Re: Bugs status again

2006-01-10 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Georg> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1934 not easy Not easy indeed :( Georg> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1973 x I am not sure I like the patch (it is intrusive). I have to re-read the thread to convince myself that

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-10 Thread Bennett Helm
On Jan 9, 2006, at 10:54 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Bennett, do you think you will be able to find somebody with acess to OSX 10.3 to compile lyx 1.3.7? If you can, I think I am going to give up trying to make it work with gcc3. I think I can. (It might be easiest to put 10.3 on an

Re: Bugs status again

2006-01-10 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | - it is not possible to build on OSX right now. This is related to the | changes Lars did to the libtool files, I think. Recent libtools | versions have code that reads -framework Foo from linker commands | and does something with them (?).

Re: Bugs status again

2006-01-10 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes: | I'd like to have some more information about the tar binary on OSX. More specifically what tar formats it actually supports. -- Lgb

Re: Bugs status again

2006-01-10 Thread Bennett Helm
On Jan 10, 2006, at 9:34 AM, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes: | I'd like to have some more information about the tar binary on OSX. More specifically what tar formats it actually supports. tar (GNU tar) 1.15.1 That's the version installed via fink

Re: Bugs status again

2006-01-10 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 15:14 +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: ... > Georg> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2015 x > > Should have been applied long ago :) Hear hear. > Georg> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2019 x > >

Re: Bugs status again

2006-01-10 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Jan 10, 2006, at 9:34 AM, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | | > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes: | > | > | I'd like to have some more information about the tar binary on OSX. | > | > More specifically what tar formats it actually supports.

Re: Bugs status again

2006-01-10 Thread Jose' Matos
On Tuesday 10 January 2006 15:25, Martin Vermeer wrote: > Ah well, some other time. Don't worry, we will get there. ;-) > - Martin -- José Abílio

Re: Bugs status again

2006-01-10 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Apple's version is: tar (GNU tar) 1.14 Lars> this might not have it And OSX people may not have the fink version. JMarc

Re: Bugs status again

2006-01-10 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Martin> If you can get this to work somehow, I would be happy for Martin> 1.4.0 at least. Not sure I can :) Martin> Still I think we differ in our views of what the charstyle Martin> paradigm should be (I see it as a longer term

Re: Bugs status again

2006-01-10 Thread Bennett Helm
On Jan 10, 2006, at 10:46 AM, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Jan 10, 2006, at 9:34 AM, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | | > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes: | > | > | I'd like to have some more information about the tar binary on OSX. |

Re: Bugs status again

2006-01-10 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 05:36:38PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Martin> If you can get this to work somehow, I would be happy for > Martin> 1.4.0 at least. > > Not sure I can :) > > Martin> Still I think we differ in our

bug 2192, was: Re: Bugs status again

2006-01-10 Thread Georg Baum
Am Dienstag, 10. Januar 2006 15:14 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: > Georg> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2192 x > > Can you describe what you do? I cannot guess it from the patch. We have no format information for a file if getFormatFromContents() does not recognize the file format.

bug 1973, was: Re: Bugs status again

2006-01-10 Thread Georg Baum
Am Dienstag, 10. Januar 2006 15:14 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: > > "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Georg> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1973 x > > I am not sure I like the patch (it is intrusive). I have to re-read > the thread to convince myself that there

Re: Bugs status again

2006-01-10 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | I've done a bit more digging. It turns out Firefox on Mac defaults to | using Stuffit Expander to decompress .tar.gz files, and it's all | Stuffit's fault. Both versions of tar (1.15 and 1.14) succeed in | unpacking the file. | | We'll need to include a

Re: bug 1973, was: Re: Bugs status again

2006-01-10 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Am Dienstag, 10. Januar 2006 15:14 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: | > > "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | > Georg> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1973 x | > | > I am not sure I like the patch (it is intrusive). I have to

Re: bug 2192, was: Re: Bugs status again

2006-01-10 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > The src/ChageLog entry is wrong BTW. | | Indeed. I attach an updated patch. IMHO this is not for 1.4.0 -- Lgb

Re: Bugs status again

2006-01-10 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Think about it! _I_ will, but not for 1.4.0. (what you say makes sense to me) -- Lgb

