Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > Kornel Benko wrote:
> >> I do not agree. We should check attic too IMHO (or else do not provide it).
> >> Therefore I prefer you to commit :)
> >
> > We "provide it" :)
> > Have you ever looked at the junk in developme
Am Montag, 5. August 2013 um 19:42:25, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > Kornel Benko wrote:
> >> I do not agree. We should check attic too IMHO (or else do not provide it).
> >> Therefore I prefer you to commit :)
> >
> > We "provide it" :)
> > Hav
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Kornel Benko wrote:
>> I do not agree. We should check attic too IMHO (or else do not provide it).
>> Therefore I prefer you to commit :)
>
> We "provide it" :)
> Have you ever looked at the junk in development/attic? It's almost definition
> th
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 7:48 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Montag, 5. August 2013 um 07:41:31, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
>
>
>> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
>
>> > Am Montag, 5. August 2013 um 07:07:58, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
>
>> >
>
>> >
>
>> >> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 6:02
Kornel Benko wrote:
> I do not agree. We should check attic too IMHO (or else do not provide it).
> Therefore I prefer you to commit :)
We "provide it" :)
Have you ever looked at the junk in development/attic? It's almost definition
that we put files there if they are no more functional. The only
Am Montag, 5. August 2013 um 14:50:19, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn
> Op 5-8-2013 14:37, Kornel Benko schreef:
> >
> > Am Montag, 5. August 2013 um 08:22:19, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> >
> >
> > > On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
> >
> > > > Am Montag, 5. August 2013 um 08:
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 8:53 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> Op 3-8-2013 9:54, Scott Kostyshak schreef:
>
>> On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Kornel Benko wrote:
>>>
>>> Am Freitag, 2. August 2013 um 20:06:40, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn
>>>
>>>
> Why should we update? This is also the
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 8:50 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> Op 5-8-2013 14:37, Kornel Benko schreef:
>
> Am Montag, 5. August 2013 um 08:22:19, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
>
>
>> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
>
>> > Am Montag, 5. August 2013 um 08:01:08, schrieb Scott Kosty
Op 3-8-2013 9:54, Scott Kostyshak schreef:
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Kornel Benko wrote:
Am Freitag, 2. August 2013 um 20:06:40, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn
Why should we update? This is also the test for lyx2lyx, isn't it?
No, this is not the way to test lyx2lyx.
Vincent
Sorry,
Am Montag, 5. August 2013 um 14:40:12, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn
> Op 5-8-2013 13:07, Scott Kostyshak schreef:
> > On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 6:02 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> >> Op 4-8-2013 22:23, Scott Kostyshak schreef:
> >>
> >>> On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 3:54 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote
Op 5-8-2013 14:37, Kornel Benko schreef:
Am Montag, 5. August 2013 um 08:22:19, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Am Montag, 5. August 2013 um 08:01:08, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> >
> >
> >> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 5:56 AM, Pavel Sanda wro
Op 5-8-2013 13:07, Scott Kostyshak schreef:
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 6:02 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Op 4-8-2013 22:23, Scott Kostyshak schreef:
On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 3:54 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 5:58 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn
wrote:
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at
Am Montag, 5. August 2013 um 08:22:19, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Am Montag, 5. August 2013 um 08:01:08, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> >
> >
> >> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 5:56 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> >
> >> > Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> >
> >> >>
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Montag, 5. August 2013 um 08:01:08, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
>
>
>> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 5:56 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>
>> > Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
>> >> > Sorry, I meant "This is also a test for lyx2lyx, isn't it?"
>
>> >>
>
>> >> My op
Am Montag, 5. August 2013 um 08:01:08, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 5:56 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> >> > Sorry, I meant "This is also a test for lyx2lyx, isn't it?"
> >>
> >> My opinion is that we should update those documents. I agree that it
> >
> >
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 5:56 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>> > Sorry, I meant "This is also a test for lyx2lyx, isn't it?"
>>
>> My opinion is that we should update those documents. I agree that it
>
> attic is just garbage and it is somewhat absurd that test should fail
> becaus
Am Montag, 5. August 2013 um 07:41:31, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Am Montag, 5. August 2013 um 07:07:58, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> >
> >
> >> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 6:02 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn
> >> wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> >> > As f
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Montag, 5. August 2013 um 07:07:58, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
>
>
>> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 6:02 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn
>> wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>> > As far as I see it, it cannot happen that there is no
>> > default_output_format.
