

RE: Too much options in LyX

2011-04-28 Thread venom00
> On 27-4-2011 14:07, venom00 wrote: > > Ping > > > > Yes, shame on me... > > Vincent > Np, it's just that I want this patch commited before going to other improvements. venom00

RE: Trunk is completely frozen for any commits

2011-04-28 Thread venom00
> Local control tower: giving permission to land. > Over. One small step for a bunch of developers, a giant leap for mankind. venom00

RE: Too much options in LyX

2011-04-27 Thread venom00
Ping -Original Message- From: lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org [mailto:lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org] On Behalf Of venom00 Sent: Friday, April 22, 2011 5:24 PM To: lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org Cc: 'Vincent van Ravesteijn'; 'Peter Kümmel' Subject: RE: Too much options in LyX OK, I've fixed

#7493 and preview-latex in general

2011-04-27 Thread venom00
it much slower, making IP unusable on big documents, as it is in TeXmacs. So, my conclusion is: let's drop preview-latex. venom00

Wiki upload password

2011-04-27 Thread venom00
I need the IPFM [1] password to upload my slides about LyX (do you remember the conference I had in Feb?). Do you think I should create a wiki page like LyXEvangelism as someone suggested at that time or simply drop them In LyX/Tutorials [2]? Thanks. venom00 [1] http://wiki.lyx.org/ipfm

RE: Too much options in LyX

2011-04-27 Thread venom00
Ping > -Original Message- > From: lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org > [mailto:lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org] On Behalf Of venom00 > Sent: Friday, April 22, 2011 5:24 PM > To: lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org > Cc: 'Vincent van Ravesteijn'; 'Peter Kümmel' > Subject: RE: Too much options

#7493 and preview-latex in general

2011-04-27 Thread venom00
-latex would make it much slower, making IP unusable on big documents, as it is in TeXmacs. So, my conclusion is: let's drop preview-latex. venom00

Wiki upload password

2011-04-27 Thread venom00
I need the IPFM [1] password to upload my slides about LyX (do you remember the conference I had in Feb?). Do you think I should create a wiki page like LyXEvangelism as someone suggested at that time or simply drop them In LyX/Tutorials [2]? Thanks. venom00 [1] http://wiki.lyx.org/ipfm

  1   2   3   4   >