Hello!
Hereby I grant permission to license my contributions to
LyX under the GNU General Public License, version 2 or later.
Best Regards
Påvel Nicklasson
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
On Sun, Jan 14, 2024 at 10:23:29AM +0100, Kees Zeelenberg wrote:
> > Van: Pavel Sanda
> > Verzonden: zaterdag 13 januari 2024 23:24
> >
> > But there is one more change now:
> > "Exercise" "Oefening" -> "Opgave".
> >
> > Is this correct or should it stay as it was before?
> >
>
> Yes, "Opgave"
> Van: Pavel Sanda
> Verzonden: zaterdag 13 januari 2024 23:24
>
> But there is one more change now:
> "Exercise" "Oefening" -> "Opgave".
>
> Is this correct or should it stay as it was before?
>
Yes, "Opgave" is correct.
Kees
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.ly
On Sat, Jan 13, 2024 at 02:27:25PM +0100, Kees Zeelenberg wrote:
> It is indeed not correct; it should be "Eindnoten". In the po file (line
> 10821, ID 2422) I sent, it is incorrectly translated as "Opmerkingen" .
>
>
>
> Also, in layouttranslations "Corollary" is incorrectly translated as
> "C
On Sat Jan 6 15:28:43 UTC 2024 Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Hi Kees, would you mind please going through
https://www.lyx.org/trac/browser/lyxgit/lib/layouttranslations
> section "Translation nl" and double check that translation for
Notes[[Endnotes]] is correct?
>
> (new pdf string fdor 2.4)
It
On Sat, Jan 06, 2024 at 11:15:19AM +0100, Kees Zeelenberg wrote:
> I hereby grant permission to license my contributions to LyX under the Gnu
> General Public License, version 2 or later.
Hi Kees, would you mind please going through
https://www.lyx.org/trac/browser/lyxgit/lib/layouttransl
Am Samstag, dem 06.01.2024 um 11:15 +0100 schrieb Kees Zeelenberg:
> I hereby grant permission to license my contributions to LyX under
> the Gnu General Public License, version 2 or later.
Thanks, Kees, your translation update is now included.
Best,
Jürgen
>
> Kee
I hereby grant permission to license my contributions to LyX under the Gnu
General Public License, version 2 or later.
Kees Zeelenberg
> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: Jürgen Spitzmüller
> Verzonden: zaterdag 6 januari 2024 10:54
> Aan: Kees Zeelenberg ; po-upda...@lyx.org
I have been told that I must identify myself with my full name, either to
someone in private or publicly in this list; so I am reposting my previous
e-mail with my full name this time.
I, Daniel Fernández, hereby license all my contributions to LyX under the GNU
General Public License version
I hereby licence all my contributions to LyX under the GNU General Public
Licence version 2 or later.
Daniel.
--
Enviat amb Tutanota.
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
I hereby grant permission to license my contributions to LyX under the GNU
General Public License, version 2 or later.
Narahari Rao
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Am Sonntag, den 05.01.2020, 11:37 +0100 schrieb Yu Jin:
> I hereby grant permission to license my contributions to LyX under
> the GNU General Public License, version 2 or any later version.
Thank you. Now keep the patches coming :-)
Jürgen
>
> Eugene Chornyi
signature.asc
Descr
I hereby grant permission to license my contributions to LyX under the GNU
General Public License, version 2 or any later version.
Eugene Chornyi
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Am Freitag, den 21.06.2019, 01:20 +0200 schrieb Niko Strijbol:
> Hi,
>
> This was requested on the po mailing list:
>
> I hereby grant permission to licence my contributions to LyX under
> the
> GNU General Public Licence, version 2 or later.
Thanks, Niko. You are in the credits now.
Looking fo
Hi,
This was requested on the po mailing list:
I hereby grant permission to licence my contributions to LyX under the
GNU General Public Licence, version 2 or later.
Niko Strijbol
> ?: Jürgen Spitzmüller mailto:sp...@lyx.org>>
> ??: Chinese (Simplified) translation for LyX???
>
> As you wish.
Hi Winfred,
thanks for your update.
There are few bits which needs your approval:
attached are changes generated by your update to lib/layouttranslations
file
Am Samstag, den 28.07.2018, 01:07 + schrieb 黄 克鲁:
> I hereby grant permission to use my work for LyX under the license
> GPL version 2 or later.
thank you. You're now credited.
