On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
Currently it looks like neither Asger, Angus and John could come if we
insisted June 20th.
Currently I have (5 - ok, 0 - not ok):
I think I'm going to be a 0 for all dates this year unless I win the
lottery. I am however making good progress on my
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 02:14:32PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
I think I'm going to be a 0 for all dates this year unless I win the
lottery.
Is that the price of spending the whole life upside down?
I wonder whether RyanAir will go beyond Europe some time. Yesterday I've
seen Frankfurt-Glasgow
On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 02:14:32PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
I think I'm going to be a 0 for all dates this year unless I win the
lottery.
Is that the price of spending the whole life upside down?
No the price for spending my life upside down is
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 04:36:43PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
I wonder whether RyanAir will go beyond Europe some time. Yesterday I've
seen Frankfurt-Glasgow for 7 EUR...
How much extra for a seat?
And how much on top of that for a seat belt?
And how much more on top of that for a
On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
My last trip a few weeks ago was Berlin-London for ~50 EUR (one way,
including taxes) with a company called buzz and it was ok. No food on
board (well, there was, but you would have to pay extra) but I really don't
care about that for a two hours
On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Currently it looks like neither Asger, Angus and John could come if we
> insisted June 20th.
>
> Currently I have (5 - "ok", 0 - "not ok"):
I think I'm going to be a 0 for all dates this year unless I win the
lottery. I am however making good progress
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 02:14:32PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> I think I'm going to be a 0 for all dates this year unless I win the
> lottery.
Is that the price of spending the whole life upside down?
I wonder whether RyanAir will go beyond Europe some time. Yesterday I've
seen Frankfurt-Glasgow
On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 02:14:32PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> > I think I'm going to be a 0 for all dates this year unless I win the
> > lottery.
>
> Is that the price of spending the whole life upside down?
No the price for spending my life upside down
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 04:36:43PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> > I wonder whether RyanAir will go beyond Europe some time. Yesterday I've
> > seen Frankfurt-Glasgow for 7 EUR...
>
> How much extra for a seat?
> And how much on top of that for a seat belt?
> And how much more on top of that for a
On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> My last trip a few weeks ago was Berlin-London for ~50 EUR (one way,
> including taxes) with a company called "buzz" and it was ok. No food on
> board (well, there was, but you would have to pay extra) but I really don't
> care about that for a two
On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
OK, my response follows in the first column:
Lars John José
0 earlier131
0 May 3105
0 May10105
0 May17105
0 May24105
0 June1155
0 June8
On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
OK, my response follows in the first column:
> Lars John José
0 > 131
0 > May 3105
0 > May10105
0 > May17105
0 > May24105
0 > June1155
0 > June8
This one has been in my tree for a while. It does not fix the
'$ blah$$ foo $
problem, but it doesn't break anything either.
It works by setting a switch, $inside_math, so that reLyX knows whether to
enter or leave math mode when it receives a '$' or '$$' token.
Ok to apply? And to
On Friday 07 February 2003 11:39, Angus Leeming wrote:
This one has been in my tree for a while. It does not fix the
'$ blah$$ foo $
problem, but it doesn't break anything either.
It works by setting a switch, $inside_math, so that reLyX knows whether to
enter or leave math mode when
José Matos wrote:
On Friday 07 February 2003 11:39, Angus Leeming wrote:
This one has been in my tree for a while. It does not fix the
'$ blah$$ foo $
problem, but it doesn't break anything either.
It works by setting a switch, $inside_math, so that reLyX knows whether
to enter or
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ok to apply? And to 1.3.x?
I would say apply it for 1.4.x. Regarding 1.3.x we should be
paranoid. ;-) (by Jean:marc advice's) ;-)
Angus Ok, I'll apply it to 1.4.x and store the patch in my 1.3.x dir.
What kind of problems does it fix? We
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 01:43:33PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Angus Ok, I'll apply it to 1.4.x and store the patch in my 1.3.x dir.
What kind of problems does it fix? We have to weight the risk/benefit
ratio.
I think having it just for 1.4 is ok.
Andre'
PS: Jean-Marc, could you
Andre == Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andre On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 01:43:33PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre wrote:
Angus Ok, I'll apply it to 1.4.x and store the patch in my 1.3.x dir.
What kind of problems does it fix? We have to weight the
risk/benefit ratio.
Andre I think
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ok to apply? And to 1.3.x?
I would say apply it for 1.4.x. Regarding 1.3.x we should be
paranoid. ;-) (by Jean:marc advice's) ;-)
Angus Ok, I'll apply it to 1.4.x and store the patch in my 1.3.x dir.
