On 5/9/20 1:05 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Am Freitag, den 08.05.2020, 17:14 -0400 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck:
On 5/8/20 1:54 PM, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Before I file a ticket on this, I'd like to get a sense of whether
it
is in fact a bug v. intended behavior.
Consider a document with an
Am Freitag, den 08.05.2020, 17:14 -0400 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck:
> On 5/8/20 1:54 PM, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
>
> > Before I file a ticket on this, I'd like to get a sense of whether
> > it
> > is in fact a bug v. intended behavior.
> > Consider a document with an activated branch containing
On 5/8/20 1:54 PM, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
> Before I file a ticket on this, I'd like to get a sense of whether it
> is in fact a bug v. intended behavior.
>
> Consider a document with an activated branch containing text that has
> been edited, and with change tracking turned on. The user wants to
>
Before I file a ticket on this, I'd like to get a sense of whether it is
in fact a bug v. intended behavior.
Consider a document with an activated branch containing text that has
been edited, and with change tracking turned on. The user wants to
dissolve the branch but retain the content. If
as an
underlined shortcut (which is functional). If the file name contains
multiple ampersands, they are all deleted, all the following characters are
underscored and the first underscored character does act as a shortcut.
Bug or feature?
Paul
not display the ampersand and instead marks the next character as an
underlined shortcut (which is functional). If the file name contains
multiple ampersands, they are all deleted, all the following characters are
underscored and the first underscored character does act as a shortcut.
Bug or feature
characters are
underscored and the first underscored character does act as a shortcut.
Bug or feature?
Paul
--
Do you know how to read?
http://www.alienetworks.com/srtest.cfm
http://goodies.xfce.org/projects/applications/xfce4-dict#speed-reader
Do you know how to write?
http
Liviu Andronic landronimirc at gmail.com writes:
Depending on the OS, it may not be a good idea to have ampersand chars
in file names.
Probably true, but I don't recall having problems with it either in Linux or
in Windows, and I'm afraid I'm a bit prone to using it.
Paul
Jürgen Spitzmüller spitz at lyx.org writes:
Bug.
Okay; I'll file a ticket. Thanks.
as an
underlined shortcut (which is functional). If the file name contains
multiple ampersands, they are all deleted, all the following characters are
underscored and the first underscored character does act as a shortcut.
Bug or feature?
Paul
a shortcut.
>
> Bug or feature?
Bug.
Jürgen
, they are all deleted, all the following characters are
> underscored and the first underscored character does act as a shortcut.
>
> Bug or feature?
>
> Paul
>
--
Do you know how to read?
http://www.alienetworks.com/srtest.cfm
http://goodies.xfce.org/projects/applications/xfce4-dic
Liviu Andronic gmail.com> writes:
> Depending on the OS, it may not be a good idea to have ampersand chars
> in file names.
>
Probably true, but I don't recall having problems with it either in Linux or
in Windows, and I'm afraid I'm a bit prone to using it.
Paul
Jürgen Spitzmüller lyx.org> writes:
>
> Bug.
Okay; I'll file a ticket. Thanks.
Dear developers,
Assume that Ctrl+E and Ctrl+H are not bound as shortcuts for anything. Two
scenarios:
1) In text mode, if you type these combinations, empty squares appear on the
screen. They are saved (I checked it by writing a small program) as 5 and 8
respectively (E is the fifth letter and
Dear developers,
Assume that Ctrl+E and Ctrl+H are not bound as shortcuts for anything. Two
scenarios:
1) In text mode, if you type these combinations, empty squares appear on the
screen. They are saved (I checked it by writing a small program) as 5 and 8
respectively (E is the fifth letter and
Jose' Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Sunday 30 April 2006 22:04, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
| Hi all,
|
| Before submitting this to bugzilla, I wanted to verify it was a bug and
| not a feature (i.e., not deliberate).
|
| This has happened to me as well, cutting or deleting leaves those
On Monday 01 May 2006 08:21, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Does this bug also exist in 1.4.0?
I only remember seeing it after 1.4.1, but I could be wrong.
--
Lgb
--
José Abílio
Jose' Matos wrote:
This has happened to me as well, cutting or deleting leaves those ghosts
behind. I have just tested 1.4.2svn and the problem is still there.