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-09 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Bennett == Bennett Helm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Bennett On Jan 4, 2006, at 11:08 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Note Bennett that I still cannot compile 1.3.7 on Mac (Nor, at this Bennett point, 1.4.0.) Note that you can compile it, but it does not run ;) Bennett Thbpbpthpt! Bennett,

Bugs status again

2006-01-09 Thread Georg Baum
These are the bugs currently scheduled for 1.4.0: bug patch comment http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1934 not easy http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1973 x http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2015 x

Re: Bugs status again

2006-01-09 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Georg Baum schrieb: These are the bugs currently scheduled for 1.4.0: I just noticed that http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2199 seems to be a crash and perhaps this should also be fixed before 1.4. regards Uwe

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-09 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Bennett> On Jan 4, 2006, at 11:08 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Note Bennett> that I still cannot compile 1.3.7 on Mac (Nor, at this Bennett> point, 1.4.0.) >> Note that you can compile it, but it does not run ;) Bennett>

Bugs status again

2006-01-09 Thread Georg Baum
These are the bugs currently scheduled for 1.4.0: bug patch comment http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1934 not easy http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1973 x http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2015 x

Re: Bugs status again

2006-01-09 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Georg Baum schrieb: These are the bugs currently scheduled for 1.4.0: I just noticed that http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2199 seems to be a crash and perhaps this should also be fixed before 1.4. regards Uwe

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-08 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 05:44:24PM +, Jose' Matos wrote: On Monday 02 January 2006 17:41, Herbert Voss wrote: uuh, this causes an error! \tabular{lr} Jür gen \endtabular You are really a magician, splitting Jürgen in half. ;-) I thought the magic part was implementing 'undo'

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-08 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 05:44:24PM +, Jose' Matos wrote: > On Monday 02 January 2006 17:41, Herbert Voss wrote: > > uuh, this causes an error! > > > > \tabular{lr} > > Jür & gen > > \endtabular > > You are really a magician, splitting Jürgen in half. ;-) I thought the magic part was

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-05 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Bo == Bo Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Also, if you keep the extension to .lyx, you are going to overwrite the file. What about exporting to .lyx13? Fine with me. Bo But a more common approach is that the user is prompted for a new Bo filename. Yes, but this is more work :) JMarc

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-05 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Bennett == Bennett Helm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Note that you can compile it, but it does not run ;) Bennett Thbpbpthpt! I did try to do something after all! Did I ask you to try to compile with --disable-optimization already? Bennett No, but it doesn't help: So, just to make sure,

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-05 Thread Bennett Helm
On Jan 5, 2006, at 4:51 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Did I ask you to try to compile with --disable-optimization already? Bennett No, but it doesn't help: So, just to make sure, you did a make clean and recompiled, didn't you? Yes. Bennett

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-05 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Bo" == Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > Also, if you keep the extension to ".lyx", you are going to >> overwrite > the file. What about exporting to ".lyx13"? >> >> Fine with me. Bo> But a more common approach is that the user is prompted for a new Bo> filename. Yes, but this is

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-05 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Note that you can compile it, but it does not run ;) Bennett> Thbpbpthpt! I did try to do something after all! >> Did I ask you to try to compile with --disable-optimization >> already? Bennett> No, but it doesn't help: So, just

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-05 Thread Bennett Helm
On Jan 5, 2006, at 4:51 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Did I ask you to try to compile with --disable-optimization already? Bennett> No, but it doesn't help: So, just to make sure, you did a "make clean" and recompiled, didn't you? Yes. Bennett

[Patch] (Re: Bugs status)

2006-01-04 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 08:52:06PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote: On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 06:17:31PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote: ... Bugzilla has a fix which simply disables font attribute editing inside a charstyle inset; see above theory. Problem solved :-) ... See attached, tested and

Re: [Patch] (Re: Bugs status)

2006-01-04 Thread Georg Baum
Martin Vermeer wrote: On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 08:52:06PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote: On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 06:17:31PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote: ... Bugzilla has a fix which simply disables font attribute editing inside a charstyle inset; see above theory. Problem solved :-) ...

