Larry S. Marso wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 11, 1999 at 10:18:00AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >
> > > I personally use the teTeX-0.9 pretest versions
>
> Is there someone out there using teTeX-0.9 who wouldn't mind jotting
> down a few observations about additional capabilities it offers Ly
On Mon, 11 Jan 1999, Larry S. Marso wrote:
> Is there someone out there using teTeX-0.9 who wouldn't mind jotting
> down a few observations about additional capabilities it offers LyX
> users?
The primary reason I use it is rather stupid - the version of xdvi
included with it doesn't complain abo
> On Mon, Jan 11, 1999 at 10:18:00AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > I personally use the teTeX-0.9 pretest versions
Is there someone out there using teTeX-0.9 who wouldn't mind jotting
down a few observations about additional capabilities it offers LyX
users?
Best regards
--
Larry S.
On Mon, Jan 11, 1999 at 10:18:00AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > As a separate issue, is there a way to get LyX to linebreak intelligently in
> > such cases? But doesn't url.sty make url's break cleanly? I just looked at the
> > docs for it, and it sort of looks like we ought to be using it
On Mon, Jan 11, 1999 at 10:18:00AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Editors' Revolt to Trim ERT) and optimizing for LyX.
>
> Is this ERTERT? :-)
Sure. Remember that I"m also a member of the Redundant Redundancy
Reduction Committee.
> url.sty is certainly one option, at least for the URLs
On Mon, 11 Jan 1999, Amir Karger wrote:
> I certainly don't want to suggest that you were wasting your time when you did
> this, but I feel it's not worth optimizing for printing for several
> reasons.
Okay - if no one else objects, I'm going to nuke all the ERT I put in.
This goes with my gut f