And certainly this falls under the bugs section. :-)
So much for my bugzilla-searching skills. I think this is actually bug
Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Sunday 30 April 2006 22:04, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
| > Hi all,
| >
| > Before submitting this to bugzilla, I wanted to verify it was a bug and
| > not a feature (i.e., not deliberate).
|
| This has happened to me as well, cutting or deleting leaves
On Monday 01 May 2006 08:21, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Does this bug also exist in 1.4.0?
I only remember seeing it after 1.4.1, but I could be wrong.
> --
> Lgb
--
José Abílio
Jose' Matos wrote:
This has happened to me as well, cutting or deleting leaves those ghosts
behind. I have just tested 1.4.2svn and the problem is still there.
And certainly this falls under the bugs section. :-)
So much for my bugzilla-searching skills. I think this is actually bug
Hi all,
Before submitting this to bugzilla, I wanted to verify it was a bug and
not a feature (i.e., not deliberate).
Create an enumeration or itemization that contains some nesting, e.g.,
1. blahx
2. blah
(a) blah
3. blahy
4. blah.
Now highlight some of it (say from the 'x' to the
On Sunday 30 April 2006 22:04, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Hi all,
Before submitting this to bugzilla, I wanted to verify it was a bug and
not a feature (i.e., not deliberate).
This has happened to me as well, cutting or deleting leaves those ghosts
behind. I have just tested 1.4.2svn and the
Hi all,
Before submitting this to bugzilla, I wanted to verify it was a bug and
not a feature (i.e., not deliberate).
Create an enumeration or itemization that contains some nesting, e.g.,
1. blahx
2. blah
(a) blah
3. blahy
4. blah.
Now highlight some of it (say from the 'x' to the
On Sunday 30 April 2006 22:04, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Before submitting this to bugzilla, I wanted to verify it was a bug and
> not a feature (i.e., not deliberate).
This has happened to me as well, cutting or deleting leaves those ghosts
behind. I have just tested 1.4.2svn and the
Abdelrazak == Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Abdelrazak IMHO,this should be noted somewhere in the release note. I
Abdelrazak took me multiple try to figure out there was a problem.
Sure, but we do not have release notes. If some tester could work on
that, it would be nice.
JMarc
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> IMHO,this should be noted somewhere in the release note. I
Abdelrazak> took me multiple try to figure out there was a problem.
Sure, but we do not have release notes. If some tester could work on
that, it would be
Hello,
I have just discovered a potential bug with the keyboard selection:
Anywhere in the document, if you first press Shift+PageDown the effect
is the same as PageDown. But if you have already something selected
(with the keyboard or the mouse), Shift+PageDown will extend the
selection
Abdelrazak == Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Abdelrazak Hello, I have just discovered a potential bug with the
Abdelrazak keyboard selection: Anywhere in the document, if you first
Abdelrazak press Shift+PageDown the effect is the same as PageDown.
Abdelrazak But if you have already
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Abdelrazak == Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Abdelrazak Hello, I have just discovered a potential bug with the
Abdelrazak keyboard selection: Anywhere in the document, if you first
Abdelrazak press Shift+PageDown the effect is the same as PageDown.
Hello,
I have just discovered a potential bug with the keyboard selection:
Anywhere in the document, if you first press Shift+PageDown the effect
is the same as PageDown. But if you have already something selected
(with the keyboard or the mouse), Shift+PageDown will extend the
selection
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Hello, I have just discovered a potential bug with the
Abdelrazak> keyboard selection: Anywhere in the document, if you first
Abdelrazak> press Shift+PageDown the effect is the same as PageDown.
Abdelrazak> But if you
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Hello, I have just discovered a potential bug with the
Abdelrazak> keyboard selection: Anywhere in the document, if you first
Abdelrazak> press Shift+PageDown the effect is the same as
Hi,
I just wanted to write an BIG BIG thanks to Angus.
So I opened the new Lyx, selected File - New
and started to type Sehr geehrter Herr Sisyphus. To
check the font I selected View (pdflatex). Everything
was fine. It occurred to me, however, that I wrote in German.
So I changed the Language to
Hi,
I just wanted to write an BIG BIG thanks to Angus.
So I opened the new Lyx, selected File -> New
and started to type "Sehr geehrter Herr Sisyphus". To
check the font I selected "View (pdflatex)". Everything
was fine. It occurred to me, however, that I wrote in German.
