When will LDN appear?

2003-06-06 Thread Alfredo Braunstein
;^) Alfredo

Re: When will LDN appear?

2003-06-06 Thread John Levon
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 06:58:48PM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote: ;^) Not this month probably john

When will LDN appear?

2003-06-06 Thread Alfredo Braunstein
;^) Alfredo

Re: When will LDN appear?

2003-06-06 Thread John Levon
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 06:58:48PM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote: > ;^) Not this month probably john

Re: LDN mascot

2001-12-13 Thread Amir Karger
On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 10:58:42AM +1000, Allan Rae wrote: On Wed, 12 Dec 2001, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote: On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 10:26:21AM +1000, Allan Rae wrote: As for the contest I think we have had arguements on that earlier this year and nobody wanted to change from the

Re: LDN mascot

2001-12-13 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Amir == Amir Karger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Amir I guess that -- although I have no particular liking for the Amir name, I'd have to go for Felix (Felyx?). Or Alyx. Obelyx? JMarc

Re: LDN mascot

2001-12-13 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 03:16:42PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Amir I guess that -- although I have no particular liking for the Amir name, I'd have to go for Felix (Felyx?). Or Alyx. Obelyx? This somehow suggests some kind of bloat... Don't know why... So yes, looks suitable ;-)

Re: LDN & mascot

2001-12-13 Thread Amir Karger
On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 10:58:42AM +1000, Allan Rae wrote: > On Wed, 12 Dec 2001, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 10:26:21AM +1000, Allan Rae wrote: > > > As for the contest I think we have had arguements on that earlier this > > > year and nobody wanted to change

Re: LDN & mascot

2001-12-13 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Amir> I guess that -- although I have no particular liking for the Amir> name, I'd have to go for "Felix" (Felyx?). Or Alyx. Obelyx? JMarc

Re: LDN & mascot

2001-12-13 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 03:16:42PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Amir> I guess that -- although I have no particular liking for the > Amir> name, I'd have to go for "Felix" (Felyx?). Or Alyx. > > Obelyx? This somehow suggests some kind of bloat... Don't know why... So yes, looks

Re: LDN mascot

2001-12-12 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 10:26:21AM +1000, Allan Rae wrote: I have a secret plan to produce another LDN sometime soon -- hopefully to coincide with the first prerelease of 1.2.0 or 1.1.6fix4. It will almost certainly be a massive issue -- so if you have any more collected tips please start

Re: LDN mascot

2001-12-12 Thread Allan Rae
On Wed, 12 Dec 2001, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote: On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 10:26:21AM +1000, Allan Rae wrote: As for the contest I think we have had arguements on that earlier this year and nobody wanted to change from the existing creature design. The pretty anti-aliased version will

Re: LDN & mascot

2001-12-12 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 10:26:21AM +1000, Allan Rae wrote: > > I have a secret plan to produce another LDN sometime soon -- hopefully > to coincide with the first prerelease of 1.2.0 or 1.1.6fix4. It will > almost certainly be a massive issue -- so if you have any more > collec

Re: LDN & mascot

2001-12-12 Thread Allan Rae
On Wed, 12 Dec 2001, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote: > On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 10:26:21AM +1000, Allan Rae wrote: > > As for the contest I think we have had arguements on that earlier this > > year and nobody wanted to change from the existing creature design. > > The pretty anti-aliased

LDN mascot

2001-12-11 Thread Allan Rae
to make a contest for that? Alan, I know that you are busy and I don't want to disturb you, but maybe a special number of the LDN would be a good thing, with a contest for choosing the name of our mascot. What do you think? I have a secret plan to produce another LDN sometime soon

LDN & mascot

2001-12-11 Thread Allan Rae
t now would be a good time to make a contest for that? > > Alan, I know that you are busy and I don't want to disturb you, but > maybe a special number of the LDN would be a good thing, with a > contest for choosing the name of our mascot. > > What do you think? I have a secr

Where's LDN (was Re: Keyboard selection in mathed)

