Re: #5964: Lyx 1.6.2 much slower than 1.5.5 with long documents, even without autocompletion

2009-08-05 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
d for some reason on this system. It's perhaps due to the Intel Atom CPU or due to bad graphics card or to the configuration of the X server or due to some other reason. Sometimes switching between virtual screens takes many seconds. However, typing text on this system was never slow until I tried

Re: #5964: Lyx 1.6.2 much slower than 1.5.5 with long documents, even without autocompletion

2009-08-05 Thread Sergei Winitzki
Hi, I am using Ubuntu 9.x with Intel Atom 330 processor (quad core), 32-bit linux-2.6.28.9 with SMP, Intel Corporation 82945G/GZ Integrated Graphics Controller, 2GB RAM. LyX 1.6.2 and LyX 1.5.5 are compiled against Qt 4. LyX 1.4.4 is compiled against Qt 3 -mt. I have an impression that the

Re: bogus \lang_english markers inserted into ERT by LyX 1.6.2

2009-05-01 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2009-05-01, Paul Johnson wrote: > On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 6:30 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > wrote: >> Le 01/05/2009 08:31, Paul Johnson a écrit : >>> ... inside the LyX file, i find that  language markers \lang_english >>> are inserted in the middle of my equation. >> Can you try to find out how

Re: bogus \lang_english markers inserted into ERT by LyX 1.6.2

2009-05-01 Thread Paul Johnson
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 6:30 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 01/05/2009 08:31, Paul Johnson a écrit : >> >> I am having trouble with Noweb documents where R code is embedded in >> ERT boxes.  Characters that do not show on the screen are being >> inserted into my document.  When the Noweb proc

Re: bogus \lang_english markers inserted into ERT by LyX 1.6.2

2009-05-01 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 01/05/2009 08:31, Paul Johnson a écrit : I am having trouble with Noweb documents where R code is embedded in ERT boxes. Characters that do not show on the screen are being inserted into my document. When the Noweb processor tries to parse the code, it finds errors. On screen, for example,

bogus \lang_english markers inserted into ERT by LyX 1.6.2

2009-04-30 Thread Paul Johnson
I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 with LyX 1.6.2 and I'm having some troubles I've not had before. I am having trouble with Noweb documents where R code is embedded in ERT boxes. Characters that do not show on the screen are being inserted into my document. When the Noweb processor tries to

Re: bug: crash (doc attached) with Lyx-1.6.2.

2009-04-30 Thread Paul Johnson
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 9:44 PM, Paul Johnson wrote: I saw some discussion that the outline view is related to the crash in Lyx 1.6.2, and I noticed the outline was open when the crash happened that I reported a moment ago. I closed the outline view and produced the crash again, this time the

bug: crash (doc attached) with Lyx-1.6.2.

2009-04-30 Thread Paul Johnson
I have run into some trouble editing documents with a newly installed version of Lyx. The attached document produces crashes in lyx-1.62 on Ubuntu 9.04. The crash is reproducible. Just hold down the arrow keys for a while. You won't be able to compile this document unless you have the Sweave/R

Re: LyX 1.6.2 -- does it provide inverse search via Yap ?

2009-04-25 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 08:41:54AM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Pavel Sanda wrote: > > >> It's in the LyX/Cygwin package here: > >> ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/bin/1.6.2/lyx-1.6.2-cygwin.tar.gz > > > > i see. imho worth to add such file somewe

Re: LyX 1.6.2 -- does it provide inverse search via Yap ?

2009-04-22 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Pavel Sanda wrote: >> It's in the LyX/Cygwin package here: >> ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/bin/1.6.2/lyx-1.6.2-cygwin.tar.gz > > i see. imho worth to add such file somewere into development/. Why not in the manuals? >> I think that a button "Use src-special

Re: LyX 1.6.2 -- does it provide inverse search via Yap ?

2009-04-22 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2009-04-22, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Enrico Forestieri wrote: >> > i just asked if we can have (easily) something like View->DVI >> > (reverse) in our output formats, which will work in normal lyx >> > install, without any additional tweaks so xdvi works... >> I think that a button "Use src-specia

Re: LyX 1.6.2 -- does it provide inverse search via Yap ?