So I changed the
Garst R. Reese wrote:
R. Lahaye wrote:
I added ulem in the preamble.
No change, though :(.
This is with 1.3.0cvs.
Rob.
Shucks, guess it does not do it's magic with underbar. Did you check
Herbert's help page? www.lyx.org/help
Before I do that, a simple question:
Is something as
Garst R. Reese wrote:
R. Lahaye wrote:
I added ulem in the preamble.
No change, though :(.
This is with 1.3.0cvs.
Rob.
Shucks, guess it does not do it's magic with underbar. Did you check
Herbert's help page? www.lyx.org/help
When underbar is used, why not let LyX add
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 09:23:02AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 03:49:37PM +0900, R. Lahaye wrote:
When underbar is used, why not let LyX add automagically to the preamble:
\usepackage{ulem}
\let\underbar\uline
\let\underline\uline
Or would that break any
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 11:02:27AM +0100, José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote:
And what if the user happend to define a macro called \underbar which is
better/different than the one from ulem?
Then we should put that definition above the user preamble, so that
the user defined shades the
"Garst R. Reese" wrote:
>
> "R. Lahaye" wrote:
> >
> > I added ulem in the preamble.
> > No change, though :(.
> > This is with 1.3.0cvs.
> > Rob.
> >
> Shucks, guess it does not do it's magic with underbar. Did you check
> Herbert's help page? www.lyx.org/help
Before I do that, a simple
"Garst R. Reese" wrote:
>
> "R. Lahaye" wrote:
> >
> > I added ulem in the preamble.
> > No change, though :(.
> > This is with 1.3.0cvs.
> > Rob.
> >
> Shucks, guess it does not do it's magic with underbar. Did you check
> Herbert's help page? www.lyx.org/help
When underbar is used, why not
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 09:23:02AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 03:49:37PM +0900, R. Lahaye wrote:
> > When underbar is used, why not let LyX add automagically to the preamble:
> >
> > \usepackage{ulem}
> > \let\underbar\uline
> > \let\underline\uline
> >
> > Or would
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 11:02:27AM +0100, José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> > And what if the user happend to define a macro called \underbar which is
> > better/different than the one from ulem?
>
> Then we should put that definition above the user preamble, so that
> the user defined
Hi,
Underlined (underbarred) text stretches out beyond the right side of
the paper, without ever getting a new line (see attachment).
I see this in 1.2.0 as well as in 1.3.0cvs.
Is this a bug in LyX, or in LaTeX?
Or is this some awkward feature?
Thanks,
Rob.
$ latex -version
TeX (Web2C
I added ulem in the preamble.
No change, though :(.
This is with 1.3.0cvs.
Rob.
Garst R. Reese wrote:
Try \usepackage{ulem}
more info in archives
R. Lahaye wrote:
Underlined (underbarred) text stretches out beyond the right side of
the paper, without ever getting a new line (see
Hi,
Underlined (underbarred) text stretches out beyond the right side of
the paper, without ever getting a new line (see attachment).
I see this in 1.2.0 as well as in 1.3.0cvs.
Is this a bug in LyX, or in LaTeX?
Or is this some awkward feature?
Thanks,
Rob.
$ latex -version
TeX (Web2C
I added ulem in the preamble.
No change, though :(.
This is with 1.3.0cvs.
Rob.
"Garst R. Reese" wrote:
>
> Try \usepackage{ulem}
> more info in archives
>
> "R. Lahaye" wrote:
> >
> > Underlined (underbarred) text stretches out beyond the right side of
> > the paper, without ever getting a
john jabbered,
Actually, Amir, I ran into this very same problem about 6 months ago.
I haven't been able to figure out why \lyxslide friends break the
features of the "slides.cls", but I know that they do. I'd have to go
through past versions of "slides.layout" and match changes there to
john jabbered,
> Actually, Amir, I ran into this very same problem about 6 months ago.
