On Friday 19 April 2002 2:51 am, R. Lahaye wrote:
Hi,
I'm writing a paper with LyX-CVS using Grace (.agr) graphics files,
which is extremely convenient since Grace is my 2D graphics application.
No need for manual conversions: LyX does that for me and my graphics
in LyX is always
Angus Leeming wrote:
On Friday 19 April 2002 2:51 am, R. Lahaye wrote:
Hi,
I'm writing a paper with LyX-CVS using Grace (.agr) graphics files,
which is extremely convenient since Grace is my 2D graphics application.
No need for manual conversions: LyX does that for me and my graphics
in LyX
On 19-Apr-2002 Herbert Voss wrote:
Angus, I think Rob means that file-export-latex should not
write the original filename. for example:
\includegraphics[...]{my.agr}
is the original latex code. Rob wants it as my.eps in the
exported texfile.
But can't we anymore have
On Friday 19 April 2002 9:53 am, Herbert Voss wrote:
Angus Leeming wrote:
On Friday 19 April 2002 2:51 am, R. Lahaye wrote:
Hi,
I'm writing a paper with LyX-CVS using Grace (.agr) graphics files,
which is extremely convenient since Grace is my 2D graphics application.
No need for manual
Juergen Vigna wrote:
On 19-Apr-2002 Herbert Voss wrote:
Angus, I think Rob means that file-export-latex should not
write the original filename. for example:
\includegraphics[...]{my.agr}
is the original latex code. Rob wants it as my.eps in the
exported texfile.
But can't we anymore
Herbert Voss wrote:
Angus, I think Rob means that file-export-latex should not
write the original filename. for example:
\includegraphics[...]{my.agr}
is the original latex code. Rob wants it as my.eps in the
exported texfile.
Yes, indeed, that's what I was referring to.
Within LyX
Angus Leeming wrote:
Ok. Understood. However, I can now anticipate the next user request: it'd be
nice if LyX did this all for me.
your right!
maybe a question for 1.3 or not ...
Herbert
--
http://www.lyx.org/help/
On Friday 19 April 2002 10:14 am, Herbert Voss wrote:
Angus Leeming wrote:
Ok. Understood. However, I can now anticipate the next user request: it'd
be nice if LyX did this all for me.
your right!
maybe a question for 1.3 or not ...
Herbert
We already have a bug blocking 1.2 in this
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus Ok. Understood. However, I can now anticipate the next user
Angus request: it'd be nice if LyX did this all for me.
Angus Ie, on export to LaTeX move the generated eps files from /tmp
Angus to the working directory
Angus (Perhaps with an
R == R Lahaye [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
R Herbert Voss wrote:
Angus, I think Rob means that file-export-latex should not write
the original filename. for example: \includegraphics[...]{my.agr}
is the original latex code. Rob wants it as my.eps in the exported
texfile.
R Yes, indeed,
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 10:05:45AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
Ok. Understood. However, I can now anticipate the next user request: it'd be
nice if LyX did this all for me.
Ie, on export to LaTeX move the generated eps files from /tmp to the working
directory
What about generating .tex
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
R == R Lahaye [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
R Herbert Voss wrote:
Angus, I think Rob means that file-export-latex should not write
the original filename. for example: \includegraphics[...]{my.agr}
is the original latex code. Rob wants it as my.eps in the
Herbert Voss wrote:
But can't we anymore have \includegraphics[...]{my}?
Didn't we say this is good if we want pdf and ps output?
It's not an important question for me, so I can't really
say what's the right way. but writing it in the above
way is only a one-line-patch.
If it's easy,
When exporting and when making the preview,
why don't create a subdirectory in the document_name.lyx dir and put
there the converted eps? (just like many web browsers do when
saving a page)
I think the exported file should be:
- if and only if my.eps is a converted file:
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Herbert Voss wrote:
But can't we anymore have \includegraphics[...]{my}?
Didn't we say this is good if we want pdf and ps output?
It's not an important question for me, so I can't really
say what's the right way. but writing it in the above
way is only a
On Friday 19 April 2002 3:04 pm, Herbert Voss wrote:
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Herbert Voss wrote:
But can't we anymore have \includegraphics[...]{my}?
Didn't we say this is good if we want pdf and ps output?
It's not an important question for me, so I can't really
say what's the right
Angus Leeming wrote:
On Friday 19 April 2002 3:04 pm, Herbert Voss wrote:
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Herbert Voss wrote:
But can't we anymore have \includegraphics[...]{my}?
Didn't we say this is good if we want pdf and ps output?
It's not an important question for me, so I can't really
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 06:52:20PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
Herbert, prepareFile removes the extension in some cases also. Can you
strip that code out too to remoce the redundancy?
At last someone actually worked out what I meant for bug 49 !!
john
--
When the patent office gets into
Now graphics with LaTeX-export works like a charm here.
Thanks for fixing so quickly.
Rob.
Herbert Voss wrote:
Angus Leeming wrote:
Herbert, prepareFile removes the extension in some cases also. Can you strip
that code out too to remoce the redundancy?
thanks Angus,
here is
On Friday 19 April 2002 2:51 am, R. Lahaye wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm writing a paper with LyX-CVS using Grace (.agr) graphics files,
> which is extremely convenient since Grace is my 2D graphics application.