>
>>
>
Am Montag, 5. August 2013 um 07:07:58, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 6:02 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
[snip]
> > As far as I see it, it cannot happen that there is no default_output_format.
>
> > Only if there are lyx files with an old file format. In that case:
> >
> >
Am Montag, 5. August 2013 um 12:02:00, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn
> Op 4-8-2013 22:23, Scott Kostyshak schreef:
> > On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 3:54 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> >> On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 5:58 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn
> >> wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Kornel B
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > Sorry, I meant "This is also a test for lyx2lyx, isn't it?"
>
> My opinion is that we should update those documents. I agree that it
attic is just garbage and it is somewhat absurd that test should fail
because of some contents in there. Please create proper tests for
t
Op 4-8-2013 22:23, Scott Kostyshak schreef:
On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 3:54 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 5:58 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
About the patch... why do we care about malformed LyX documents ? How
can
thi
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 6:02 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> Op 4-8-2013 22:23, Scott Kostyshak schreef:
>
>> On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 3:54 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 5:58 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn
>>> wrote:
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Kornel Benk
On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 3:54 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 5:58 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
>>>
>>> > About the patch... why do we care about malformed LyX documents ? How
>>> > can
>>>
>>> > this happen ? Are
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 5:58 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
>>
>> > About the patch... why do we care about malformed LyX documents ? How
>> > can
>>
>> > this happen ? Are there some documents in a very old fileformat. Then we
>>
>> > sh
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Freitag, 2. August 2013 um 20:06:40, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn
>
>
>> > Why should we update? This is also the test for lyx2lyx, isn't it?
>
>> >
>
>>
>
>> No, this is not the way to test lyx2lyx.
>
>>
>
>> Vincent
>
>
>
> Sorry, I mea
Am Freitag, 2. August 2013 um 20:06:40, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn
> > Why should we update? This is also the test for lyx2lyx, isn't it?
> >
>
> No, this is not the way to test lyx2lyx.
>
> Vincent
Sorry, I meant "This is also a test for lyx2lyx, isn't it?"
Kornel
signature.asc
Op 2-8-2013 18:18, Kornel Benko schreef:
Am Freitag, 2. August 2013 um 11:58:46, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn
> On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
>
> > **
> >
> >
> > > About the patch... why do we care about malformed LyX documents
? How can
> >
> > > this hap
Am Freitag, 2. August 2013 um 11:58:46, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn
> On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
>
> > **
> >
> >
> > > About the patch... why do we care about malformed LyX documents ? How can
> >
> > > this happen ? Are there some documents in a very old fileforma
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
> **
>
>
> > About the patch... why do we care about malformed LyX documents ? How can
>
> > this happen ? Are there some documents in a very old fileformat. Then we
>
> > should update those.
>
>
>
> At least now the tests will show it.
>
If
Am Freitag, 2. August 2013 um 11:06:36, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn
> On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 4:25 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 2:00 AM, Scott Kostyshak
> > wrote:
> > >>
>
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 4:25 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 2:00 AM, Scott Kostyshak
> wrote:
> >>
> >> If a .lyx file has no 'default_output_format' property
> >> (that is, not even 'default'),
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 4:25 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 2:00 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>>
>> If a .lyx file has no 'default_output_format' property
>> (that is, not even 'default'), then it is malformed and
>> the test should fail.
>>
>> Before this patch, we
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 2:00 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> If a .lyx file has no 'default_output_format' property
> (that is, not even 'default'), then it is malformed and
> the test should fail.
>
> Before this patch, we guess that the correct format to test with is 'pdf'.
>
> Comments?
>
>
I do
If a .lyx file has no 'default_output_format' property
(that is, not even 'default'), then it is malformed and
the test should fail.
Before this patch, we guess that the correct format to test with is 'pdf'.
Comments?
Scott
From 9ec76ee7f68037f900c458b25fc3510ec8b78e3f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
F
35 matches
Mail list logo