2009-04-22 Thread Pavel Sanda
Enrico Forestieri wrote: > So, the bug is about "inverse DVI search", which is now implemented (and > thus the bug should be either closed or renamed), but the last comments > are about the "forward DVI search" feature. i renamed the bug pavel

Re: LyX 1.6.2 -- does it provide inverse search via Yap ?

2009-04-22 Thread Pavel Sanda
ining everything. > > > > where is this file located? i just grepped our tree without success. > > It's in the LyX/Cygwin package here: > ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/bin/1.6.2/lyx-1.6.2-cygwin.tar.gz i see. imho worth to add such file somewere into development/. > >

Re: LyX 1.6.2 -- does it provide inverse search via Yap ?

2009-04-22 Thread Enrico Forestieri
win package, explaining everything. > > where is this file located? i just grepped our tree without success. It's in the LyX/Cygwin package here: ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/bin/1.6.2/lyx-1.6.2-cygwin.tar.gz > > > is your solution extendible for xdvi? > > > > What do

Re: LyX 1.6.2 -- does it provide inverse search via Yap ?

2009-04-22 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 11:33:18PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: > hmmm i recently studied this bug: > http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/94 > and thought this is not possible OOTB. Now that I read bug 94, I think that there's some confusion there. Inverse DVI search is already implemented in LyX. What i

Re: LyX 1.6.2 -- does it provide inverse search via Yap ?

2009-04-22 Thread Pavel Sanda
Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > > > is this version patched somehow? > > > > > > No, it works OOTB on cygwin. > > > > hmmm i recently studied this bug: > > http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/94 > > and thought this is not possible OOTB. > > I think this has always been possible OOTB with xdvi, provided

Re: LyX 1.6.2 -- does it provide inverse search via Yap ?

2009-04-22 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 11:33:18PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 06:08:12PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > > > > Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 07:27:46PM -0700, sykes wrote: > &g

Re: LyX 1.6.2 -- does it provide inverse search via Yap ?

2009-04-22 Thread Pavel Sanda
Enrico Forestieri wrote: > On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 06:08:12PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > > Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 07:27:46PM -0700, sykes wrote: > > > > > > > I'm running LyX 1.6.2 on Windows XP. I would like to

Re: LyX 1.6.2 -- does it provide inverse search via Yap ?

2009-04-22 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 06:08:12PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 07:27:46PM -0700, sykes wrote: > > > > > I'm running LyX 1.6.2 on Windows XP. I would like to perform inverse > > > searches from Yap ba

Re: LyX 1.6.2 -- does it provide inverse search via Yap ?

2009-04-22 Thread Pavel Sanda
Enrico Forestieri wrote: > On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 07:27:46PM -0700, sykes wrote: > > > I'm running LyX 1.6.2 on Windows XP. I would like to perform inverse > > searches from Yap back to the actual line in LyX. Is this possible? > > This is possible only with t

Re: LyX 1.6.2 -- svn on Windows

2009-04-22 Thread Paul A. Rubin
sykes wrote: hi, I'm running LyX 1.6.2 on Windows XP. I use the Tortoise SVN client for subversion. I'm getting an error when I try to commit from within LyX: "Some problem occured while running the command: 'svn commit -m " ... " I'm assuming I ne

Re: LyX 1.6.2 -- does it provide inverse search via Yap ?

2009-04-22 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 07:27:46PM -0700, sykes wrote: > I'm running LyX 1.6.2 on Windows XP. I would like to perform inverse > searches from Yap back to the actual line in LyX. Is this possible? This is possible only with the cygwin version of LyX. -- Enrico

LyX 1.6.2 -- svn on Windows

2009-04-21 Thread sykes
hi, I'm running LyX 1.6.2 on Windows XP. I use the Tortoise SVN client for subversion. I'm getting an error when I try to commit from within LyX: "Some problem occured while running the command: 'svn commit -m " ... " I'm assuming I need a command l

LyX 1.6.2 -- does it provide inverse search via Yap ?