Re: [Patch] (Re: Bugs status)

2006-01-04 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 01:48:15PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote: Martin Vermeer wrote: On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 08:52:06PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote: On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 06:17:31PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote: ... Bugzilla has a fix which simply disables font attribute editing

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-04 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Martin == Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Martin On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 09:21:09AM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller Martin wrote: Martin Vermeer wrote: I believe bug 822 is fixed. Is 1561 still major? Was partly fixed by Andre. Are these (and 2155) the only major bugs left for

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-04 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Since the bug was present in 1.3.x too (wasn't it?) and we do not know of a good fix yet, we could schedule it for later... I was about to propose this too. The bug should definitely also apply to 1.3.x, so it's not a regression. We should try and implement a solid

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-04 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Juergen == Juergen Spitzmueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Juergen Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Since the bug was present in 1.3.x too (wasn't it?) and we do not know of a good fix yet, we could schedule it for later... Juergen I was about to propose this too. The bug should definitely Juergen

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-04 Thread Georg Baum
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: So, what's left? There are bugs 2026 and 1973, for which Georg has announced fixes-to-come, I don't plan anything for 2026, because I don't know what to do (reintroduce stdletters.inc or add ObsoletedBy statements for the missing layouts). The fix for 1973 is

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-04 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Georg Baum wrote: Then I sent a patch for 2153 (this is a regression) to the list which is waiting for testing/comments. I had a quick look some days ago; I have to admit that I didn't get the report down to the ground. Do does problem only occur in LaTeX export (not view DVI/PDF) and only if

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-04 Thread Georg Baum
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: Georg Baum wrote: Then I sent a patch for 2153 (this is a regression) to the list which is waiting for testing/comments. I had a quick look some days ago; I have to admit that I didn't get the report down to the ground. Do does problem only occur in LaTeX export

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-04 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Georg == Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Georg I also think that 2174 would be good to have (it does not make Georg so much sense anymore after 1.4.0 is out for some time). Note that I'd like to release 1.3.7 as soon as possible, so that 1.3 people will actually be able to read 1.4 files.

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-04 Thread Georg Baum
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Georg == Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Georg I also think that 2174 would be good to have (it does not make Georg so much sense anymore after 1.4.0 is out for some time). Note that I'd like to release 1.3.7 as soon as possible, so that 1.3 people will

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-04 Thread Jose' Matos
On Wednesday 04 January 2006 15:20, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Isn't it possible to define a lyx13 format, so that people can export to that? Could you give an example? If if find a reasonable call syntax it is easy to implement it... JMarc -- José Abílio

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-04 Thread Bennett Helm
On Jan 4, 2006, at 10:20 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Note that I'd like to release 1.3.7 as soon as possible, so that 1.3 people will actually be able to read 1.4 files. Note that I still cannot compile 1.3.7 on Mac (Nor, at this point, 1.4.0.) Bennett

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-04 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Georg == Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Isn't it possible to define a lyx13 format, so that people can export to that? Georg That is what the patch in bugzilla does :-) See Georg http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2174, sorry that I Georg forgot to mention that I had a patch. I

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-04 Thread Georg Baum
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: I like it, although I do not see why you add a menu entry. Doesn't it appear in FileExport? No, because Exporter::GetExportableFormats() only considers formats that can be reached from the backends and not from .lyx directly. I am not sure whether this is a bug or a

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-04 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Bennett == Bennett Helm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Bennett On Jan 4, 2006, at 10:20 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Note that I'd like to release 1.3.7 as soon as possible, so that 1.3 people will actually be able to read 1.4 files. Bennett Note that I still cannot compile 1.3.7 on Mac

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-04 Thread Bennett Helm
On Jan 4, 2006, at 11:08 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Bennett Note that I still cannot compile 1.3.7 on Mac (Nor, at Bennett this point, 1.4.0.) Note that you can compile it, but it does not run ;) Thbpbpthpt! This is one of the main things that makes 1.3.7 wait, and I have run out

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-04 Thread Bo Peng
Also, if you keep the extension to .lyx, you are going to overwrite the file. What about exporting to .lyx13? Fine with me. But a more common approach is that the user is prompted for a new filename. Bo

[Patch] (Re: Bugs status)

2006-01-04 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 08:52:06PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote: > On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 06:17:31PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote: > ... > Bugzilla has a fix which simply disables font attribute editing inside a > charstyle inset; see above theory. Problem solved :-) ... > See attached, tested

Re: [Patch] (Re: Bugs status)

2006-01-04 Thread Georg Baum
Martin Vermeer wrote: > On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 08:52:06PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 06:17:31PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote: >> > ... > >> Bugzilla has a fix which simply disables font attribute editing inside a >> charstyle inset; see above theory. Problem solved

