Re: LyX on OS X 10.9

Le 04/03/2014 22:40, Georg Baum a écrit : Stephan Witt wrote: In principle you're right. But I've never seen LyX on X11 OSX. I'm not sure what this is - X11 OSX. Perhaps a Darwin application running with X11 server like old Gimp versions. Exactly. I have to admit that it is years ago since I

Re: LyX on OS X 10.9

Le 04/03/2014 22:40, Georg Baum a écrit : Stephan Witt wrote: In principle you're right. But I've never seen LyX on X11 OSX. I'm not sure what this is - X11 OSX. Perhaps a Darwin application running with X11 server like old Gimp versions. Exactly. I have to admit that it is years ago since I

Re: LyX on OS X 10.9

Am 08.03.2014 um 22:54 schrieb Benjamin Piwowarski bpiwo...@lyx.org: I mean why it crashes when not creating a new view before displaying the preferences or about dialogs (even with QT4). I didn't try that. The rule is simple: When GuiApplication::getStatus() returns ok (aka. enables the

Re: LyX on OS X 10.9

Am 08.03.2014 um 22:54 schrieb Benjamin Piwowarski : > I mean why it crashes when not creating a new view before displaying the > preferences or about dialogs (even with QT4). I didn't try that. The rule is simple: When GuiApplication::getStatus() returns ok (aka. enables the

Re: LyX on OS X 10.9

Am 08.03.2014 um 08:21 schrieb Benjamin Piwowarski bpiwo...@lyx.org: I agree with Stephan, no need to continue on qt5 for LyX2.1. The last .dmg seems to work - only one minor issue: the about and preferences menu items are not working (they are enabled, but do nothing) when all the

Re: LyX on OS X 10.9

The last .dmg seems to work - only one minor issue: the about and preferences menu items are not working (they are enabled, but do nothing) when all the windows are closed. Thank you. I've commit this changes now. Sorry, I forgot to mention your work on ticket 8925 solution. The about and

Re: LyX on OS X 10.9

Am 08.03.2014 um 14:37 schrieb Benjamin Piwowarski bpiwo...@lyx.org: The last .dmg seems to work - only one minor issue: the about and preferences menu items are not working (they are enabled, but do nothing) when all the windows are closed. Thank you. I've commit this changes now.

Re: LyX on OS X 10.9

I mean why it crashes when not creating a new view before displaying the preferences or about dialogs (even with QT4). Benjamin On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 9:56 PM, Stephan Witt st.w...@gmx.net wrote: Am 08.03.2014 um 14:37 schrieb Benjamin Piwowarski bpiwo...@lyx.org: The last .dmg seems to

Re: LyX on OS X 10.9

Am 08.03.2014 um 08:21 schrieb Benjamin Piwowarski : > I agree with Stephan, no need to continue on qt5 for LyX2.1. > > The last .dmg seems to work - only one minor issue: the about and preferences > menu items are not working (they are enabled, but do nothing) when all the >

Re: LyX on OS X 10.9

> The last .dmg seems to work - only one minor issue: the about and preferences menu items are not working (they are enabled, but do nothing) when all the windows are closed. > > Thank you. I've commit this changes now. > Sorry, I forgot to mention your work on ticket 8925 solution. > The about

Re: LyX on OS X 10.9

Am 08.03.2014 um 14:37 schrieb Benjamin Piwowarski : > > The last .dmg seems to work - only one minor issue: the about and > > preferences menu items are not working (they are enabled, but do nothing) > > when all the windows are closed. > > Thank you. I've commit this

Re: LyX on OS X 10.9

I mean why it crashes when not creating a new view before displaying the preferences or about dialogs (even with QT4). Benjamin On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 9:56 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: > > Am 08.03.2014 um 14:37 schrieb Benjamin Piwowarski : > > > > The last .dmg

Re: LyX on OS X 10.9

Am 05.03.2014 um 21:56 schrieb Georg Baum georg.b...@post.rwth-aachen.de: Stephan Witt wrote: But this isn't a low hanging fruit. IMO, Qt-5.x changed too much. It crashed on exit with Qt-5.x when closing the document window before. Given this + the fact that Qt4.x works now fine for

Re: LyX on OS X 10.9

Am 05.03.2014 um 21:56 schrieb Georg Baum georg.b...@post.rwth-aachen.de: Stephan Witt wrote: But this isn't a low hanging fruit. IMO, Qt-5.x changed too much. It crashed on exit with Qt-5.x when closing the document window before. Given this + the fact that Qt4.x works now fine for