> I haven't been able to figure out why \lyxslide & friends break the
> features of the "slides.cls", but I know that they do. I'd have to go
> through past versions of "slides.layout" and match changes there
On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 11:51:20AM -0500, Amir Karger wrote:
On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 06:34:56PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 11:09:45AM -0500, Amir Karger wrote:
Is this a bug due to the \lyxslide other commands that slide textclass
creates? Or am I doing something
On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 11:51:20AM -0500, Amir Karger wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 06:34:56PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 11:09:45AM -0500, Amir Karger wrote:
> > > Is this a bug due to the \lyxslide & other commands that slide textclass
> > > creates? Or am I doing
When I try to use \onlyslides{1-99} in the preamble of a slides class file,
the dvi/ps file only outputs through the eighth slide. The ninth slide is my
first note. That is, it's not printing out the note, as it shouldn't, but
then it doesn't print out any of the slides after the first note
On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 11:09:45AM -0500, Amir Karger wrote:
Is this a bug due to the \lyxslide other commands that slide textclass
creates? Or am I doing something wrong?
Yes, I think that this is the reason.
On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 06:34:56PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 11:09:45AM -0500, Amir Karger wrote:
Is this a bug due to the \lyxslide other commands that slide textclass
creates? Or am I doing something wrong?
Yes, I think that this is the reason.
Answering "Is it
When I try to use \onlyslides{1-99} in the preamble of a slides class file,
the dvi/ps file only outputs through the eighth slide. The ninth slide is my
first note. That is, it's not printing out the note, as it shouldn't, but
then it doesn't print out any of the slides after the first note
On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 11:09:45AM -0500, Amir Karger wrote:
> Is this a bug due to the \lyxslide & other commands that slide textclass
> creates? Or am I doing something wrong?
Yes, I think that this is the reason.
On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 06:34:56PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 11:09:45AM -0500, Amir Karger wrote:
> > Is this a bug due to the \lyxslide & other commands that slide textclass
> > creates? Or am I doing something wrong?
>
> Yes, I think that this is the reason.
Answering
"Matej" == Matej Cepl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Matej Yes, sorry, it has been fixed, and I have been wrong. I
Matej thought, that I have already sent apology to the list, but
Matej nevertheless I am sorry for causing confusion.
No problem. One less bug to fix.
JMarc
> "Matej" == Matej Cepl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Matej> Yes, sorry, it has been fixed, and I have been wrong. I
Matej> thought, that I have already sent apology to the list, but
Matej> nevertheless I am sorry for causing confusion.
No problem. One less bug to fix.
JMarc
"Matej" == Matej Cepl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Matej What makes me angry is the situation when footnote in list is
Matej not translated to direct \footnote construct, but to pair of
Matej \footnotemark \footnotetext, where the text of footnote is
Matej put behind the end of the whole list.
Yes, sorry, it has been fixed, and I have been wrong. I thought, that
I have already sent apology to the list, but nevertheless I am sorry
for causing confusion.
Thanks for care.
Matej
On 5 Sep 00, at 15:50, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Matej" == Matej Cepl [EMAIL
> "Matej" == Matej Cepl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Matej> What makes me angry is the situation when footnote in list is
Matej> not translated to direct \footnote construct, but to pair of
Matej> \footnotemark & \footnotetext, where the text of footnote is
Matej> put behind the end of the
Yes, sorry, it has been fixed, and I have been wrong. I thought, that
I have already sent apology to the list, but nevertheless I am sorry
for causing confusion.
Thanks for care.
Matej
On 5 Sep 00, at 15:50, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Matej" == Matej Cepl
Hi,
I have downloaded lyx-1.1.5fix1 (as a SRPM) and I have found that
the thing, which I always considered to be bug is still there.
Fortunately, my old hack which fixes it still works. Attached to this e-
mail you shall find patch as well changed .spec file.
What makes me angry is the
On Mon, Jul 24, 2000 at 01:49:33AM +0200, Matej Cepl wrote:
Hi,
Hi there.
I have downloaded lyx-1.1.5fix1 (as a SRPM) and I have found that
the thing, which I always considered to be bug is still there.
Fortunately, my old hack which fixes it still works. Attached to this e-
mail you
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, Matej Cepl wrote:
Hi,
Hello,
[...]
What makes me angry is the situation when footnote in list is not
translated to direct \footnote construct, but to pair of \footnotemark
\footnotetext, where the text of footnote is put behind the end of
the whole list. So, when
On Mon, Jul 24, 2000 at 02:03:23PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, Matej Cepl wrote:
Hi,
Hello,
[...]