Jürgen
>
> Winfred Huang
>
> 发自我的 iPhone
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
I hereby grant permission to use my work for LyX under the license GPL version
2 or later.
Winfred Huang
发自我的 iPhone
发自我的 iPhone
以下是转发的邮件：
发件人: 黄 克鲁 mailto:tone90...@hotmail.com>>
日期: 2018年7月25日 GMT+8 16:25:01
收件人: Jürgen Spitzmüller mailto:sp...@lyx.org>>
主题: 回复： Chinese (Simplified) translation for LyX
As you wish.
I hereby grant permission to license any and all contributions I've
made
Am Dienstag, den 25.10.2016, 23:52 +0200 schrieb Uwe Stöhr:
> Am 25.10.2016 um 02:10 schrieb Joel Kulesza:
>
> > I hereby grant the right to publish my work for LyX under the
> > license GPL
> > version 2 or later.
>
> Many thanks Joel.
>
> As soon as your
Am 25.10.2016 um 02:10 schrieb Joel Kulesza:
I hereby grant the right to publish my work for LyX under the license GPL
version 2 or later.
Many thanks Joel.
As soon as your first patch goes in for LyX we will add you to the LyX
credits as an author of LyX.
regards Uwe
LyX Developers:
I hereby grant the right to publish my work for LyX under the license GPL
version 2 or later.
Please contact me with any comments, questions, or concerns.
Thank you,
Joel
To LyX Maintainers,
I hereby grant permission to use my contributions to the LyX project
under the license GPL version 2 and later.
Kindest Regards,
Jessica Hamilton
2015-03-15 18:34 GMT+01:00 Stefan Swerk:
> I hereby grant permission to license my contributions to LyX
> under the GNU General Public License, version 2 or any later version.
>
Thanks. I have committed the stuff to master and added you to the credits.
Jürgen
>
> Stefan Swerk
>
>
>
I hereby grant permission to license my contributions to LyX
under the GNU General Public License, version 2 or any later version.
Stefan Swerk
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
I hereby license my contributions to LyX under the General Public
License, Version 2 or any later version
Prannoy Pilligundla
ᐧ
Hashini Senaratne wrote:
> Modification for Licensing:
>
> I hereby grant permission to license my contributions to LyX under the GNU
> General Public License, version 2 or later.
Thanks :) P
Modification for Licensing:
I hereby grant permission to license my contributions to LyX under the GNU
General Public License, version 2 or later.
Thank you
Hashini Senaratne
Hashini Senaratne wrote:
> My work will be released under open source license, GPL 3.0. as I agrees
> with Google Summer of Code 2013.
> So my contributions to LyX are licensed under GPL v3.
The problem is that LyX is at the moment licensed under GPL 2.
If you agree with this licensing,
My work will be released under open source license, GPL 3.0. as I agrees
with Google Summer of Code 2013.
So my contributions to LyX are licensed under GPL v3.
*Thank you
*
*Hashini Senaratne
*
I hereby license my contributions to LyX under the General Public
License, Version 2 or any later version.
--
Gioele Barabucci
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 1:37 AM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> -) has anyone ever thought of licensing issues in the case of a possible
> port to an iPad, or perhaps Android ?
>
Such licensing issues would unlikely arise with Android-powered
devices. Beyond the official Google Market/Play, there are m
Hi all,
recently, in another open-source project where I wanted to contribute
with a new feature, I've been asked to sign a Contributor License
Agreement (CLA) that starts with this statement: "You grant Mr.
[OMITTED] the ability to use the Contributions in any way.&q
Hi,
I just contributed an icon and some Dutch translation strings. For the record:
I hereby grant permission to release my contributions to LyX under the
license GPL, version 2 or later.
This also applies to all future contributions I may submit.
Best regards,
Timo Kluck
I hereby grant permission to license my contributions to LyX under the
Gnu General Public License, version 2 or later.
Marcus Kriele
To date I have only fixed some sv* layout files (Bug 7301) which is targeted
for 2.0.1.
Hereby I grant permission to license my contributions to
LyX under the GNU General Public License, version 2 or later.
Giovanni Sora
I hereby grant permission to license my contributions to LyX
under the GNU General Public License, version 2 or later.