Re: LyX on OS X 10.9

Stephan Witt wrote: Am 05.03.2014 um 21:56 schrieb Georg Baum georg.b...@post.rwth-aachen.de: Given this + the fact that Qt4.x works now fine for Benjamin I'd say we should stop here and continue with the Qt5 stuff for 2.2. Ok, but the LyX Benjamin is testing contains his patches. I

Re: LyX on OS X 10.9

I agree with Stephan, no need to continue on qt5 for LyX2.1. The last .dmg seems to work - only one minor issue: the about and preferences menu items are not working (they are enabled, but do nothing) when all the windows are closed. Benjamin On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 11:10 PM, Georg Baum

Re: LyX on OS X 10.9

Am 05.03.2014 um 21:56 schrieb Georg Baum : > Stephan Witt wrote: > >> But this isn't a low hanging fruit. IMO, Qt-5.x changed too much. >> It crashed on exit with Qt-5.x when closing the document window before. > > Given this + the fact that Qt4.x works now fine

Re: LyX on OS X 10.9

Am 05.03.2014 um 21:56 schrieb Georg Baum : > Stephan Witt wrote: > >> But this isn't a low hanging fruit. IMO, Qt-5.x changed too much. >> It crashed on exit with Qt-5.x when closing the document window before. > > Given this + the fact that Qt4.x works now fine

Re: LyX on OS X 10.9

Stephan Witt wrote: > Am 05.03.2014 um 21:56 schrieb Georg Baum > : > >> Given this + the fact that Qt4.x works now fine for Benjamin I'd say we >> should stop here and continue with the Qt5 stuff for 2.2. > > Ok, but the LyX Benjamin is testing contains his

Re: LyX on OS X 10.9

I agree with Stephan, no need to continue on qt5 for LyX2.1. The last .dmg seems to work - only one minor issue: the about and preferences menu items are not working (they are enabled, but do nothing) when all the windows are closed. Benjamin On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 11:10 PM, Georg Baum

Re: LyX on OS X 10.9

Stephan Witt wrote: But this isn't a low hanging fruit. IMO, Qt-5.x changed too much. It crashed on exit with Qt-5.x when closing the document window before. Given this + the fact that Qt4.x works now fine for Benjamin I'd say we should stop here and continue with the Qt5 stuff for 2.2. I

Re: LyX on OS X 10.9

Stephan Witt wrote: > But this isn't a low hanging fruit. IMO, Qt-5.x changed too much. > It crashed on exit with Qt-5.x when closing the document window before. Given this + the fact that Qt4.x works now fine for Benjamin I'd say we should stop here and continue with the Qt5 stuff for 2.2. I

Re: LyX on OS X 10.9

Am 03.03.2014 um 21:23 schrieb Georg Baum georg.b...@post.rwth-aachen.de: Stephan Witt wrote: I'll attach my current diff improving your patches to make LyX ready for using Qt5 frameworks. I had to take care for missing QPA modules in Qt-5.0 and Qt-5.1 and added to auto tools support. If

Re: LyX on OS X 10.9

Stephan Witt wrote: In principle you're right. But I've never seen LyX on X11 OSX. I'm not sure what this is - X11 OSX. Perhaps a Darwin application running with X11 server like old Gimp versions. Exactly. I have to admit that it is years ago since I saw an OS X with X server (and it was on

Re: LyX on OS X 10.9

a version which build easily with qt5. no rush - reading some mails in the mailing list, I thought this was the only way to get LyX 2.1 on OS X 10.9, but the built with qt4 works perfectly (used for 2 days without any trouble). However, I feel that defining macros for LyX with a proper semantic would

Re: LyX on OS X 10.9

Am 04.03.2014 um 22:40 schrieb Georg Baum georg.b...@post.rwth-aachen.de: Stephan Witt wrote: In principle you're right. But I've never seen LyX on X11 OSX. I'm not sure what this is - X11 OSX. Perhaps a Darwin application running with X11 server like old Gimp versions. Exactly. I have

Re: LyX on OS X 10.9

Am 03.03.2014 um 21:23 schrieb Georg Baum : > Stephan Witt wrote: > >> I'll attach my current diff improving your patches to make LyX ready for >> using Qt5 frameworks. I had to take care for missing QPA modules in Qt-5.0 >> and Qt-5.1 and added to auto tools

Re: LyX on OS X 10.9

Stephan Witt wrote: > In principle you're right. But I've never seen LyX on X11 OSX. I'm not > sure what this is - X11 OSX. Perhaps a Darwin application running with X11 > server like old Gimp versions. Exactly. I have to admit that it is years ago since I saw an OS X with X server (and it was