Re: [Patch] (Re: Bugs status)

2006-01-04 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 01:48:15PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote: > Martin Vermeer wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 08:52:06PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote: > >> On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 06:17:31PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote: > >> > > ... > > > >> Bugzilla has a fix which simply disables font

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-04 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Martin> On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 09:21:09AM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller Martin> wrote: >> Martin Vermeer wrote: > I believe bug 822 is fixed. > Is 1561 still >> major? Was partly fixed by Andre. >> > >> > Are these (and 2155) the only

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-04 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Since the bug was present in 1.3.x too (wasn't it?) and we do not know > of a good fix yet, we could schedule it for later... I was about to propose this too. The bug should definitely also apply to 1.3.x, so it's not a regression. We should try and implement a

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-04 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Juergen> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> Since the bug was present in 1.3.x too (wasn't it?) and we do not >> know of a good fix yet, we could schedule it for later... Juergen> I was about to propose this too. The bug should

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-04 Thread Georg Baum
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > So, what's left? There are bugs 2026 and 1973, for which Georg has > announced fixes-to-come, I don't plan anything for 2026, because I don't know what to do (reintroduce stdletters.inc or add ObsoletedBy statements for the missing layouts). The fix for 1973 is

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-04 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Georg Baum wrote: > Then I sent a patch for 2153 (this is a regression) to the list which is > waiting for testing/comments. I had a quick look some days ago; I have to admit that I didn't get the report down to the ground. Do does problem only occur in LaTeX export (not view DVI/PDF) and only

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-04 Thread Georg Baum
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > Georg Baum wrote: >> Then I sent a patch for 2153 (this is a regression) to the list which is >> waiting for testing/comments. > > I had a quick look some days ago; I have to admit that I didn't get the > report down to the ground. Do does problem only occur in

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-04 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Georg> I also think that 2174 would be good to have (it does not make Georg> so much sense anymore after 1.4.0 is out for some time). Note that I'd like to release 1.3.7 as soon as possible, so that 1.3 people will actually be able to read

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-04 Thread Georg Baum
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> "Georg" == Georg Baum >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> writes: > > Georg> I also think that 2174 would be good to have (it does not make > Georg> so much sense anymore after 1.4.0 is out for some time). > > Note that I'd like to release 1.3.7 as soon as

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-04 Thread Jose' Matos
On Wednesday 04 January 2006 15:20, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Isn't it possible to define a lyx13 format, so that people can export > to that? Could you give an example? If if find a reasonable call syntax it is easy to implement it... > JMarc -- José Abílio

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-04 Thread Bennett Helm
On Jan 4, 2006, at 10:20 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Note that I'd like to release 1.3.7 as soon as possible, so that 1.3 people will actually be able to read 1.4 files. Note that I still cannot compile 1.3.7 on Mac (Nor, at this point, 1.4.0.) Bennett

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-04 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Isn't it possible to define a lyx13 format, so that people can >> export to that? Georg> That is what the patch in bugzilla does :-) See Georg> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2174, sorry that I Georg> forgot to mention that I

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-04 Thread Georg Baum
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > I like it, although I do not see why you add a menu entry. Doesn't it > appear in File>Export? No, because Exporter::GetExportableFormats() only considers formats that can be reached from the backends and not from .lyx directly. I am not sure whether this is a bug

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-04 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Bennett> On Jan 4, 2006, at 10:20 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> Note that I'd like to release 1.3.7 as soon as possible, so that >> 1.3 people will actually be able to read 1.4 files. Bennett> Note that I still cannot compile 1.3.7

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-04 Thread Bennett Helm
On Jan 4, 2006, at 11:08 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Bennett> Note that I still cannot compile 1.3.7 on Mac (Nor, at Bennett> this point, 1.4.0.) Note that you can compile it, but it does not run ;) Thbpbpthpt! This is one of the main things that makes 1.3.7 wait, and I have run

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-04 Thread Bo Peng
> > Also, if you keep the extension to ".lyx", you are going to overwrite > > the file. What about exporting to ".lyx13"? > > Fine with me. But a more common approach is that the user is prompted for a new filename. Bo