2001-07-05 Thread Allan Rae
On Thu, 5 Jul 2001, Eran Tromer wrote: [snip] Let me try to explain the more strategic parts of the LyX development effort at this moment: [snip] Thanks for the explanations! This really cleared things up for me, especially about what you were all up to in Italy... Now where's LDN when

Where's LDN (was Re: Keyboard selection in mathed)

2001-07-05 Thread Allan Rae
to in Italy... Now where's LDN > when you really need it? Waiting for more input so it can answer questions such as yours ;-) Now we have an explanation but everyone has read it :( Well there are still plenty of users and random visitors who won't have read any of this. I'll add it all into

Re: LDN validations

2001-06-25 Thread Allan Rae
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote: On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 12:12:50PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote: Opera does something even stranger. Instead of centering the table it suddenly decides it should left align it! Konqueror does the same. CSS1 specification gives an example with

Re: LDN validations

2001-06-25 Thread Allan Rae
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Allan Rae wrote: See http://www.devel.lyx.org/~rae/www-user/news/20010117.php3 the table is near the bottom and is something like: div class=center table ... /table /div There are no `class=xxx' statements in the table itself although it does have a few local

Re: LDN validations

2001-06-25 Thread Allan Rae
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote: On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 10:26:43PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote: Netscape4 and IE5.5 centre the table. Galeon0.10.2 (mozilla-0.8) and Opera5 both left align the table. I am looking in the same issue for other reasons. Anything that's not a

Re: LDN validations

2001-06-25 Thread Allan Rae
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote: > On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 12:12:50PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote: > > Opera does something even stranger. Instead of centering the table it > > suddenly decides it should left align it! > > > Konqueror does the same. CSS1 specification gives an example

Re: LDN validations

2001-06-25 Thread Allan Rae
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Allan Rae wrote: > See http://www.devel.lyx.org/~rae/www-user/news/20010117.php3 > > the table is near the bottom and is something like: > > > > ... > > > > There are no `class="xxx"' statements in the table itself although it does > have a few local parameter settings.

Re: LDN validations

2001-06-25 Thread Allan Rae
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote: > On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 10:26:43PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote: > > > > Netscape4 and IE5.5 centre the table. > > > > Galeon0.10.2 (mozilla-0.8) and Opera5 both left align the table. > > I am looking in the same issue for other reasons. Anything that's

LDN validations

2001-06-22 Thread Allan Rae
Slowly but surely they are falling under the mighty weight of the XHTML and CSS steam-roller. 20010523.php3 has two small validation errors but I'm not sure what is the best way around these. 20010425.php3 and 20010328.php3 are valid! YAY! Note that there will likely be a delay of up to 30

Re: LDN validations

2001-06-22 Thread Allan Rae
in. Is the table inheriting some dumb settings from the div? Apart from this small blemish the 20010117 LDN is valid and even looks pretty in both Opera and Netscape. Note that Opera 5 renders everything as I expect it should it's only Netscape that's fussy. (NS Commmunicator 4.77) http

Re: LDN validations

2001-06-22 Thread Allan Rae
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Allan Rae wrote: On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Allan Rae wrote: Slowly but surely they are falling under the mighty weight of the XHTML and CSS steam-roller. Okay XHTML and CSS gurus here's a chance to get some browny points and maybe even a Mickey Mouse badge if your

Re: LDN validations

2001-06-22 Thread Allan Rae
Yay all done (sort of). Everything in www.lyx.org/news/ is now either valid or has one or two tiny little errors. These errors are mentioned in the ChangeLog and in previous posts here. Well, my LDM weekend is off to a good start. Seems John is also joining in the fun. But what about the

Re: LDN validations

2001-06-22 Thread Allan Rae
I might have a sleep shortly but before I do I'll set another challenge. CSS challenge: Given a php3 function taking 4 parameters I want the following logical output: h3font color=black$one : /font$twohfillfont color=black$three/font/h3 $four Now obviously we aren't using font... so how do I

Re: LDN validations

2001-06-22 Thread Zvezdan Petkovic
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 10:54:11PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote: Why does the mail-list stats table in the tips section of news/20010117.php3 render with black text in Netscape? How do I fix it so the text is white? Try to validate the things as Strict instead of transitional

Re: LDN validations

2001-06-22 Thread Zvezdan Petkovic
On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 12:12:50PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote: Did you try this yourself? I didn't. I'll try to find the solution tomorrow morning. I had a tough day at work and its time to get some sleep. This was the first thing I tried last night and guess what happens when you do this?