Re: LyX on OS X 10.9

sting is strong. >> >> Should I try this? > > I think that would be great. Since Benjamin helped so nicely with bug fixing > I think he deserves a version which build easily with qt5. no rush - reading some mails in the mailing list, I thought this was the only way to get L

Re: LyX on OS X 10.9

Am 04.03.2014 um 22:40 schrieb Georg Baum : > Stephan Witt wrote: > >> In principle you're right. But I've never seen LyX on X11 OSX. I'm not >> sure what this is - X11 OSX. Perhaps a Darwin application running with X11 >> server like old Gimp versions. > >

Re: LyX on OS X 10.9

Stephan Witt wrote: I'll attach my current diff improving your patches to make LyX ready for using Qt5 frameworks. I had to take care for missing QPA modules in Qt-5.0 and Qt-5.1 and added to auto tools support. If no one objects I'll commit this as it works with 4.8.5. The menu issues can

Re: LyX on OS X 10.9

Stephan Witt wrote: > I'll attach my current diff improving your patches to make LyX ready for > using Qt5 frameworks. I had to take care for missing QPA modules in Qt-5.0 > and Qt-5.1 and added to auto tools support. > > If no one objects I'll commit this as it works with 4.8.5. The menu issues

Re: LyX on OS X 10.9

It seems that it would be better to have LyX macros handling the following cases: - QT + OS X = LYX_QT_OSX - QT5 + OS X = LYX_QT5_OSX - QT4 + OS X = LYX_QT4_OSX - QT4 + OS X + COCOA = LYX_QT_OSX_COCOA - QT4 + OS X + X11 = LYX_QT_OSX_X11 this would make the code more readable and

Re: LyX on OS X 10.9

Stephan, The qt4 build is working fine on OS X 10.9 (did some basic checks). No problems with menus, no crash.The qt5 has still troubles with menus (when closing the main window, they completely disappear) but otherwise seems to work fine - but it does not crash. Stephan, could you try to

Re: LyX on OS X 10.9

Am 02.03.2014 um 09:03 schrieb Benjamin Piwowarski benjamin.piwowar...@gmail.com: It seems that it would be better to have LyX macros handling the following cases: - QT + OS X = LYX_QT_OSX - QT5 + OS X = LYX_QT5_OSX - QT4 + OS X = LYX_QT4_OSX - QT4 + OS X + COCOA = LYX_QT_OSX_COCOA -

Re: LyX on OS X 10.9

Am 02.03.2014 um 09:16 schrieb Benjamin Piwowarski benjamin.piwowar...@gmail.com: Stephan, The qt4 build is working fine on OS X 10.9 (did some basic checks). No problems with menus, no crash.The qt5 has still troubles with menus (when closing the main window, they completely disappear)

Re: LyX on OS X 10.9

>> >> It seems that it would be better to have LyX macros handling the following >> cases: >> - QT + OS X => LYX_QT_OSX >> - QT5 + OS X => LYX_QT5_OSX >> - QT4 + OS X => LYX_QT4_OSX >> - QT4 + OS X + COCOA => LYX_QT_OSX_COCOA >> - QT4 + OS X + X11 => LYX_QT_OSX_X11 >> >> this would make the

Re: LyX on OS X 10.9

Stephan, The qt4 build is working fine on OS X 10.9 (did some basic checks). No problems with menus, no crash.The qt5 has still troubles with menus (when closing the main window, they completely disappear) but otherwise seems to work fine - but it does not crash. Stephan, could you try to

Re: LyX on OS X 10.9

Am 02.03.2014 um 09:03 schrieb Benjamin Piwowarski : >>> >>> It seems that it would be better to have LyX macros handling the following >>> cases: >>> - QT + OS X => LYX_QT_OSX >>> - QT5 + OS X => LYX_QT5_OSX >>> - QT4 + OS X => LYX_QT4_OSX >>> - QT4 + OS X +

Re: LyX on OS X 10.9

Am 02.03.2014 um 09:16 schrieb Benjamin Piwowarski : > Stephan, > > The qt4 build is working fine on OS X 10.9 (did some basic checks). No > problems with menus, no crash.The qt5 has still troubles with menus (when > closing the main window, they completely

Re: LyX on OS X 10.9

Am Freitag 28 Februar 2014, 23:01:37 schrieb Georg Baum: Also, the qt sources themselves still use the Q_WS macros, although I could not find any place where they are defined. Is that simply broken code? I can't believe. This is intentional, apparently:

Re: LyX on OS X 10.9

Here is a patch following this strategy, and an update patch for bug #8925 - http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/8925 Benjamin 0006-Qt5-support-for-Mac.patch Description: Binary data 0007-Fix-bug-8925-menubar-not-displayed-in-Mac-OS-10.9.patch Description: Binary data On 28 Feb 2014, at

Re: LyX on OS X 10.9

Am Samstag, 1. März 2014 um 11:27:05, schrieb Benjamin Piwowarski benjamin.piwowar...@lip6.fr Here is a patch following this strategy, and an update patch for bug #8925 - http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/8925 Benjamin 0006-Qt5-support-for-Mac.patch

Re: LyX on OS X 10.9

Kornel, the LYX_QT_... are defined in qt_platforms.h in the qt4 directory (patch 6). The patch 7 has been updated and depends on patch 6. Benjamin On 01 Mar 2014, at 11:27 , Benjamin Piwowarski benjamin.piwowar...@lip6.fr wrote: Here is a patch following this strategy, and an update patch

Re: LyX on OS X 10.9

Am Samstag, 1. März 2014 um 11:48:48, schrieb Kornel Benko kor...@lyx.org Am Samstag, 1. März 2014 um 11:27:05, schrieb Benjamin Piwowarski benjamin.piwowar...@lip6.fr Here is a patch following this strategy, and an update patch for bug #8925 - http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/8925

Re: LyX on OS X 10.9

Am 01.03.2014 um 11:26 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller juer...@spitzmueller.org: Am Freitag 28 Februar 2014, 23:01:37 schrieb Georg Baum: Also, the qt sources themselves still use the Q_WS macros, although I could not find any place where they are defined. Is that simply broken code? I can't

Re: LyX on OS X 10.9

Am 28.02.2014 um 23:01 schrieb Georg Baum georg.b...@post.rwth-aachen.de: Benjamin Piwowarski wrote: Hi Georg, here are some comments/answers on your questions: On 27 Feb 2014, at 22:36 , Georg Baum georg.b...@post.rwth-aachen.de wrote: We do not use C-style casts. Could you

Re: LyX on OS X 10.9

Am 01.03.2014 um 20:34 schrieb Stephan Witt st.w...@gmx.net: Am 28.02.2014 um 23:01 schrieb Georg Baum georg.b...@post.rwth-aachen.de: Benjamin Piwowarski wrote: Hi Georg, here are some comments/answers on your questions: On 27 Feb 2014, at 22:36 , Georg Baum

Re: LyX on OS X 10.9

Am 28.02.2014 um 23:23 schrieb Benjamin Piwowarski benjamin.piwowar...@lip6.fr: On 28 Feb 2014, at 23:01 , Georg Baum georg.b...@post.rwth-aachen.de wrote: I can't comment on the cmake part, but the C++ changes look good. To our Mac expperts: Is there any reason why they are not already

Re: LyX on OS X 10.9

Am Freitag 28 Februar 2014, 23:01:37 schrieb Georg Baum: > Also, the qt sources > themselves still use the Q_WS macros, although I could not find any place > where they are defined. Is that simply broken code? I can't believe. This is intentional, apparently:

Re: LyX on OS X 10.9

Here is a patch following this strategy, and an update patch for bug #8925 - http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/8925 Benjamin 0006-Qt5-support-for-Mac.patch Description: Binary data 0007-Fix-bug-8925-menubar-not-displayed-in-Mac-OS-10.9.patch Description: Binary data On 28 Feb 2014, at

Re: LyX on OS X 10.9

Am Samstag, 1. März 2014 um 11:27:05, schrieb Benjamin Piwowarski > Here is a patch following this strategy, and an update patch for bug #8925 - > http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/8925 > > Benjamin > 0006-Qt5-support-for-Mac.patch > >

Re: LyX on OS X 10.9

Kornel, the LYX_QT_... are defined in qt_platforms.h in the qt4 directory (patch 6). The patch 7 has been updated and depends on patch 6. Benjamin On 01 Mar 2014, at 11:27 , Benjamin Piwowarski wrote: > Here is a patch following this strategy, and an update

Re: LyX on OS X 10.9

Am Samstag, 1. März 2014 um 11:48:48, schrieb Kornel Benko > Am Samstag, 1. März 2014 um 11:27:05, schrieb Benjamin Piwowarski > > > Here is a patch following this strategy, and an update patch for bug #8925 > > - http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/8925

