On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, José Matos wrote:
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 15:16:56 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's the risk of embarrassing[*] bugs? (As this is just before the
release of 1.5.0). There is no RC3 planned, right?
Do you want a formula with deltas and epsilons? ;-)
No there is not any
On Wednesday 11 July 2007 11:33:32 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Regarding this subject I think that this course of action is sound so I
don't expect any major surprises. (Famous last words).
If something does happen, your words might well make it into LyX's famous
quotes :-)
AFAIU the right
José Matos wrote:
On Wednesday 11 July 2007 11:33:32 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Regarding this subject I think that this course of action is sound so I
don't expect any major surprises. (Famous last words).
If something does happen, your words might well make it into LyX's famous
quotes :-)
On Wednesday 11 July 2007 13:34:18 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
José Matos wrote:
On Wednesday 11 July 2007 11:33:32 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Regarding this subject I think that this course of action is sound so
I don't expect any major surprises. (Famous last words).
If something does
José Matos wrote:
On Wednesday 11 July 2007 13:34:18 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
???
How are we disagreeing?
We are discussing an implementation detail, the final result should be the
same. Instead of the current:
Style Anão
...
End
I am proposing
Style Anao
LyXName Anão
...
End
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, José Matos wrote:
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 15:16:56 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's the risk of embarrassing[*] bugs? (As this is just before the
release of 1.5.0). There is no RC3 planned, right?
Do you want a formula with deltas and epsilons? ;-)
No there is not any
On Wednesday 11 July 2007 11:33:32 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Regarding this subject I think that this course of action is sound so I
> > don't expect any major surprises. (Famous last words).
>
> If something does happen, your words might well make it into LyX's famous
> quotes :-)
AFAIU
José Matos wrote:
On Wednesday 11 July 2007 11:33:32 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Regarding this subject I think that this course of action is sound so I
don't expect any major surprises. (Famous last words).
If something does happen, your words might well make it into LyX's famous
quotes :-)
On Wednesday 11 July 2007 13:34:18 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> José Matos wrote:
> > On Wednesday 11 July 2007 11:33:32 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>> Regarding this subject I think that this course of action is sound so
> >>> I don't expect any major surprises. (Famous last words).
> >>
> >> If
José Matos wrote:
On Wednesday 11 July 2007 13:34:18 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
???
How are we disagreeing?
We are discussing an implementation detail, the final result should be the
same. Instead of the current:
Style Anão
...
End
I am proposing
Style Anao
LyXName "Anão"
...
End
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1) provide a python script that converts the layout as good as possible:
Théorème - Theoreme
Liste_à_puce - Liste_a_puce
The problem is that it could be done easily for French but maybe not
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 10:23:02 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
So?
This patch fixes a crash and a regression against 1.4. Unless you want
to implement the layout2layout support and do the GUIName addition
before 1.5.0, this patch should go in now.
It's just a string - docstring conversion and
José Matos wrote:
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 10:23:02 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
So?
This patch fixes a crash and a regression against 1.4. Unless you want
to implement the layout2layout support and do the GUIName addition
before 1.5.0, this patch should go in now.
It's just a string - docstring
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 10:50:28 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Right.
Does anyone has any objection to this change?
The purpose of this release is the support of unicode, we are using utf8 for
the saved files so it makes all sense to follow the same route for layout
files.
In the special
José Matos wrote:
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 10:50:28 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Right.
Does anyone has any objection to this change?
The purpose of this release is the support of unicode, we are using utf8 for
the saved files so it makes all sense to follow the same route for layout
files.
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 13:25:04 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
What about the documentation? It is probably time to convert them, isn't
it?
As far as I remember there are no patches holding that change the file
format. If so then yes it is time to start updating the documentation to the
latest
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, José Matos wrote:
The plan for this change is then:
* to convert our layout files to utf8;
* apply your patch;
* add a comment to the release notes.
I propose to do this tomorrow to give some time for feedback. If by
tomorrow there are no voices against we will
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 15:16:56 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's the risk of embarrassing[*] bugs? (As this is just before the
release of 1.5.0). There is no RC3 planned, right?
Do you want a formula with deltas and epsilons? ;-)
No there is not any RC3 planned. Do you think we need one?
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
1) provide a python script that converts the layout as good as possible:
Théorème -> Theoreme
Liste_à_puce -> Liste_a_puce
The problem is that it could be done easily for French but maybe
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 10:23:02 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> So?
>
> This patch fixes a crash and a regression against 1.4. Unless you want
> to implement the layout2layout support and do the GUIName addition
> before 1.5.0, this patch should go in now.
>
> It's just a string -> docstring
José Matos wrote:
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 10:23:02 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
So?
This patch fixes a crash and a regression against 1.4. Unless you want
to implement the layout2layout support and do the GUIName addition
before 1.5.0, this patch should go in now.
It's just a string -> docstring
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 10:50:28 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Right.
Does anyone has any objection to this change?
The purpose of this release is the support of unicode, we are using utf8 for
the saved files so it makes all sense to follow the same route for layout
files.
In the special
José Matos wrote:
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 10:50:28 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Right.
Does anyone has any objection to this change?
The purpose of this release is the support of unicode, we are using utf8 for
the saved files so it makes all sense to follow the same route for layout
files.
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 13:25:04 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> What about the documentation? It is probably time to convert them, isn't
> it?
As far as I remember there are no patches holding that change the file
format. If so then yes it is time to start updating the documentation to the
latest
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, José Matos wrote:
The plan for this change is then:
* to convert our layout files to utf8;
* apply your patch;
* add a comment to the release notes.
I propose to do this tomorrow to give some time for feedback. If by
tomorrow there are no voices against we will
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 15:16:56 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> What's the risk of embarrassing[*] bugs? (As this is just before the
> release of 1.5.0). There is no RC3 planned, right?
Do you want a formula with deltas and epsilons? ;-)
No there is not any RC3 planned. Do you think we need
Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1) provide a python script that converts the layout as good as possible:
Théorème - Theoreme
Liste_à_puce - Liste_a_puce
The problem is that it could be done easily for French but maybe not for
other languages.
Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
1) provide a python script that converts the layout as good as possible:
Théorème -> Theoreme
Liste_à_puce -> Liste_a_puce
The problem is that it could be done easily for French but maybe not for
other languages.
28 matches
Mail list logo