LDN validations

2001-06-22 Thread Allan Rae
Slowly but surely they are falling under the mighty weight of the XHTML and CSS steam-roller. 20010523.php3 has two small validation errors but I'm not sure what is the best way around these. 20010425.php3 and 20010328.php3 are valid! YAY! Note that there will likely be a delay of up to 30

Re: LDN validations

2001-06-22 Thread Allan Rae
that it's in. Is the table inheriting some dumb settings from the ? Apart from this small blemish the 20010117 LDN is valid and even looks pretty in both Opera and Netscape. Note that Opera 5 renders everything as I expect it should it's only Netscape that's fussy. (NS Commmunicator 4

Re: LDN validations

2001-06-22 Thread Allan Rae
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Allan Rae wrote: > On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Allan Rae wrote: > > > Slowly but surely they are falling under the mighty weight of the XHTML > > and CSS steam-roller. > > Okay XHTML and CSS gurus here's a chance to get some browny points and > maybe even a Mickey Mouse badge if

Re: LDN validations

2001-06-22 Thread Allan Rae
Yay all done (sort of). Everything in www.lyx.org/news/ is now either valid or has one or two tiny little errors. These errors are mentioned in the ChangeLog and in previous posts here. Well, my LDM weekend is off to a good start. Seems John is also joining in the fun. But what about the

Re: LDN validations

2001-06-22 Thread Allan Rae
I might have a sleep shortly but before I do I'll set another challenge. CSS challenge: Given a php3 function taking 4 parameters I want the following logical output: $one : $two$three $four Now obviously we aren't using so how do I do it using CSS? How do I do a hfill? Can I only do that

Re: LDN validations

2001-06-22 Thread Zvezdan Petkovic
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 10:54:11PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote: > Why does the mail-list stats table in the tips section of > news/20010117.php3 render with black text in Netscape? > > How do I fix it so the text is white? > Try to validate the things as Strict instead of

Re: LDN validations

2001-06-22 Thread Zvezdan Petkovic
On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 12:12:50PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote: > > Did you try this yourself? > I didn't. I'll try to find the solution tomorrow morning. I had a tough day at work and its time to get some sleep. > This was the first thing I tried last night and guess what happens when > you do

LDN-20010523

2001-05-23 Thread Allan Rae
http://www.lyx.org/news/20010523.php3 Time for a little bit of reading. Go get it! Allan. (ARRae)

LDN-20010523

2001-05-23 Thread Allan Rae
http://www.lyx.org/news/20010523.php3 Time for a little bit of reading. Go get it! Allan. (ARRae)

Re: LDN-20010425

2001-04-26 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 26-Apr-2001 Allan Rae wrote: It seems that the Norwegian mirror is rather slow at updating. You can find it at the Italian mirror though: http://www.it.lyx.org/news/20010425.php3 And thinking that I update only once a day 02:00 ;) Jürgen --

Re: LDN-20010425

2001-04-26 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 26-Apr-2001 Allan Rae wrote: > It seems that the Norwegian mirror is rather slow at updating. > You can find it at the Italian mirror though: > > http://www.it.lyx.org/news/20010425.php3 And thinking that I update only once a day 02:00 ;) Jürgen --

Re: LDN-20010425

2001-04-25 Thread Allan Rae
On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, Allan Rae wrote: A new LDN will be available sometime in the next 30 minutes or so. So don't rush off now and then complain that the URL is broken. I've committed the changes to CVS but I want to go home by midnight if I can. Lars? It's been 12 hours and I don't see