--
-
ataman...@frobs.net
Jim Rotmalm wrote:
> I hereby grant permission to license my contributions to LyX
> under the GNU General Public License, version 2 or later.
thanks, i added you to the contributors.
pavel
I hereby grant permission to license my contributions to LyX
under the GNU General Public License, version 2 or later.
Jim
Dear Lyx-Devel:
I hereby grant permission for my LyX contributions to by licensed under the GNU
General Public License, version 2 or later.
Sincerely,
Jack Desert
--
~~~
Jack Desert --Writer, Entrepeneur
Author and Spokesman
Hereby I grant permission to license my contributions to
LyX under the GNU General Public License, version 2 or later.
Ulysse Danglis
nick wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I hereby grant permission to license my contributions to LyX under the
> GNU
> General Public License, version 2 or later.
>
> With best regards,
> Nick A. Gusev
Thanks, Nick. I committed your update to ru.po to the 1.6.4 branch now.
Jürgen
Hello!
I hereby grant permission to license my contributions to LyX under the
GNU
General Public License, version 2 or later.
With best regards,
Nick A. Gusev
Hi,
in case I have forgotten, which is very likely, since I did not contribute
anything important ...
I hereby grant permission to license my contributions to LyX under the Gnu
General Public License, version 2 or later.
Kornel
--
Kornel Benko
kornel.be...@berlin.de
signature.asc
Many thanks,
I added you now to our CREDITS.
regards Uwe
hatim ali wrote:
>
> I hereby grant permission to license my contributions to LyX under
> the GNU General Public License, version 2 or later.
thanks, added.
pavel
I hereby grant permission to license my contributions to LyX under
the GNU General Public License, version 2 or later.
_
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE!
http://messenger.msn.click-url.c
I hereby grant permission to license my contributions to LyX under
the GNU General Public License, version 2 or later.
_
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE!
http://messenger.msn.click-url.c
>> Should I commit my patch to switch to wrapfig anyway?
>
> I'd say so, yes.
I put it in:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/22895
Maybe we should change a bit the status1.5.x entry - I leave this to you.
regards Uwe
> do you upload the package with a changed license to CTAN?
I asked him if he could do this, but also offered him that I can do this if he
don't find time.
> And, do me a favour: Mats has written several other
> packages also with the "no sell" statement. Please ask him
Uwe Stöhr schrieb:
Jürgen, it seems that floatflt is readded in a few weeks. Should I
commit my patch to switch to wrapfig anyway?
Uwe,
do you upload the package with a changed license to CTAN?
And, do me a favour: Mats has written several other
packages also with the "no sell"
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Jürgen, it seems that floatflt is readded in a few weeks. Should I commit
> my patch to switch to wrapfig anyway?
I'd say so, yes.
Jürgen
?
>>>
>>> Original-Nachricht ----
>>> Betreff: Re: [floatflt] about the license of your floatflt LaTeX-package
>>> Datum: Fri, 08 Feb 2008 18:53:21 +0100
>>> Von: Mats Dahlgren
>>> []
>>> Yes, you may remove the nosell dec
Andre Poenitz schrieb:
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 09:39:24PM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Jürgen, it seems that floatflt is readded in a few weeks. Should I commit
my patch to switch to wrapfig anyway?
Original-Nachricht
Betreff: Re: [floatflt] about the license of your floatflt
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 09:39:24PM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Jürgen, it seems that floatflt is readded in a few weeks. Should I commit
> my patch to switch to wrapfig anyway?
>
> Original-Nachricht
> Betreff: Re: [floatflt] about the license of your floatfl
Jürgen, it seems that floatflt is readded in a few weeks. Should I commit my patch to switch to
wrapfig anyway?
Original-Nachricht
Betreff: Re: [floatflt] about the license of your floatflt LaTeX-package
Datum: Fri, 08 Feb 2008 18:53:21 +0100
Von: Mats Dahlgren
Organisation
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007, José Matos wrote:
PS: I have been absent from discussion because in Bromarv port 25 was
blocked and answering over the webmail interface is tedious and sloppy.
:-)
Good luck with catching up on the discussions...
/C
--
Christian Ridderström, +46-8-768 39 44
On Wednesday 15 August 2007 16:21:31 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> From me too!
I hate to say "me too" but in this case it is impossible to avoid. :-)
> /C
PS: I have been absent from discussion because in Bromarv port 25 was blocked
and answering over the webmail interface is tedious and sloppy
On Tue, 14 Aug 2007, Andre Poenitz wrote:
PS: Martin: I really appreciated the hospitality - no matter how the
complaints on too much too well tasting food sounded like. Please also
tell Liisa.
