Changing "latex file.tex" to "latex '\batchmode\input{file.tex}'"?

1999-02-05 Thread Fred Hucht
On Fri, 5 Feb 1999, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: JML> > "Fred" == Fred Hucht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Fred> A better fix would be to call latex with Fred> "latex '\nonstopmode\input{file.tex}'" Fred> like emacs does. This would make sure that latex won't hang Fred> regardless of the conten

Re: Changing "latex file.tex" to "latex '\batchmode\input{file.tex}'"?

1999-02-05 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Fred" == Fred Hucht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Fred> First, I must correct the call. It should read Fred> latex '\batchmode\input{file.tex}' Fred> as \nostopmode still generates the normal output. Right. Fred> Do you mean, under every OS/LaTeX installation? We should ask Fred> the LaT

Re: Changing "latex file.tex" to "latex '\batchmode\input{file.tex}'"

1999-02-07 Thread Miyata Shigeru
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, that's it. Could somebody tell whether emTeX supports this? I > think the answer is 'yes' but I'd rather be sure to avoid stupid > problems. Please use double quotes rather than single quotes. latex "\batchmode\input{file.tex}" emTeX does

Re: Changing "latex file.tex" to "latex '\batchmode\input{file.tex}'"

1999-02-07 Thread Arnd Hanses
On 8 Feb 1999 08:36:19 +0900, Miyata Shigeru wrote: >Please use double quotes rather than single quotes. > >latex "\batchmode\input{file.tex}" > >emTeX does support this but cmd.exe doesn't interpret single quotes >correctly. > >BTW I have put OS/2 binary to devel. It is mostly a complete >packa

Re: Changing "latex file.tex" to "latex '\batchmode\input{file.tex}'"

1999-02-08 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Miyata" == Miyata Shigeru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Miyata> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Yes, that's it. Could somebody tell whether emTeX supports this? I >> think the answer is 'yes' but I'd rather be sure to avoid stupid >> problems. Miyata> Please use double qu

Re: Changing "latex file.tex" to "latex '\batchmode\input{file.tex}'"

1999-02-08 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
>> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes writes: >> "Miyata" == Miyata Shigeru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> writes: Miyata> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Yes, that's it. Could somebody tell whether emTeX supports this? >>> I think the answer is 'yes' but I'd rather be sure to a

Re: Changing "latex file.tex" to "latex '\batchmode\input{file.tex}'"

1999-02-08 Thread Fred Hucht
On 8 Feb 1999, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: LGB> >> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes writes: LGB> >> "Miyata" == Miyata Shigeru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> writes: Miyata> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Yes, that's it. Could somebody tell whether emTeX supports this? >>> I think the

Re: Changing "latex file.tex" to "latex '\batchmode\input{file.tex}'"

1999-02-08 Thread Arnd Hanses
On Mon, 08 Feb 1999 05:53:13 +0100, Arnd Hanses wrote: >On 8 Feb 1999 08:36:19 +0900, Miyata Shigeru wrote: > >>Please use double quotes rather than single quotes. >> >>BTW I have put OS/2 binary to devel. It is mostly a complete >>package, but lacks README.bin Will someone write a proper >>doc

Re: Changing "latex file.tex" to "latex '\batchmode\input{file.tex}'"

1999-02-10 Thread Miyata Shigeru
Sorry for the late reply. Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And would > latex "\\batchmode\\input{file.tex}" > work? This is what unix requires, I think. No. It is not system dependent but highly shell dependent. I don't have a time to look into emacs source but something like l

Re: Changing "latex file.tex" to "latex '\batchmode\input{file.tex}'"

1999-02-16 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Miyata" == Miyata Shigeru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Miyata> Sorry for the late reply. Jean-Marc Lasgouttes Miyata> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> And would latex "\\batchmode\\input{file.tex}" work? This is what >> unix requires, I think. Miyata> No. It is not system dependent but hig

Re: Changing "latex file.tex" to "latex '\batchmode\input{file.tex}'"

1999-02-17 Thread Fred Hucht
On Tue, 16 Feb 1999, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: JML> JML> >> And would latex "\\batchmode\\input{file.tex}" work? This is what JML> >> unix requires, I think. JML> In sh, ksh, and csh, all of these work: latex '\batchmode\input{file.tex}' latex '\batchmode\input{file}' latex "\\batchmode\\inp

Re: Changing "latex file.tex" to "latex '\batchmode\input{file.tex}'"

1999-02-18 Thread Miyata Shigeru
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK. If I write the code for unix, can you do the OS/2 adaptation? Sure, I will, of course. Do you think I should check out 1.0 CVS or can I wait for 1.0.1pre package? > Miyata> BTW I guess configure does not detect shell aliases, right? > Miyat

Re: LyX/2 1.0.0 (was)Re: Changing "latex file.tex" to "latex '\batchmode\input{file.tex}'"

1999-02-09 Thread Arnd Hanses
Hello LyX users! >On 8 Feb 1999 08:36:19 +0900, Miyata Shigeru wrote: >BTW I have put OS/2 binary to devel. It is mostly a complete >package, but lacks README.bin Will someone write a proper >document and repackage it please? Arnd Hanses? Here as an attachment my second draft of README_OS2

Re: LyX/2 1.0.0 (was)Re: Changing "latex file.tex" to "latex '\batchmode\input{file.tex}'"

1999-02-09 Thread Peter Meerwald
Hi there, > I would be grateful if someone with experience in EmteX, XDVI/2 and LyX > could proofread it before I upload the binary to hobbes. Especially > tricky is the configuration of search pathes for XDVI/2, which is as a > previewer a bit better than vp of EmTeX. where can I grab a copy?