Re: LDN-20010425

2001-04-25 Thread Allan Rae
On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, Allan Rae wrote: A new LDN will be available sometime in the next 30 minutes or so. So don't rush off now and then complain that the URL is broken. I've committed the changes to CVS but I want to go home by midnight if I can. Anyway, here's the URL: http

LDN-20010425

2001-04-25 Thread Allan Rae
A new LDN will be available sometime in the next 30 minutes or so. So don't rush off now and then complain that the URL is broken. I've committed the changes to CVS but I want to go home by midnight if I can. Anyway, here's the URL: http://www.lyx.org/news/20010425.php3

Re: LDN-20010425

2001-04-25 Thread Allan Rae
On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, Allan Rae wrote: > A new LDN will be available sometime in the next 30 minutes or so. So > don't rush off now and then complain that the URL is broken. I've > committed the changes to CVS but I want to go home by midnight if I can. Lars? It's been 12 hours an

Re: LDN-20010425

2001-04-25 Thread Allan Rae
On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, Allan Rae wrote: > A new LDN will be available sometime in the next 30 minutes or so. So > don't rush off now and then complain that the URL is broken. I've > committed the changes to CVS but I want to go home by midnight if I can. > > Anyway,

LDN-20010425

2001-04-25 Thread Allan Rae
A new LDN will be available sometime in the next 30 minutes or so. So don't rush off now and then complain that the URL is broken. I've committed the changes to CVS but I want to go home by midnight if I can. Anyway, here's the URL: http://www.lyx.org/news/20010425.php3

LDN-20010328

2001-03-28 Thread Allan Rae
I've kept you waiting long enough. Go get it at: http://www.lyx.org/news/20010328.php3 Allan. (ARRae)

LDN-20010328

2001-03-28 Thread Allan Rae
I've kept you waiting long enough. Go get it at: http://www.lyx.org/news/20010328.php3 Allan. (ARRae)

Almost certainly no LDN for February

2001-02-19 Thread Allan Rae
Sorry people but there are not enough hours in my days at the moment. My contract employment job is quickly becoming a 24x7 thing and I don't know when I'm going to get to sleep. Maybe in a fortnight. With a great deal of luck a short LDN may be produced as Jos is working on some stuff. And I

Almost certainly no LDN for February

2001-02-19 Thread Allan Rae
Sorry people but there are not enough hours in my days at the moment. My contract employment job is quickly becoming a 24x7 thing and I don't know when I'm going to get to sleep. Maybe in a fortnight. With a great deal of luck a short LDN may be produced as José is working on some stuff

Re: LDN

2000-11-19 Thread Allan Rae
On Wed, 15 Nov 2000, Amir Karger wrote: Well done, Allan. I like the thread thing, especially since I'm not reading lyx-users anymore. So do I. It would be nice to do a more kernel-cousins like discussion of threads at least of the developers list. The users list tends to just have single

Re: LDN

2000-11-19 Thread Allan Rae
On Wed, 15 Nov 2000, Amir Karger wrote: > Well done, Allan. > > I like the thread thing, especially since I'm not reading lyx-users anymore. So do I. It would be nice to do a more kernel-cousins like discussion of threads at least of the developers list. The users list tends to just have

Re: LDN

2000-11-16 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
I have seen this before but after your message I read it again and there are several points that can help for future editions. I liked the FAQ, it has some good points. thanks john p.s. I liked what you did ! Thanks. And Thanks for Allan for the amazing work he is doing with LDN... -- José

Re: LDN

2000-11-16 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
kt.linuxcare.com/index.epl I have seen this before but after your message I read it again and there are several points that can help for future editions. I liked the FAQ, it has some good points. > thanks > john > p.s. I liked what you did ! Thanks. And Thanks for Allan for the amazing work he is doing with LDN... -- José