What makes me angry is the situation when footnote in list is not
translated to direct \footnote construct, but to pair of \footnotemark
\footnotetext, where the
Could someone else try forwarding this email to Matej. All mine are being
refused because some intervening mailer thinks I'm trying to exploit a bug
in MS Outlook. (Must be a pile of dung if it doesn't know how to handle
date formats)
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, Allan Rae wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jul
Hi,
I have downloaded lyx-1.1.5fix1 (as a SRPM) and I have found that
the thing, which I always considered to be bug is still there.
Fortunately, my old hack which fixes it still works. Attached to this e-
mail you shall find patch as well changed .spec file.
What makes me angry is the
On Mon, Jul 24, 2000 at 01:49:33AM +0200, Matej Cepl wrote:
> Hi,
Hi there.
> I have downloaded lyx-1.1.5fix1 (as a SRPM) and I have found that
> the thing, which I always considered to be bug is still there.
> Fortunately, my old hack which fixes it still works. Attached to this e-
> mail
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, Matej Cepl wrote:
> Hi,
Hello,
[...]
> What makes me angry is the situation when footnote in list is not
> translated to direct \footnote construct, but to pair of \footnotemark
> & \footnotetext, where the text of footnote is put behind the end of
> the whole list.
On Mon, Jul 24, 2000 at 02:03:23PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, Matej Cepl wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> Hello,
>
> [...]
> > What makes me angry is the situation when footnote in list is not
> > translated to direct \footnote construct, but to pair of \footnotemark
> > &
Could someone else try forwarding this email to Matej. All mine are being
refused because some intervening mailer thinks I'm trying to exploit a bug
in MS Outlook. (Must be a pile of dung if it doesn't know how to handle
date formats)
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, Allan Rae wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jul
the form, but I'll let you decide.
Jürgen
-FW: [EMAIL PROTECTED]-
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 1999 10:19:27 -0700 (PDT)
From: "T.C. Zhao" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Juergen Vigna [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Smal bug or feature?
Hi Juergen,
I believe this new behavior is the correct o
"Juergen" == Juergen Vigna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Juergen Hi! I wrote an EMail to T.C. Zhao for the problem we have
Juergen with the latest 0.89 version of xforms, my mail is below and
Juergen this is his answer. I would like to hear some comments.
Juergen IMO that the behaviour is not
the form, but I'll let you decide.
Jürgen
-FW: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>-
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 1999 10:19:27 -0700 (PDT)
From: "T.C. Zhao" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Smal bug or feature?
Hi Juergen,
I believe this new behavio
> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> Hi! I wrote an EMail to T.C. Zhao for the problem we have
Juergen> with the latest 0.89 version of xforms, my mail is below and
Juergen> this is his answer. I would like to hear some comments.
Juergen> IMO that the behaviour
Allan,
I assume replying to the list is standard pprocedure...
- Footnotes do not appear on the same page as teh reference if the whole
pages consist of a list. If I use DESCRIPTION that extends over 3 pages,
the
footnotes ar epresented on the third page.
This is a "feature" of a
"Peter" == Kunz, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Peter Allan, I assume replying to the list is standard pprocedure...
Yes, that's fine.
Peter [Kunz, Peter] I really don't want to upgrade,m as my paper is
Peter due in 2 days :-) can I set \footnote in the preamble?...
Unfortunately, in this
Allan,
I assume replying to the list is standard pprocedure...
> > - Footnotes do not appear on the same page as teh reference if the whole
> > pages consist of a list. If I use DESCRIPTION that extends over 3 pages,
> the
> > footnotes ar epresented on the third page.
>
> This is a "feature"
> "Peter" == Kunz, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Peter> Allan, I assume replying to the list is standard pprocedure...
Yes, that's fine.
Peter> [Kunz, Peter] I really don't want to upgrade,m as my paper is
Peter> due in 2 days :-) can I set \footnote in the preamble?...
Hi folks,
using Lyx 1.0.1, book koma-script and German language and found some
annyoing little thinigs that might be Tex-related or a bug.
- Footnotes do not appear on the same page as teh reference if the whole
pages consist of a list. If I use DESCRIPTION that extends over 3 pages, the
Hi folks,
using Lyx 1.0.1, book koma-script and German language and found some
annyoing little thinigs that might be Tex-related or a bug.
- Footnotes do not appear on the same page as teh reference if the whole
pages consist of a list. If I use DESCRIPTION that extends over 3 pages, the
84 matches
Mail list logo
