Anybody else notice that its sshd seems dead? As a result I cannot use
CVS.
- Martin
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 11:39 +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> Anybody else notice that its sshd seems dead? As a result I cannot use
> CVS.
The reason I'm asking is, I've got multi-paragraph change tracking
working (for 1.4.1 as promised), but cannot make a patch ;-)
- Martin
signature.asc
Descri
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> Anybody else notice that its sshd seems dead? As a result I
Martin> cannot use CVS.
I can't even ping it.
JMarc
On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Martin> Anybody else notice that its sshd seems dead? As a result I
> Martin> cannot use CVS.
>
> I can't even ping it.
Me neither:
PING baywatch.lyx.org (62.70.27.114) from 130.23
> "christian" == christian ridderstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I can't even ping it.
christian> Is the IP number correct?
I suspect the machine has been hacked (again), but we will not know
for sure until Lars tells us.
JMarc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
|
| > > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > Martin> Anybody else notice that its sshd seems dead? As a result I
| > Martin> cannot use CVS.
| >
| > I can't even ping it.
|
| Me neither:
|
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "christian" == christian ridderstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| >> I can't even ping it.
|
|
| christian> Is the IP number correct?
|
| I suspect the machine has been hacked (again), but we will not know
| for sure until Lars tell
| I suspect the machine has been hacked (again), but we will not know
| for sure until Lars tells us.
Lars> To my kmowledge, this is not the case.
Good news :)
JMarc
On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 12:16 +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 11:39 +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > Anybody else notice that its sshd seems dead? As a result I cannot use
> > CVS.
>
> The reason I'm asking is, I've got multi-paragraph change tracking
> working (for 1.4.1 as pro
Martin Vermeer wrote:
Basically it introduces one more position in a paragraph, after the last
character (i.e., pos = par.size() ) to represent the change attached to
the paragraph break ("carriage return", which we don't really have in
our model).
Martin, thank you very much for your work! O
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 10:22:59AM +0100, Michael Gerz wrote:
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
>
> >Basically it introduces one more position in a paragraph, after the last
> >character (i.e., pos = par.size() ) to represent the change attached to
> >the paragraph break ("carriage return", which we don't r
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > I am busy right now but I will hopefully find some time for testing by
| > the end of next week.
|
| Let's hope the tree is open for 1.4.1 then...
But it really should be tested somewhere else... don't you think, a
trunk or a branch.
--
L
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 03:21:12PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | > I am busy right now but I will hopefully find some time for testing by
> | > the end of next week.
> |
> | Let's hope the tree is open for 1.4.1 then...
>
> But it really sh
> "Michael" == Michael Gerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Michael> Martin Vermeer wrote:
>> Basically it introduces one more position in a paragraph, after the
>> last character (i.e., pos = par.size() ) to represent the change
>> attached to the paragraph break ("carriage return", which we don'
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 03:21:12PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > | > I am busy right now but I will hopefully find some time for testing by
| > | > the end of next week.
| > |
| > | Let's hop
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 04:40:11PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 03:21:12PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | > Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | >
> | > | > I am busy right now but I will hopefully fi
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 04:40:11PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > | On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 03:21:12PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > | > Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > |
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 07:06:30PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
...
> | > I will create my own personal tree under branches/ farily soon, I'd
> | > rather keep my WIP there than on my own disk.
> | >
> | > branches/developers/larsbj
> | >
> | >
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > Right.
|
| We have quite a set of branches already... are they all actual anymore?
No. (That was a rhetorical Q right?)
|5928 lasgouttJan 09 2003 BRANCH-1_2_X/
|3897 lasgouttApr 04 2002 BRANCH_1_1_6/
| 10803 lasg
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Personal branches should be moved to 'personal'¹ some appropriate
> place.
> ¹ Or propose abetter name please.
How about 'sandbox' since that's what the purpose of these branches will
be; to play around in without causing harm to anyone else.
--
Angus
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 09:48:23PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
>7240 poenitz Jul 04 2003 BRANCH_NOUPDATE/
Could be removed. It basically is in 1.4.
Andre'
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 08:58:43PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> One thing with subversion is that it is a lot easier to use branches,
> and they are not slow as in cvs. I will at least create 5-8 branches
> for myself. Stuff I work with, ideas, etc.
Merging back - and more important - keepi
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 08:58:43PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > One thing with subversion is that it is a lot easier to use branches,
| > and they are not slow as in cvs. I will at least create 5-8 branches
| > for myself. Stuff I work with, ide
Martin Vermeer wrote:
> We have quite a set of branches already... are they all actual anymore?
>9351 baumDec 06 2004 BooktabBranch/
Is a nearly finished implementation of booktabs support in tables and should
go into 1.5.
>9297 abraunstNov 24 2004 CoordBr
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 11:12:17PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 09:48:23PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> >7240 poenitz Jul 04 2003 BRANCH_NOUPDATE/
>
> Could be removed. It basically is in 1.4.
>
> Andre'
I removed it.
- Martin
pgprAz3z1ykhB.pgp
Des
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 11:12:17PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
| > On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 09:48:23PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
| > >7240 poenitz Jul 04 2003 BRANCH_NOUPDATE/
| >
| > Could be removed. It basically is in 1.4.
| >
|
26 matches
Mail list logo