LDN

2000-11-15 Thread Amir Karger
Well done, Allan. I like the thread thing, especially since I'm not reading lyx-users anymore. By the way, "it's new home" should be "its new home". "It's" is an abbreviation for "It is", while "Its" is an adjective meaning "belonging to it". Ah, I haven't been pedantic in a long time. -Amir

Re: LDN

2000-11-15 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 09:17:36AM -0500, Amir Karger wrote: Well done, Allan. I like the thread thing, especially since I'm not reading lyx-users anymore. I intend to give it a similar look next time. Did you like the format? I'm trying several formats obeying two main principles:

Re: LDN

2000-11-15 Thread John Levon
On Wed, 15 Nov 2000, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote: On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 09:17:36AM -0500, Amir Karger wrote: Well done, Allan. I like the thread thing, especially since I'm not reading lyx-users anymore. I intend to give it a similar look next time. Did you like the format?

Re: LDN

2000-11-15 Thread Amir Karger
On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 02:29:03PM +, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote: On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 09:17:36AM -0500, Amir Karger wrote: I intend to give it a similar look next time. Did you like the format? Sure. I'm trying several formats obeying two main principles: * looks

LDN

2000-11-15 Thread Amir Karger
Well done, Allan. I like the thread thing, especially since I'm not reading lyx-users anymore. By the way, "it's new home" should be "its new home". "It's" is an abbreviation for "It is", while "Its" is an adjective meaning "belonging to it". Ah, I haven't been pedantic in a long time. -Amir

Re: LDN

2000-11-15 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 09:17:36AM -0500, Amir Karger wrote: > Well done, Allan. > > I like the thread thing, especially since I'm not reading lyx-users anymore. I intend to give it a similar look next time. Did you like the format? I'm trying several formats obeying two main principles:

Re: LDN

2000-11-15 Thread John Levon
On Wed, 15 Nov 2000, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote: > On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 09:17:36AM -0500, Amir Karger wrote: > > Well done, Allan. > > > > I like the thread thing, especially since I'm not reading lyx-users anymore. > > I intend to give it a similar look next time. Did you like the

Re: LDN

2000-11-15 Thread Amir Karger
On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 02:29:03PM +, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote: > On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 09:17:36AM -0500, Amir Karger wrote: > > I intend to give it a similar look next time. Did you like the format? Sure. > I'm trying several formats obeying two main principles: > > *

Re: LDN?

2000-07-19 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 18-Jul-2000 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Well, the insetfoot and insetmarginal is working perfectly as long as the underlying insetcollapsable and insettext is working perfectly. Well ok we still have to solve some update problems there, but IMO they work quite good. The InsetFloat is

Re: LDN?

2000-07-19 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 18-Jul-2000 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > > Well, the insetfoot and insetmarginal is working perfectly as long as > the underlying insetcollapsable and insettext is working perfectly. > Well ok we still have to solve some update problems there, but IMO they work quite good. > The

Re: LDN?

2000-07-18 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 17-Jul-2000 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | Second, it seems like JÜrgen has been working like crazy, and | accomplished quite a lot on the new tables. Not just the new insettabular... Jürgens work also creates the basis for all the new insets. #:O) well still some update problem (try to do

Re: LDN?

2000-07-18 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Juergen Vigna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | (btw. I__could_ use some help in getting some of the new insets | working, especially the insetfoot,insetmarginal,insetfloat with these | working properly we can remove some ~4000 lines of code...) | | What do you need for inset-foot? Well, the

Re: LDN?

2000-07-18 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 17-Jul-2000 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >| Second, it seems like JÜrgen has been working like crazy, and >| accomplished quite a lot on the new tables. > > Not just the new insettabular... Jürgens work also creates the basis > for all the new insets. #:O) well still some update problem (try

Re: LDN?

2000-07-18 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > (btw. I__could_ use some help in getting some of the new insets | > working, especially the insetfoot,insetmarginal,insetfloat with these | > working properly we can remove some ~4000 lines of code...) | | What do you need for inset-foot? Well, the

LDN?