> No need for manual conversions: LyX does that for me and my graphics
> in LyX is always
Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Friday 19 April 2002 2:51 am, R. Lahaye wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>I'm writing a paper with LyX-CVS using Grace (.agr) graphics files,
>>which is extremely convenient since Grace is my 2D graphics application.
>>No need for manual conversions: LyX does that for me and my
On 19-Apr-2002 Herbert Voss wrote:
> Angus, I think Rob means that file->export->latex should not
> write the original filename. for example:
> \includegraphics[...]{my.agr}
> is the original latex code. Rob wants it as my.eps in the
> exported texfile.
But can't we anymore have
On Friday 19 April 2002 9:53 am, Herbert Voss wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
> > On Friday 19 April 2002 2:51 am, R. Lahaye wrote:
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>I'm writing a paper with LyX-CVS using Grace (.agr) graphics files,
> >>which is extremely convenient since Grace is my 2D graphics application.
>
Juergen Vigna wrote:
> On 19-Apr-2002 Herbert Voss wrote:
>
>
>>Angus, I think Rob means that file->export->latex should not
>>write the original filename. for example:
>>\includegraphics[...]{my.agr}
>>is the original latex code. Rob wants it as my.eps in the
>>exported texfile.
>>
>
> But
Herbert Voss wrote:
>
> Angus, I think Rob means that file->export->latex should not
> write the original filename. for example:
> \includegraphics[...]{my.agr}
> is the original latex code. Rob wants it as my.eps in the
> exported texfile.
Yes, indeed, that's what I was referring to.
Within
Angus Leeming wrote:
> Ok. Understood. However, I can now anticipate the next user request: it'd be
> nice if LyX did this all for me.
your right!
maybe a question for 1.3 or not ...
Herbert
--
http://www.lyx.org/help/
On Friday 19 April 2002 10:14 am, Herbert Voss wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Ok. Understood. However, I can now anticipate the next user request: it'd
> > be nice if LyX did this all for me.
>
> your right!
>
>
> maybe a question for 1.3 or not ...
>
> Herbert
We already have a bug blocking
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Ok. Understood. However, I can now anticipate the next user
Angus> request: it'd be nice if LyX did this all for me.
Angus> Ie, on export to LaTeX move the generated eps files from /tmp
Angus> to the working directory
Angus>
> "R" == R Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
R> Herbert Voss wrote:
>> Angus, I think Rob means that file->export->latex should not write
>> the original filename. for example: \includegraphics[...]{my.agr}
>> is the original latex code. Rob wants it as my.eps in the exported
>> texfile.
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 10:05:45AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Ok. Understood. However, I can now anticipate the next user request: it'd be
> nice if LyX did this all for me.
>
> Ie, on export to LaTeX move the generated eps files from /tmp to the working
> directory
What about generating
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> > "R" == R Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> R> Herbert Voss wrote:
> >> Angus, I think Rob means that file->export->latex should not write
> >> the original filename. for example: \includegraphics[...]{my.agr}
> >> is the original latex code. Rob wants
Herbert Voss wrote:
> > But can't we anymore have \includegraphics[...]{my}?
> > Didn't we say this is good if we want pdf and ps output?
>
> It's not an important question for me, so I can't really
> say what's the right way. but writing it in the above
> way is only a one-line-patch.
If it's
When exporting and when making the preview,
why don't create a subdirectory in the document_name.lyx dir and put
there the converted eps? (just like many web browsers do when
saving a page)
I think the exported file should be:
- if and only if my.eps is a converted file:
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Herbert Voss wrote:
>
>>>But can't we anymore have \includegraphics[...]{my}?
>>>Didn't we say this is good if we want pdf and ps output?
>>>
>>It's not an important question for me, so I can't really
>>say what's the right way. but writing it in the above
>>way is
On Friday 19 April 2002 3:04 pm, Herbert Voss wrote:
> Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> > Herbert Voss wrote:
> >>>But can't we anymore have \includegraphics[...]{my}?
> >>>Didn't we say this is good if we want pdf and ps output?
> >>
> >>It's not an important question for me, so I can't really
>
Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Friday 19 April 2002 3:04 pm, Herbert Voss wrote:
>
>>Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
>>
>>>Herbert Voss wrote:
>>>
>But can't we anymore have \includegraphics[...]{my}?
>Didn't we say this is good if we want pdf and ps output?
>
It's not an important
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 06:52:20PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
> >Herbert, prepareFile removes the extension in some cases also. Can you
> >strip that code out too to remoce the redundancy?
At last someone actually worked out what I meant for bug 49 !!
john
--
"When the patent office gets
Now graphics with LaTeX-export works like a charm here.
Thanks for fixing so quickly.
Rob.
Herbert Voss wrote:
>
> Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> > Herbert, prepareFile removes the extension in some cases also. Can you strip
> > that code out too to remoce the redundancy?
>
> thanks Angus,
>
>
Hi,
I'm writing a paper with LyX-CVS using Grace (.agr) graphics files,
which is extremely convenient since Grace is my 2D graphics application.
No need for manual conversions: LyX does that for me and my graphics
in LyX is always up-to-date. Wonderful!
However, when exporting this to LaTeX
Hi,
I'm writing a paper with LyX-CVS using Grace (.agr) graphics files,
which is extremely convenient since Grace is my 2D graphics application.
No need for manual conversions: LyX does that for me and my graphics
in LyX is always up-to-date. Wonderful!
However, when exporting this to LaTeX
40 matches
Mail list logo