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-02 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Martin Vermeer wrote: I believe bug 822 is fixed. Is 1561 still major? Was partly fixed by Andre. Are these (and 2155) the only major bugs left for 1.4.0? and 1656. Cf. the list of open, non-fixedintrunk bugs targeted to 1.4.0: http://tinyurl.com/7qacq I think bug 2019 deserves your special

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-02 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 09:21:09AM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: Martin Vermeer wrote: I believe bug 822 is fixed. Is 1561 still major? Was partly fixed by Andre. Are these (and 2155) the only major bugs left for 1.4.0? and 1656. I remember that this can be fixed, but in a way

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-02 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Martin Vermeer wrote: I think bug 2019 deserves your special attendance. Hmmm... perhaps the remark in insetcharstyle.C:draw: // I don't understand why the above .reduce and .realize aren't //needed, or even wanted, here. It just works. -- MV 10.04.2005 isn't quite true... could you have

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-02 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 10:42:58AM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: Martin Vermeer wrote: I think bug 2019 deserves your special attendance. Hmmm... perhaps the remark in insetcharstyle.C:draw: // I don't understand why the above .reduce and .realize aren't //needed, or even

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-02 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 10:42:58AM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: Martin Vermeer wrote: I think bug 2019 deserves your special attendance. Hmmm... perhaps the remark in insetcharstyle.C:draw: // I don't understand why the above .reduce and .realize aren't //needed, or even

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-02 Thread Jose' Matos
On Monday 02 January 2006 10:15, Martin Vermeer wrote: That having been said, obviously *some* font attributes should appear both on-screen and in output. My understanding was that, for LaTeX use, charstyles were for things like Emph and Noun. They should not use any coloured representation

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-02 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 10:42:58AM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: Martin Vermeer wrote: I think bug 2019 deserves your special attendance. Hmmm... perhaps the remark in insetcharstyle.C:draw: // I don't understand why the above .reduce and .realize aren't //needed, or even

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-02 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Martin Vermeer wrote: Actually I don't dare to touch this stuff. The whole font architecture needs an overhaul/simplification. E.g., there are two different getFonts, one in lyxtext (for display) and one in paragraph (for latexing). If it is too complicated or risky to fix this stuff now, we

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-02 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 01:01:46PM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: Martin Vermeer wrote: Actually I don't dare to touch this stuff. The whole font architecture needs an overhaul/simplification. E.g., there are two different getFonts, one in lyxtext (for display) and one in paragraph (for

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-02 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 03:30:21PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote: On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 01:01:46PM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: Martin Vermeer wrote: Actually I don't dare to touch this stuff. The whole font architecture needs an overhaul/simplification. E.g., there are two

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-02 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Martin Vermeer wrote: Actually I would put it differently: you are not supposed to mix character styles and font attributes :-) My idea with charstyles has always been, longer term, to become a logical replacement for visual font attributes. In XML they represent elements; in LaTeX my idea

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-02 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 05:39:52PM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: Martin Vermeer wrote: ... This sounds very reasonable to me. Perhaps you could add this explanation to the bug report. IIRC there is also another bug involved which will be fixed by your #2015-patch. I propose to move

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-02 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Martin Vermeer wrote: Perhaps this should be called an enhancement request and get its own bug number. perhaps. Now convince HIM to put the #2015-fix in ;-) Which of them? ;-) Lars or Gullik. Jean and Marc have already expressed their principal accordance on bugzilla IIRC. Jür gen

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-02 Thread Herbert Voss
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: Martin Vermeer wrote: Perhaps this should be called an enhancement request and get its own bug number. perhaps. Now convince HIM to put the #2015-fix in ;-) Which of them? ;-) Lars or Gullik. Jean and Marc have already expressed their principal

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-02 Thread Jose' Matos
On Monday 02 January 2006 17:41, Herbert Voss wrote: uuh, this causes an error! \tabular{lr} Jür gen \endtabular You are really a magician, splitting Jürgen in half. ;-) and don't forget \usepackage[latin9]{inputenc} ... :-) We are very modest, in this case 1 is enough. ;-) Herbert

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-02 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 06:17:31PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote: ... Actually I would put it differently: you are not supposed to mix character styles and font attributes :-) My idea with charstyles has always been, longer term, to become a logical replacement for visual font attributes.