2009-04-21 Thread sykes
hi, I'm running LyX 1.6.2 on Windows XP. I would like to perform inverse searches from Yap back to the actual line in LyX. Is this possible? Also, is there a better viewer than Yap that people could suggest? Thanks, Ed Sykes -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.co

Re: LyX 1.6.2: possible performance issue inside master document

2009-03-26 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Georg Baum wrote: Abdelrazak Younes wrote: I agree that we need two comparison methods. I am not sure though that the operator==() should be lighter one. I 'd rather look at the all the cases where it is used and replace them on a case by case with equivalent() or isSimilarTo() as I suggeste

Re: LyX 1.6.2: possible performance issue inside master document

2009-03-25 Thread Georg Baum
Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > I agree that we need two comparison methods. I am not sure though that > the operator==() should be lighter one. I 'd rather look at the all the > cases where it is used and replace them on a case by case with > equivalent() or isSimilarTo() as I suggested earlier. I fea

Re: LyX 1.6.2: possible performance issue inside master document

2009-03-25 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Andre Poenitz wrote: On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 08:02:12AM -0400, rgheck wrote: I had a similar concern. Just changing the semantics of operator== seems dangerous. But another option would be, short term, to replace it by two methods, get things working again, and then make one of them back i

Re: LyX 1.6.2: possible performance issue inside master document

2009-03-24 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 08:02:12AM -0400, rgheck wrote: > I had a similar concern. Just changing the semantics of operator== seems > dangerous. But another option would be, short term, to replace it by two > methods, get things working again, and then make one of them back into > operator==.

Re: LyX 1.6.2: possible performance issue inside master document

2009-03-24 Thread rgheck
Abdelrazak Younes wrote: Hi Georg, Georg Baum wrote: Even if you ignore the InsetInclude problem for a moment, there will be more performance problems caused by the current FileName implementation. The reason is simple: FileName once was a lightweight wrapper around a string, and it is still

Re: LyX 1.6.2: possible performance issue inside master document

2009-03-24 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Hi Georg, Georg Baum wrote: Even if you ignore the InsetInclude problem for a moment, there will be more performance problems caused by the current FileName implementation. The reason is simple: FileName once was a lightweight wrapper around a string, and it is still used in many places like tha

RE: Re: LyX 1.6.2: possible performance issue inside master document

2009-03-23 Thread Georg Baum
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote: >>Yes, that is the case I am aware of. I just tried, and the patch > ensures >>that you cannot open two buffers in that case. Note that there is still >>a bug in setting path.d->name in FileName::onlyPath(), this needs to be >>set from path.d->fi, not d->fi. >

RE: Re: LyX 1.6.2: possible performance issue inside master document

2009-03-22 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW
>> I could be wrong, but I think so, yes. The problem is that an absolute >> filename isn't the same as a canonical filename, i.e., one with >> symlinks etc resolved. We don't want to open /home/me/file.lyx and >> /tmp/file.lyx in different buffers if, in fact, they are the same file. > >Yes, th

Re: LyX 1.6.2: possible performance issue inside master document

2009-03-22 Thread Georg Baum
rgheck wrote: > Georg Baum wrote: >> rgheck wrote: >> >>> Unfortunately, the case where equivalence() is needed is one of the >>> cases causing the performance problems. >>> >> >> Honest question: Really? >> >> > I could be wrong, but I think so, yes. The problem is that an absolute > file

Re: LyX 1.6.2: possible performance issue inside master document

2009-03-22 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 01:48:39PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote: > Apart from the performance changes, the patch corrects the following issues: I can confirm that this patch solves the slowness problem with child documents (I only checked it on Solaris). Well spotted Georg! -- Enrico

Re: LyX 1.6.2: possible performance issue inside master document

2009-03-22 Thread rgheck
Georg Baum wrote: rgheck wrote: Georg Baum wrote: I believe that the performance problems could be solved quite easily by basing FileName::operator==() on simple string comparison again and implenting an equivalence() method that is used only when needed. Unfortunately, the