What
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 12:51:37PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
Sure. It fixes nothing since André can cope equally well with both \(...\)
and $...$. He merely said that he'd prefer to receive math as it is in the
original LaTeX file.
And the only reason for that is the goal of a lossless
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus Sure. It fixes nothing since André can cope equally well with
Angus both \(...\) and $...$. He merely said that he'd prefer to
Angus receive math as it is in the original LaTeX file.
Let's drop it, then.
JMarc
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 01:49:48PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Andre PS: Jean-Marc, could you fill in the list with the dates, too?
We have the ChangeLogs for that already, don't we? The list is what I
use to make the list of features in the announcement. What we could
add though
Andre == Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andre On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 01:49:48PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre wrote: PS: Jean-Marc, could you fill in the list with the
Andre dates, too?
We have the ChangeLogs for that already, don't we? The list is
what I use to make the list of
On Friday 07 February 2003 1:17 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 01:49:48PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Andre PS: Jean-Marc, could you fill in the list with the dates, too?
We have the ChangeLogs for that already, don't we? The list is what I
use to make the list of
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 02:28:25PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Andre No, I mean the list with the dates you might be able to come to
Andre Chemnitz.
Can you wait until tomorrow?
Sure.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do
This one has been in my tree for a while. It does not fix the
'$ blah$$ foo $
problem, but it doesn't break anything either.
It works by setting a switch, $inside_math, so that reLyX knows whether to
enter or leave math mode when it receives a '$' or '$$' token.
Ok to apply? And to
On Friday 07 February 2003 11:39, Angus Leeming wrote:
> This one has been in my tree for a while. It does not fix the
> '$ blah$$ foo $
> problem, but it doesn't break anything either.
>
> It works by setting a switch, $inside_math, so that reLyX knows whether to
> enter or leave math
José Matos wrote:
> On Friday 07 February 2003 11:39, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> This one has been in my tree for a while. It does not fix the
>> '$ blah$$ foo $
>> problem, but it doesn't break anything either.
>>
>> It works by setting a switch, $inside_math, so that reLyX knows whether
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> Ok to apply? And to 1.3.x?
>> I would say apply it for 1.4.x. Regarding 1.3.x we should be
>> paranoid. ;-) (by Jean:marc advice's) ;-)
Angus> Ok, I'll apply it to 1.4.x and store the patch in my 1.3.x dir.
What kind of problems
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 01:43:33PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Angus> Ok, I'll apply it to 1.4.x and store the patch in my 1.3.x dir.
>
> What kind of problems does it fix? We have to weight the risk/benefit
> ratio.
I think having it just for 1.4 is ok.
Andre'
PS: Jean-Marc, could
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 01:43:33PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre> wrote:
Angus> Ok, I'll apply it to 1.4.x and store the patch in my 1.3.x dir.
>> What kind of problems does it fix? We have to weight the
>> risk/benefit ratio.
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
Ok to apply? And to 1.3.x?
>>> I would say apply it for 1.4.x. Regarding 1.3.x we should be
>>> paranoid. ;-) (by Jean:marc advice's) ;-)
>
> Angus> Ok, I'll apply it to 1.4.x and store the patch in
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 12:51:37PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Sure. It fixes nothing since André can cope equally well with both \(...\)
> and $...$. He merely said that he'd prefer to receive math as it is in the
> original LaTeX file.
And the only reason for that is the goal of a lossless
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Sure. It fixes nothing since André can cope equally well with
Angus> both \(...\) and $...$. He merely said that he'd prefer to
Angus> receive math as it is in the original LaTeX file.
Let's drop it, then.
JMarc
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 01:49:48PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Andre> PS: Jean-Marc, could you fill in the list with the dates, too?
>
> We have the ChangeLogs for that already, don't we? The list is what I
> use to make the list of features in the announcement. What we could
> add
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 01:49:48PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre> wrote: PS: Jean-Marc, could you fill in the list with the
Andre> dates, too?
>> We have the ChangeLogs for that already, don't we? The list is
>> what I use to
On Friday 07 February 2003 1:17 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 01:49:48PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > Andre> PS: Jean-Marc, could you fill in the list with the dates, too?
> >
> > We have the ChangeLogs for that already, don't we? The list is what I
> > use to make
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 02:28:25PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Andre> No, I mean the list with the dates you might be able to come to
> Andre> Chemnitz.
>
> Can you wait until tomorrow?
Sure.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor
38 matches
Mail list logo