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-02 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Martin Vermeer wrote: > I believe bug 822 is fixed. > Is 1561 still major? Was partly fixed by Andre. > > Are these (and 2155) the only major bugs left for 1.4.0? and 1656. Cf. the list of open, non-fixedintrunk bugs targeted to 1.4.0: http://tinyurl.com/7qacq I think bug 2019 deserves your

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-02 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 09:21:09AM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > Martin Vermeer wrote: > > I believe bug 822 is fixed. > > Is 1561 still major? Was partly fixed by Andre. > > > > Are these (and 2155) the only major bugs left for 1.4.0? > > and 1656. I remember that this can be fixed, but

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-02 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Martin Vermeer wrote: > > I think bug 2019 deserves your special attendance. > > Hmmm... perhaps the remark in insetcharstyle.C:draw: > > // I don't understand why the above .reduce and .realize aren't > //needed, or even wanted, here. It just works. -- MV 10.04.2005 > > isn't quite true... could

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-02 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 10:42:58AM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > Martin Vermeer wrote: > > > I think bug 2019 deserves your special attendance. > > > > Hmmm... perhaps the remark in insetcharstyle.C:draw: > > > > // I don't understand why the above .reduce and .realize aren't > > //needed,

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-02 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 10:42:58AM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > Martin Vermeer wrote: > > > I think bug 2019 deserves your special attendance. > > > > Hmmm... perhaps the remark in insetcharstyle.C:draw: > > > > // I don't understand why the above .reduce and .realize aren't > > //needed,

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-02 Thread Jose' Matos
On Monday 02 January 2006 10:15, Martin Vermeer wrote: > That having been said, obviously *some* font attributes should appear > both on-screen and in output. My understanding was that, for LaTeX use, > charstyles were for things like Emph and Noun. They should not use > any coloured

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-02 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 10:42:58AM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > Martin Vermeer wrote: > > > I think bug 2019 deserves your special attendance. > > > > Hmmm... perhaps the remark in insetcharstyle.C:draw: > > > > // I don't understand why the above .reduce and .realize aren't > > //needed,

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-02 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Martin Vermeer wrote: > Actually I don't dare to touch this stuff. The whole font architecture > needs an overhaul/simplification. E.g., there are two different > getFonts, one in lyxtext (for display) and one in paragraph (for > latexing). If it is too complicated or risky to fix this stuff now,

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-02 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 01:01:46PM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > Martin Vermeer wrote: > > Actually I don't dare to touch this stuff. The whole font architecture > > needs an overhaul/simplification. E.g., there are two different > > getFonts, one in lyxtext (for display) and one in

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-02 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 03:30:21PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote: > On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 01:01:46PM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > > Martin Vermeer wrote: > > > Actually I don't dare to touch this stuff. The whole font architecture > > > needs an overhaul/simplification. E.g., there are two

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-02 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Martin Vermeer wrote: > Actually I would put it differently: you are not supposed to mix > character styles and font attributes :-) > > My idea with charstyles has always been, longer term, to become a > logical replacement for visual font attributes. In XML they represent > "elements"; in LaTeX

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-02 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 05:39:52PM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > Martin Vermeer wrote: ... > This sounds very reasonable to me. > Perhaps you could add this explanation to the bug report. IIRC there is also > another bug involved which will be fixed by your #2015-patch. > > I propose

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-02 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Martin Vermeer wrote: > Perhaps this should be called an enhancement request and get its own bug > number. perhaps. > > Now convince HIM to put the #2015-fix in ;-) > > Which of them? ;-) Lars or Gullik. Jean and Marc have already expressed their principal accordance on bugzilla IIRC. Jür &

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-02 Thread Herbert Voss
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: Martin Vermeer wrote: Perhaps this should be called an enhancement request and get its own bug number. perhaps. Now convince HIM to put the #2015-fix in ;-) Which of them? ;-) Lars or Gullik. Jean and Marc have already expressed their principal

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-02 Thread Jose' Matos
On Monday 02 January 2006 17:41, Herbert Voss wrote: > uuh, this causes an error! > > \tabular{lr} > Jür & gen > \endtabular You are really a magician, splitting Jürgen in half. ;-) > and don't forget \usepackage[latin9]{inputenc} ... :-) We are very modest, in this case 1 is enough. ;-) >

Re: Bugs status

2006-01-02 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 06:17:31PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote: ... > Actually I would put it differently: you are not supposed to mix > character styles and font attributes :-) > > My idea with charstyles has always been, longer term, to become a > logical replacement for visual font

<    1   2   3   >