2000-07-17 Thread Amir Karger
It seems to me that a new LDN would be a great idea. First, the fact that LyX has taken its first step towards compatibility with Gnome will probably excite lots of people, even if that step is small and is running into some complications. Second, it seems like JÜrgen has been working like

Re: LDN?

2000-07-17 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Amir Karger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Second, it seems like JÜrgen has been working like crazy, and | accomplished quite a lot on the new tables. Not just the new insettabular... Jürgens work also creates the basis for all the new insets. (btw. I _could_ use some help in getting some of the

Re: LDN?

2000-07-17 Thread Allan Rae
On Mon, 17 Jul 2000, Amir Karger wrote: It seems to me that a new LDN would be a great idea. Hello conscience my old friend... I'm about to start writing it. Should be out next week. I have been reading through about 4500 emails (mostly lyx-devel) in my mailboxes and saving a few to my LDN

LDN?

2000-07-17 Thread Amir Karger
It seems to me that a new LDN would be a great idea. First, the fact that LyX has taken its first step towards compatibility with Gnome will probably excite lots of people, even if that step is small and is running into some complications. Second, it seems like JÜrgen has been working like

Re: LDN?

2000-07-17 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Second, it seems like JÜrgen has been working like crazy, and | accomplished quite a lot on the new tables. Not just the new insettabular... Jürgens work also creates the basis for all the new insets. (btw. I _could_ use some help in getting some of the

Re: LDN?

2000-07-17 Thread Allan Rae
On Mon, 17 Jul 2000, Amir Karger wrote: > It seems to me that a new LDN would be a great idea. Hello conscience my old friend... I'm about to start writing it. Should be out next week. I have been reading through about 4500 emails (mostly lyx-devel) in my mailboxes and saving a few to

LDN

2000-03-17 Thread Amir Karger
www.lyx.org/news currently points to the March 1 LDN! -Amir

Re: LDN

2000-03-17 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
"Amir" == Amir Karger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Amir www.lyx.org/news currently points to the March 1 LDN! -Amir Fixed. JMarc

LDN

2000-03-17 Thread Amir Karger
www.lyx.org/news currently points to the March 1 LDN! -Amir

Re: LDN

2000-03-17 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
>>>>> "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Amir> www.lyx.org/news currently points to the March 1 LDN! -Amir Fixed. JMarc

Re: LDN future plans

2000-03-08 Thread Allan Rae
On 8 Mar 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Allan Rae [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | I just downloaded a copy of the latest html-4.01 specification. It has a | paragraph saying that redirects via META tags are _bad_ and server side | redirects only should be used -- in other words they aren't

Re: LDN

2000-03-08 Thread Allan Rae
On Tue, 7 Mar 2000, Allan Rae wrote: A "LyX tip of the (Bi)Week" might not be a bad idea, though. Of course, if we had FAQ it might not be necessary. What's with this bi-weekly rubbish? Hasn't the US heard of fortnights? [ I then went on and ranted about people with tiny minds ] None

Re: LDN future plans

2000-03-08 Thread Allan Rae
On 8 Mar 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | I just downloaded a copy of the latest html-4.01 specification. It has a > | paragraph saying that redirects via META tags are _bad_ and server side > | redirects only should be used -- in other words they

Re: LDN

2000-03-08 Thread Allan Rae
On Tue, 7 Mar 2000, Allan Rae wrote: > > A "LyX tip of the (Bi)Week" might not be a bad idea, though. Of course, if > > we had FAQ it might not be necessary. > > What's with this bi-weekly rubbish? Hasn't the US heard of fortnights? [ I then went on and ranted about people with tiny minds ]

Re: LDN

2000-03-07 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 07-Mar-2000 Allan Rae wrote: I'm still waiting for Lars or Jürgen to write a paragraph or three about why Insets are cool and what they're doing to them. Don't worry about the quality of the writing I clean it up a bit if needed. Well I really don't know what to tell you here #:O)