Re: LyX 1.6.2: possible performance issue inside master document

2009-03-22 Thread Georg Baum
rgheck wrote: > Georg Baum wrote: >> I believe that the performance problems could be solved quite easily by >> basing FileName::operator==() on simple string comparison again and >> implenting an equivalence() method that is used only when needed. >> >> > Unfortunately, the case where equivale

Re: LyX 1.6.2: possible performance issue inside master document

2009-03-21 Thread rgheck
Georg Baum wrote: I believe that the performance problems could be solved quite easily by basing FileName::operator==() on simple string comparison again and implenting an equivalence() method that is used only when needed. Unfortunately, the case where equivalence() is needed is one of the

RE: LyX 1.6.2: possible performance issue inside master document

2009-03-20 Thread Georg Baum
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote: >>> Do we need a new class that we use internally. In this class we store > >>> a filename, which is case-sensitive on case-sensitive filesystem, > that >>> is guaranteed to be a long filename and not a short one (on Windows), > >>> that is not a symlink, that

Re: LyX 1.6.2: possible performance issue inside master document

2009-03-20 Thread rgheck
Helge Hafting wrote: rgheck wrote: Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote: Maybe it's already clear, Yes, I understand now. How do we solve it then ? Do we need a new class that we use internally. In this class we store a filename, which is case-sensitive on case-sensitive filesystem, t

RE: LyX 1.6.2: possible performance issue inside master document

2009-03-20 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW
>Seems excessive indeed. Ideally, typing text should be fine >even with a "sleep(1)" in every filesystem interface. Just a >slight stop whenever the emergency save happens. That's why I now use a test document that I access via WebDav. It is very rewarding to see the speed up then. >Helge Hafti

Re: LyX 1.6.2: possible performance issue inside master document

2009-03-20 Thread Helge Hafting
rgheck wrote: Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote: Maybe it's already clear, Yes, I understand now. How do we solve it then ? Do we need a new class that we use internally. In this class we store a filename, which is case-sensitive on case-sensitive filesystem, that is guaranteed to b

Re: LyX 1.6.2: possible performance issue inside master document

2009-03-20 Thread pseudo2009
Hi all, I'm not familar with the coding of LyX in any case - and so don't misinterpret my comment as any kind of paternalism. LyX is a worthy successor of SciWord, open source, and full of excellent ideas and work. I have the same suspicion as Vincent: Each user input inside the master(not onl

RE: LyX 1.6.2: possible performance issue inside master document

2009-03-19 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW
>> Do we need a new class that we use internally. In this class we store >> a filename, which is case-sensitive on case-sensitive filesystem, that >> is guaranteed to be a long filename and not a short one (on Windows), >> that is not a symlink, that is relative or absolute (pick one or both). >

Re: LyX 1.6.2: possible performance issue inside master document

2009-03-19 Thread rgheck
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote: Maybe it's already clear, Yes, I understand now. How do we solve it then ? Do we need a new class that we use internally. In this class we store a filename, which is case-sensitive on case-sensitive filesystem, that is guaranteed to be a long file

RE: LyX 1.6.2: possible performance issue inside master document

2009-03-19 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW
> Maybe it's already clear, Yes, I understand now. How do we solve it then ? Do we need a new class that we use internally. In this class we store a filename, which is case-sensitive on case-sensitive filesystem, that is guaranteed to be a long filename and not a short one (on Windows), that

Re: LyX 1.6.2: possible performance issue inside master document

2009-03-19 Thread rgheck
The previous == and != checks had just been against the file NAMES, which meant you could get file1 != file2, >if the names were symlinks pointing to the same file, and names with different capatalizations would be seen >as different on Windows, VFAT, etc. So Abdel changed it to call QFileInfo::

RE: LyX 1.6.2: possible performance issue inside master document

2009-03-19 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW
-Original Message- From: rgheck [mailto:rgh...@bobjweil.com] Sent: donderdag 19 maart 2009 20:46 To: Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW Cc: lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org Subject: Re: LyX 1.6.2: possible performance issue inside master document Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote: > >