From me too!
/C
--
Christian Ridderström, +46-8-768 39 44 http://www.md.kth.se/~
you Martin and Liisa for the superb hospitality!
Susana
On Tuesday 14 August 2007, you wrote:
> Susana Barbosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I grant permission to license any and all contributions I've made to
> > LyX under the Gnu GPL version 2 or later.
>
>
On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 09:54:44PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >> Susana Barbosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >>> I grant permission to license any and all contributions I've made to
> >>> LyX under the Gnu GPL version 2 or later.
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Susana Barbosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> I grant permission to license any and all contributions I've made to
>>> LyX u
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Susana Barbosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I grant permission to license any and all contributions I've made to
>> LyX under the Gnu GPL version 2 or later.
>
> Thank you Susana. Will you ever for
Susana Barbosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I grant permission to license any and all contributions I've made to
> LyX under the Gnu GPL version 2 or later.
Thank you Susana. Will you ever forgive me?
JMarc
I grant permission to license any and all contributions I've made to
LyX under the Gnu GPL version 2 or later.
Susana
Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> All my contributions to the LyX project fall under the
> Gnu General Public License, version 2 or later.
Thanks, Peter. Feel free to suggest an improved description of your
contribution. (In fact, many of these descriptions are woefully
All my contributions to the LyX project fall under the
Gnu General Public License, version 2 or later.
Peter Kuemmel
Anders Ekberg wrote:
> For the record:
> I agree to license my contributions to LyX under the Gnu General
> Public License, version 2 or later.
Thanks, Anders.
--
Angus
For the record:
I agree to license my contributions to LyX under the Gnu General
Public License, version 2 or later.
Anders Ekberg
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Anyway. Angus, you may add my name to that list of yours (not the one of
> people owing you lots of beer, but that other one with poeple granting
> permission to licence their contributions to LyX under the Gnu General
> Public Licence, version 2 or later).
Great! Done so.
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 05:17:53PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> | It looks like I can't really resist here, however I am not happy at all
>> | about this "or later" thing. I am interested to keep m
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 05:17:53PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | It looks like I can't really resist here, however I am not happy at all
> | about this "or later" thing. I am interested to keep my code (well, at
> | least the part related to Ly
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| It looks like I can't really resist here, however I am not happy at all
| about this "or later" thing. I am interested to keep my code (well, at
| least the part related to LyX) free and open in the spirit of the
| current GPL.
Regardless of what happes
On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 08:47:28PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> But so far IT has seen quite a couple of guys jumping from good to bad
> to in-between and the other way round (IBM, SCO, MS, ...) and there is
> no guarantee that the FSF won't sell there ideals or will be forced to
> do so to Foo
reasonable assumptions to make any progress at all.
>
> I doubt that I am the only paranoid person in this audience, so why is
> _everybody_ so eager to have this 'or later' thingy explicitly signed?
>
> Andre'
>
> PS:
>
>> Even less excitingly, beca
l there ideals or will be forced to
do so to FooBar666 Inc at some point of time which immediately will
release GPL666.
I doubt that I am the only paranoid person in this audience, so why is
_everybody_ so eager to have this 'or later' thingy explicitly signed?
Andre'
PS:
&g
Martin Vermeer wrote:
> Does it matter? If the text of a permission given contains "...or
> later", doesn't that imply the same author as the implied "earlier"
> licence?
>
> ...and then there is a copyright issue (on the licence text)...
Yes, that was my point. Can "FooBar Inc" release "GPL v666
On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 06:47:25PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
...
> > the releasing. Yes, FooBar Inc could release their own rip-off of LyX
> > under GPL v666, but it wouldn't remain the mainstream version for long.
>
> Incidentally, does the FSF not own the Gnu and GPL
Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-03-19 at 08:49, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 11:34:28AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> > flags them as different but I really don't care too much. I'm much
>> > more interested in getting Poenitz on board ;-)
>>
>> And I am still interested
On Sat, 2005-03-19 at 08:49, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 11:34:28AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > flags them as different but I really don't care too much. I'm much more
> > interested in getting Poenitz on board ;-)
>
> And I am still interested why I should sign not just GP
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 11:34:28AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> flags them as different but I really don't care too much. I'm much more
> interested in getting Poenitz on board ;-)
And I am still interested why I should sign not just GPL v2 (which is
just fine) but also any following version inc
chr () home ! se wrote:
>> Ronald Florence
Were you trying to tell me something about this address too?
