On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 11:12:17PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 09:48:23PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
7240 poenitz Jul 04 2003 BRANCH_NOUPDATE/
Could be removed. It basically is in 1.4.
Andre'
I removed it.
- Martin
pgprAz3z1ykhB.pgp
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 11:12:17PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 09:48:23PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> >7240 poenitz Jul 04 2003 BRANCH_NOUPDATE/
>
> Could be removed. It basically is in 1.4.
>
> Andre'
I removed it.
- Martin
pgprAz3z1ykhB.pgp
Martin Vermeer wrote:
We have quite a set of branches already... are they all actual anymore?
9351 baumDec 06 2004 BooktabBranch/
Is a nearly finished implementation of booktabs support in tables and should
go into 1.5.
9297 abraunstNov 24 2004
Martin Vermeer wrote:
> We have quite a set of branches already... are they all actual anymore?
>9351 baumDec 06 2004 BooktabBranch/
Is a nearly finished implementation of booktabs support in tables and should
go into 1.5.
>9297 abraunstNov 24 2004
Martin Vermeer wrote:
Basically it introduces one more position in a paragraph, after the last
character (i.e., pos = par.size() ) to represent the change attached to
the paragraph break (carriage return, which we don't really have in
our model).
Martin, thank you very much for your work!
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 10:22:59AM +0100, Michael Gerz wrote:
Martin Vermeer wrote:
Basically it introduces one more position in a paragraph, after the last
character (i.e., pos = par.size() ) to represent the change attached to
the paragraph break (carriage return, which we don't really
Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| I am busy right now but I will hopefully find some time for testing by
| the end of next week.
|
| Let's hope the tree is open for 1.4.1 then...
But it really should be tested somewhere else... don't you think, a
trunk or a branch.
--
Lgb
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 03:21:12PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| I am busy right now but I will hopefully find some time for testing by
| the end of next week.
|
| Let's hope the tree is open for 1.4.1 then...
But it really should be
Michael == Michael Gerz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Michael Martin Vermeer wrote:
Basically it introduces one more position in a paragraph, after the
last character (i.e., pos = par.size() ) to represent the change
attached to the paragraph break (carriage return, which we don't
really have in
Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 03:21:12PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| | I am busy right now but I will hopefully find some time for testing by
| | the end of next week.
| |
| | Let's hope the tree
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 04:40:11PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 03:21:12PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| | I am busy right now but I will hopefully find some time
Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 04:40:11PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| | On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 03:21:12PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| | Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| |
| | |
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 07:06:30PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
...
| I will create my own personal tree under branches/ farily soon, I'd
| rather keep my WIP there than on my own disk.
|
| branches/developers/larsbj
|
| or something.
Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Right.
|
| We have quite a set of branches already... are they all actual anymore?
No. (That was a rhetorical Q right?)
|5928 lasgouttJan 09 2003 BRANCH-1_2_X/
|3897 lasgouttApr 04 2002 BRANCH_1_1_6/
| 10803
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Personal branches should be moved to 'personal'¹ some appropriate
place.
¹ Or propose abetter name please.
How about 'sandbox' since that's what the purpose of these branches will
be; to play around in without causing harm to anyone else.
--
Angus
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 09:48:23PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
7240 poenitz Jul 04 2003 BRANCH_NOUPDATE/
Could be removed. It basically is in 1.4.
Andre'
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 08:58:43PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
One thing with subversion is that it is a lot easier to use branches,
and they are not slow as in cvs. I will at least create 5-8 branches
for myself. Stuff I work with, ideas, etc.
Merging back - and more important - keeping
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 08:58:43PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| One thing with subversion is that it is a lot easier to use branches,
| and they are not slow as in cvs. I will at least create 5-8 branches
| for myself. Stuff I work with, ideas,
Martin Vermeer wrote:
Basically it introduces one more position in a paragraph, after the last
character (i.e., pos = par.size() ) to represent the change attached to
the paragraph break ("carriage return", which we don't really have in
our model).
Martin, thank you very much for your work!
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 10:22:59AM +0100, Michael Gerz wrote:
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
>
> >Basically it introduces one more position in a paragraph, after the last
> >character (i.e., pos = par.size() ) to represent the change attached to
> >the paragraph break ("carriage return", which we don't
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > I am busy right now but I will hopefully find some time for testing by
| > the end of next week.
|
| Let's hope the tree is open for 1.4.1 then...
But it really should be tested somewhere else... don't you think, a
trunk or a branch.
--
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 03:21:12PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | > I am busy right now but I will hopefully find some time for testing by
> | > the end of next week.
> |
> | Let's hope the tree is open for 1.4.1 then...
>
> But it really
> "Michael" == Michael Gerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Michael> Martin Vermeer wrote:
>> Basically it introduces one more position in a paragraph, after the
>> last character (i.e., pos = par.size() ) to represent the change
>> attached to the paragraph break ("carriage return", which we
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 03:21:12PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > | > I am busy right now but I will hopefully find some time for testing by
| > | > the end of next week.
| > |
| > | Let's
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 04:40:11PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 03:21:12PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | > Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | >
> | > | > I am busy right now but I will hopefully
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 04:40:11PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > | On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 03:21:12PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > | > Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > |
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 07:06:30PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
...
> | > I will create my own personal tree under branches/ farily soon, I'd
> | > rather keep my WIP there than on my own disk.
> | >
> | > branches/developers/larsbj
> | >
> |
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > Right.
|
| We have quite a set of branches already... are they all actual anymore?
No. (That was a rhetorical Q right?)
|5928 lasgouttJan 09 2003 BRANCH-1_2_X/
|3897 lasgouttApr 04 2002 BRANCH_1_1_6/
| 10803
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Personal branches should be moved to 'personal'¹ some appropriate
> place.
> ¹ Or propose abetter name please.
How about 'sandbox' since that's what the purpose of these branches will
be; to play around in without causing harm to anyone else.
--
Angus
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 09:48:23PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
>7240 poenitz Jul 04 2003 BRANCH_NOUPDATE/
Could be removed. It basically is in 1.4.
Andre'
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 08:58:43PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> One thing with subversion is that it is a lot easier to use branches,
> and they are not slow as in cvs. I will at least create 5-8 branches
> for myself. Stuff I work with, ideas, etc.
Merging back - and more important -
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 08:58:43PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > One thing with subversion is that it is a lot easier to use branches,
| > and they are not slow as in cvs. I will at least create 5-8 branches
| > for myself. Stuff I work with,
On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 12:16 +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 11:39 +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
Anybody else notice that its sshd seems dead? As a result I cannot use
CVS.
The reason I'm asking is, I've got multi-paragraph change tracking
working (for 1.4.1 as promised),
On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 12:16 +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 11:39 +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > Anybody else notice that its sshd seems dead? As a result I cannot use
> > CVS.
>
> The reason I'm asking is, I've got multi-paragraph change tracking
> working (for 1.4.1 as
34 matches
Mail list logo