Re: LyX 1.6.2: possible performance issue inside master document

2009-03-19 Thread rgheck
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote: So, if there are four filesystem-checks in Linux, there are at least six on Windows and maybe the compiler does something smart when os::internal_path does nothing. That would make it worse. But enough worse that I see nothing here? Is networ

Re: LyX 1.6.2: possible performance issue inside master document

2009-03-19 Thread rgheck
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote: rgheck wrote: By the way, can you remember what problem Bennet had which made you adding the lhs.refresh() and rhs.refresh() lines to FileName::operator==(). This solution looks a bit like "Abdel's hammer". Not right now, no, thou

RE: LyX 1.6.2: possible performance issue inside master document

2009-03-19 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW
>> So, if there are four filesystem-checks in Linux, there are at least >> six on Windows and maybe the compiler does something smart when >> os::internal_path does nothing. >> >> >That would make it worse. But enough worse that I see nothing >here? Is network file system performance much >s

RE: LyX 1.6.2: possible performance issue inside master document

2009-03-19 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW
rgheck wrote: >>> By the way, can you remember what problem Bennet had which made you >>> adding the lhs.refresh() and rhs.refresh() lines to >>> FileName::operator==(). This solution looks a bit like "Abdel's hammer". >>> >>> >> Not right now, no, though it's probably on the list somewhere.

Re: LyX 1.6.2: possible performance issue inside master document

2009-03-19 Thread rgheck
rgheck wrote: By the way, can you remember what problem Bennet had which made you adding the lhs.refresh() and rhs.refresh() lines to FileName::operator==(). This solution looks a bit like "Abdel's hammer". Not right now, no, though it's probably on the list somewhere. But I think the proble

Re: LyX 1.6.2: possible performance issue inside master document

2009-03-19 Thread rgheck
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote: As a data point, I don't see any slowdown in Linux, using latest branch and Qt 4.4.3, under Fedora 8. UNLESS I open the View Source window, when (unsurprisingly) I do. Same result if I put the files on a network drive. Is it possible that LaTeX is being genera

RE: LyX 1.6.2: possible performance issue inside master document

2009-03-19 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW
>As a data point, I don't see any slowdown in Linux, using latest >branch and Qt 4.4.3, under Fedora 8. UNLESS I open the View Source >window, when (unsurprisingly) I do. Same result if I put the files >on a network drive. > >Is it possible that LaTeX is being generated, even though the window >

Re: LyX 1.6.2: possible performance issue inside master document

2009-03-19 Thread harald pchler
Well list didn't accept the large files. Now with small ones. Slowness is the same. Thanks, Zardoz Original-Nachricht > Datum: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 12:31:59 -0400 > Von: rgheck > An: pseudo2...@gmx.at > CC: lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org > Betreff: Re: LyX 1.6.2: p

Re: LyX 1.6.2: possible performance issue inside master document

2009-03-19 Thread rgheck
pseudo2...@gmx.at wrote: Well, my attached zip-file has been rejected. I try the lyx-files. An no, the latex "view source" window is not open. OK, thanks. As a data point, I don't see any slowdown in Linux, using latest branch and Qt 4.4.3, under Fedora 8. UNLESS I open the View Source wi

Re: LyX 1.6.2: possible performance issue inside master document

2009-03-19 Thread rgheck
pseudo2...@gmx.at wrote: I've created some testdocument that reproduces the behaviour (where can files be uploaded?). Just attach it. rh

Re: LyX 1.6.2: possible performance issue inside master document

2009-03-19 Thread pseudo2009
> If you are able to send me a test document (maybe privately) I'll have a > look. Even better: put it in a new bugzilla entry. > I've created some testdocument that reproduces the behaviour (where can files be uploaded?). (WinXP) -> 1.6.1 (AltInstaller or Classic same behaviour): slow down in