Re: LDN future plans

2000-03-07 Thread Allan Rae
On 6 Mar 2000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Another point. The redirect from news/ to the latest LDN is such that I cannot press back from the LDN to go where I was before. This is annoying... It certainly is isn't it. Anyone a html guru who can tell me what to do to avoid this? I expect

Re: LDN future plans

2000-03-07 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Allan Rae [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On 6 Mar 2000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: | | Another point. The redirect from news/ to the latest LDN is such that | I cannot press back from the LDN to go where I was before. This is | annoying... | | It certainly is isn't it. Anyone a html guru who

Re: LDN future plans

2000-03-07 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes: | Allan Rae [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | | | On 6 Mar 2000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: | | | | Another point. The redirect from news/ to the latest LDN is such that | | I cannot press back from the LDN to go where I was before

Re: LDN future plans

2000-03-07 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes: | Allan Rae [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | | | On 6 Mar 2000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: | | | | Another point. The redirect from news/ to the latest LDN is such that | | I cannot press back from the LDN to go where I was before

Re: LDN future plans

2000-03-07 Thread Allan Rae
On 8 Mar 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Allan Rae [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On 6 Mar 2000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: | | Another point. The redirect from news/ to the latest LDN is such that | I cannot press back from the LDN to go where I was before. This is | annoying

Re: LDN future plans

2000-03-07 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Allan Rae [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | I created a index.php3 file that contains _only_ this: | | BEGIN_FILE | ?php | include("2301.php3"); | ? | END_FILE | | At it seems to work nicely. | | It certainly is a neat trick, however, we still have the problem JMarc was |

Re: LDN future plans

2000-03-07 Thread Allan Rae
think it's in the future plans thread) is that I was going to create an index.php3 that merged the top dozen news items from news.inc with a short blurb about LDN. Then LDN.php3 (or current.php3 or latest.php3 haven't decided which name to use) would either redirect or load the current issue so people l

Re: LDN future plans

2000-03-07 Thread Allan Rae
On Wed, 8 Mar 2000, Allan Rae wrote: The following: meta http-equiv="pragma" contents="no-cache" blocks caching of the page. There may well be something else available with html-4.0 to block/ignore redirecting pages. I just downloaded a copy of the latest html-4.01 specification. It

Re: LDN future plans

2000-03-07 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Allan Rae [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Wed, 8 Mar 2000, Allan Rae wrote: | The following: | meta http-equiv="pragma" contents="no-cache" | | blocks caching of the page. There may well be something else available | with html-4.0 to block/ignore redirecting pages. | | I just

Re: LDN

2000-03-07 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 07-Mar-2000 Allan Rae wrote: > > I'm still waiting for Lars or Jürgen to write a paragraph or three about > why Insets are cool and what they're doing to them. Don't worry about the > quality of the writing I clean it up a bit if needed. > Well I really don't know what to tell you here

Re: LDN future plans

2000-03-07 Thread Allan Rae
On 6 Mar 2000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Another point. The redirect from news/ to the latest LDN is such that > I cannot press back from the LDN to go where I was before. This is > annoying... It certainly is isn't it. Anyone a html guru who can tell me what to do to avoid this?

Re: LDN future plans

2000-03-07 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On 6 Mar 2000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: | | > Another point. The redirect from news/ to the latest LDN is such that | > I cannot press back from the LDN to go where I was before. This is | > annoying... | | It certainly is isn't it.

Re: LDN future plans

2000-03-07 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes: | Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | | On 6 Mar 2000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: | | | | > Another point. The redirect from news/ to the latest LDN is such that | | > I cannot press back from the LDN to go where

Re: LDN future plans

2000-03-07 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes: | Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | | On 6 Mar 2000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: | | | | > Another point. The redirect from news/ to the latest LDN is such that | | > I cannot press back from the LDN to go where

Re: LDN future plans

2000-03-07 Thread Allan Rae
On 8 Mar 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | On 6 Mar 2000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > | > | > Another point. The redirect from news/ to the latest LDN is such that > | > I cannot press back from th

  1   2   >