>> Mate Wierdl
> Have you tried this address?
> mw () csi ! hu
Nope. Thanks. I'll try it.
> You'll probably need to get through some spam checking software.. IIRC,
> that meant replying to
On Mon, 7 Mar 2005, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Ronald Florence
> Mate Wierdl
Have you tried this address?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You'll probably need to get through some spam checking software.. IIRC,
that meant replying to a separate e-mail that was automatically generated.
/Chri
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> I'm much more interested in getting Poenitz on board ;-)
Indeed. And you could probably get Kornelia Pietsch at the same
time...
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Angus> The following authors are present in both lists but their email
> Angus> has changed. (blanket-permission.txt email first):
>
> Angus> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> Angus>
> Angus>
>
> Don't you have a slight problem with your scripts?
There are a
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> The following authors are present in both lists but their email
Angus> has changed. (blanket-permission.txt email first):
Angus> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Angus>
Angus>
Don't you have a slight problem with your script
I think that I've just about bottomed out in my attempt to get
people to sign blanket-permission.txt. Below is the output of a
script I've been usiing to compare the contents of CREDITS and
blanket-permission.txt. It would be nice if we could get André
to sign... I also attach the file listing the
My contributions to the code base are small but anyway:
I hereby grant permission to licence my contributions
to LyX under the Gnu General Public Licence, version 2 or later
Michael Schmitt,
Bonn, Germany
The license is granted for use with LyX. People who prefer
the other fonts may continue to do so. This is just a
replacement. It is, from my point view, o.k. that those
who would like to use LyX commercially should either
ask for permission themselves or stick with the inferior
fonts.
Anyway
uot; I don't
Georg> see a phrase in the additional information you sent that allows
Georg> this use. The consequence is that LyX may not be used in
Georg> commercial organizations if it uses these fonts. Do we want
Georg> that? Does the existing license of LyX allows such a
Georg
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> What about your opinions? Can we accept the license info?
IMHO no. The problem is that these fonts may not be used in any commercial
organization. From the license at
http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/fonts/cm/ps-type1/bakoma/BaKoMa-AMS.Fo
Thanks to Uwe for caring about these matters.
Die licence is granted for all versions of LyX.
I have referred to version 1.3.5. because other versions may require
other mappings.
Boris Malyshev has granted me permission to make such changes provided
they are documented like in the present Readme
Hello LyXers,
thanks to Ekkehart, the license problems of the modified TrueTypeFonts
taken from Bakoma are fixed. He asked the font designer Mr. Malyshev for
a permission and he accepted the attached license information. He also
gave the permission to provide the following font package for
On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 11:35:02AM +0100, Asger Kunuk Ottar Alstrup wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Dec 2004, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
>
> > Does the COPYING file apply to all the doc/ documentation that
> > don't have any license in them?
> >
> > For example, I don't s
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004, Asger Kunuk Ottar Alstrup wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Dec 2004, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
>
> > Does the COPYING file apply to all the doc/ documentation that don't have
> > any license in them?
> >
> > For example, I don't see any repub
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> Does the COPYING file apply to all the doc/ documentation that don't have
> any license in them?
>
> For example, I don't see any republishing or reuse license for
> lib/doc/Customization.lyx.
It is a good question. When the
Does the COPYING file apply to all the doc/ documentation that don't have
any license in them?
For example, I don't see any republishing or reuse license for
lib/doc/Customization.lyx.
I want to test a print-on-demand service. I want to submit the LyX
documentation in a single PDF fo
>>>>> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Rob Lahaye wrote:
>> Sorry, just a rediculous detail.
>>
>> "Help->About LyX...", License tab.
>>
>> Doesn't the LyX Team still have the li
On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 09:52:40AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> LyX is Copyright (C) 1995-2004 by the scores of volunteers listed in
Hmm, at least one bit of it wasn't volunteer work :)
john
Rob Lahaye wrote:
>
> Sorry, just a rediculous detail.
>
> "Help->About LyX...", License tab.
>
> Doesn't the LyX Team still have the license/copyrights?
Apparently there's no such legal entity as the 'LyX Team'.
I'd suggest chang
1 - 100 of 144 matches
Mail list logo