Re: LyX 1.6.2: possible performance issue inside master document

2009-03-19 Thread Guenter Milde
r Debian? Or because many people are editing the master less frequently than its children? I see a slower response in a master than in a child also under Linux. (Debian/testing, LyX 1.6.2-svn). It is still usable but annoying. Maybe it gets worse with auto-completion (which I turned off for performance resons). Günter

Re: LyX 1.6.2: possible performance issue inside master document

2009-03-18 Thread pseudo2009
Well, I'll keep the traffic to the devel-list. > I wish I had some idea why this is happening only on certain platforms. > Or is it only on certain platforms? I've not seen reports of this > behavior under Linux, but maybe there are people with similar problems. > > Have there been other change

Re: LyX 1.6.2: possible performance issue inside master document

2009-03-18 Thread Richard Heck
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote: I wish I had some idea why this is happening only on certain platforms. Or is it only on certain platforms? I've not seen reports of this behavior under Linux, but maybe there are people with similar problems. Have there been other changes to the Windows or Ma

RE: LyX 1.6.2: possible performance issue inside master document

2009-03-18 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW
>I wish I had some idea why this is happening only on >certain platforms. Or is it only on certain platforms? >I've not seen reports of this behavior under Linux, but >maybe there are people with similar problems. > >Have there been other changes to the Windows or Mac distributions from >1.6.1 to 1

Re: LyX 1.6.2: possible performance issue inside master document

2009-03-18 Thread Richard Heck
pseudo2...@gmx.at wrote: Child document opened alone or together with its parent? Performance inside the child document is much better. Only the master is concerned. It does not matter whether the master is opened or not. It even does not make any difference if the master or the child is

Re: LyX 1.6.2: possible performance issue inside master document

2009-03-18 Thread pseudo2009
Hi all, thank Abdelrazak Younes for the prompt answer. so I'm not the only one (see users list: Lyx 1.6.2 unusably slow on the Mac) > Child document opened alone or together with its parent? Performance inside the child document is much better. Only the master is concerned. It

Re: LyX 1.6.2

2009-03-17 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote: > Any sign of life from Joost yet ? no. Jürgen

RE: LyX 1.6.2

2009-03-17 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW
Any sign of life from Joost yet ? Vincent

Re: LyX 1.6.2: possible performance issue inside master document

2009-03-17 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
pseudo2...@gmx.at wrote: Hi all, has anybody noticed some performance issues while editing inside a master document that includes a number (say about 5 or more) of long child docs. The same large document caused no problems in LyX 1.5.6 indication: cursor movement is annoyingly slow, fast typ

LyX 1.6.2: possible performance issue inside master document

2009-03-17 Thread pseudo2009
Hi all, has anybody noticed some performance issues while editing inside a master document that includes a number (say about 5 or more) of long child docs. The same large document caused no problems in LyX 1.5.6 indication: cursor movement is annoyingly slow, fast typing on keyboard-> you can

Re: LyX 1.6.2

2009-03-16 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > They just fixed the problem. Thanks, I reset the links. Jürgen

Re: LyX 1.6.2

2009-03-15 Thread John McCabe-Dansted
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 11:16 PM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > LyX 1.6.2 is here: > ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable FYI, I have put up binaries for the Eeepc 701. http://www.ucc.asn.au/~mccabedj/eeepc/lyx-1.5.7-eeepc.tar.bz2 http://www.ucc.asn.au/~mccabedj/eeepc/lyx-1.6.2-eeepc.t

Re: LyX 1.6.2

2009-03-15 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 15 mars 09 à 13:21, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit : Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: I just sent a message to the ftp admins. Thanks. They just fixed the problem. JMarc

Re: LyX 1.6.2

2009-03-15 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 12:13:49PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > On 15/03/2009 11:59, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: >> Sven Hoexter wrote: >> >>> Now I just need to meet you to verify your key or find a trustpath to >>> you. :) Hm no sigs on the key. Bad. But fair enough for the moment. >>>

Re: LyX 1.6.2

2009-03-15 Thread BH
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 2:02 PM, Anders Ekberg wrote: > On 15 mar 2009, at 16.56, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > >> BH wrote: >>> >>> The new version is now at: >>> >>> http://edisk.fandm.edu/bennett.helm/lyx/LyX-1.6.2.1-Mac-Universal.dmg >> >> It's online. > > Updated on http://www.apple.com/downloa