Re: LyX on OS X 10.9

Am 01.03.2014 um 11:26 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller : > Am Freitag 28 Februar 2014, 23:01:37 schrieb Georg Baum: >> Also, the qt sources >> themselves still use the Q_WS macros, although I could not find any place >> where they are defined. Is that simply broken code? I

Re: LyX on OS X 10.9

Am 28.02.2014 um 23:01 schrieb Georg Baum : > Benjamin Piwowarski wrote: > >> Hi Georg, >> >> here are some comments/answers on your questions: >> >> On 27 Feb 2014, at 22:36 , Georg Baum >> wrote: >> >>> >>> We do not use

Re: LyX on OS X 10.9

Am 01.03.2014 um 20:34 schrieb Stephan Witt : > Am 28.02.2014 um 23:01 schrieb Georg Baum : > >> Benjamin Piwowarski wrote: >> >>> Hi Georg, >>> >>> here are some comments/answers on your questions: >>> >>> On 27 Feb 2014, at 22:36 , Georg Baum

Re: LyX on OS X 10.9

Am 28.02.2014 um 23:23 schrieb Benjamin Piwowarski : > > On 28 Feb 2014, at 23:01 , Georg Baum wrote: > I can't comment on the cmake part, but the C++ changes look good. To our Mac expperts: Is there any reason why they

Re: LyX on OS X 10.9

Benjamin Piwowarski wrote: Hi Georg, here are some comments/answers on your questions: On 27 Feb 2014, at 22:36 , Georg Baum georg.b...@post.rwth-aachen.de wrote: We do not use C-style casts. Could you please rewrite this, e.g. like bool const success = (os contents) ? true :

Re: LyX on OS X 10.9

On 28 Feb 2014, at 23:01 , Georg Baum georg.b...@post.rwth-aachen.de wrote: I can't comment on the cmake part, but the C++ changes look good. To our Mac expperts: Is there any reason why they are not already in? I guess this is because since QT_WS_MACX was not defined anymore in QT5, the mac

Re: LyX on OS X 10.9

Benjamin Piwowarski wrote: > Hi Georg, > > here are some comments/answers on your questions: > > On 27 Feb 2014, at 22:36 , Georg Baum > wrote: > >> >> We do not use C-style casts. Could you please rewrite this, e.g. like >> >> bool const success = (os <<

Re: LyX on OS X 10.9

On 28 Feb 2014, at 23:01 , Georg Baum wrote: >>> I can't comment on the cmake part, but the C++ changes look good. To our >>> Mac expperts: Is there any reason why they are not already in? >> I guess this is because since QT_WS_MACX was not defined anymore in

LyX on OS X 10.9

Hi, While I was trying to update a patch for LyX, I had troubles compiling LYX on OS X 10.9 introduces quite some changes: - QT5 is required (as discussed on the mailing list) - libc++ (instead of libstdc++) is used by default systemwide So here are some patches for compiling LyX on OS X 10.9

Re: LyX on OS X 10.9

Benjamin Piwowarski wrote: Hi, While I was trying to update a patch for LyX, I had troubles compiling LYX on OS X 10.9 introduces quite some changes: - QT5 is required (as discussed on the mailing list) - libc++ (instead of libstdc++) is used by default systemwide So here are some

Re: LyX on OS X 10.9

Hi Georg, here are some comments/answers on your questions: On 27 Feb 2014, at 22:36 , Georg Baum georg.b...@post.rwth-aachen.de wrote: Benjamin Piwowarski wrote: Hi, While I was trying to update a patch for LyX, I had troubles compiling LYX on OS X 10.9 introduces quite some changes

LyX on OS X 10.9

Hi, While I was trying to update a patch for LyX, I had troubles compiling LYX on OS X 10.9 introduces quite some changes: - QT5 is required (as discussed on the mailing list) - libc++ (instead of libstdc++) is used by default systemwide So here are some patches for compiling LyX on OS X 10.9

Re: LyX on OS X 10.9

Benjamin Piwowarski wrote: > Hi, > > While I was trying to update a patch for LyX, I had troubles compiling LYX > on OS X 10.9 introduces quite some changes: - QT5 is required (as > discussed on the mailing list) - libc++ (instead of libstdc++) is used by > default syste

Re: LyX on OS X 10.9

Hi Georg, here are some comments/answers on your questions: On 27 Feb 2014, at 22:36 , Georg Baum <georg.b...@post.rwth-aachen.de> wrote: > Benjamin Piwowarski wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> While I was trying to update a patch for LyX, I had troubles compiling LYX &g