Re: LyX 1.6.2

2009-03-15 Thread BH
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > BH wrote: >> The new version is now at: >> >> http://edisk.fandm.edu/bennett.helm/lyx/LyX-1.6.2.1-Mac-Universal.dmg > > It's online. > > Jürgen > Thanks. Bennett

Re: LyX 1.6.2

2009-03-15 Thread Anders Ekberg
On 15 mar 2009, at 16.56, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: BH wrote: The new version is now at: http://edisk.fandm.edu/bennett.helm/lyx/LyX-1.6.2.1-Mac-Universal.dmg It's online. Updated on http://www.apple.com/downloads/macosx/ It should show up in a day or two. /Anders

Re: LyX 1.6.2

2009-03-15 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
BH wrote: > The new version is now at: > > http://edisk.fandm.edu/bennett.helm/lyx/LyX-1.6.2.1-Mac-Universal.dmg It's online. Jürgen

Re: LyX 1.6.2

2009-03-15 Thread BH
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 9:44 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > BH wrote: >> Can you remove the Mac binary for now? Uwe correctly identified that >> problems I was having with typesetting the User's Guide are the result >> of using Qt-4.5, and I'm currently recompiling with Qt-4.4. I'll post >> a new

Re: LyX 1.6.2

2009-03-15 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
BH wrote: > Can you remove the Mac binary for now? Uwe correctly identified that > problems I was having with typesetting the User's Guide are the result > of using Qt-4.5, and I'm currently recompiling with Qt-4.4. I'll post > a new binary shortly. OK. (I wouldn't have recommended Qt 4.5 for the

Re: LyX 1.6.2

2009-03-15 Thread BH
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 7:31 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > BH wrote: >> I've put the Mac universal binary here: >> >> http://edisk.fandm.edu/bennett.helm/lyx/LyX-1.6.2-Mac-Universal.dmg >> >> Could you upload it to the server? >> >> ... And tha

Re: LyX 1.6.2

2009-03-15 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > But, that's probably because you don't have an installer from Joost yet.. exactly :-) Jürgen

[ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.6.2 is released

2009-03-15 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Public release of LyX version 1.6.2 === We are pleased to announce the release of LyX 1.6.2. This is the second maintenance release in the 1.6.x series. The release fixes a large number of major and critical bugs that were reported by users of LyX 1.6.0 and 1.6.1

Re: LyX 1.6.2

2009-03-15 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Vincent van Ravesteijn schreef: Jürgen Spitzmüller schreef: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: I just sent a message to the ftp admins. Thanks. Note that the access via http just works. We can use that as URLs. Ah, excellent. Then I use that for the time being. Jürgen Please not

Re: LyX 1.6.2

2009-03-15 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Jürgen Spitzmüller schreef: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: I just sent a message to the ftp admins. Thanks. Note that the access via http just works. We can use that as URLs. Ah, excellent. Then I use that for the time being. Jürgen Please note that in section 2.1 of http:

Re: LyX 1.6.2

2009-03-15 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > I just sent a message to the ftp admins. Thanks. > Note that the access via http > just works. We can use that as URLs. Ah, excellent. Then I use that for the time being. Jürgen

Re: LyX 1.6.2

2009-03-15 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Jürgen Spitzmüller writes: > Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: >> But you did put it on the website ? > > Yes. I only realized that afterwards. I just sent a message to the ftp admins. Note that the access via http just works. We can use that as URLs. JMarc

Re: LyX 1.6.2

2009-03-15 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > But you did put it on the website ? Yes. I only realized that afterwards. Jürgen

Re: LyX 1.6.2

2009-03-15 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Jürgen Spitzmüller schreef: BH wrote: I've put the Mac universal binary here: http://edisk.fandm.edu/bennett.helm/lyx/LyX-1.6.2-Mac-Universal.dmg Could you upload it to the server? ... And thank you for your patience! Thanks, Bennett, Uwe and Enrico, your binaries are o

Re: LyX 1.6.2

2009-03-15 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
BH wrote: > I've put the Mac universal binary here: > > http://edisk.fandm.edu/bennett.helm/lyx/LyX-1.6.2-Mac-Universal.dmg > > Could you upload it to the server? > > ... And thank you for your patience! Thanks, Bennett, Uwe and Enrico, your binaries are on the server o

Re: LyX 1.6.2

2009-03-15 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
On 15/03/2009 11:59, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Sven Hoexter wrote: Now I just need to meet you to verify your key or find a trustpath to you. :) Hm no sigs on the key. Bad. But fair enough for the moment. Just tell me if there's anything I can do to make it more trustworthy. You

Re: LyX 1.6.2

2009-03-15 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Sven Hoexter wrote: > Now I just need to meet you to verify your key or find a trustpath to > you. :) Hm no sigs on the key. Bad. But fair enough for the moment. Just tell me if there's anything I can do to make it more trustworthy. Jürgen

Re: LyX 1.6.2

2009-03-14 Thread Uwe Stöhr
> LyX 1.6.2 is here: I've uploaded the alternative Windows installer here: http://developer.berlios.de/project/showfiles.php?group_id=5117&release_id=15926 Can you please put it to ftp.lyx.org? thanks and regards Uwe

Re: LyX 1.6.2

2009-03-14 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 03:16:24PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > LyX 1.6.2 is here: > ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable Please, find a cygwin binary here: http://www.lyx.org/~forenr/lyx-1.6.2-cygwin.tar.gz -- Enrico

Re: LyX 1.6.2

2009-03-14 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 05:20:06PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Sven Hoexter wrote: > > Is it possible to post the sha-/md5sum for the tarball on your > > system? > > I intend to post the attached signatures on ftp.lyx.org. Would that be > sufficient? Sure. Thanks. Now I just need to meet

Re: LyX 1.6.2

2009-03-14 Thread BH
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > LyX 1.6.2 is here: > ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable > > As usual, I will wait a bit with the announce, to give the packagers the time > to set up the binaries. I hope ftp.lyx.org will be back until then (I can

Re: LyX 1.6.2

2009-03-14 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Sven Hoexter wrote: > Is it possible to post the sha-/md5sum for the tarball on your > system? I intend to post the attached signatures on ftp.lyx.org. Would that be sufficient? Jürgen lyx-1.6.2.tar.gz.sig Description: PGP signature lyx-1.6.2.tar.bz2.sig Description: PGP signature

Re: LyX 1.6.2

2009-03-14 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 03:16:24PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Hi Juergen, > LyX 1.6.2 is here: > ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable Is it possible to post the sha-/md5sum for the tarball on your system? Sven -- If God passed a mic to me to speak I'd say stay in bed, wor

LyX 1.6.2

2009-03-14 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
LyX 1.6.2 is here: ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable As usual, I will wait a bit with the announce, to give the packagers the time to set up the binaries. I hope ftp.lyx.org will be back until then (I can log into the server, but I cannot upload anything). Thanks everybody for testing

Re: LyX 1.6.2 release candidate

2009-03-14 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > I've committed the two fixes for Qt4.5. thanks. > Are we set now or are there still more issues open ? no, we are ready now. I'll set up the final tarball now. > By the way, note that ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx is still not available, so > before releasing 1.6.2, we'll

Re: LyX 1.6.2 release candidate

2009-03-14 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Jürgen Spitzmüller schreef: The test tarball is available here: http://www.lyx.org/~spitz/lyx-1.6.2rc1.tar.gz If no regressions are reported, this will become LyX 1.6.2. Please test. Meanwhile, branch remains frozen until the freeze lift is announced (probably end of next week). Thanks

Re: LyX 1.6.2 release candidate

2009-03-09 Thread rgheck
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: (I wonder, however, why no one noticed earlier; am I the only one who uses branch for daily work?) I always do, but I've had so much administrative stuff to do that that kind of daily work hasn't been happening of late rh

  1   2   >